Gaza ceasefire once again in doubt as first phase nears end
As the first phase of the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza is meant to be drawing to an end, it has once again been put in doubt.After the last six living Israel hostages due to be released in this phase were freed, more than 600 Palestinian prisoners were due to be released by Israel in exchange - the biggest number so far to be freed in one go. But that has now been delayed indefinitely by the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, with his demand that Hamas must stop what he called its "cynical use of hostages for propaganda purposes". Hamas has in turn accused Israel of deliberately trying to disrupt the ceasefire agreement.It's the latest big bump in the road that's intended ultimately to lead to a permanent end to hostilities and the start of rebuilding Gaza.
Israel complained about the chaotic scenes in one of the first handovers, saying the physical safety of the hostages had been put in jeopardy. Then, Israel said Hamas had broken the terms of the agreement by not releasing a female civilian hostage, Arbel Yehud. In response, it delayed opening access for hundreds of thousands of Palestinians to return to the north of Gaza for 48 hours. That was resolved when Arbel Yehud was freed in an extra handover before the next scheduled for the following Saturday.Hamas later accused Israel of not living up to its commitments to permit heavy machinery, tents and caravans into Gaza. It then said it would not carry out the next hostage handover as scheduled. That prompted threats from both Netanyahu and the US President Donald Trump that all out war would resume in Gaza if the hostages weren't freed as agreed. With the clock ticking down, Hamas agreed to release them.And just in the past few days, the discovery that the body Hamas handed over on Thursday as that of Shiri Bibas turned out not to be her. That set off new anger and shock in Israel, where the images of Shiri trying to shield her two young children as they were abducted on 7 October, 2023, is seen as the most potent symbol of the horror of that day. Netanyahu denounced Hamas for what he called a "cruel and evil violation" of the agreement. Once again, the ceasefire was kept on track only at the last moment by Hamas providing another body within a day that this time did indeed prove to be hers.All these incidents have shown how fragile the ceasefire process remains. They may also have contributed to the fact talks on the second phase - due to start earlier this month - have not yet got under way. Time is running out, with the first phase due to end in a week's time.Hamas has offered to release the remaining hostages due to be freed in the second phase in one go, but only if Israel pulls all its forces out of Gaza and there is a permanent end to the war.Israel has demanded the complete disarmament of Hamas, which it has so far rejected. The stage-managed ceremonies at each hostage handover, which Netanyahu has so strongly condemned, are intended to show it is still a force to be reckoned with in Gaza.In Israel, voices on the right demand the government resumes its war against Hamas, while the families of the hostages - backed by much of Israel - say securing the release of the remaining hostages is what matters above and beyond all else.Trump's plan for Gaza has brought new uncertainty into the equation. The third phase of the ceasefire is meant to set Gaza on the path towards reconstruction and renewal. Arab states are hurriedly trying to come up with a concrete alternative proposal in which Palestinians would continue to live in Gaza while it is rebuilt, rather than being removed from the enclave as envisaged in Trump's plan.The future governance of Gaza also remains a key sticking point, with Israel, Hamas, the Palestinian Authority and Arab countries all so far appearing to have contradictory proposals.These issues will require difficult negotiations, which will be conducted amid the constant risk of a return to war, for which some on both sides continue to advocate.But for now, the mediators from Egypt, Qatar and the US may have their work cut out just getting the first phase of the ceasefire over the line.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
32 minutes ago
- The National
Gaza aid chief: 'Israel herding Palestinians into concentration camps'
Amjad Al-Shawa, the head of the Palestinian Network of NGOs, said that Israel was trying to lure Gazans in the north to the south of the territory with its 'Gaza Humanitarian Foundation' – then imprison them. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) is an American organisation which has been at the centre of an international scandal where Palestinians trying to reach food at its sites have been shot at and killed. It is backed by both the US and Israeli governments as a way of getting around the United Nations as the main distributor of food in the territory – and has been condemned by a number of humanitarian organisations, including Christian Aid and Amnesty International. Speaking from Gaza via a video link to a press conference in London on Thursday, said that Israel planned to 'starve' Palestinians in the north in a bid to move them to the south, consistent with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu's (below) plans to colonise the region. He said: 'They starve Palestinians under the famine they went to catch up some aid which was distributed in these military sites, mainly in Rafah, south of Netzarim, they were