
Rümeysa Öztürk chose grace over bitterness. What we can learn
Rümeysa Öztürk could have said a lot of things when she got off the plane at Logan Airport last Saturday night, freed after 45 days in custody at a Louisiana detention center.
She could have ripped the masked U.S. Immigration Customs and Enforcement agents who snatched her off the street in Somerville in March as she was on her way to break her Ramadan fast.
She didn't.
She could have excoriated the Trump administration for stripping her of her visa and putting her into a legal purgatory that endangered her health and tested her resolve.
She didn't.
She could have confirmed the Trump White House's worst fears and offered some full-throated support for the murderous terrorists who call themselves Hamas.
She didn't.
Instead, the soft-spoken, 30-year-old Tufts University graduate student from Turkey stepped to the microphone and just said: 'America is the greatest democracy in the world.'
'And I believe in those values that we share. I have faith in the American system of justice,' she continued.
Those few sentences were a powerful reminder that sometimes it takes someone who's not from here to see us as we should see ourselves.
A quick refresher: Öztürk was one of four students who wrote an op-ed in the campus newspaper, The Tufts Daily, last year criticizing the university's response to student activists who were demanding that the university 'acknowledge the Palestinian genocide,' disclose its investments and divest from companies with ties to Israel.
A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said in March, without providing evidence, that investigations found that Öztürk engaged in activities in support of Hamas, a U.S.-designated terrorist group.
She was never charged with criminal wrongdoing, leaving only the slender pretext of the commentary piece she co-authored.
And last week, a federal judge ordered her released while her case makes its way through the courts.
You don't have to like, or even agree, with Öztürk to be troubled by the circumstances of her arrest and detention.
'She never should have been detained for one day, let alone 45,' Jessie Rossman, legal director at the ACLU of Massachusetts, said after Öztürk was released. 'It's a violence to rip someone from home, their community ... for nothing but their beliefs.'
There's growing agreement that the rule of law is under assault. And if that were just coming from the current White House's critics — and it is, make no mistake — that would be one thing.
But it's not.
Half of all respondents to an Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll released earlier this month said they saw more overreach from President Donald Trump than they did from the courts.
Only 3 in 10 respondents to the poll said federal judges have too much power, according to the poll.
The survey is one of several recent tests of public opinion that have shown public anxiety over Trump's actions.
A Pew Research Center poll found that about half of U.S. adults say Trump is setting too much policy by executive order, while about 3 in 10 say he's doing about the right amount.
A separate CNN-SSRS poll found that 46 percent of Americans have 'a lot' or 'some' confidence in Trump's ability to use the power of the presidency responsibly, which is down from 54 percent in December.
The findings indicate a rising sense of panic among Democrats as Trump takes aggressive actions to implement his agenda. Republicans were less troubled, according to the poll.
According to the AP-NORC poll, the share of U.S. adults who say the president has too much power in the way the U.S. government operates has jumped significantly since last year, when Democrat Joe Biden was in his final year in office.
It has risen from 32 percent in a March 2024 AP-NORC poll.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, meanwhile, has defended the administration's tactics, arguing that visas are a privilege, not a right, and instituted a 'one-strike' policy for students and all temporary visa holders, according to Forbes.
You would be hard-pressed to find anyone who disagrees with removing dangerous criminals from the country, as the White House has sought to do with its mass deportation program.
But when due process protections are sidestepped — a right afforded to citizen and non-citizen alike — the potential for abuse and error multiplies.
Such was the case with Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland resident who remains in prison in Central America, despite a U.S. Supreme Court order to return him to the United States.
If you cover the criminal justice system long enough, two separate and distinct patterns quickly emerge.
The first is that we are far more cavalier with the rights of those we don't know than we are with our own.
Someone else is accused of a crime? Lock 'em up and throw away the key. The heck with the niceties of a trial or due process. And maybe even off with their heads.
You're accused of a crime? There will be no stone unturned, no defense untested, no expense spared as you proclaim your innocence to anyone willing (or not) to listen.
The second is that being arrested, charged, and processed through the criminal justice system is physically, psychologically, and emotionally draining for the accused and the victim alike.
It is the great equalizer, hitting the powerful and vulnerable. And it spits them out, vastly diminished, at the other end.
You can argue that this is as it should be. And justice indeed has elements of punishment and retribution about it. But it also has elements of mercy and rehabilitation about it as well.
So before we put someone through that process, who may or may not be guilty — and our system, citizen or not, is premised on the assumption that they are innocent — we need to make sure that we dot every 'I' and cross every 'T.'
