logo
Lawmakers consider tax incentives to promote employee ownership and safe gun storage

Lawmakers consider tax incentives to promote employee ownership and safe gun storage

Yahoo16-04-2025

Wisconsin State Capitol (Wisconsin Examiner photo)
Wisconsin lawmakers considered new tax incentives meant to encourage the development of more employee-owned businesses and cooperatives and to promote safe gun storage. Both measures drew bipartisan support during a hearing Tuesday in the Assembly Way and Means Committee.
One bill — AB 17 — would provide a tax credit to businesses that make the transition to a model that gives employees a stake. The credit would cover 70% of the costs for converting a business to a worker-owned cooperative or 50% of the costs for converting the business to an employee stock ownership plan. Businesses could receive a maximum of $100,000 from the tax credit.
In a worker-owned cooperative, employees jointly own the business and have control over its operations. Employee stock ownership plans give employees partial or full ownership of a company's stock as an investment for their retirement.
According to the UW Center for Cooperatives, there are 728 cooperatives across the state, including 33 worker-owned cooperatives.
The bill would create an individual income tax subtraction and a corporate income and franchise tax deduction for the capital gain realized from the conversion. It would also instruct the Department of Revenue to create a program to promote employee-owned and cooperative business structures, providing education, outreach, technical assistance and training.
'More than ever, Wisconsin benefits from companies keeping jobs here, investing in their communities and staying locally owned,' bill coauthor Sen. Jesse James (R-Thorp) told lawmakers on the committee. This type of business structure, he said, is a 'strong tool' to encourage that goal.
James said the tax incentive would help businesses considering switching because the conversion process can be complicated and expensive.
According to the National Center for Employee Ownership, a transition to a worker-owned model can initially cost between $10,000 and $30,000. Converting to an employee stock ownership plan can generally cost between $100,000 and $300,000, with ongoing costs of $20,000 to $30,000 a year.
Several Wisconsinites who have benefited from making the switch testified in favor of the bill.
John Dally, a veterinarian, said it would provide 'critical support' for cooperatives in Wisconsin. Dally started a practice about 20 years ago with a colleague in Spring Green, and in 2020, they acquired another location in Mazomanie.
As they were getting older, he said, they began considering retirement and the future for their business, Cooperative Veterinary Care.
'We wanted to ensure the practice would stay in these small communities, continue to serve the families and the pets that we just come to know and love — we've worked with them for our entire careers — and we also wanted to have some fair and equitable options for our employees and have a return on our investment to sell,' Dally said.
Dally said historically veterinary practices would be sold to younger associates, but with increasing costs of education, many young veterinarians cannot take on the additional debt that comes with taking it over. Private equity firms and large corporations have also been acquiring small practices in recent years, he said.
According to Brakke Consulting, a veterinary management consulting firm, nearly 25% of general veterinary practices and 75% of specialty practices, such as emergency and surgery care, are owned by large corporations. The issue of consolidation in the pet care field by large corporations has gotten the attention of U.S. Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut.
'We were looking around and thinking, what could we do, and I came upon this idea of employee ownership and it just made total sense,' Dally said. He said the transition in 2022 to a worker-owned cooperative cost about $30,000. He said a grant helped with the expense, and they also received support from the UW Center for Cooperatives.
Dally said that their team of veterinarians, technicians and assistants have been able to take ownership of the business. The employees, he said, range in age from 20 to 58 and come from a variety of backgrounds.
'We all came together to create bylaws, manage the business, make decisions about how to allocate resources in smart and equitable ways,' Dally said. He said the cooperative has kept these veterinary services in these communities when they might have closed as they retired or sold to a large corporation who may or may not have kept them there.
In the three years since transitioning, Dally said the worker cooperative has developed a beneficial health insurance program and a mental health program, invested in new equipment, raised wages and distributed additional profits back to the employees.
'It's just created a tangible, positive impact on our local communities. It provides a clear pathway for employees to not only work for the business, but to own a piece of it and benefit from its success and all their efforts and enthusiasm,' Dally said. 'Our experience in transitioning to this model is proof that it works, particularly in small communities.'
Dally said it would not have been possible without the help they received, and the bill could provide the necessary support to other businesses looking to make the transition.
'It will allow businesses like ours to thrive and continue serving their communities while providing meaningful economic benefits for workers. It has the potential to change the landscape of business ownerships in Wisconsin, especially in these rural communities that are often overlooked by larger corporate interests,' Dally said. 'We need your support to make this a reality.'
Kristin Forde with the UW Center for Cooperatives told lawmakers that the center's staff has seen greater interest in employee ownership as a succession strategy for retiring owners, but the models remain largely unknown among business owners.
Forde said the state is likely to face a crisis in business as Baby Boomers prepare to retire.
'We really see employee ownership as… a solution to that problem,' Forde said. The legislation, she said, would tie together education and financial incentives to ensure that employee-owned cooperatives are a 'feasible solution to retaining jobs and services in our communities.'
Republicans and Democrats also appeared supportive of AB 10, which would eliminate sales taxes on devices meant to ensure safe storage of guns.
According to the CDC, unintentional injury is a top cause of death among children with guns being a leading method for injury. 'It was kind of jarring to hear that,' bill coauthor Rep. Adam Neylon (R-Pewaukee) said.
Neylon said unsecured firearms are a major cause for those deaths and injuries, and that he wanted to propose a way to make safe storage more affordable.
'This isn't about politics,' Neylon said. 'This is about saving kids' lives.'
Neylon said after hearing from constituents and consulting with the state Department of Revenue, he has amended the bill to cover a variety of devices in addition to gun safes.
The amendment defines a 'firearm storage device' as a locked and fully enclosed container and excludes glass-faced display cabinets. It adds 'firearm safety' devices, 'installed on a firearm designed to prevent unauthorized access to the firearm or to prevent it from being operated without first deactivating the device.'
Rep. Joan Fitzgerald (D-Fort Atkinson) said she supports the action, but called for more to be done.
'Protecting our kids and our communities should be top of mind for many of us… and there are a lot of people that are not responsible gun owners, so I do think we need to do more in this area,' Fitzgerald said.
Gov. Tony Evers has also included the proposal in his 2025-27 budget, but Republican leaders on the Joint Finance Committee have removed it from his previous budget proposals and have said they plan to write their own budget. Fitzgerald asked Neylon why he proposed the measure if it was included in Evers' budget.
'I think, personally, this is at risk of being pulled out of the budget as a public policy item,' Neylon said. While his bill does have a fiscal impact, 'I think there's precedent of doing this through legislation in the past,' he added. 'But if it ultimately is in a budget that I support, I would be happy about that.'
Lawmakers also considered AB 64, which would allow teachers to claim a tax deduction of up to $300 for expenses, including professional development courses, books and other classroom supplies. It, too, has bipartisan support.
Bill coauthors Sen. Dan Feyen (R-Fond du Lac) and Rep. David Armstrong (R-Rice Lake said) the bill mirrors the deduction that is already available for teachers when they file their federal taxes.
'This would double the potential benefit and bring teachers significantly closer to be made whole,' Armstrong said.
Armstrong noted that teachers 'sometimes find it necessary to purchase books or supplies for their classrooms.' He added that he has two daughters who are teachers and remind him about the costs 'consistently at the beginning of school.'
CESA 6 CEO Ted Neitzke told lawmakers his wife, a Sheboygan middle school language arts teacher, has a classroom with likely 'tens of thousands of dollars worth of Mrs. Neitzke's investments in books and materials.'
'This is something that… would be a great tool for local school systems, especially when we're competing nationally for talent, to be able to support our staff in reimbursing some costs that they spend,' Neitzke said. 'Any little bit helps.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration asks federal court not to dismiss charges against Milwaukee County judge
Trump administration asks federal court not to dismiss charges against Milwaukee County judge