shot and killed' Al-Shawa added: 'This mechanism is to serve the Israeli plan, to force displacement for the Palestinians from Gaza's north – and this was clearly declared by Netanyahu himself. READ MORE: BBC issues statement after staff 'held at gunpoint and strip searched ' by IDF 'The first step of that is displacement and the second to have concentration camps on the south for the Palestinians under the security measures of the Israeli occupation forces.' The Gazan humanitarian worker hit out at Israel for replacing a 'humanitarian structure' with 'military companies'. The GHF announced on Thursday it would reopen two distribution centres – despite the Israeli military previously declaring that the routes leading to them were 'considered combat zones'. An open letter signed by 11 charities in May called the GHF a 'sham', while UN humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher described it as a 'cynical sideshow'. The letter, published before people were killed trying to access GHF centres, said: 'Despite branding itself as 'independent' and 'transparent', the GHF would be wholly dependent on Israeli coordination and operates via Israeli-controlled entry points, primarily the Port of Ashdod and the Kerem Shalom/Karem Abu Salem crossing. 'This entrenches and legitimises the very structures of control that are responsible for cutting Gaza off from food, fuel, and medicine.' Amnesty International has accused the organisation of 'inhumane and politically motivated methods of aid delivery'. The US and Israeli governments were approached for comment.
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Why can't Piers Morgan handle the truth about Israel?
As Israel continues to wage a defensive war against the terrorists who invaded and slaughtered hundreds of Jews on October 7, the Jewish State is under attack as never before in the West. I found this out for myself when I was invited on to Piers Morgan Uncensored to discuss the situation in Gaza. What my appearance and censorship on the ironically named 'Uncensored' show demonstrated was a refusal, perhaps even a fear, to hear the reality, the facts and the law when it comes to the war against Hamas. This is in stark contrast to the disinformation and falsehoods about Israel that have been freely disseminated on that show – and elsewhere in the media – by those who oppose Israel. My crime was to suggest that we should wait for an investigation to take place into the alleged deaths of a number of children in Gaza.
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Here's what to know about Trump's new travel ban
President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday night that nationals from 12 countries would be banned from entering the United States. Trump said that the ban, which primarily targets countries in Africa and the Middle East, was necessary in the name of preserving national security and to prevent terrorism in the U.S. "As President, I must act to protect the national security and national interest of the United States and its people," t he proclamation reads. "I remain committed to engaging with those countries willing to cooperate to improve information-sharing and identity-management procedures, and to address both terrorism-related and public-safety risks." Who is banned? Citizens of the following countries will be blocked from entering the United States: Afghanistan, Chad, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Myanmar, the Republic of Congo, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. In addition to the 12 countries listed above, nationals of the following seven countries will be barred from coming to the country permanently or entering under several visa programs: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. When does the ban take effect? The executive goes into effect at 12:01 am Eastern Daylight Time on June 9, 2025. Why now? A similar policy implemented during the first Trump administration, which barred foreigners from six Muslim-majority countries from entering the country, was reversed by former President Joe Biden. On the campaign trail, Trump promised he would revive the ban. In a Wednesday video the White House posted on YouTube, Trump cited the recent attack in Boulder as justification for a travel ban renewal. "The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas," Trump said. We don't want them." On Sunday, a man was accused of using a "makeshift flamethrower" and Molotov cocktails on a group of people peacefully calling for the release of Israeli hostages in Gaza. The suspect in connection with the incident, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, entered the U.S. from Egypt on a tourist visa, according to officials. Egypt is not one of the countries affected by the policy. Are there any exceptions? Yes. The travel ban will not affect nationals who are already lawful permanent residents of the U.S. In other words, the proclamation will not apply to nationals from the list of banned countries who have green cards or who are living in the U.S. with a visa. It will also not affect citizens of the banned countries who have citizenship in a second country and are entering the U.S. with a passport from an unrestricted nation. Other exemptions include Afghans who helped the U.S. government during the war in Afghanistan, ethnic and religious minorities facing persecution in Iran, athletes from banned countries who are entering the U.S for the World Cup or the Olympics, and children who are being adopted.
