Jordan outlaws Muslim Brotherhood opposition group
Photo credit- AP
The Jordanian Interior Ministry said the Islamist opposition group had been linked to a sabotage plot. The group has operated legally for decades, though it is banned in other Arab countries.
The
Jordanian Interior Ministry
outlawed the
Muslim Brotherhood
, the country's most prominent opposition group, on Wednesday, closing its offices and confiscating its assets.
Interior Minister Mazen al-Faraya said the decision was a response to a sabotage plot to which a son of one of the group's leaders had been linked and would take immediate effect.
What did Jordan say about the Muslim Brotherhood ban?
"It has been decided to ban all activities of the so-called Muslim Brotherhood and to consider any [of its] activity a violation of the provisions of the law," Faraya said, adding that any promoters of the group's ideology would be held accountable by law.
"It has been proven that members of the group operate in the dark and engage in activities that could destabilize the country," read an Interior Ministry statement.
"Members of the dissolved Muslim Brotherhood have tampered with security and national unity, and disrupted security and public order."
The ban extends to anything that is published by the group.
Following the announcement, police surrounded and searched the party's headquarters in the capital, Amman.
What is the Muslim Brotherhood?
The Muslim Brotherhood, which is banned in many Arab countries, has operated legally in Jordan for decades.
Its Sunni Islamist ideology and stated goal of establishing a caliphate under sharia law enjoys grass-roots support in major urban centers in Jordan.
The political arm of the Brotherhood in Jordan, the Islamic Action Front (IAF), made significant gains in parliamentary elections in September, tapping into anger over Israel's war against Hamas to win 31 out of 138 seats.
"The Jordanian people have given us their trust by voting for us," said IAF leader Wael al-Saqqa at the time – although turnout was measured at just 32%.
Murad Adailah, the head of the Muslim Brotherhood, said the IAF's victory amounted to a "popular referendum" endorsing the group's support for the Palestinian militant group
Hamas
.
The movement says it publicly renounced violence decades ago and now claims to pursue its Islamist aims using peaceful means.
But opponents maintain that it is a terrorist organization and it is listed as such in
Egypt
, where it originated in the 1920s.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
50 Years ago: Israeli troops kill Arab guerillas
Tel Aviv, June 15: A four-man Arab guerilla death squad from Lebanon attacked the frontier settlement of Kfar Yuval to-day, seizing a house and holding people hostage inside, before Israeli troops killed them in a hail of gunfire, military sources said. Two members of the family were killed and six others, including a seven-month-old baby, were wounded, an Army spokesman said. The guerillas who attacked the co-operative settlement less than a mile south of the hilly frontier were killed by the storming troops, about 24 hours after they attacked. The Arab marauders shot their way into the settlement at dawn, held an Israeli family at gunpoint and demanded that Israel release the Greek Catholic Archbishop of Jerusalem and other Arab prisoners. The Syrian-born Archbishop, Monsignor Hilarion Capucci, was jailed for 12 years in December for smuggling arms to terrorists inside Israel. Troops then surrounded the village and stormed the house. Formations of Israeli warplanes bombed a village and plantations in the Arkoub area of south Lebanon to-day, a Lebanese Defence Ministry communique said. Arkoub is often referred to as Fatahland, home of the Palestine guerilla group. The Israeli air strike came less than one hour after the report of the guerilla raid into the Israeli village.
New Indian Express
6 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Malayalis in Israel fear for safety as conflict with Iran escalates
ALAPPUZHA: As the conflict between Israel and Iran continues to escalate, the Malayali community in Israel is grappling with the reality of life amid a raging war. With missile attack sirens blaring through the day, fear has become a constant. Speaking to TNIE over the phone, Tince James, belonging to Vazhathope in Idukki district and currently residing in the city of Tel Aviv, described the situation as alarming. 'On Saturday night alone, we had to run to the bunker more than three times following missile attack sirens,' Tince said. While most of the Iranian missiles and drones were intercepted by Israel's Iron Dome air defence system, a few managed to hit their targets. 'In one such attack, an Arab family of five living near our apartment complex was killed,' he said. Over 20,000 Malayalis are currently working in Israel, mainly in the agriculture and service sectors. Workers from Kerala were recruited on a large scale after the Israel-Hamas conflict began in October 2023. The Israel government has declared a state of emergency and work has been suspended for the past three days, Tince pointed out. He has been working in Tel Aviv for the past 18 months. Tince had initially come to Israel on an agricultural work visa after the Hamas conflict led to the dismissal of Palestinian workers. Hundreds of Keralites had reached Israel under similar circumstances. However, many later switched to other jobs due to the physically demanding nature of agricultural work. Tince is currently residing in Israel under a UN Refugee visa and is employed in the hospitality sector as a daily wage worker.
