CBC K-W goes door-knocking with local candidates ahead of Monday's election
With Monday's federal election quickly approaching, candidates and party volunteers are campaigning by knocking on doors. To learn more about door-knocking sessions, CBC K-W's Karis Mapp accompanied three local candidates: Kitchener Centre's Green incumbent Mike Morris, Héline Chow of the NDP in Waterloo, and Kitchener-Conestoga's Liberal incumbent Tim Louis. All local Conservative candidates chose not to partake in the story.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Sun
30 minutes ago
- Toronto Sun
SIMS: CBC set to get more money and power
The CBC building at Front and John Street in Toronto, Sept. 6, 2011. Photo by Alex Urosevic / Toronto Sun file photo Canada's government news organization is set to get fatter and more powerful. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account In the middle of the election campaign, Prime Minister Mark Carney vowed to pay the CBC more money, waving around about $150 million in fresh taxpayer cash. CBC covered that big scoop with a headline calling the CBC 'underfunded.' Think about that scene. Imagine being a CBC employee asking questions at a news conference during the election, with Carney saying that, if he won, the CBC would get more money, while Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said he would defund the CBC. The CBC covered this funding story in the middle of the election. That's a conflict of interest so big it would dwarf Godzilla. Journalists should not be paid by the government and that scene in the election is a perfect illustration of why. In the speech from the throne, the Carney government announced: 'The government is determined to protect the institutions that bring these cultures and this identity to the world, like CBC/Radio-Canada.' Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. To get an idea of what that protection could look like, consider the federal government report delivered on Feb. 20, before the election. Former heritage minister Pascale St-Onge said the government should nearly double the amount of money the CBC gets from taxpayers every year. 'The average funding for public broadcasters in G7 countries is $62 per person, per year,' St-Onge said. 'We need to aim closer to the middle ground, which is $62 per year per person.' If the government funded the CBC that way, the CBC would cost taxpayers about $2.5 billion per year. That amount would cover the annual grocery bill for about 152,854 Canadian families. St-Onge also pushed for the CBC mandate to be expanded to 'fight against disinformation.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'I propose to anchor in CBC-Radio Canada's mandate its role in helping the Canadian population fight against disinformation and understand fact-based information,' St-Onge said. Carney's Liberal party platform pledged to 'fully equip them ( CBC) to combat disinformation, so that Canadians have a news source they know they can trust.' What does this mean? Will the CBC play a role as an official 'fact-checker' in Canada, or is this just clunky language urging the CBC to be more fact-based? What is clear is that the federal government is planning to hand the CBC more money and enshrine its funding into law, taking it out of the annual budget vote and clouding transparency. CBC hasn't improved its accountability after years of scrutiny from Canadians. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Former CEO Catherine Tait was being paid about half a million dollars per year. New CEO Marie‑Philippe Bouchard has started her new role where Tait left off, as she is also set to be paid between $478,300 and $562,700. After years of criticism over executive bonuses, the government media company finally said it would get rid of the bonuses but hike the salaries of the executives instead. With so many Canadians struggling to pay for the basics, the CBC needed to read the room and end the bonuses and knock the CEO down a few levels in pay. Taxpayers are forced to spend a lot of money on the CBC, but only a tiny fraction of them choose to watch it. For CBC News Network's flagship English language prime-time news program, the audience is 1.8% of available viewers, according to its latest quarterly report. That means more than 98% of TV-viewing Canadians chose to watch something else. The CBC is a waste of taxpayers' money. Nearly nobody is watching it and it is a severe conflict of interest for journalists to be paid by the government. The CBC doesn't need more money from taxpayers; it needs to be defunded and raise money based on its work. Kris Sims is Alberta director for the Canadian Taxpayers Federation and former longtime member of the Parliamentary Press Gallery. Olympics NHL Toronto & GTA Editorial Cartoons Ontario
Toronto Star
6 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Mark Carney is proving to be very popular — with conservatives
It's still early days, but so far I'm pretty impressed with what I see from Canada's new conservative government. Voters clearly wanted a big change after a decade of Justin Trudeau's Liberal approach, and boy are they getting it. There was the throne speech, delivered by no less a personage than the King himself. That alone was a great homage to our enduring traditions and storied institutions. No more of those tiresome apologies for the flaws in our collective story. Time to celebrate being Canadian! True conservatives had to love it. And the speech itself was all 'build, baby, build,' in the words of our new PM, Mark Carney. Let's get those resources out of the ground and on their way to foreign markets. Plus a tax cut! No wonder what remains of the left — the NDP rump in Parliament, the unions and environmentalists — was left seething on the sidelines. Clearly, their day is over. Then this week, the capper: the government's first big piece of legislation is called the 'Strong Borders Act' and it's all about giving new powers to police and security agencies and