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump administration asks federal court not to dismiss charges against Milwaukee County judge

Protesters gather outside of the Milwaukee FBI office to speak out against the arrest of Milwaukee Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan (Photo by Isiah Holmes/Wisconsin Examiner) Prosecutors for the Trump administration filed a brief Monday requesting that a federal judge not dismiss the government's indictment against Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan. Dugan faces criminal charges after Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, along with agents from the Drug Enforcement Agency and FBI, arrived in the Milwaukee County Courthouse April 18 to arrest 31-year-old Eduardo Flores-Ruiz for being in the country illegally. Flores-Ruiz was set to appear in Dugan's courtroom that day for a status hearing on misdemeanor charges against him. When Dugan learned that the agents were outside her courtroom, she confronted them and learned they only had an administrative warrant, which was issued by an agency official and not a judge. An administrative warrant doesn't allow agents to enter private spaces in the courthouse such as Dugan's courtroom. Later, while the agents were waiting for Flores-Ruiz in the hallway outside the main courtroom door, Dugan sent him and his attorney out a side door into the hallway. One of the agents rode down the elevator with Flores-Ruiz and he was later arrested on the street. Dugan-DOJ-Filing Dugan was charged with concealing an individual to prevent arrest, a misdemeanor, and obstruction, which is a felony. Last month, Dugan's attorneys filed a motion to dismiss the case against her, arguing she was acting in her official capacity as a judge and therefore immune from prosecution for her actions and that the federal government is impinging on the state of Wisconsin's authority to operate its court system. The case drew national attention, with Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and FBI Director Kash Patel both making public statements about Dugan's arrest before she'd even been indicted. Legal experts have questioned the strength of the federal government's case and accused Trump officials of grandstanding to make a political point. In the Monday filing, federal prosecutors argued that dismissing the case would ignore previously established law that allows judges to face criminal charges. 'Such a ruling would give state court judges carte blanche to interfere with valid law enforcement actions by federal agents in public hallways of a courthouse, and perhaps even beyond,' the prosecutors argued. 'Dugan's desired ruling would, in essence, say that judges are 'above the law,' and uniquely entitled to interfere with federal law enforcement.' Dugan is set to appear for trial on July 21. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Survey finds majority of Wisconsinites support Planned Parenthood and abortion access
Survey finds majority of Wisconsinites support Planned Parenthood and abortion access

