Law firms fighting back against Trump report security clearance suspensions
Advertisement
The handful of firms that did not make deals -- and were then singled out in orders that accused them of working against the country's national interest -- sued, arguing that the orders amount to blatantly illegal retaliation for representing clients and employing lawyers the president opposes politically.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
In at least one instance, a federal judge has agreed, bypassing a trial and permanently blocking the government from enforcing the terms of an order targeting the firm Perkins Coie. In the cases involving WilmerHale and Jenner & Block, judges have temporarily halted the Trump administration from implementing the orders aimed at them while litigation plays out.
Even so, Paul Clement, a lawyer for WilmerHale, said in a filing that two of its lawyers had received letters informing them that their security clearances had been suspended.
Advertisement
'This development underscores that the executive branch stands ready and willing to implement the executive order absent judicial intervention,' Clement wrote in a notice dated May 9.
A lawyer for Jenner & Block filed a similar notice dated May 14 indicating that it had just learned one of its attorneys had their clearance suspended as well.
Trump's executive orders directed agencies to essentially exile the firms from any work that runs through the federal government, such as by barring their attorneys from entering federal buildings, blacklisting them from federal contracts and taking away any security clearances held by their staff.
As justification, the orders cited the fact that both firms had employed top members of the special unit that investigated Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, and the question of whether Trump had worked to obstruct that investigation. They specifically named Robert Mueller and Andrew Weissmann, who returned to those firms in the years after the investigation wound down. Both left in 2021, as lawyers for the firms have noted.
Both firms have asked the respective judges in their cases to skip past a trial and decide the relatively straightforward question of whether Trump's orders are legal and should be allowed to stand.
Their cases are essentially identical in nature to those brought by other firms that found themselves in a similar position, such as Perkins Coie and Susman Godfrey. When Perkins Coie received its final ruling from a judge this month, the answer to whether the president's order was lawful was an emphatic no.
The ruling, from Judge Beryl A. Howell of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, compared the president's order to an attempt by a populist mob to destabilize society by rooting out the legal opposition in Shakespeare's play 'Henry VI.'
Advertisement
Howell's ruling also showed deep disdain for the firms that had cut deals with Trump to avoid retribution.
Nine firms, including Paul Weiss; Rifkind; Wharton & Garrison; and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom preemptively offered to take on millions of dollars in free work for largely uncontroversial causes, collectively approaching nearly $1 billion.
But after extracting those deals, the White House moved to consider even more intrusive terms, including enlisting them in legal fights to further Trump's agenda.
This article originally appeared in
.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Nothing is stopping': Peace talks feel far away for Ukraine's soldiers
Sipping a coffee under the blazing sun around 20 kilometres from the front line, Ukrainian platoon commander Andriy is ready for peace. But as Russia and Ukraine hold direct talks in search of an end to the three-year war, he sees no let up to the fighting in east Ukraine, ravaged by Russia's full-scale invasion. "Nothing is stopping. Everything is as it was," the 27-year-old told AFP, in the town of Druzhkivka while on a break from the combat. Hours after negotiations in Istanbul ended on Monday, the sound of Russian glide bombs flying over -- and down onto -- the town resumed. The next morning, those civilians who refuse to leave set about their daily business, meandering through streets dotted with destroyed buildings. Andriy was clinging to hope the war will end this year, and said talks should continue, despite little sign of progress. But asked about Moscow's hardline demands for Ukraine's army to completely pull out of the four regions Russia says it has annexed -- Donetsk, Kherson, Lugansk and Zaporizhzhia -- he is sceptical. "That's too much, I would say. But if the border remained as it is now, then maybe." - 'No real impact' - Nearby, another young soldier who goes by Leleka, in his early thirties, was trying to relax. He is just back from near Toretsk, one of the hottest spots on the eastern front where Russian and Ukrainian soldiers have been killing each other for months in a battle for the city, claimed by Russia earlier this year. "To be honest, I haven't watched the news for a long time because it doesn't really affect the reality we face here. So it's a bit like a parallel reality," he told AFP. After two rounds of talks that yielded only prisoner exchanges, the ginger-bearded soldier sees no point in trying to deal with the Russians. "It does not work. Negotiations with them? How? How do negotiations work? We talk about peace, and at the same time, they are shooting at us," he said. Moscow has repeatedly rejected calls by Ukraine, the United States and European countries for a full and immediate ceasefire. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has accused Russia of dragging out the talks and not seriously wanting to halt its invasion. The Kremlin said Tuesday negotiations were "extremely complex" and that it was "wrong" to expect a speedy breakthrough. Leleka said there is "no way" Ukrainian troops would pull back from territory they still control. "The local commanders will not allow it." For 59-year-old deputy commander Did -- a call sign which means "grandfather" in Ukrainian -- an unconditional ceasefire is the only "logical" way to end the fighting. But he understands why Russia is refusing. "They have more weapons, their factories are working, they have more men, and North Korea and China are supplying them. Why would they stop?" Moscow's army will only halt their attacks, if Ukraine can deliver "a beating so bad that their teeth fall out or they swallow them," he said. - 'Give us weapons' - Instead of a full and unconditional 30-day ceasefire, Moscow has proposed a partial pause to the fighting -- two-to-three days and only in certain areas of the frontline. "They really need this. They need to regroup their troops. They need to restore their logistics," Leleka said of the Russian call for a temporary truce. Both Did and Leleka instead issued their own request for the West to step up its military support to Ukraine -- saying that could help give them a leg-up on the battlefield, and at the negotiating table. "Give us more weapons. We know how to use them ... Give us good weapons and we will stop them. We will stop them, we know how to do it," Did said. Standing away from the other two, Andriy, his head bowed, was thinking of home. "I want to be with my wife, to rest," he whispered. He has been fighting for three years and got married amid the war. "Whatever it takes, I want to go home." fv/asy-jc/giv
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cromwell Board of Ed ponders next steps amid Title IX investigation
CROMWELL, Conn. (WTNH) — On Tuesday, the Trump administration launched an investigation into Cromwell Public School's Title IX policy, specifically in regards to transgender athletes. The Cromwell Board of Education held a meeting Tuesday night, where people were trying to make sense out of a federal investigation challenging their trans policies. Trump administration probes Cromwell Public Schools on Title IX Out front of Cromwell High School, more than 50 protesters gathered in support of trans rights and chanted, 'What do we want? Trans rights!' After meeting in executive session, the board came out and voted to not respond to the investigations, stating they need more time to review the federal request. 'We have informed OCR, that the decision not to sign the agreement as written, should not be interpreted as unwillingness to engage in a respectful discussion and have requested an extension of time to do so,' Cromwell Board of Education President Celina Kelleher (R) February, President Trump signed an executive order keeping men out of women's sports. Linda McMahon, the U.S. Secretary of Education, is backing it up. 'This administration will fight on every front to protect women's and girls sports, intimate spaces, dormitories, and living quarters, and fraternal and panhellenic organizations,' McMahon said. Cromwell Mayor James Demetriades (D) noted a lot hangs in the balance, nearly $1 million in federal funding. 'They're holding hostage nearly $1 million of federal funding and putting the board of education in the town of Cromwell and possible situation, capitulating on our core values of community and inclusion,' Demetriades said. In 2018, Andrea Yearwood from Cromwell was one of two transgender athletes that took the top spots in a state track competition, setting new women's records. Their participation sparked protests and later a lawsuit. Now nearly seven years later, a federal investigation. Now students are wondering how this will affect their daily lives, as no decision has been made, and policies hang in the balance. The Board of Ed and the mayor are now looking to the state for guidance. 'Reach out to your representatives, ask the state of Connecticut to help enforce its own rules and its own laws and make sure that our most vulnerable children are protected,' Demetriades said. Dr. Enza Macri, the Superintendent of Cromwell Public Schools released a statement saying in part they make it a priority to create a welcoming and nurturing environment for all students. At the same time they're fully committed to following federal and state laws prohibiting discrimination. Read the full letter below issued to Cromwell Superintendent Dr. Enza Macri. Cromwell-Schools-letterDownload Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Johnson blasts House ‘big, beautiful' bill, backs Musk
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) on Tuesday blasted the megabill featuring President Trump's tax cut and spending priorities and backed tech billionaire Elon Musk's recent comments on it. In an interview on NewsNation's 'The Hill,' host Blake Burman brought up an earlier post from Musk on the social platform X in which he called the legislation a 'disgusting abomination.' 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk said in his post. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' 'He's telling the truth, you know I'm — that's all I'm doing too,' Johnson said of Musk's comments. The 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' legislation, which made it through the House last month, prolongs Trump's 2017 tax cuts and bolsters funding for defense and border priorities. It also makes cuts to spending on social safety net programs like Medicaid and food aid. 'The trajectory of deficits is up, and no matter what the 'big, beautiful bill' does, it does not address that long term prospect, it does not bend the deficit curve down,' Johnson said Tuesday. 'It supports it going up.' Musk had said previously in an interview on 'CBS Sunday Morning' that he was 'disappointed' to see the 'big, beautiful' legislation make it through the House. 'I was, like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit … and it undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing,' Musk said in the interview. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