That's due process. And it's in the U.S. Constitution. It's not a suggestion. It's not something we do if we have the time or the luxury. And it's for everyone. No matter who they are, what they believe, or where they come from.
Because right now, it's the accused. Next time, it could be you.
Rümeysa Öztürk could have condemned the judicial system last weekend. Instead, she reaffirmed it.
'I have faith in the American system of justice,' she said, seeing us as we badly need to see ourselves again.
Associated Press reports are included in this story.
'What About Us?': Native leaders say time's up on broken promises | John L. Micek
Broken brokers' fees: Mass. lawmakers try again for a fix | Bay State Briefing
A hospital that fights antisemitism? This Israeli doctor wants to make it happen | John L. Micek
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
7 minutes ago
- Fox News
Merz says US in 'strong position' to stop Putin, Trump says 'let them fight for a little while'
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz told President Donald Trump he is in a "strong position" to stop Russia's war in Ukraine, to which the president suggested maybe the world needs to "let them fight for a little while." "America is again in a very strong position to do something on this war and ending this war," Merz said, while also referencing the U.S.'s role in ending World War II on the eve of the anniversary of D-Day, which marked the turn of events that led to the defeat of Nazi Germany. "So let's talk about what we can do jointly, and we are ready to do what we can." Merz called for more pressure to be placed on Russia in coordination with European allies. Trump responded by providing an analogy of two kids fighting, and suggested perhaps it was "too early" to break up the fight between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. "Sometimes you see two young children fighting like crazy – they hate each other, and they're fighting in a park, and you try and pull them apart, they don't want to be pulled," Trump said. "Sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart." Trump said he gave that analogy to Putin in his call with him on Wednesday and said he told the Kremlin chief "maybe you're going to have to keep fighting and suffering a lot." Reporters asked Merz, who has been an ardent supporter of Ukraine and recently lifted Germany's existing strike bans, if he agrees with Trump that "fighting it out" was the way to proceed. "I think we both agree on this war and how terrible this war is. And we are both looking for ways to stop it very soon," Merz said. "I told the president before we came in that he is the key person in the world who can really do that now by putting pressure on Russia, and we will have this debate later on again, how we can proceed jointly between the Europeans and the Americans. "I think we are all… having the duty to do something on that now, to stop it after three and a half years, which is really terrible," he added, making it clear without directly contradicting the president that he did not agree with Trump. "We are on the side of Ukraine, and we are trying to get them stronger and stronger just to make Putin stop this war. This is our approach," Merz added.


New York Post
7 minutes ago
- New York Post
How Trump special envoy's move to bring Tate brothers to US caught president unaware
WASHINGTON — White House special envoy Ric Grenell caught President Trump off-guard when he advocated for the notorious Tate brothers to travel to Florida while awaiting trial in Romania earlier this year, leaving administration insiders frustrated and questioning Grenell's motives. In mid-February, Grenell, 58, approached Romanian Foreign Minister Emil Hurezeanu on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference and convinced him to release accused sex traffickers Andrew and Tristan Tate into US custody as they await trial on charges including rape and human trafficking in eastern Europe — without notifying anyone else in the administration, according to multiple sources and Hurezeanu's own admission. 'We learned about the Tate brothers after the fact,' a high-ranking White House source told The Post last week. Advertisement Grenell's actions — both in the matter of the Tates and in other delicate situations — exemplify the problems raised by special envoys, who play roles similar to ambassadors and assistant secretaries of state but often do so without the obligation to obey a formal chain of command and while carrying added responsibility as the president's personal representative. 'This was yet another example of Grenell going outside the chain of command to pursue his own goals, rather than the president's,' a source close the the White House familiar with discussions told The Post. 3 President Trump (right) walks with special envoy and interim Kennedy Center executive director Ric Grenell March 17. AP Advertisement On Feb. 27, 11 days after the Munich conference wrapped, the Tates, who were born in the US, touched down in Fort Lauderdale on a private jet. The same day, Trump hosted British Prime Minister Kier Starmer and was asked whether the president's administration had 'pressured' Romania to hand over the accused sexual predators. 'I don't know. You're saying he's on a plane right now?' a visibly confused Trump asked. 'I just know nothing about it. We'll check it out, we'll let you know.' Shortly after, when Starmer spoke about the brothers facing investigation in the United Kingdom, the president said to him, perplexed: 'You're aware? You're aware of this? I didn't know anything about it.' Risky game Advertisement While much of the media scorned Trump's comments, White House officials confirmed the president's surprise and bewilderment — and rounded on Grenell for putting the commander in chief in a tight spot. 