Boy (16) wins €9,000 equality claim over wearing earring at school
A 16-year-old transition year student has won €9,000 in compensation for gender-based discrimination and victimisation after he was punished for wearing an earring to school at the start of term last year.
The Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) has ruled that his school's uniform policy was indirectly discriminatory on gender grounds, favouring female students over males by requiring ear studs to be worn in pairs – and has ordered the rule changed.
The decision on the boy's claim against the school under the Equal Status Act 2000 was published on Tuesday by the tribunal in anonymised form. The school had denied his claim.
The student arrived to school at the start of the new term on August 30th last year with the upper cartilage of his left ear newly pierced and a round silver stud through it, the tribunal heard at hearings in November and December 2024.
READ MORE
The school considered it to be in breach of the uniform rules in its code of behaviour, which forbids 'all body piercings except one small stud in each ear', the tribunal heard.
'I think their intention is that boys don't wear studs ... I think they know boys won't pierce the other ear because they'll be called gay, they'll be called names. They won't go through the hassle of it, and they'll take it out,' the claimant told the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) at a hearing December last.
Asked why he chose to wear the ear stud, the young man said: 'It's my grandad – it's a sense of my personality, following in the footsteps.'
The student's solicitor, Gerard Cullen, said his client was presented with choices to either 'remove the stud or pierce the other ear' or complete the three week healing process with a plaster covering the piercing. He called that 'interference with bodily integrity'.
Counsel for the school Kevin Roche BL, appearing instructed by Mason Hayes and Curran, said that after the young man instructed a solicitor in the matter, he had been sent a legal letter to say he would be considered to be 'in compliance' if he 'covered the ear with plaster'. He said that had already been offered to the young man, and rejected.
The boy's grandmother told the tribunal her husband and all of her sons had worn piercings in their left ears – and that she considered this the usual practice for a man to wear one.
A row broke out at a meeting between the boy and his family and the principal and deputy principal on September 4th, 2024, when the claimant's mother and grandmother came to the school, the tribunal heard.
The complainant's case is that in the weeks that followed he was subject to sanctions, including being placed sitting outside the principal's office, being denied leave to go down to the town on his lunch break, and being assigned to evening detention which would have meant missing his bus home.
The school's position is that it followed its disciplinary code at all times and sought to de-escalate the matter – with its barrister telling the tribunal that the first mention of legal action was on the part the complainant's solicitor.
In his decision, adjudicator Brian Dalton wrote that the 'apparently neutral' rule on ear studs was discriminatory on the grounds of gender.
He added that since the claimant had complained about that rule being unfair, it followed that the sanctions 'solely arose because of [his] objection to an unfair practice' and amounted to victimisation.
Mr Dalton ordered the school to amend its rule on body piercings 'so that it facilitates the wearing of one or two earrings'.
