Primordial surf: ‘microlightning' in mist may have sparked life on Earth, study finds
Charles Darwin thought it started in a warm pond. Others point to comets that ploughed into Earth. And some suspect a bolt from the blue, a lightning strike into the ocean.
How life started on Earth may forever be a mystery, but new research proposes a radical idea: that crashing waves and waterfalls may have kicked off the process by throwing up mists of water.
In experiments at Stanford University, chemists discovered that microdroplets in fine sprays of water generate streaks of 'microlightning'. When surrounded by the right mix of gases, these sparks power chemical reactions that synthesise many molecules for life.
Prof Richard Zare, a chemist who led the team, said: 'This is a real contribution to understanding how you can go from non-life to life. You have water sprays all over the place, particularly around rocks, and there are crevices in rocks where these chemicals can accumulate.'
There is no consensus about the origins of life, and no shortage of hypotheses. When Darwin published On the Origin of Species in 1859 he described how evolution generated the diversity of life, but not how it started. He speculated, however, that chemicals could have interacted in 'a warm little pond' from which living cells eventually emerged.
Hot undersea vents that spew mineral-rich fluids are now considered to be leading contenders for fostering life. Impacting comets may have helped, too, by creating shock waves that converted simple organics into amino acids, the constituents of proteins.
Lightning strikes might also have lent a hand. The idea that lightning created the ingredients for life gained traction in 1953 when Stanley Miller and Harold Urey at the University of Chicago reported that electrical discharges in a simulated early Earth atmosphere produced amino acids. But the hypothesis has its critics: lightning is too infrequent, they say, and the chemicals produced simply drift away.
Zare's team took to a dark room to investigate the electrical properties of water sprays. They found that droplets carry opposing charges and when they come together, tiny sparks leap between them. Unlike lightning bolts that cover miles, microlightning travels a few billionths of a metre.
While the effect is faint, it carries enough energy to drive chemical reactions. Writing in Science Advances, the researchers describe how they sprayed water into a mixture of nitrogen, methane, carbon dioxide and ammonia. This led to the rapid formation of key molecules including hydrogen cyanide; glycine, an amino acid involved in protein production; and uracil, a building block of RNA found in all living cells. 'We propose that this is a new mechanism for the prebiotic synthesis of molecules that constitute the building blocks of life,' Zare said.
Dr Eva Stueeken, who studies the origins of life at the University of St Andrews, said the work was fascinating. 'It opens up an array of possibilities that we need to explore further, using different gas and fluid compositions,' she said. 'It will also be important to quantify how significant this mechanism would have been on a global scale for the generation of prebiotic molecules.'
Prof David Deamer at the University of California, Santa Cruz, who has worked with Zare but not on the latest study, said microlightning 'can now be added to the list of possible energy sources available to drive organic synthesis before life began'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
a day ago
- The Independent
The surprising health benefits of fecal transplants
Fecal microbiota transplants, used to restore gut health, involve transferring stool from a healthy donor to a recipient. A new University of Chicago study in mice reveals potential long-lasting, unintended health consequences from these transplants due to microorganisms colonizing the entire intestinal tract, creating regional gut mismatches. The study found that transplanted microbes altered intestinal environments, affecting metabolism, behavior, energy balance, and liver function in mice. Researchers advocate for caution and suggest using microorganisms from all regions of the intestine, not just the colon, for transplants. Dr. Eugene Chang, the study's senior author, notes that fecal microbiota transplants can cause changes in host-microbe relationships in different bowel regions that may be difficult to reverse.
