Assassination claims as first openly gay Muslim imam shot dead in South Africa
A prominent figure in the LGBTQ+ Muslim community has been fatally shot in South Africa, sparking outrage and fears of an assassination.
Muhsin Hendricks, widely considered the first openly gay Muslim imam, was ambushed on Saturday while sitting in a car in Gqeberha, formerly known as Port Elizabeth.
Security footage captured the moment a masked assailant leaped from a pickup truck, firing multiple shots through the car window at Hendricks.
A driver accompanying Hendricks survived the attack.
While police investigations are ongoing and a motive has yet to be officially established, political parties and LGBTQ+ organisations believe Hendricks was targeted for his progressive religious teachings.
He founded a mosque in Cape Town specifically welcoming LGBTQ+ Muslims and advocated for greater inclusion within Islam, despite homosexuality being traditionally forbidden in the religion.
South Africa's Justice Ministry has confirmed it is investigating the possibility of an assassination.
Hendricks was known internationally and spoke at the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association's conference in South Africa in 2024.
The ILGA family 'is in deep shock at the news of the murder of Muhsin Hendricks and calls on authorities to thoroughly investigate what we fear may be a hate crime', said Julia Ehrt, executive director of ILGA.
'He supported and mentored so many people in South Africa and around the world in their journey to reconcile with their faith.'
The ILGA said Hendricks had spoken of how some people were calling for the closing of his mosque and had branded it the 'gay temple'.
The Democratic Alliance, South Africa's second biggest political party, said 'the nature of the killing strongly suggests a professional hit'.
Hendricks said in an interview with a South African newspaper in 2022 that he felt he was the target of a series of fatwas – rulings in Islamic law – issued by South Africa's Muslim Judicial Council that year.
They reminded the country's Muslims that same-sex relationships were prohibited, although the council said gay Muslims who abstain from 'same-sex actions' should be welcomed at mosques.
Hendricks was the subject of a documentary film released the same year called The Radical, in which he said that there had been threats against him but 'it just didn't bother me. The need to be authentic was greater than the fear to die'.
The film also focused on young gay Muslims who said Hendricks provided somewhere they could pray and practice Islam while still being themselves.
The Muslim Judicial Council of South Africa said in a statement Sunday that while it had consistently stated that Hendricks' position was incompatible with Islamic teachings, 'we unequivocally condemn his murder and any acts of violence targeting members of the LGBTQ community or any other community'.
Hendricks grew up in a conservative Muslim family and married a woman. He ended the marriage and came out publicly as a gay imam in the mid-1990s and started a support network and later a mosque for gay Muslims.
He advocated for their inclusion through his Al-Ghurbaab Foundation and referred to himself as 'the world's first openly queer imam'.
'When I was looking at the way queer Muslims were negotiating this dilemma between Islam and their sexual orientation and identity, I felt compelled to do something about it,' he said, explaining his beliefs.
'And I thought, for me to help would probably be for me to be authentic with myself and come out. I think it's possible to be queer and Muslim or queer and Christian.'
In a message on its official Facebook page, the Al-Ghurbaab Foundation said Hendricks was 'a great father and a guardian of many. Continue resting with angels'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Belfast Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Belfast Telegraph
DUP councillor questions if burqas should be banned in UK
Ex-UKIP and TUV member Henry Reilly asks on social media if full covering worn by Muslim women 'alien' A DUP councillor has raised questions over whether the burqa should be banned and if it is 'alien to British culture'. Henry Reilly, a member of Newry, Mourne and Down Council, raised the matter in the wake of controversy over the issue in Reform UK ranks.
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
Pulse massacre survivors are set to revisit the nightclub before it's razed
Survivors and family members of the 49 victims killed in the Pulse nightclub massacre nine years ago are getting their first chance Wednesday to walk through the long-shuttered, LGBTQ+-friendly Florida venue before it's razed and replaced with a permanent memorial to what was once the worst U.S. mass shooting in modern times. In small groups over four days, survivors and family members of those killed planned to spend a half hour inside the space where Omar Mateen opened fire during a Latin night celebration on June 12, 2016, leaving 49 dead and 53 wounded. Mateen, who had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State group, was killed after a three-hour standoff with police. At the time, it was the worst mass shooting in modern U.S. history. The Pulse shooting's death toll was surpassed the following year when 58 people were killed and more than 850 injured among a crowd of 22,000 at a country music festival in Las Vegas. The city of Orlando purchased the Pulse property in 2023 for $2 million and plans to build a $12 million permanent memorial which will open in 2027. Those efforts follow a multiyear, botched attempt by a private foundation run by the club's former owner. The existing structure will be razed later this year. 'None of us thought that it would take nine years to get to this point and we can't go back and relitigate all of the failures along the way that have happened, but what we can do is control how we move forward together," Orange County Mayor Jerry Demings said two weeks ago when county commissioners pledged $5 million to support the city of Orlando's plan. Visits coincide with the shooting's ninth anniversary The opportunity to go inside the nightclub comes on the ninth anniversary of the mass shooting. Outside, over-sized photos of the victims, rainbow-colored flags and flowers have hung on fences in a makeshift memorial, and the site has attracted visitors from around the globe. But very few people other than investigators have been inside the structure. Around 250 survivors and family members of those killed have responded to the city's invitation to walk through the nightclub this week. Families of the 49 people who were killed can visit the site with up to six people in their group, and survivors can bring one person with them. The people invited to visit are being given the chance to ask FBI agents who investigated the massacre about what happened. They won't be allowed to take photos or video inside. Brandon Wolf, who hid in a bathroom as the gunman opened fire, said he wasn't going to visit, primarily because he now lives in Washington. He said he wanted to remember Pulse as it was before. 