'President Trump is on recording saying he know nothing about the Tate brothers' flight to Florida, so why did Ric Grenell even raise the issue with a Romanian official?' a source close the the White House familiar with discussions told The Post. 3 Andrew Tate, left, and his brother Tristan outside a Romanian police station May 21. AP The Tates' release caused bipartisan blowback — with big GOP names like Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) as well as conservative media personalities Ben Shapiro and Megyn Kelly speaking out against the White House. Advertisement It also sparked a congressional inquiry by House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), who penned a letter asking the State Department to what extent the US government was involved in Romanian officials' decision to release the brothers. Almost immediately after the letter — which cc'd Grenell — was sent to the State Department, the envoy called to 'berate' a Raskin staffer, saying 'you're going to ruin my reputation,' according to a person familiar with the conversation. The interaction was first reported in early April by NOTUS. 'The State Department has failed to answer the Committee's questions and address our concerns,' the person said. 'All we have received was a short, non-substantive response from the State Department more than a month after the letter was sent.' While the blowback over the release has died down, the question that has puzzled Grenell's critics remains: Why risk the administration's credibility on Andrew and Tristan Tate? Grenell, a former ambassador to Germany and acting director of national intelligence, has been open about his support for the Tate brothers, whose followers among the far-right include longtime Trump confidant Roger Stone and Paul Ingrassia, the newly appointed head of the Office of Special Counsel. Andrew Tate has similarly expressed support for Grenell, tweeting the day before his release from Romania that the envoy is helping Trump 'sav(e) America along with the entire western world by extension.' Grenell also has extensive experience in eastern and southeastern Europe, dating back to at least his role facilitating peace talks between Serbia and Kosovo during Trump's first term. 'Was this motivated by a personal, political or business interest, or is he just a Tate Brothers fanboy?' asked a former friend of Grenell's. 'Either is a massive red flag.' Advertisement In a comment to the Financial Times in February, Grenell acknowledged his support for the Tates, 'as evident by my publicly available tweets' But he has since scrubbed all posts about the brothers, including a retweet of Stone crediting Grenell for 'securing the release of the Tates.' However, a Grenell associate says he kept up ties with the Tates even after their return, sitting ringside when the brothers made an appearance at the UFC 313 card in Las Vegas on March 8. 'Not Ric's job to make sure State knows' Since the Tate fiasco, Grenell has continued to ruffle feathers in his various roles, sounding a rare discordant note in an administration whose key players seem to be mainly on the same page. Advertisement 'It's like Festivus inside the White House, and the airing of the grievances is heavy on Grenell,' said one source close to President Trump, referencing an episode of the classic sitcom 'Seinfeld.' Last month, Grenell — in an apparent attempt to apply lessons from the Tate incident — briefly mentioned to Trump that he had reached a deal with Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro to return an American detainee, but left key White House and State Department officials without any clue of his foreign dealings, according to senior administration officials. 'State Department was intentionally left in the dark, as was Rubio,' confirmed Tactic Global lobbyist Caroline Wren, who told The Post she helps Grenell with his public relations and worked on the Venezuela initiative with him. 'It's not Ric's job to make sure State knows.' Advertisement 3 Venezuela President Nicolas Maduro speaks to Iranian officials in Caracas last month. via REUTERS Wren did not elaborate on why the department was left out of the loop, but Grenell had asked Maduro to free Air Force veteran Joe St. Clair as a sign that the dictator was willing to work with the Trump administration, multiple sources say. In return, Grenell suggested to Maduro that Trump would extend Chevron's license to import Venezuelan oil — but that was news to the administration, which has consistently supported the president's desire to expire the license May 27, according to senior officials. Some far-right influencers — such as firebrand Laura Loomer and many of Grenell's closest associates, including Wren — say the license should be extended to block China from cornering the Venezuelan oil market. Advertisement When The Post contacted Grenell May 15 to ask whether he was holding discussions with Caracas about extending the Chevron license, Grenell directed another lobbyist — former Rep. Aaron Schock (R-Ill.) — to contact The Post to push the China angle. Schock, who according to Wren also helps Grenell with PR, also consults for South Florida oil magnate Harry Sargeant, whose license to operate his oil-trading company in Venezuela was canceled by Trump's anti-Maduro policy, a former friend of Sargeant's told The Post. Schock did not reply to a request for comment on his association with Sargeant, whom Wren called a 'good friend' she 'talks to all the time.' Sargeant, however, denied that Schock or Grenell were