Nigerian cyberfraud kingpin arrested for duping businessman of Rs 1.25cr
Vadodara: Cybercrime investigators have arrested a Nigerian national, Gabriel Onyeka, for allegedly defrauding a Vadodara-based businessman of ₹1.25 crore in a sophisticated online scam.
Onyeka, 41, was apprehended from his residence in Kalyan, Maharashtra, and is believed to be the mastermind behind an organized cyber racket.
Assistant commissioner of police (cybercrime) Mayursinh Rajput said Onyeka posed as a senior executive of a reputed pharmaceutical company and contacted the businessman under the pretense of placing a bulk order for Plukenetia volubilis — an Ayurvedic liquid used in nutritional, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical products.
"Onyeka initially sent an email offering the victim a dealership and a large order. He then directed him to purchase the liquid from a specific supplier, which was, in fact, a fake firm operated by the accused himself," said Rajput.
The complainant, unaware of the trap, purchased one litre of the liquid from the fraudulent firm. Soon after, Onyeka's accomplices met him under the guise of quality checks and convinced him to invest further.
Enticed by the promise of substantial profits, the businessman ended up transferring ₹47 lakh for additional orders. The scammers continued to manipulate him into making further payments under various pretexts, eventually defrauding him of ₹1.25 crore.
"Once the fraud came to light, we began tracking the phone number used by the accused, which led us to his location in Mumbai. He was using the same number throughout the operation," Rajput told TOI.
During the arrest, police seized four mobile phones from Onyeka. One of the devices contained a screenshot of a WhatsApp message he had sent to the victim, further confirming his involvement.
Prolonged illegal stay
Investigations revealed that Gabriel Onyeka had been living illegally in India for over a decade. He first arrived in 2012 on a medical visa for treatment in West Bengal. However, after his visa expired, he continued to stay in the country and eventually moved to Mumbai. In 2020, Mumbai police had already filed a case against him for overstaying his visa. Onyeka resides in a 2BHK apartment on the 20th floor of a residential tower in Kalyan.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Vijay Mallya—declared a fugitive economic offender—wants to return home. What are his options?
Mumbai/Bengaluru/New Delhi: After nearly a decade of silence, Vijay Mallya, the flashy business tycoon who founded one of India's fanciest airlines that eventually went kaput and resulted in him being declared a fugitive economic offender, has re-emerged to tell his side of the story. The 'King of Good Times' wants to return to India and clear his name if promised a 'fair trial and a dignified existence", he said in a podcast recorded in London, where he has resided since leaving India in 2016. 'We all know how long detentions and trials can last in India," he said. 'That's not justice." But while the former liquor baron has legal remedies available to him to return to India and settle the outstanding cases against him, it won't be a smooth landing, say legal experts. 'If Vijay Mallya steps off a plane in India, the legal chessboard lights up instantly," said Ketan Mukhija, a senior partner at law firm Burgeon Law. Mallya could voluntarily appear before the court and surrender, thereby invoking his right to apply for bail, including anticipatory bail, Mukhija said. Mallya's legal team, however, would have to contest every existing arrest warrant, lookout circular, and non-bailable order, arguing on grounds of procedural irregularities or the absence of fresh incriminating evidence, Mukhija added. Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, including the right to a fair trial, would govern Mallya's request for a 'fair trial', according to Ajay Khatalawala, managing partner at law firm Little & Co. Mallya can also contest the tag of fugitive economic offender. The tag is proclaimed by a court when an individual accused of a serious financial crime, usually involving large sums, either flees the country or refuses to return to face trial. If Mallya decides to return to India and surrender, he can file a petition seeking to have the declaration of fugitive economic offender rescinded. However, the court will only consider such relief if it is satisfied that the return is genuine and made without mala fide intent, Khatalawala said. What Mallya said The podcast called Figuring Out, hosted by Raj Samani, featured Mallya's first public conversation in nine years, during which he claims to have not been given a chance of fair trial by the media. He claimed to be a victim of media sensationalism and political scapegoating. 