Howard County residents voice frustrations over proposed recycling plant
Howard County residents voiced their concerns on Tuesday over a Maryland-based chemical plant looking to build a pilot plastics recycling plant for research in Columbia.
As the county council considers plans for the recycling plant, dozens of residents spoke out at a heated public hearing, asking the board to shut this proposed plan down.
W.R. Grace & Co. told WJZ that the plant will introduce a new and safe way to recycle plastic. However, residents are calling on county leaders to have W.R. Grace build the plant away from their residential neighborhoods.
"Too close is too close," said Howard County resident Leonard Boyd.
Residents are worried about pollution in their community.
"The chemicals they admitted, will be admitted, will be dangerous at the distances we are," said Shamika Preston. "It doesn't matter if it's teeny-weeny or a whole lot."
W.R. Grace says plant will be "safe and effective"
W.R. Grace & Co. told WJZ that the plant will not burn plastic, but will study a potentially game-changing innovation for recycling plastic that is safe and effective.
"Grace is proud to be headquartered in Howard County and to contribute to its scientific and economic legacy by conducting meaningful, safe and properly permitted R&D at our world class facility for more than 60 years," W.R. Grace said in a statement. "With this new project, we will not burn plastic, as some who misunderstand our project and our intentions have asserted. Rather, we are studying a potentially game-changing innovation for recycling plastic – a safe and effective way to solve a problem facing us all."
W.R. Grace added, "If passed, this ZRA would set a harmful precedent that would repel institutions and employers away from Howard County. The Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) process is designed specifically to evaluate the safety of projects like ours, and we are committed to faithfully and fully following that process."
The company says their research shows the plant could reduce energy use, improve air emissions, and help keep plastic out of landfills and oceans.
Boyd said he's not against the operation, just the location.
"There's still a danger of an explosion. and why is it so close to residential?" Boyd said. "So even if every case they are making is true, why not build it away from communities?"
Since august of 2023, W.R. Grace has been working with the Maryland Department of the Environment on permitting the plant, but MDE says they have not yet decided on approval and will be taking public comment into consideration.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Barron Trump made millions from family's lucrative crypto firm: report
Barron Trump, the youngest son of the 47th President, may have raked in millions of dollars from the sale of crypto tokens linked to the family's lucrative venture into digital tokens, according to report. The 19-year-old New York University student could have picked up a cool $40 million — $25 million after taxes — from the sale of digital assets by World Liberty Financial Group, the Trump family firm launched nine months ago after Barron persuaded his dad about the benefits of crypto, Forbes reported. 'Barron knows so much about this,' commander-in-chief said during an interview in September after the launch. 'Barron's a young guy, but he knows it — he talks about his wallet. He's got four wallets or something, and I'm saying, 'What is a wallet?'' Barron Trump, seen here at his father's second inauguration, is listed as a 'co-founder' on World Liberty Financial's website. AFP via Getty Images World Liberty has been a financial bonanza for the family. In March, World Liberty announced that it had sold $550 million worth of tokens. An Office of Government Ethics filing released by President Trump last week declared he had made $57 million from token sales. It also said that the real estate mogul held a 75% stake in his umbrella company, DT Marks Defi LLC, with unnamed 'third parties' holding the other 25%. Barron Trump is listed as a 'co-founder' of World Liberty Financial alongside the president, as well as Eric and Donald Trump Jr, the president's two eldest sons. Forbes, which provided no direct evidence for its claims of Barron Trump's massive digital windfall, suggested that he owned a 7.5% stake in Delaware-based World Liberty. The stake would mirror what the NYU freshman holds in the Trump Organization's Washington, DC hotel, Forbes said. The Post has approached a Trump Organization spokesperson for comment. Trump once derided digital assets such as Bitcoin as 'a scam' but he has since U-turned and embraced cryptocurrencies. REUTERS Barron Trump's name does not appear in the company's solitary SEC filing from October 30 last year. Also listed as business partners in the venture are Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff and his son, Zachary. An analysis by Bloomberg, the financial news outlet, estimates the president's net worth has doubled since the start of his 2024 campaign, standing at just over $5.4 billion
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Social Security stops reporting call wait times and other metrics
Social Security has stopped publicly reporting its processing times for benefits, the 1-800 number's current call wait time and numerous other performance metrics, which customers and advocates have used to track the agency's struggling customer service programs. The agency removed a menu of live phone and claims data from its website earlier this month, according to Internet Archive records. It put up a new page this week that offers a far more limited view of the agency's customer service performance. The website also now urges customers to use an online portal for services rather than calling the main phone line or visiting a field office — two options that many disabled and elderly people with limited mobility or computer skills rely on for help. The agency had previously considered cutting phone services and then scrapped those plans amid an uproar. The changes are the latest sign of the agency's struggle with website crashes, overloaded servers and long lines at field offices after cost-cutting efforts led by Elon Musk's U.S. DOGE Service targeted the agency's customer service system. The decision to remove public-facing data drew sharp criticism from advocates who said that it will make it more difficult to assess how the agency is performing for its 74 million beneficiaries. Former Maryland governor Martin O'Malley, who served as Social Security commissioner under President Joe Biden, said that public disclosure of data provided staff with an incentive for higher performance and held the agency accountable. 'It's a shame that now they are trashing the trust that the public should have in numbers that are timely and accurate and real,' O'Malley said. In response to questions about why the data was removed, a Social Security spokesperson who declined to be named said that as Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano 'continues to evaluate the agency, we are updating our performance metrics to better reflect the real experiences of the people we serve and highlight the fastest ways our customers can get service. The agency will determine if additional information will be provided at a later date.' The spokesperson also provided a statement from Bisignano that said his 'top priority is to turn the Social Security Administration into a model of excellence — one that operates at peak efficiency.' The spokesperson said Bisignano aims to make Social Security a 'digital-first' agency, and the agency wants to encourage customers to use the online portal so staff can focus on more complex cases. Alex Lawson, executive director of the Social Security Works advocacy group, said the data removals 'hide how much they've destroyed the system's customer service.' 'If they think this lack of transparency will fool the American people, they're in for a surprise,' Lawson said. 'People notice when they can't get an appointment because their local field office has lost half its staff. When checks and decisions are delayed. When they get the runaround from an AI chatbot on the phone, instead of getting to talk to a real person.' In response to the criticism, White House spokeswoman Elizabeth Huston said in a statement that President Donald Trump 'is leading the most transparent administration in history' and Bisignano 'is streamlining the Social Security Administration to deliver more efficient and better service for American taxpayers.' Among the performance metrics now withheld was a 'live data' section with current call wait time, callback wait time, number of callers waiting on hold and the number of callers waiting on callback. The new website now shows only the percentage of calls and number of calls handled through automation, the average speed to answer and the total number of customers served. That data is only available for the fiscal year through the last month that data is available. And while the previous dashboard allowed users to click on data points and see trends over time, the new page does not show historical data. The dashboard says that nearly 42 percent of calls — or 27.2 million — were handled through automation in the current fiscal year through the last completed month. In contrast, the Social Security spokesperson said 5 percent — or 2.9 million calls — were handled through automation in the same period in the prior year. The data does not identify what month was used. It took an average of 19.2 minutes to answer calls and 72 percent of customers were served over the phone in this fiscal year through the last available month, the dashboard shows. The current tracker now provides one new statistic about in-person visits: that the average time to wait for an appointment at a field office is 34 days. The page says 'very few services require you to visit a field office' and customers are encouraged again to use the online portal. However, that statistic is a national average and does not help retirees and those with disabilities assess what wait times might be like in their area. Pages with information about the processing times for retirement, survivor, disability and Medicare benefits are now gone, as well as pages about the time it takes to reconsider disability decisions and process appeals. There is no reference to disability benefits on the new page. Another agency webpage does have some historical data about claims available to download. Rich Couture, a spokesman for the largest federal workers union, American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), said the loss of 10 percent of the agency's workforce has taken a 'toll on already overworked employees.' 'Removal of real-time performance data from SSA's website will only obscure the impact of the cuts and chaos on public service,' he said in a statement. One Social Security employee, who works in a claims processing center and who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation, said she suspects the erased webpages indicate an attempt to hide exploding call times and service backlogs piling up under the second Trump administration. She noted that, in her experience under Trump so far, it is taking at least double the time to process a claim than it did under Biden. She sits near colleagues who handle international calls, she said, and often overhears co-workers tell callers that actions will take 15 to 30 business days to process. She attributed the slowdown to mismanagement driven in part by DOGE, which slashed the agency's staff, hampered its ability to spend and driven down efficiency by enacting massive staff reorganizations. 'Them removing that type of data off the website about processing times doesn't surprise me, because we're so behind on things being processed,' the employee said. 'It's really a mess right now, everything is so far backed up.' The agency took down the data performance page on June 6 and replaced it with a message that the website was under maintenance until Monday, according to Internet Archive records compiled by the Strategic Organizing Center, a coalition of unions, and independently verified by The Washington Post. The altered page was then published with fewer statistics and with the added language about using the online portal. 'The fastest way for customers to get service is through my Social Security, which gives you immediate access to important information and tools, putting you in control of your time,' the new website reads. The page also says that the wait time to access online services is '0 minutes' and lists the number of transactions completed online, the count of customers who got replacement cards through the website and the percent of customers who filed for retirement benefits online. The website also says 'if you are thinking of calling us' there's a list of actions you can complete online without having to make the call. Kathryn Locatell, a 68-year-old in Placerville, California, whose 73-year-old husband receives Social Security payments, scoffed at the webpage's updated suggestion that applicants should forgo phone calls in favor of an online portal. She noted that her town is filled with elderly people who do not use smartphones, some of whom cannot even access the internet. When Locatell has visited her local Social Security office, she said she found it filled with older men and women who often wait hours to be seen. 'It's sad,' she said. 'Using an online portal just isn't going to happen in this community … I know it from my personal experience. My husband doesn't use the internet at all.' Across the country in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 76-year-old Joan Garnett, for whom Social Security payments are the primary form of income, was also struggling to understand why the agency would revise its website. She, too, thinks it unrealistic that elderly people will be able to use the portal. And she finds it disturbing that Social Security would take down data on its own performance serving customers. 'The government should be transparent in how they function,' she said. 'If you can't check on things, how do you know it's functioning right?'
Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
‘We can't wait forever': GOP frustrated but unwilling to act on Trump's TikTok extension
President Donald Trump's latest move to keep TikTok alive is yet again frustrating congressional Republicans, many of whom object to China's continued involvement in the popular app but just want to be done with the whole drama. 'Not my favorite thing,' Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), along-time proponent of the ban, deadpanned, when asked about the president's plan to issue another extension. He spoke a day before the White House confirmed Trump signed a 90-day suspension of enforcement of the law requiring TikTok to divest from ByteDance, its China-based parent company, throwing another lifeline to the short-form video app. By Friday, some House lawmakers registered a note of resigned irritation. The extension — Trump's third since the law went into effect on Jan. 19 — is a unilateral decision not envisioned in the bipartisan law passed by Congress and upheld last year by the Supreme Court. Rep. Darin LaHood (R-Ill.), a member of the House Intelligence and China committees, told POLITICO. 'The national security concerns and vulnerabilities are still there, and they have not gone away. I would argue they've almost become more enhanced in many ways.' But Trump's extension of the TikTok law largely boxed out Republicans in both chambers who have shown little inclination — beyond stern words — to prevent him from making these postponements almost routine. Many GOP lawmakers saw themselves as granting the president space to cut a promised deal while the White House deals with urgent priorities, like trade negotiations and the Israel-Iran conflict. 'In light of everything going on, I think he did the right thing,' Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a China hawk who voted for the ban, told POLITICO of Trump. 'I have concerns about all kinds of things — that [the extension] is on the list — but it's not at the top of the list.' Though Trump has promised his TikTok negotiations areclosely tied to trade talks with China, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent testified last week to a Senate panel that TikTok's sale was not currently a part of the negotiations with China, raising a further potential obstacle to Trump inking a deal in the near future. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a close ally of the president and longtime national-security hawk said earlier in the week: 'The sooner we get that issue solved, the better,' without offering any ideas for further enforcement. 'I just want finality,' Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) told POLITICO. 'I want some certainty and just know that the Congress isn't being played when we make a decision [that the app] be sold.' Another member of the House China Committee, Rep. Zach Nunn (R-Iowa), told POLITICO, 'No more extensions. It's time to follow through.' Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-Wash.), also a member of the China panel, noted in a post on X Thursday the law only allows one extension of the compliance deadline, adding, 'I was proud to support the ban of TikTok and believe the law should be implemented as written.' With their comments, the lawmakers echoed House China Chair John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), who in early June called for the U.S. to 'let [TikTok] go dark' to bring China to the table to negotiate. He reiterated that stance on Friday. 'Delays only embolden the Chinese Communist Party,' Moolenaar said in a statement to POLITICO. 'I urge the administration to enforce the law as written and protect the American people from this growing national security threat.' Still, observers say Republicans are not exercising their leverage to demand the White House enforce the law they helped write, for example by withholding funding or congressional oversight hearings. 'I keep reading that Republicans are 'frustrated' and 'impatient' about their TikTok law being ignored, but they should stop complaining to reporters and take it up with Trump,' said Adam Kovacevich, founder and CEO of the pro-tech Chamber of Progress. Among the Republicans being undercut by the president is his own secretary of state. Marco Rubio — who as senator was one of the loudest critics of TikTok's ties to China, and a huge backer of the app's ban — has been conspicuously silent as Trump has repeatedly granted more time to strike a deal for its sale. 'You have to decide what's more important, our national security and the threat that it poses to our national security,' Rubio told POLITICO in March 2023, as Congress was considering a ban. 'You have to weigh that against what you might think the electoral consequences of it are. For me, it's an easy balancing act. I mean, there is no balance. I'm always going to be for our national security.' A spokesperson for Rubio at the State Department did not respond to a request for comment. Democrats — even those who support keeping TikTok online — say Trump's approach is the wrong one. 'These endless extensions are not only illegal, but they also put TikTok's fate in the hands of risk-averse corporate shareholders,' Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) told POLITICO in a statement. 'This is deeply unfair to TikTok's creators and users. I'm prepared to work towards a solution, but Trump isn't coming to the table.'