He directed the school to pay €9,000 in compensation to the young man.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Carl O'Brien: ‘Day five is done - and the hardest part is over'
So, day five is done. With English, Irish and maths now tamed, students have already faced down the big beasts of the Leaving Cert with focus and determination. That's something to be truly proud of. It helped that both Irish paper two and biology had such good responses from students and teachers alike. It's a big confidence booster after some challenging maths papers . We were reminded of Dr Tom Crawford, who teaches maths at the University of Oxford and the University of Cambridge, decided to try his hand at the Leaving Cert maths paper in real time on YouTube. His response? 'It was a slog. I need to lie down'. READ MORE Students To students: you've shown resilience, discipline and courage. Every exam you finish is a step closer to the finish line. Whether today went exactly as you hoped or not, remember – it's the overall journey that counts. Keep going. You're doing better than you think. Parents To parents and guardians: your encouragement, patience and quiet support make all the difference. This is the foundation helping these young people stay grounded and keep striving. There are still papers ahead, but the hardest part – getting into the rhythm and facing the fear – is done. Post-marking adjustment: how will it work exactly? We've had a few queries from parents asking about how the postmarking adjustment will affect exam results this year. As you may know, exams will be marked as normal and, when this is completed, the grades will be increased to a level that is 5.5 per cent above pre-Covid norms on aggregate. These marks that are added on at the end are separate from the marks a candidate gets in the exam itself: you'll be able to see how much has been added on in each subjects in the candidate portal in late August. Will all exam results be inflated by 5.5 per cent? No – and the extent to which marks are added will vary. For example, last year authorities were aiming to keep the 2024 results the same, on aggregate, as the 2023 results. The gap between then was narrower at the upper grades and wider at the lower grades. So, the postmarking adjustment gave more marks at the lower end of the marking scale than at the upper end to deal with this. For example, the adjustment was +12.1 per cent of the examination total at the very bottom of the marking scale, and gradually reduced to +4.8 per cent of the exam total at the very top of the scale. We hope that clears it up for you. If you have any further questions, feel free to fill in this below. How are we doing? If you are a parent/ guardian of a Leaving Cert student, we'd love to hear from you. Maybe you have a personal story to share, have a burning question or want to comment on the exams, CAO and further education applications process. Please click the link to send us your questions or feedback: ingCert
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Marian Finucane and John Clarke's home goes on sale at €1.35m
Address : Stream House, Naas, Co Kildare Price : €1,350,000 Agent : JP & M Doyle View this property on Stream House, outside the village of Kilteel, Co Kildare , is a contemporary pavilion-style property that was the home of the late broadcaster Marian Finucane , who died in 2020, and her husband John Clarke , who died earlier this year. The five-bedroom property may be utterly modern but it has all the warmth and expansive range that was the renowned RTÉ broadcaster's signature. Marian Finucane, who died in 2020, with her husband John Clarke, who died this year. Photograph: Alan Betson [ Marian Finucane: Memorable quotes and broadcasting moments Opens in new window ] Constructed in a T-shape, it opens into a welcomingly large hall that leads through to a room painted cerulean blue and to a library lined in pale oak bookcases filled to the rafters. A roomy chaise longue with a punchy coloured rug create a comfortable, ambient reading room. No doubt a copy of Finucane & Me: My Life with Marian, written by Clarke, which was shortlisted for the Irish Book Awards in 2023, sits on one of the shelves. READ MORE [ John Clarke on missing his wife Marian Finucane: 'I didn't realise how much we chatted' Opens in new window ] The library opens into an inner hall and through to a vaulted-roof corridor where more books line its length. Artworks and objects from the couple's many travels fill the walls and shelves. The large square kitchen is to the right and opens out to a wraparound patio and the lawn. Adjacent to this is the livingroom, another long room with a vast sofa that could fit an entire rugby team. The property has five bedrooms, all of which are en suite. The principal bedroom has a large bathroom with his and hers sinks and a doorway leading out to the paved terrace. It's a lovely quirk that affords private enjoyment of the lovely grounds. The kitchen The hall Living room The Japanese-style garden The house is surrounded by Japanese-inspired ornamental gardens that are also blessedly low maintenance. The property is set on 22 acres with post and rail paddocks and a well-appointed stable yard. There is excellent equestrian potential here for both amateurs and professionals as this is prime thoroughbred county. The B2 Ber-rated residence is seeking €1.35 million through agents JP & M Doyle.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Animal Farm – Frank McNally on how 'Skin-the-Goat' Fitzharris was radicalised by the killing of a fox
James 'Skin the Goat' Fitzharris (1833 – 1910), about whom we were talking here last week, was synonymous with an animal he supposedly turned into a rug after he caught it eating straw from his horse's collar. Less well known is how the death of another four-legged creature, back in the 1830s, may have helped send the infamous cab driver to the scene of the Phoenix Park Murders half a century later. I'm indebted for the story to reader Brian Garvey, whose wife has ancestral connections to Fitzharris's Sliabh Buidhe (aka Bhui), 'where a crow never flew over the head of an informer'. She inherited it as part of family lore. But it was written and first published in 1961 by the journalist and former Irish revolutionary, Commandant W.J. Brennan-Whitmore. READ MORE The latter was also from 'Slievebwee', as he spelt it, and his parents' house was the first that Skin-the-Goat visited on his return to Wexford circa 1899, upon release from penal servitude for his part in the 1882 conspiracy. Central to the story was James's father Andrew, an employee of a substantial farmer named Michael Sinnott, whose land was owned by the area's main landlord, the Earl of Courtown. 'One spring morning,' according to Brennan-Whitmore, 'Fitzharris was carting manure from the yard of his employer to the top of a field on Corrig Hill,' while his burdened mare 'zig-zagged' up the incline and Sinnott's large collie dog 'hunted the ditch'. When the mare stopped for a breather, as was her habit, Fitzharris paused too and lit his pipe. He and the dog then waited patiently for the mare to regather herself. Meanwhile, floating on the breeze, came the sound of the Island Fox Hunt (from Ferns), which was somewhere close by. The mare recovered, Fitzharris was about resume the climb when the unfortunate fox, fleeing one pack of hounds, hurdled the ditch and straight into the path of the collie, which promptly seized it. This was bad news for the fox, but also for Fitzharris. He was thrown into a panic, not from animal welfare concerns but because killing foxes in those days was the preserve of the gentry. A mere peasant who did it, especially mid-hunt, could be in big trouble. But despite his attempts to rescue it, the fox was soon dead. 'Terrified,' Fitzharris now looked all around him. There was no-one within sight, it seemed, so he carried the fox's carcase farther up the hill and flung it across the ditch into a dense heap of bushes and briars. When the hunt arrived and the hounds lost the scent, Fitzharris was asked which way the fox went. He pointed towards the mountain, the same Slievebwee, and the hunt rode on. The failure to pick up the scent would now be the dogs' fault, he thought. But a week later, as he was again working in the fields, his wife came running, distressed. They were being evicted, she said. Police and bailiffs had arrived and were throwing the family's belongings 'out on the roadside'. Fitzharris hurried to the scene and grabbed a fork before neighbours pacified him. Then, hearing from the sheriff that the eviction was on the earl's orders, Sinnott intervened: 'Good heavens man, you can't throw a young family out on the side of the road whose father did no wrong and who owes no rent.' Here the landlord's gamekeeper, a man named Rigley, spoke up to say that he had witnessed Fitzharris allow the collie to kill the fox. Hence the eviction, he explained. Fitzharris called him a 'damned liar,' but it was no use. The family was out, and forced to seek shelter that night in a barn owned by a relative. The vindictive landlord and his gamekeeper, however, were not having that either. Learning of the arrangement, they warned the sheltering tenant that if he did not 'put Fitzharris on the road', he would be evicted too. So next, the family sought refuge in a one-roomed hut on a property farmed by a Mr McDonald and owned by another, smaller landlord. The Earl then let it be known that he wanted Fitzharris out of there too. But the smaller landlord and the hut owner both stood up to him and the family remained. According to Brennan-Whitmore, this is where James Fitzharris and his brothers, whom he knew well, grew up: 'James turned into a sturdy stock of a man, processing a fund of humour, with a tendency to harmless devilment and an ability to make ballad poetry. While in jail, he composed a ballad to his 'Old Grey Mare'. I often heard him sing it.' Brennan-Whitmore had enlisted in the Royal Irish Regiment as a teenager, spending five years in India. The experience seems to have radicalised him. He left the British army in 1907 and became an ardent republican who fought in 1916 and later served in the Free State Army before retiring to be a writer. His 1961 account for the Evening Herald, was headlined: 'The authentic story of James Fitzharris, alias 'Skin-the-Goat''. The subhead read: 'His first taste of landlord tyranny as an infant.' As the author told it, the accidental killing of a fox and its consequences may have helped propel Fitzharris to the Phoenix Park one fateful afternoon in 1882.