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Survey finds majority of Wisconsinites support Planned Parenthood and abortion access

Planned Parenthood Advocates of Wisconsin President and CEO Tanya Atkinson stood alongside Wisconsin Democrats to introduce the bill in May, saying it was the 'next step in protecting and securing full reproductive freedom for people in Wisconsin.' (Photo by Baylor Spears/Wisconsin Examiner) A majority of Wisconsinites support allowing access to abortion according to recent polling commissioned by Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin and A Better Wisconsin Together. The online poll conducted by the D.C.-based Hart Research Associates between March 21 and March 28 got feedback from 605 registered voters in Wisconsin as a way of understanding perspectives on abortion in the state. Planned Parenthood is facing the possibility of being cut off from Medicaid funds under Donald Trump and House Republicans' budget reconciliation package and Wisconsin Republicans recently reaffirmed their commitment to enforcing a strict statewide abortion ban. The poll found that 45% of voters are 'base supporters' of abortion, meaning they personally support the right to abortion and believe it should be legal, while 34% were 'soft supporters' meaning they are personally against abortion but oppose government restrictions. Planned Parenthood Advocates of Wisconsin President and CEO Tanya Atkinson said in a statement that the poll confirms the 'overwhelming' support across the state for abortion care access and for Planned Parenthood. 'That Wisconsin Republicans in Congress, in the State Legislature and in their own political party platform continue to endorse policies and enact cuts to essential care despite broad support from their constituents is devastating,' Atkinson said. 'These cuts mean Wisconsinites will lose access to birth control, wellness visits, STI tests and cancer screenings. This isn't just about abortion — it's about whether people can count on the care they need, when they need it.' About 69% of survey participants reported a 'favorable' view of Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin. Lucy Ripp, communications director for A Better Wisconsin Together, said in a statement that the poll shows that Planned Parenthood is 'a healthcare provider that Wisconsinites overwhelmingly support and rely on for quality healthcare access.' The poll found that 74% of voters think abortion is at risk nationally and 71% said it is at risk on a statewide level. Wisconsin Republicans approved a resolution at their state convention in May that calls for the enforcement of a criminal 1849 law, which effectively banned abortion in the state following the overturn of Roe v. Wade in 2022. A Dane County judge ruled that the law doesn't apply to abortion, though the decision was appealed and is currently before the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Democrats, meanwhile, have introduced a proposal that would repeal the 1849 law as well as an array of other laws on the books in Wisconsin that restrict abortion access, including a state-mandated requirement that patients have two appointments before an abortion, a requirement that doctors must provide a state-mandated booklet that contains medically inaccurate information, an ultrasound requirement and a law that stops physician assistants, nurse practitioners and APRNs from performing abortions. The bill would also repeal state laws that prohibit coverage of abortion care under insurance plans for public employees, plans on the Affordable Care Act's marketplace for Wisconsin and under BadgerCare. Federal law also bans the use of federal money for abortion with exceptions in the case that a pregnancy endangers the life of a pregnant person or is the result of rape or incest. The poll also found that 78% of voters support protecting health care professionals from criminal charges related to providing abortion care, that 72% of voters favor allowing advanced health care providers like nurse practitioners and midwives to provide abortion care, 70% favor funding for health care clinics that provide abortion care and 68% favor Medicaid and Badgercare coverage for abortion care. Atkinson stood alongside Wisconsin Democrats to introduce the bill in May, saying it was the 'next step in protecting and securing full reproductive freedom for people in Wisconsin.' The bill has not progressed in the Republican-led Legislature, though the authors of the bill Rep. Lisa Subeck (D-Madison) and Sen. Kelda Roys (D-Madison) have said they plan to continue to advocate for better abortion access in the state, even if it has to wait until next session. 'This legislation is about making a future here in Wisconsin, where everyone has access to the health care in need, where every single person has the ability to thrive. This is legislation that Wisconsinites broadly support, that Americans broadly support,' Roys said. '[The] only people who don't broadly support it are the Republican politicians who have gerrymandered themselves away from any voter accountability that is coming to an end. We will be getting a hearing on this bill if it's not this session, it will be next session back — mark my words.' Democrats in Wisconsin and nationally have used abortion as a motivator in elections since 2022, including in key state Supreme Court elections and in competitive state legislative races. State Democrats are aiming to win a trifecta in 2026 and need to flip the Assembly and Senate to do so — a goal that could be within their reach under the legislative maps put in place last year. The last time Democrats held majorities in the state Legislature was during the 2009-2010 legislative session The survey also asked participants about their electoral preferences, finding that 62% of respondents said they were more likely to vote for a candidate who supports guaranteeing legal abortion while 57% said they would vote against a candidate who wants to make abortion illegal. The poll also found that 70% of voters would support a referendum that guarantees the legal right to an abortion in Wisconsin if it appeared on ballots. It also found that 81% of voters support passing legislation to conduct a statewide referendum on abortion. Wisconsin does not have a voter-led ballot initiative process. There is a process to allow voters to decide whether to ratify a law through a referendum, but under that, it would need to be passed by the Legislature and signed by Gov. Tony Evers. Democrats and Republicans have at times expressed support for placing a question about abortion on the ballot — both advisory and binding — though neither has agreed on the details. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Lawmakers should listen to their own commission and fully fund special education
Lawmakers should listen to their own commission and fully fund special education