The Independent
2 days ago
- The Independent
‘Poop transplants' have been happening for decades. Now researchers have identified some unintended consequences
Fecal microbiota transplants are common medical procedures dating back decades that can help restore the gut health of people with colon infections - but scientists now warn of newly discovered consequences from the procedure. The 'poop transplant' is the transfer of the stool of a healthy donor to a recipient. The stool contains beneficial bacteria that can improve the patient's gut bacteria, which guards immune health and helps to regulate metabolism. They are approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat people with common C. diff infections that may cause severe gastrointestinal symptoms and inflammation in hospital patients who have been on antibiotics. Roughly 48,000 procedures are done each year. Now, University of Chicago researchers say a study in mice and experiments with human tissue have revealed some long-lasting and unintended consequences due to transplanting microorganisms from only one section of the digestive tract. 'I think it's a bit of a wakeup call to the field that maybe we shouldn't willy-nilly put large bowel microbes into different parts of the intestine that shouldn't be there,' Dr. Orlando 'Landon' DeLeon, postdoctoral researcher at the university, said in a statement. 'If we're designing good therapeutics, we should be aware of the importance of matching the regional microbiota to their proper environments, so that we provide better overall health benefits.' DeLeon is the lead author of the new research, which was published on Friday in the journal Cell. To reach these conclusions, the authors gave three groups of mice transplants of microorganisms from the middle part of the small intestine that connects to the colon, and a standard fecal transplant from the colon. The test showed that the microorganisms from each transplant were able to colonize the entirety of the intestinal tract in the mice -- not just certain regions. This created what they called regional gut mismatches, lasting for up to three months following a transplant. The microbes also altered their new intestinal environments, 'terraforming' the lining in ways that caused changes in the recipient's metabolism, behavior and energy balance. There were shifts in liver metabolism, including activity in genes associated with immune function. The mice also exhibited different eating behaviors. The gut has several distinct regions with vastly different microbial ecosystems. Imbalances in gut bacteria have been tied to a risk of cancer. 'There are microbes along the entire intestinal tract, and we just study predominately the last third of it (the colon),' DeLeon said. 'So, how can you expect [a transplant], with microbes from a third of the intestinal tract at the end of it, to fix the rest of the intestine?' What this means for human patients may be murky right now, but the authors say more caution is needed with the transplants going forward. They advocate for an approach that would transfer microorganism from all regions of the intestine and not just largely from the colon. In the future, they plan to conduct further study related to how different microbes exert their influence in different parts of the intestine and how the gut regions terraformed by microbiota mismatches can be restored. 'We have absolutely no idea what's in FMT, except that it's a combination of microbes,' Dr. Eugene Chang, the Martin Boyer Professor of Medicine at the university and senior author of the study, said. 'But even a single FMT will cause a change in the host-microbe relationships in these very different regions of the bowel that may be very difficult to reverse.'
Daily Mail
4 days ago
- Daily Mail
Stanford scientists discover intriguing dinner hack that can help keep you thin
Eating eggs and vegetables before chips could help you stay thin, research from US scientists suggests. Experts from Stanford University tested if eating a dose of fibre, protein or fat before carbohydrates could reduce or delay blood sugar spikes. Such spikes have been linked to obesity, as fluctuating blood sugar makes you more likely to suffer hunger pangs and therefore snack on calorific foods in between meals. But the experts found this process could be interrupted by changing not what people eat, but in what order. In the experiment, scientists took 55 volunteers, about half of which had signs of pre-diabetes, a precursor to type 2 diabetes that involves higher-than-normal blood sugar levels. They then gave each participant a meal consisting of rice on three separate occasions while they wore devices to measure blood sugar levels called continuous glucose monitors. Ten minutes before each meal participants were given either a fibre supplement, protein in the form of boiled egg whites, or dairy fat from crème fraîche. Analysing the results, they found eating fibre or the egg protein first lowered the blood sugar spike that came from the energy-dense rice. Eating fat before the carbohydrates didn't lower the blood sugar spike but did delay it from happening. This suggests that eating fibre-rich foods like vegetables, and proteins like eggs before tucking into carbohydrates could prevent rocketing blood sugar that leads to a hunger-inducing crash. Professor Michael Snyder, an expert in genetics author of the study, said diners should try to eat their meals in a specific order. 'Eating carbohydrates later in a meal is still a good idea even though it has not yet been sorted out whether it is best to eat protein, fat or fibre before carbohydrates,' he said. 'Eat your salad or hamburger before your French fries.' The researchers also noted that the impact of fibre, protein and fat on blood sugar levels was less significant among participants with signs of pre-diabetes. The authors said this was an area in need of further research. Carbohydrates, a group that includes rice, potatoes, bread and pasta, are energy dense foods that are quickly converted to sugar in our blood, giving us the resources we need to function. The NHS says carbohydrates should make up about a third of a person's daily diet. Officials urge people to eat wholegrain varieties like brown bread or potatoes with the skin on as these come with higher levels of fibre and nutrients, and can slow the release of sugar in our bloodstream, maintaining fullness. Almost 6million Britons have diabetes, of which 90 per cent is type 2, but charities estimate 1.2million are living with the disease undiagnosed. While nationally, an estimated eight per cent of the population of England has the disease, this rises to over one in 10 people in some parts of the country. Type 2 diabetes occurs when the body doesn't make enough insulin or the insulin it makes doesn't work properly. Insulin is a hormone critical to controlling blood sugar levels. Having high blood sugar levels over time can cause heart attacks and strokes, as well as problems with the eyes, kidneys and feet. Sufferers may need to overhaul their diet, take daily medication and have regular check-ups. Symptoms of the condition, which is diagnosed with a blood test, include excessive thirst, tiredness and needing to urinate more often. But many people have no signs.