Mint
6 hours ago
- Mint
The Israel-Iran war is now a brutal test of staying power
IN TEL AVIV and Tehran rescue crews are looking for survivors in piles of rubble. The missile and air war that Israel and Iran have spent decades planning for has come, and it is spectacular and terrifying. Israeli officials say they need at least two weeks to degrade Iran's nuclear and missile capabilities. That means the struggle ahead is a test of staying power for both countries. Yet even then Israel may need America to deliver a knockout blow to Iran's deeply buried nuclear sites. For Israel, the coming days are all about momentum: if it maintains an aura of success it may be able to draw in President Donald Trump. But if the pace of damage to nuclear sites slows and casualties spiral, he may push to end the war before Israel has achieved its aims. A hasty ceasefire could leave Iran with a huge incentive to rush to restore its nuclear programme. Israel has launched hundreds of air strikes since the early hours of June 13th. Iran has responded with salvoes of ballistic missiles and drones, although only a handful have penetrated Israel's defence systems. Israel's official objective is 'removing an existential threat" from Iran's nuclear programme and ballistic missiles. It has prioritised striking Iranian headquarters, the homes of generals and missile-launchers, and achieving air dominance over Iran. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) chief of staff, Eyal Zamir, has said the 'road to Tehran has been opened". Yet crucially the damage done to Iran's nuclear sites so far is limited. Three days into the war, only two main sites have been hit, in Natanz and Isfahan, along with some minor ones. Israeli analysts assess the IDF has at most hit a third of the nuclear programme, which would set it back by months, not years. Israel has yet to attack underground nuclear facilities, including the large uranium-enrichment plant in Fordow (though there have been Israeli strikes above ground at Fordow). Israeli officials say this will take place soon. But Israel may lack sufficiently powerful 'bunker-buster" bombs to totally destroy the subterranean enrichment plants. Another 10-20 days of bombardment will test the resilience of both societies. They have obvious things in common: a tradition of learning and science and being non-Arab nations in an often inhospitable Arab-dominated region. They were allies until Iran's Islamic revolution in 1979. Less well known is that their military strategies both reflect missile wars with Iraq. In the Iran-Iraq conflict of the 1980s the 'War of the Cities" saw Iraq launch Soviet Scuds at Tehran and other cities, eventually forcing Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, Iran's then leader, to 'drink from the poisoned chalice" and sign a ceasefire agreement in 1988. Later, during the Gulf war in 1991 Iraq's leader, Saddam Hussein, ordered Scuds to be fired at Israel. Iran's large arsenal reflects this legacy: its home-grown industry was jump-started by Libya and North Korea and can build thousands of missiles each year. Iran also launched a nuclear programme, with uranium-enrichment plants built deep underground in bunkers in the 2000s. Israel, meanwhile, invested in its own missile-defence systems and acquired from America squadrons of fighters which were modified with additional fuel-tanks and electronic-warfare systems, enabling them to carry out long-range strikes. Israel required all new homes to have at least one room capable of serving also as a reinforced bomb-shelter. These respective arsenals are now being unleashed by each side with devastating consequences. Israel's staying power is partly a question of defending the homeland: in the first 48 hours of the war Iran launched around 300 missiles and 150 drones towards Israel. Most were intercepted by Israel, with help from American forces in the region. The handful that got through destroyed dozens of buildings, killing at least 14 people, and damaged Israel's main military headquarters, in Tel Aviv, and an oil refinery in Haifa, in the north. The physical damage is less bad than expected. The financial bill is huge: Israel's wars since October 2023 have cost around $85bn, but this was before the latest stage with Iran. An economist advising the government puts the direct costs of jet-fuel and munitions for the war against Iran at around $300m a day: 'This government is prepared to pay whatever price for the war in Iran, including depleting the reserves and putting Israel in debt for generations to come." Much now depends on Israel's capability to destroy Iranian missile-launchers before Israel's stockpiles of interceptor missiles are depleted. Iran, meanwhile, had 2,000 missiles capable of reaching Israel when the war began, according to Israeli intelligence. Many have now either been fired or destroyed by Israel, but the Iranians will almost certainly retain enough, stored underground, to keep landing blows on Israel each night. It is still possible Iran achieves a spectacular hit on Israel that either kills many civilians or destroys a strategic site. Yet the rate of attrition inside Iran will be worse, with the gradual destruction of most of its missile and nuclear infrastructure looming. It entered the war at a strategic disadvantage. Its proxy, Hizbullah, was crippled by Israeli strikes last September. Iran faces an economic crisis, making its leadership vulnerable to internal unrest. Israel has also bombed two civilian fuel plants, indicating it could push that wobbly economy over the brink. At a minimum Israel's leaders believe this pressure may force Iran's leaders to consider a deal with Mr Trump, in which it would be forced to dismantle what remains of its nuclear and missile programmes. To raise the temperature Israel is playing up the prospect of internal unrest in Iran that could endanger Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader, and his inner circle and even the entire regime. While Israeli officials say regime change is not an objective, on June 13th Binyamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister, addressed the Iranian people, saying 'this is your opportunity to stand up" to a system 'which has oppressed you for almost 50 years". But these Israeli hopes for capitulation or regime change may not be realistic. 'The regime's survival is the utmost concern of the supreme leader," says Raz Zimmt, of Israel's National Institute for Strategic Studies. 'But at the same time, he sees Iran's nuclear capability, especially uranium enrichment, as a cornerstone of that survival. Having to choose between them is like choosing between two chalices of poison." Without capitulation or regime change in Iran, Israel's war makes sense only if it can set back the nuclear programme by years. 'Iran can't beat Israel, but Israel probably doesn't have the capabilities to entirely destroy Iran's nuclear programme either," says Amos Yadlin, former chief of Israel's military intelligence. Whether America, which does have the necessary bunker-busting bombs, will join the fight, is unclear. Speaking on June 15th Mr Trump sat on the fence: 'We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved." Israel's war is going better than it expected. It could yet get American military help. But if it does not it will need another way to end the war it has started. As Mr Yadlin puts it, alongside the military campaign 'we also need a diplomatic exit-strategy, and Netanyahu hasn't been adept at devising one of those."