advocating on his behalf. On a more ominous note, law enforcement sources say Grenell's deal with Maduro to return a single detainee could encourage Caracas officials to direct the Tren de Aragua cartel to kidnap more Americans for use as bargaining chips to reduce US sanctions. The FBI has said that the Venezuelan dictator controls the brutal cartel recently listed as a foreign terrorist organization. The same day the Chevron oil license expired, the State Department issued a stark travel warning to Americans, urging them not to visit Venezuela due to risk of wrongful detention, torture, kidnapping and crime. Closer to home, Grenell — who is also president and interim executive director of the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts — caused another firestorm when he dismissed center vice president Floyd Brown May 28 after Brown refused to disown comments promoting 'traditional marriage' and criticizing the influence of gay staffers in the Republican party. 'The only explanation is the one given to me at the time of my firing: 'Floyd, you must recant your belief in traditional marriage and your past statements on the topic, or you will be fired,'' Brown posted to X May 29. 'Needless to say, I refused to recant and was shown the door. My beliefs are much more common to Biblical Christianity.' As multiple sources pointed out, the firing appeared to run counter to Trump's main reason for appointing Grenell, who is openly gay, in the first place: To rid the DC venue of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion policies. 'From being rebuked on the Chevron license, to his connection to the Tate Brothers, to allegations of firing a Kennedy staffer over Christian beliefs, Ric Grenell keeps finding new and creative ways to embarrass himself and those around him,' a source close the the White House familiar with the situation said. The State Department, Romanian Foreign Ministry, Schock, Grenell and an attorney for the Tates did not respond to requests for comment.


New York Post
9 minutes ago
- New York Post
OpenAI finds more Chinese bad actors using ChatGPT for malicious purposes
Chinese bad actors are using ChatGPT for malicious purposes – generating social media posts to sow political division across the US and seeking information on military technology, OpenAI said. An organized China-linked operation, in one such incident dubbed 'Uncle Spam,' used ChatGPT to generate social media posts that were supportive and critical of contentious topics related to US politics – and then posted both versions of the comments from separate accounts, the company said in a report released Thursday. 'This appears likely designed to exploit existing political divisions rather than to promote a specific ideological stance,' OpenAI wrote in the report, describing what is known as an influence operation. Advertisement 3 A growing number of Chinese bad actors are using ChatGPT for malicious purposes, OpenAI said. REUTERS OpenAI said it followed Meta's lead to disrupt this operation, after the social media conglomerate discovered the actors were posting at hours through the day consistent with a work day in China. The actors also used ChatGPT to make logos for their social media accounts that supported fake organizations – mainly creating personas of US veterans critical of President Trump, like a so-called 'Veterans For Justice' group. These users also tried to request code from ChatGPT that they could use to extract personal data from social media platforms like X and Bluesky, OpenAI said. Advertisement While the number of these operations has jumped, they had relatively little impact as these social media accounts typically had small followings, OpenAI said. Another group of likely Chinese actors used ChatGPT to create polarizing comments on topics like USAID funding cuts and tariffs, which were then posted across social media sites. In the comments of a TikTok video about USAID funding cuts, one of these accounts wrote: 'Our goodwill was exploited. So disappointing.' Advertisement 3 Another group of likely Chinese actors used ChatGPT to create polarizing comments on topics like USAID funding cuts and tariffs. REUTERS Another post on X took the opposite stance: '$7.9M allocated to teach Sri Lankan journalists to avoid binary-gender language. Is this the best use of development funds?' These actors made posts on X appearing to justify USAID cuts as a means of offsetting the tariffs. 'Tariffs make imported goods outrageously expensive, yet the government splurges on overseas aid. Who's supposed to keep eating?' one post said. Advertisement Another read: 'Tariffs are choking us, yet the government is spending money to 'fund' foreign politics.' 3 The operations used ChatGPT to write divisive comments on some of the Trump administration's policies, including USAID funding cuts and tariffs. AFP via Getty Images In another China-linked operation, users posed as professionals based in Europe or Turkey working for nonexistent European news outlets. They engaged with journalists and analysts on social media platforms like X, and offered money in exchange for information on the US economy and classified documents, all while using ChatGPT to translate their requests. OpenAI said it also banned ChatGPT accounts associated with several bad actors who have been publicly linked to the People's Republic of China. These accounts asked ChatGPT for help with software development and for research into US military networks and government technology. OpenAI regularly releases reports on malicious activity across its platform, including reports on fake content for websites and social media platforms and attempts to create damaging malware.