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Lawmakers should listen to their own commission and fully fund special education

Wisconsin taxpayers are facing an undeniable truth: your property taxes are rising, and the primary culprit is the state's persistent failure to fund public education, particularly for students with disabilities, adequately. Here's the simple math: When the state shirks its constitutional duty to provide appropriate funding for students with disabilities, it leaves school districts with an impossible choice. To ensure that all students, including those with special needs, receive the education they deserve, districts are eventually forced to propose a referendum, increasing the local tax levy. This isn't a desire for more money; it's a desperate measure to fill a gaping hole left by state inaction. Instead of investing in our students on the front end, your state government is deliberately passing the buck, transforming a state responsibility into a localized property tax hike. Wisconsinites are paying with a record number of operational referendums to fill this gap. The good news? This crisis is fixable, and the solution lies within reach as elected officials finalize the state budget in the coming weeks. Over six years ago, the state legislature acknowledged the severity of public school funding and established a bipartisan Blue Ribbon Commission. This committee traveled across Wisconsin, holding extensive meetings and hearing directly from dedicated school and community leaders. Opinion: Decoupling a common sense solution to Wisconsin school funding conundrum The message was undeniable: if sufficient special education funding were provided, and if per-pupil funding kept pace with inflation, most school districts would not need to ask local taxpayers for additional funding to support operational costs. To their credit, the committee listened intently, and their comprehensive report recommended a crucial 60% reimbursement level for special education costs. Six years later, what happened? A dismal 30% reimbursement rate. That's a full 60% lower than the funding the state provides to private schools. This disparity is not only unjust; it directly contributes to your rising property tax bill. The state of Wisconsin has the financial capacity to adequately support students with disabilities, to invest in all students, and, crucially, to protect property taxpayers from these ever-increasing burdens. The solution isn't complicated; it requires legislators to implement the Blue Ribbon Commission recommendations they received and endorsed over six years ago. Opinion: Wisconsin is failing to fund education. State budget must make this right. Imagine the impact: a win-win scenario that alleviates the tax burden on hardworking Wisconsin families while simultaneously providing all students, including our most vulnerable, with the resources they need to thrive. This would be a monumental accomplishment. Let's demand that our elected officials finally act on their recommendations and work together to make 60% special education reimbursement a reality. Demond Means is superintendent of the Wauwatosa School District. Matthew Joynt is superintendent of the Mequon-Thiensville School District. Cathy Olig is executive director of the Southeastern Wisconsin Schools Alliance, which consists of 26 member school districts, including Wauwatosa and Mequon-Thiensville, serving and advocating for 180,000 public school students. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Schools forced to ask local taxpayers to make up state funds | Opinion

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store