'I will say that the site of the tragedy is where I feel closest to the people who were stolen from me,' said Wolf, who now is national press secretary for the Human Rights Campaign, a LGBTQ+ advocacy group. 'For survivors, the last time they were in that space was the worst night possible. It will be really hard to be in that space again.' Mental health counselors planned to be on hand to talk to those who walk through the building. Original memorial plans for Pulse fell short Survivors and family members had hoped to have a permanent memorial in place by now. But an earlier effort by a private foundation to build one floundered, and the organization disbanded in 2023. Barbara and Rosario Poma and businessman Michael Panaggio previously owned the property, and Barbara Poma was the executive director of the onePulse Foundation — the nonprofit that had been leading efforts to build a memorial and museum. She stepped down as executive director in 2022 and then left the organization entirely in 2023 amid criticism that she wanted to sell instead of donate the property. There were also complaints about the lack of progress despite millions of dollars being raised. The original project, unveiled in 2019 by the onePulse Foundation, called for a museum and permanent memorial costing $45 million. That estimate eventually soared to $100 million. The city of Orlando has since outlined a more modest proposal and scrapped plans for a museum. 'The building may come down, and we may finally get, a permanent memorial, but that doesn't change the fact that this community has been scarred for life,' Wolf said. 'There are people inside the community who still need and will continue to need support and resources.' ___
The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
Sydney Muslim cleric tells court Jewish people can't be offended by him calling them ‘vile' as lectures were private
A Sydney Muslim cleric being sued for alleged racial discrimination has told the federal court no Jewish person could be offended over a series of lectures in which he described Jewish people in the seventh century as 'mischievous', 'treacherous' and 'vile' because the lectures were delivered to a private Muslim audience. Wissam Haddad – whose legal name is William but who is also known as Abu Ousayd – is being sued by two senior members of Australia's peak Jewish body, the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ), over a series of lectures he gave in Bankstown in November 2023 and subsequently broadcast online, in which he is alleged to have maligned Jewish people. Haddad allegedly breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, which prohibits offensive behaviour based on race or ethnic origin. Haddad's defence argues the speeches were delivered to a known Muslim audience, in a private place, and fail the clause in 18C that the offensive act is unlawful when it is committed 'otherwise than in private'. In submissions filed before the federal court, Haddad argues four of the five speeches were delivered at his prayer centre, Al Madina Dawah Centre in Bankstown. 'The centre is a stand-alone building which is manifestly a private property – it is surrounded by high black fencing and its entrance carries a sign that says 'Private Property No Trespassing'.' Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Haddad's submissions to the court said there was no standing invitation for any non-Muslims to attend the centre. 'There will be no evidence that any of the speeches was attended or heard by anyone who was not a regular congregant of the centre and a practising Muslim.' The remaining speech was a conversation in a room between three people. Haddad was called as a witness late on Wednesday morning. He told the court uploading his speeches to social media was not part of his responsibilities. 'I'm not involved,' he told the court. But under repeated questioning from one of the applicant's barristers, Peter Braham SC, he told the court he knew his speeches would be posted online. 'Yes I did.' Haddad said the speeches were posted online by 'someone from the community'. Asked who it was, Haddad said: 'I'm not at liberty to give his name because I don't think it's relevant.' Peter Wertheim, one of the applicants in the case and ECAJ's co-chief executive, told the federal court on Tuesday that he was first alerted to the presence of Haddad's speeches online by coverage of them in mainstream media. He said Haddad's speeches used 'overtly dehumanising' language. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'Making derogatory generalisations, calling Jews a vile and treacherous people, calling them rats and cowards … are things which I think would be experienced by most Jews as dehumanising,' Wertheim said. His barrister, Braham, told the court Haddad's speeches repeated a range of offensive tropes and were designed to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate Jewish people. The court heard Haddad had sound recording and camera equipment installed to record his speeches, which Wertheim's barrister argued was for the purpose of disseminating his message far beyond his congregants. He would speak before a backdrop branded with the Al Madina Dawah Centre logo, but which also included logos of YouTube, Facebook, Instagram and other social media platforms. The applicants are seeking an injunction that Haddad's five offending sermons be removed from the internet, and an order that he refrain from publishing similar speeches in future. Wertheim and his co-applicant, Robert Goot, are also seeking publication of a 'corrective notice' on Haddad's prayer centre's social media pages, and to be awarded the legal costs of bringing their action. They have not sought damages or compensation. Haddad's barrister, Andrew Boe, argued the cleric's speeches were addressed to, and intended only for, a private Muslim congregation and that Haddad was not responsible for them being published online. Boe said it was unlikely a Jewish person would have discovered the speeches, to then be offended by them, if the recordings had not been covered and thus amplified by mainstream media. 'It would be analogous to a person of a prudish sensitivity seeking out pornography on the web and then complaining about being offended by it,' Boe told the court. Boe argued there must be room, in a democratic society, for 'the confronting, the challenging, even the shocking'. The hearing, before Justice Angus Stewart, is expected to run until the end of the week.