'I regret one thing, which is that after all my hard work, all the value that I created in so many multiple ways, that effectively, the government of India and, of course, the media made me a zero from a hero. And that's a fact of life that I have had to stomach and live with," he said. At a very young age, Mallya was 'installed in the hot seat" as he became the chairman of the Bengaluru-based United Breweries Group after his father Vittal Mallya's demise in 1983. Helming UB Group, Mallya built Kingfisher beer into a dominant brand with over 50% market share. The eponymous airline that followed in 2005 was his vision to 'produce the best flying experience that India had ever seen". The acquisition of low-cost carrier Air Deccan in 2007 was widely blamed for Kingfisher Airline's downfall. Mallya said the acquisition was a calculated consolidation and not a means to by-pass a rule that required an airline to be operational for five years before it could fly internationally. The downward spiral came after the 2008 global financial crisis. Mallya said he approached the then finance minister Pranab Mukherjee with his plan to downsize his airline. Mukherjee asked him not to downsize and promised the airline would be supported by banks, Mallya claimed. Mukherjee passed away in 2020. With fuel cost rising and the government not allowing foreign investment in the aviation sector further complicated matters for Kingfisher Airlines, Mallya said. It was 'the economy, the circumstances, the government policy then existing all conspired to create a perfect storm through which King Fisher could not survive". 'Paid more than what was due' Mallya claimed in the podcast that while he owed only ₹6,203 crore to various banks, India's ministry of finance has reported a recovery of ₹14,131.6 crore, which is 'multiple times over." 'I am not a chor (thief)," Mallya said, refuting allegations that he fled India in March 2016 to evade authorities following the bankruptcy of Kingfisher Airlines, insisting he had planned a visit to Geneva to attend an international conference. Kingfisher Airlines, which was grounded in October 2012, owed more than ₹7,500 crore to lenders led by State Bank of India. The airline had accumulated losses of ₹16,023.46 crore as of 31 March 2013. He was being investigated by the Enforcement Directorate (ED), the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), and the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) for various economic offences. But on 15 April that year, the ministry of external affairs suspended his passport. On the podcast, Mallya said he responded to a summons by the ED requesting more time to negotiate with his foreign collaborators to sell shares and settle the dues. Asked why he didn't fight harder to get his passport restored and return to India, Mallya said he was overwhelmed by the number of legal battles. 'How many fronts should I open at once? These are expensive and time-consuming battles." Fugitive or fall guy? Refuting allegations that he siphoned off funds from Kingfisher Airlines, Mallya said he infused ₹3,000 crore of United Breweries funds into the airline to keep it afloat. 'Nobody talks about that. If I intended to steal, would I have pledged my own shares and given personal guarantees?" he said. Mallya claimed that banks recovered double the amount he owed them by selling his assets. 'Yet despite 15 formal requests, they haven't given me a statement of account," he said. On the podcast, Mallya apologized for the non-payment of salaries to Kingfisher Airlines's employees. He claimed he made repeated attempts to get the Karnataka High Court to release ₹260 crore that it had frozen so he could pay employee wages. 'I offered settlements multiple times between 2012 and 2015 but they were all rejected," Mallya said. 'I am deeply sorry and I take full responsibility for it." Industrialist Harsh Goenka spoke out in Mallya's defence. While Mallya lived a 'high life" and had defaulted on loans, his dues have reportedly been settled, he said. 'Meanwhile, bigger defaulters walk free with much fatter haircuts from banks," Goenka said on social media platform X. 'If dues remain, the banks should clearly say so. If not, why is he still a political punching bag?" Mallya replied to Goenka on X that the finance ministry had 'confirmed in writing that Banks have recovered ₹14,100 crores from me against a DRT (debt recovery tribunal) judgement debt of ₹6,203 crores". Shriram Subramanian, the managing director of proxy advisory firm Ingovern doubts Mallya will return to India as there is no guarantee on what will happen to him. 'He has been the punching bag for all the large loan defaults by businessmen," said Subramanian. 'The cultivated political connections, lavish parties, and hi-profile public image makes him the ultimate fall guy."