tightening up the asylum system that spun out of control while the Trudeau Liberals ruled the roost. It's a sprawling bill and despite the name it's about a lot more than the border. It would give Canada Post greater authority to open your mail. It would let police and others demand that digital service providers hand over personal data about their users, without having to get a warrant in many cases. All in the name of fighting crime. The usual suspects — the NDP again, civil libertarians, refugee advocates — are up in arms. But it's all being done in the name of security and managing our relationship with Donald Trump. The government seems to be using the Trump crisis as cover to give law enforcement agencies powers they've been seeking for years. Given the PM's record so far, it's no surprise that people in parts of the country that lean heavily Conservative are getting behind him. A new poll of Albertans, out this week, shows they're just as impressed with Carney as they are with Pierre Poilievre. I have just one big question about this: what do the Liberals make of it all? What do they think about the new government's tilt to the right? ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW OK, OK, enough along those lines. Yes indeed, our new conservative government is a Liberal government, though a Liberal government of a very different stripe. Others have noticed this paradox, if that's what it is. Jonathan Pedneault, late of the Green Party, said during the recent election campaign that Carney was 'starting to look like a Progressive Conservative.' And writing in the Winnipeg Free Press, David McLaughlin, once chief of staff to former prime minister Brian Mulroney, says 'Canada elected its first progressive conservative prime minister in over 30 years' in the person of Mark Carney. McLaughlin goes on: 'From cancelling the consumer carbon tax, to pledging to build pipelines and offering a middle-class tax cut, Carney is actively placing conservative alongside progressive in his party's governing policies … Welcome to the new Canada, where PC doesn't stand for 'politically correct' but 'progressive conservative.' ' I prefer to think of Carney as a conservative progressive, but let's not quibble over labels. The important thing is the Liberals have pulled off a rather astonishing reinvention. If nothing else, it's proof of their fabled ideological flexibility or, if you prefer, their shameless opportunism. Whatever works, they'll do it. Whatever's needed to meet the moment, they'll pull it out of their tool bag. It's all the more remarkable since many of the same people are involved. The minister who presided over the immigration file in 2021-2023 while the system plunged into crisis, Sean Fraser, is now Carney's justice minister. What does he make of the tough measures to crack down on asylum shopping? Just curious. Perhaps only the Liberals could do all this, and perhaps they could do it only at a moment of crisis. An actual Conservative Party government in 'normal' times would run into a wall of resistance if it championed 'build, baby, build,' slashed taxes, ripped up the asylum system and trampled on privacy rights in the name of fighting crime. Instead, we'll see if the 'conservative' government we've ended up with can manage the trick. So far, they're off to a good start.
Global News
7 hours ago
- Global News
Guelph MPP looks to put ‘people before oil and gas profits' with re-introduction of fossil fuels bill
Green Party Leader and Guelph MPP Mike Schreiner is calling on the province to allow municipalities to charge gas companies to use public land. On Wednesday, Schreiner announced the No Free Ride for Fossil Fuels Act at Queen's Park. If passed, the bill would give municipalities the power to charge fees from Enbridge and other natural gas providers for public land use. 'This is about putting people before oil and gas profits,' Schreiner said. The bill was first tabled in the last parliament, but Schreiner said it 'died on the order paper' when the election was called earlier this year. In a statement, the Greens said most provinces charge gas companies to use public land, but Ontario does not. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Global News made attempts to contact Michael Chong, the Conservative MP for Wellington-Halton Hills, but no comment was provided by publication time. Story continues below advertisement Leanne Caron, councillor with the City of Guelph, said the companies use the public lands to distribute gas and do not pay back the municipalities. 'Like other provinces who are allowed to charge for use of public land, we need this revenue to invest in climate mitigation, deeply affordable housing and to support the energy transition away from dependence on fossil fuels,' Caron said. Should the province end the ban on natural gas providers using public lands for free, Schreiner said the city would like to charge gas companies a fee as part of a new agreement with Enbridge. He said the funds could create a revenue stream and put millions of dollars back into the community. 'If we use the same formula as Edmonton does, the City of Guelph could raise an additional $8.5 million in revenue that could help us fund city services and keep property taxes down,' he said. The Ontario Energy Board is currently looking at evidence presented by Evan Ferrari, executive director of eMerge Guelph Sustainability and a local advocate, along with the city, in its decision to renew its natural gas franchise agreement with Enbridge. Right now, the city is in the process of renegotiating its 20-year lease agreement with Enbridge, according to the Guelph MPP. Story continues below advertisement Schreiner said the bill could help play a part in the board's decision to renew with Enbridge. 'Re-tabling this bill is an important step,' he said. 'Let's stop the ban, let's stop preventing municipalities from charging fossil fuel companies from paying their fair share. I think that's an important message to send.'
