logo
Mark Zuckerberg, Priscilla Chan to close free school for low-income Bay Area students a decade after it opened

Mark Zuckerberg, Priscilla Chan to close free school for low-income Bay Area students a decade after it opened

New York Post28-04-2025

A tuition-free school founded by Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Dr. Priscilla Chan, for low-income communities of color in the Bay Area is abruptly shutting its doors — only a decade after it opened.
The Primary School, founded in 2016 by the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, sought to provide free schooling, health care and social work resources to families in the East Palo Alto area, just a few miles from Meta's headquarters.
It decried the systemic effects of racism and poverty, and Chan, a pediatrician married to Zuckerberg, and her late educator friend Meredith Liu often discussed how low-income children were more likely to experience impactful trauma early in their lives.
Advertisement
3 The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative opened The Primary School in 2016 in the East Palo Alto area.
Google Maps
But The Primary School, and its sister campus in the East Bay, sent shockwaves throughout the community last week when it announced it would close at the end of the 2025-26 school year.
Though it did not provide a reason for the closure, it comes as Zuckerberg has executed a strong political about-face as he tries to curry favor with the Trump administration.
Advertisement
The Primary School and Chan Zuckerberg Initiative did not immediately respond to The Post's requests for comment.
Earlier this year, just weeks before Trump's inauguration, Zuckerberg killed Meta's DEI programs and scrapped the social media platform's fact-checking policies in favor of a 'Community Notes' model. Trump ally Elon Musk uses a similar note system on X, arguing that content moderation policies infringe on free speech.
Zuckerberg donated $1 million to Trump's inaugural fund through Meta, and, alongside Chan, sat upfront at his inauguration.
Meta also agreed to pay a whopping $25 million to settle a lawsuit Trump brought against the company for suspending his account after the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. About $22 million of that figure will help fund a Trump presidential library.
Advertisement
3 Priscilla Chan, Mark Zuckerberg, Lauren Sanchez and Jeff Bezos at President Trump's inauguration.
Getty Images
Emeline Vainikolo, a parent with children in the district, told The New York Times that she and other parents were invited by school administrators to a breakfast of bagels, fruit and Starbucks coffee when they dropped the news of the closure, but were given no reason.
Her son, a kindergartner at The Primary School, later shared what he had gleaned from his teacher.
''Mommy, the guy who's been giving money to our school doesn't want to give it to us anymore,'' he told his mother, according to the Times.
Advertisement
Zuckerberg and Chan's nonprofit, CZI, plans to invest $50 million in the school's surrounding communities over the next few years, donating to education savings plans for all Primary School students, as well as support for families transitioning to new districts.
In February, the initiative announced it would focus on science and 'wind down' its social advocacy work – including investments in immigration reform and racial equity grantmaking, as well as internal DEI programs.
3 Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg at the 2025 Breakthrough Prize Ceremony in Santa Monica, Calif.
Getty Images
Families at The Primary School, however, said CZI's sudden departure is just another slap in the face from Silicon Valley entrepreneurs, who have contributed to a housing shortage thanks to an influx of highly-paid tech workers.
The Primary School 'was highly publicized as a gift to the community,' one parent told the San Francisco Standard. 'They were already taking our homes because of Facebook, landlords pricing us out. Now they're gonna take this away too. It seems unfair.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why NextEra Energy (NEE) Fell This Week
Why NextEra Energy (NEE) Fell This Week

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why NextEra Energy (NEE) Fell This Week

The share price of NextEra Energy, Inc. (NYSE:NEE) fell by 8.56% between May 20 and May 27, 2025, putting it among the Energy Stocks that Lost the Most This Week. Let's shed some light on the development. A wind turbine, its blades spinning to generate clean renewable energy. NextEra Energy, Inc. (NYSE:NEE) is the world's largest generator of renewable energy from the wind and sun and a global leader in battery storage. President Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill, intended to end Biden-era tax credits for clean energy projects years sooner than planned, poses a threat to NextEra Energy, Inc. (NYSE:NEE)'s operations as it is also the Florida Power & Light Company – America's largest electric utility which benefits greatly from Florida's famous sunshine and growing population. However, on the plus side, NEE has positioned itself well during the ongoing global trade war by shifting its tariff exposure to suppliers and contracting with domestic battery manufacturers. While we acknowledge the potential of NEE to grow, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an AI stock that is more promising than NEE and that has 100x upside potential, check out our report about this cheapest AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 Cheap Energy Stocks to Buy Now and 10 Most Undervalued Energy Stocks to Buy According to Hedge Funds Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