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Hyd IT employees in the dock for fake political donation claims
Hyderabad: The income tax department has uncovered a massive pattern of dubious political donation claims allegedly made by salaried professionals and business owners, primarily from the IT sector, aiming to illegally claim refunds under section 80GGC of the Income Tax Act. Over 400 tech employees in Hyderabad have now been served notices for allegedly declaring inflated or bogus donations to political parties—some even claiming to have donated sums equal to or exceeding their annual salaries. What began as isolated cases has now snowballed into one of the largest personal tax deduction scams under the guise of political funding, placing Hyderabad alongside metros like Mumbai, Delhi, and Bengaluru in a fast-widening national probe. In a single financial year, individuals across India reportedly claimed over ₹10,000 crore as deductions under section 80GGC, which allows tax breaks for donations made to political parties. While the provision is legal and has no upper limit, officials say the absence of safeguards has opened the door to large-scale misuse. Many of the flagged claims, particularly in Hyderabad, were made in the name of registered political parties and registered unrecognised political parties. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Upon reconciliation, tax officials found that several individuals had declared donation amounts that were double or more than what the political parties actually received, raising serious questions about the authenticity of the transactions. "This is not just tax evasion—it's identity laundering using political donations," said a senior official. "We are not only looking at individuals but also at the network of entities that enabled these fraudulent claims," he said. Cheques in, cash out The modus operandi appears both simple and deceptive. In numerous cases, individuals reportedly issued cheques to shell entities posing as political parties and later received the money back in cash. These transactions were then falsely reported as political donations in tax returns—entitling the individual to a deduction and, in many cases, a significant tax refund. In some instances, software employees were found to have issued cheques to known third party entities and then claimed those as political donations in their IT returns. In Hyderabad alone, during a Feb 2025 probe (reported by TOI), the income tax department unearthed a ₹110 crore refund racket involving employees from 36 software companies. Many had claimed inflated political donations and received refunds based on falsified documentation. Unusual donation patterns According to internal data, there has been a 10-fold increase in 80GGC claims between 2016–17 and 2021–22. A growing number of these declarations showed individuals claiming political donations worth 10–100% of their total income—a pattern that the department now flags as a critical risk indicator. In Telangana and Andhra Pradesh alone, 400 high-risk cases have been identified between FY 2023–24 and 2024–25. Some Hyderabad tech employees received notices after declaring donations exceeding ₹10 lakh. Officials have flagged 30 entities, including shell firms and little-known outfits, for allegedly facilitating these inflated claims. 6.5L taxpayers under lens Nationwide, 6.5 lakh individuals, mostly salaried professionals and small business owners, are under the scanner for making suspicious claims under Section 80GGC. The top 10%, based on the donation-to-income ratio, have been placed under special audit scrutiny. To encourage voluntary compliance, the IT department has extended the returns correction window from two to four years. In Telangana, helpdesks have been set up in tech firms, and outreach programmes have been launched across 100 companies to educate employees about the risks of fake donation claims, including penalties, prosecution, and refund recovery. So far, 15% of those flagged in earlier phases have updated their returns and corrected their donation claims. Tax officials are now urging others to do the same before enforcement action begins. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Lawyer bail plea rejected in 2.6cr cheating case
Mumbai: Observing that if this court exercises discretion in favour of applicant it will give a wrong message to society, a sessions court on Monday rejected the bail plea of advocate Vinaykumar Khatu, who is accused of defrauding a Delhi-based 74-year-old woman, a client, of Rs 2.57 crore by allegedly presenting her with forged orders purportedly issued by Bombay high court. "This court cannot ignore the antecedent of applicant. Admittedly, two offences were registered against applicant for misrepresenting himself as an IAS officer. If this court exercises discretion in favour of applicant, it will give a wrong message to society. The seriousness of allegations and antecedent of applicant prevent me from exercising discretion in favour of applicant," sessions judge VG Raghuwanshi said. The judge also said that if one decides to rely on WhatsApp chat then he cannot ignore that accused had stated about stay granted by honourable high court in his chat with the accountant and it is also clear that huge amounts were transferred to the accounts of his friends, associates and him after the date of fabricated orders. It was also held that offences relating to criminal breach of trust and forgery of valuable security were added against accused. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Nürtingen: GEERS sucht 700 Testhörer für Hörgeräte ohne Zuzahlung GEERS Undo "A judgment of civil court can be considered a valuable security…Court judgments often create or modify legal right and liabilities. Thus, the judgments fit within definition of valuable security," the judge said. The accused was a lawyer of the woman, Urmila Talyarkhan, who was involved in a property dispute relating to a land in Alibaug. After a lower court ruled against her, Talyarkhan appealed the decision to the district court. Her advocate failed to appear for the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the appeal on Mar 13, 2018. Residing in Delhi at the time, she remained unaware of this dismissal until 2022, as her advocate did not inform her. It was alleged that through a business acquaintance, Talyarkhan was introduced to Khatu. She retained Khatu for six matters, including the land dispute appeal, and a suit against her husband. Khatu allegedly charged an exorbitant fee of Rs 10 lakh per case. She allegedly transferred Rs 2 crore from her friend's account to those associated with the accused. Following Khatu's advice, she filed a second appeal in Bombay high court, with applications for condonation of a four-year delay and a stay order. Denying the allegations, the accused said that he was arrested on Oct 19, 2024. "Nothing needs to be seized from him. There is no possibility of tampering evidence," the lawyer submitted. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !
