Meta and TikTok challenge tech fees in second highest EU court
By Foo Yun Chee
LUXEMBOURG (Reuters) -Meta Platforms and TikTok said a European Union supervisory fee levied on them was disproportionate and based on a flawed methodology as they took their fight with tech regulators to Europe's second highest court on Wednesday.
Under the Digital Services Act that became law in 2022, the two companies and 16 others are subject to a supervisory fee amounting to 0.05% of their annual worldwide net income aimed at covering the European Commission's cost of monitoring their compliance with the law.
The size of the annual fee is based on the number of average monthly active users for each company and whether the company posts a profit or loss in the preceding financial year.
Meta told judges at the General Court it was not trying to avoid paying its fair share of the fee, but it questioned how the Commission had calculated the levy, saying it had been based on the revenue of the group rather than of the subsidiary.
Meta's lawyer Assimakis Komninos told the panel of five judges the company still did not know how the fee was calculated.
He said the provisions in the Digital Services Act, or DSA, "go against the letter and the spirit of the law, are totally untransparent with black boxes and have led to completely implausible and absurd results".
ByteDance-owned Chinese online social media platform TikTok was equally critical.
"What has happened here is anything but fair or proportionate. The fee has used inaccurate figures and discriminatory methods," TikTok lawyer Bill Batchelor told the court.
"It inflates TikTok's fees, requires it to pay, not just for itself, but for other platforms and disregards the excessive fee cap," he said.
He accused the Commission of double counting the companies' users, saying this was discriminatory because users switching between their mobile phones and laptops would then be counted twice.
He also said regulators had exceeded their legal power by setting the fee cap at the level of group profits.
Commission lawyer Lorna Armati rejected both companies' arguments and defended the Commission's use of group profit as a reference value to calculate the supervisory fee.
"When a group has consolidated accounts, it is the financial resources of the group as a whole that are available to that provider in order to bear the burden of the fee," she told the court.
"The providers had sufficient information to understand why and how the Commission used the numbers that it did and there is no question of any breach of their right to be heard now, unequal treatment," she said.
The Court is expected to issue its ruling next year.
The cases are T-55/24 Meta Platforms Ireland v Commission and T-58/24 TikTok Technology v Commission.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hegseth won't rule out military actions against Greenland, Panama
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday would not rule out the possibility of a future military invasion of Greenland and Panama, suggesting to lawmakers the Pentagon may have plans for such a future strike. Appearing before the House Armed Services Committee, Hegseth asserted the department 'plans for any particular contingency' and said, 'I think the American people would want the Pentagon to have plans for anything.' Pressed by Republican lawmakers to dismiss the possibility of such a U.S. military attack on Greenland or Panama, Hegseth reiterated that the 'Pentagon has plans for any number of contingencies' and that officials 'look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats.' Democrats on the panel scoffed at those answers. 'I don't think the American people voted for President Trump because they were hoping we would invade Greenland,' said committee ranking member, Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash. 'The message this sends to the rest of the world is one that the U.S. is purely in it for itself, and does not care about alliances.' Space Force commander fired after email DOD says 'undermined' JD Vance The issue of possible U.S. military intervention to take over Greenland, Panama, Canada and other allied territories has been a point of concern for months among critics of President Donald Trump. On social media and in White House comments, Trump has stated multiple times that Denmark should surrender control of Greenland for the good of global security, and that Canada should become the 51st state in the American union. Administration officials have downplayed those comments. Hegseth, in his first appearance before the committee, avoided directly responding to the claims, but said the United States government has significant interest in protecting the areas from Chinese influence or manipulation. Earlier this week, Denmark's Parliament approved legislation to allow new U.S. military bases on Danish soil, broadening an existing previous military agreement between the countries. But Greenland Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen in recent months has vowed to oppose any U.S. efforts to take over the Danish territory. The Pentagon, meanwhile, is likely to shift Greenland from U.S. European Command to U.S. Northern Command, the military body responsible for defense of the American homeland, Mexico and Canada. The change itself only involves redrawing the maps of U.S. combatant commands and handing over responsibility for the military forces in Greenland, but it has caused angst among some in Denmark who think the administration is trying to draw the territory closer to America.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Your VPN could be giving your browsing data to China, watchdog says
Using a free app to hide your internet traffic? The company behind it could be quietly tied to China, where the government maintains the ability to surveil all user data, according to a report published Thursday by the Technology Transparency Project. The report accuses 17 Apps — six on Apple's App Store, four on the Google Play Store and seven on both — of having undisclosed ties to China. In several cases, the TTP linked the app developers to a prominent Chinese cybersecurity company, Qihoo 360, which is under U.S. government sanctions. The apps are all virtual private networks, or VPNs, which allow a user to divert their internet traffic through a company's internet connection. With names like VPNify, Ostrich VPN and Now VPN, none of them make overt references to China or Chinese ownership on the app stores. VPNs are primarily used to either protect a user's privacy by making it harder for a website to know who's visiting them, or to skirt around censorship measures. But unless a VPN company takes significant steps to automatically and permanently delete its users' search histories, a company is likely to keep records of its customers' internet activity. That is particularly notable if the company is Chinese, as national law there stipulates that intelligence and law enforcement agencies do not need a warrant to view any personal data that is stored there. 'VPNs are of particular concern because anyone using a VPN has the entirety of their online activity routed through that application,' said Katie Paul, the TTP's director. 'When it comes to Chinese-owned VPNs, that means this data can be turned over to the Chinese government based on China's state laws,' Paul said. Justin Sherman, a nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council who studies data privacy, told NBC News that using a Chinese-owned VPN would be tantamount to handing over one's browsing history to Beijing. 'Capturing data via a VPN could let the Chinese government see everything from websites a person is reading that criticize the Chinese state, to the corporate databases and private portals that person might pull up (and then log into) on the internet for work,' he said. The TTP, a tech-focused arm of the Campaign for Accountability, an investigative nonprofit that seeks to expose 'corruption, negligence, and unethical behavior,' previously published a report on Chinese VPN apps on April 1. Apple soon took down three of the apps with alleged ties to Qihoo 360: Thunder VPN, Snap VPN and Signal Secure VPN. The other apps — Turbo VPN and VPN Proxy Master, which are also available on the Google Play Store, as well as three others that Google offers — are all still available. None of the apps are listed as being developed directly by Qihoo 360. Instead, they are developed by Singapore-based companies including Lemon Seed, Lemon Clove, Autumn Breeze and Innovative Connecting. The TTP cited business filings in China that show Qihoo 360 saying it had acquired those companies in 2019, and Corporate registration documents for those companies in the Cayman Islands from March that all list the director as a Chinese citizen who is a top Qihoo 360 employee. NBC News reached out to developers listed for the 17 apps. Only two claimed not to have ties to China or Qihoo 360. Autumn Breeze, the developer of Snap VPN, which Apple previously removed but is still available on the Google Play store, told TTP it has "no affiliation with Qihoo 360" despite those registration documents, and claims it does not "record, monitor, or retain any user online activity." "Autumn Breeze fails to explain clear connections to the sanctioned PLA-linked entity that are detailed in publicly available documents," Paul told NBC News. The other is WireVPN, where an employee claimed in an email to NBC News that the company is 'an independent service' with 'no ties to Chinese entities or government organizations.' 'We are neither affiliated with Qihoo 360 nor any other PRC-based enterprises, and our operations are entirely autonomous,' the employee said. However, WireVPN's privacy policy makes clear that users are expected to adhere to Chinese law and bans them from 'Violating the basic principles established by the Chinese Constitution' and 'Violating the traditional virtues of the Chinese nation, social morality, rational morality, and socialist spiritual civilization.' Qihoo 360 didn't respond to a request for comment. But China Daily, a state-run newspaper, has reported that its cybersecurity clients include the Chinese military and 'at least eight ministries' of the Chinese government. In a 2016 press release, the company seemed to indicate it was in the VPN business, saying 'Qihoo 360 also provides users with secure access points to the Internet via its market leading web browsers and application stores.' Both Apple and Google declined to address the specific apps that TTP highlighted as tied to Qihoo 360 and told NBC News that they follow U.S. laws regarding sanctions. Neither bans VPN app developers simply for following Chinese law. Peter Micek, general counsel at Access Now, a tech policy and human rights advocacy nonprofit, told NBC News that he was surprised to see the tech companies had potentially overlooked a sanctioned company offering apps under innocuous developer names. 'It seems like this project has done the homework and due diligence that Apple and Google should have done, and it does seem like those ties would constitute indirect contact with, transactions with folks who are sanctioned,' he said. Tech companies can sometimes face significant fines for violating sanctions, Micek said. Sanctions are put in place by the federal government as a penalty on foreign entities and individuals, preventing U.S. companies and individuals from doing business with them. They are often imposed after a foreign entity or individual is shown to have conducted some sort of condemned behavior or have links to condemned groups, such as cybercriminals or terrorist organizations. Qihoo 360 faced sanctions from the Commerce Department in 2020, which said the company could become involved in supplying materials to the Chinese military. The sanctions prevent American companies from exporting technology or software to Qihoo 360. It's not clear if app stores hosting apps tied to Qihoo could be in violation of those sanctions. The Commerce Department did not respond to a request for comment. This article was originally published on
The Hill
35 minutes ago
- The Hill
China could be accessing browsing data on VPNs: Watchdog
More than a dozen private browsing apps on Apple and Google's app stores have undisclosed ties to Chinese companies, leaving user data at risk of exposure to the Chinese government, according to a new report from the Tech Transparency Project. Thirteen virtual private network (VPN) apps on Apple's App Store and 11 apps on Google's Play Store have ties to Chinese companies, the tech watchdog group said in the report released Thursday. Chinese law requires Chinese companies to share data with the government upon request, creating privacy and security risks for American users. Several of the apps, including two on both app stores and two others on Google Play Store, have ties to Chinese cybersecurity firm Qihoo 360, which has been sanctioned by the U.S. government, according to the report. The Tech Transparency Project previously identified more than 20 VPN apps on Apple's App Store with Chinese ties in an April report. The iPhone maker has since removed three apps linked to Qihoo 360. 'After being informed of this issue once already, Apple and Google continue to make many of these VPN apps available to Americans without warning them of the security risks,' said Michelle Kuppersmith, executive director at Campaign for Accountability, the group behind the Tech Transparency Project. 'It's now fair to question whether the large profits Apple and Google make from their app stores have anything to do with this inaction,' Kuppersmith added in a statement. The Hill has reached out to both Apple and Google for comment. Concerns surrounding the Chinese government's ability to access American user data is at the center of the push to ban TikTok or force the app to divest from its China-based parent company ByteDance. The popular video-sharing platform still remains available in the U.S., despite a law requiring TikTok to divest or face a U.S. ban, as President Trump has repeatedly deferred enforcement as he seeks to strike a deal with China. The next TikTok deadline is fast approaching on June 19. However, the Trump administration is reportedly considering another extension, according to The Wall Street Journal.