US consumer spending slows in April; inflation rises moderately
US consumer spending slows in April; inflation rises moderately

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US consumer spending slows in April; inflation rises moderately

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. consumer spending increased marginally in April as a rush to beat higher prices from import duties slowed. Consumer spending, which accounts for more than two-thirds of economic activity, rose 0.2% last month after an unrevised 0.7% jump in March, the Commerce Department's Bureau of Economic Analysis said on Friday. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast consumer spending climbing 0.2%. Pre-emptive buying of goods ahead of President Donald Trump's sweeping import tariffs helped to push spending higher in the prior month. Most of the tariffs have been implemented though higher duties on goods have been delayed until July. Duties on Chinese imports have been slashed to 30% from 145% until mid-August. Economists have argued that Trump's aggressive trade policy will sharply slow economic growth this year and boost inflation, concerns echoed by Federal Reserve officials. Minutes of the U.S. central bank's May 6-7 meeting published on Wednesday noted "participants judged that downside risks to employment and economic activity and upside risks to inflation had risen, primarily reflecting the potential effects of tariff increases." The U.S. central bank has kept its benchmark overnight interest rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range since December. A U.S. trade court on Wednesday blocked most of Trump's tariffs from going into effect in a sweeping ruling that the president overstepped his authority. They were temporarily reinstated by a federal appeals court on Thursday, adding another layer of uncertainty over the economy's outlook. The economy by all measures contracted at a 0.2% annualized rate in the first quarter after growing at a 2.4% pace in the October-December quarter. With the exception of trade data, most official economic reports are yet to show the negative effects of tariffs in a significant way, though sentiment surveys have deteriorated. Economists expect the hit could become evident in June data. Inflation was benign in April, with retailers likely still selling inventory accumulated before the tariffs. The Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index rose 0.1% last month after being unchanged in March, the BEA said. In the 12 months through April, PCE prices increased 2.1% after advancing 2.3% in March. Stripping out the volatile food and energy components, the PCE price index gained 0.1% last month. That followed a similar rise in the so-called core PCE inflation in March. In the 12 months through April, core inflation rose 2.5% after climbing 2.7% in March. The Fed tracks the PCE price measures for its 2% inflation target. Economists expect inflation to accelerate this year as tariffs raise goods prices. Consumers' one-year inflation expectations have soared. The Fed minutes on Wednesday showed some policymakers assessed that the surge in short-term inflation expectations "could make firms more willing to raise prices." They also saw a risk that longer-term inflation expectations "could drift upward, which could put additional upward pressure on inflation." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Donald Trump accuses China of violating trade deal, says US tariffs had pushed China into ‘grave economic danger'
Donald Trump accuses China of violating trade deal, says US tariffs had pushed China into ‘grave economic danger'

Business Upturn

time20 minutes ago

  • Business Upturn

Donald Trump accuses China of violating trade deal, says US tariffs had pushed China into ‘grave economic danger'

By News Desk Published on May 30, 2025, 17:45 IST Former US President Donald Trump on Thursday claimed that China had been on the brink of severe economic trouble due to the tariffs imposed during his administration, and accused Beijing of violating a trade agreement made to ease the crisis. In a post on Truth Social, Trump wrote that the high tariffs made it 'virtually impossible' for China to trade into the US market, calling the action equivalent to going 'COLD TURKEY' with China. He said this led to widespread factory closures and 'civil unrest' in China. Trump further stated that he had intervened by negotiating a 'FAST DEAL' to stabilize the situation, not for the US but to prevent a deeper crisis in China. 'Everything quickly stabilized and China got back to business as usual,' he wrote. However, Trump sharply criticized China for what he called a breach of that agreement. 'The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' he said, ending his post with: 'So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' Trump's comments come amid renewed tensions in US-China trade relations as Washington weighs additional tariffs on Chinese goods. News desk at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store