Sucro Announces First Quarter 2025 Results
CORAL GABLES, Fla., May 23, 2025 /CNW/ - Sucro Limited (TSXV: SUGR) (OTCQB: SUGRF) ("Sucro" or the "Company"), an integrated sugar refiner focused primarily on serving North American sugar markets, today announced financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2025. All amounts are in United States dollars ("U.S. $" or "$") unless otherwise noted.
Financial Highlights
Revenue of $155.2 million on sugar deliveries of 176,319 metric tons
Net income of $12.0 million for the quarter
Adjusted gross profit 1 of $13.8 million and adjusted gross profit margin 1 of 8.9%
EBITDA 1 of $22.9 million and Adjusted EBITDA 1 of $9.9 million
Adjusted gross profit per metric ton delivered 1 of $78.18
Q1 Highlights
Three Months Ended Mar 31
In 000s of U.S. $ except per share and volume metrics.
2025
2024
Change
Sugar Deliveries (Metric Tons)
176,319
182,865
-3.6 %
Revenue
$155,247
$184,771
-16.0 %
Gross profit
27,070
37,303
-27.4 %
Adjusted gross profit 1
13,785
16,175
-14.8 %
Adjusted gross profit margin 1
8.9 %
8.8 %
EBITDA 1
22,862
31,489
-27.4 %
Adjusted EBITDA 1
9,897
10,914
-9.3 %
Adjusted EBITDA Margin 1
14.73 %
17.04 %
Net Income (Loss)
12,007
19,739
-39.2 %
Per share (basic)
1.10
2.88
-61.9 %
Per share (diluted)
0.50
0.83
-39.4 %
Adjusted gross profit per metric ton delivered 1,2
78.18
88.45
-11.6 %
Free cash flow 1
1,222
5,004
Refineries Results:
Refineries Volume (Metric Tons)
48,202
46,754
3.1 %
Adjusted gross profit 1
$8,158
$6,741
21.0 %
Adjusted gross profit per metric ton delivered 1
169.25
144.18
17.4 %
1.
Please refer to "Non IFRS and other Financial Measures" below for further details.
2.
Net of cash settlements.
"Our results in the first quarter of 2025 reflect the strength of our integrated supply chain model and the continued execution of our growth strategy," said Jonathan Taylor, Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Sucro. "We are seeing sustained momentum in our core markets, alongside disciplined cost management and a focus on margin-enhancing business."
Results from Operations – Three Months Ended March 31, 2025
Revenue for the quarter was $155.2 million compared to revenue of $184.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024, a decrease of 16.0%. Sugar deliveries of 176,319 metric tons were 3.6% lower than deliveries in the same period of 2024. Adjusted gross profit was $13.8 million, 14.8% lower than the same period a year ago of $16.2 million. Adjusted gross profit margin for 2025 of 8.9% was slightly higher than the 8.8% achieved in 2024. Adjusted gross profit per metric ton delivered was $78.18 and 11.6% lower than 2024 of $88.45. While overall volumes have remained consistent with those of the previous year, we have seen some shifts in their composition, including a decrease in deliveries into Mexico (where the market has normalized after a period of high market prices driven by a disappointing cane crop caused by adverse weather conditions) that has been compensated for with increased U.S. deliveries. The decrease in Adjusted Gross Profit was driven by lower margins from the deliveries of refined sugar out of our Lackawanna refinery. This margin compression resulted from the utilization of raw sugar inputs that were purchased to fulfill production forecasts for fiscal year 2024, when U.S. sugar prices were generally higher than those of today.
Net income for the first quarter was $12.0 million compared to net income for the three months ended March 31, 2024 of $19.7 million, a decrease of 39.2%. EBITDA was $22.9 million, compared to EBITDA of $31.5 million in the corresponding 2024 period, a decrease of 27.4%. Adjusted EBITDA was $9.9 million compared to adjusted EBITDA for the 2024 period of $10.9 million, These decreases were driven primarily by lower unrealized mark-to-market gains on physical sugar contracts and lower Adjusted Gross Profit.
Sucro continues to advance construction on its Hamilton, Ontario and University Park, Illinois cane sugar refineries, expected to be operational in late 2025 and early 2026, respectively. These strategic assets are designed to increase production capacity and improve supply responsiveness in key North American markets.
The Company remains focused on optimizing its refining operations, managing supply chain costs, and expanding commercial relationships with major food and beverage customers. Management continues to monitor global trade developments, including tariff and cross-border policy changes between the U.S., Canada, and Mexico.
Q1 2025 Investor Call
The Company will host a conference call on Friday, November 22, 2024, at 12:00 noon Eastern time during which Jonathan Taylor, Founder and Chief Executive Officer, and Stefano D'Aniello, Chief Financial Officer, will discuss Sucro's financial performance for the first quarter ended March 31, 2025.
About Sucro
Sucro is a growth-oriented sugar company that operates throughout the Americas, with a primary focus on serving the North American sugar market. The Company operates a highly integrated and interconnected sugar supply business, utilizing the entire sugar supply chain to service its customers. Sucro's integrated supply chain includes sourcing raw and refined sugar from countries throughout Latin America, and refined sugar from its own refineries, and delivering to customers in North America and the Caribbean. Since its inception in 2014, Sucro has achieved growth by creating value for customers through continuous process innovation and supply chain re-engineering. Sucro has established a broad production, sales, and sourcing network throughout North America with two cane sugar refineries and an additional value-added processing facility, and two sugar cane refineries under development in Hamilton, Ontario and University Park, Illinois (a suburb of Chicago). The Company has offices in Miami, Mexico City, Cali, Sao Paulo, and Port of Spain. For more information, visit sucro.us and follow us on LinkedIn.
Non-IFRS and Other Financial Measures
In this Press Release, reference is made to the following non-IFRS measures: "EBITDA", "EBITDA Margin", "Adjusted EBITDA", "Adjusted EBITDA Margin", "Adjusted Gross Profit", "Adjusted Gross Profit Margin", "Adjusted Gross Profit Per Metric Ton Delivered", and "Free Cash Flow". Such non-IFRS financial measures are not standardized financial measures under International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") and might not be comparable to similar financial measures disclosed by other issuers. For details on the composition and a reconciliation between such non-IFRS measures and the most directly comparable financial measure in our financial statements, please refer to the "Non-IFRS and Financial Measures (Key Performance Indicators)" section in our MD&A dated May 22, 2025 and filed on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca, which is specifically incorporated by reference herein.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Cision Canada
an hour ago
- Cision Canada
Biggest-ever aid cut by G7 members a death sentence for millions of people, says Oxfam
Aid cuts could cost millions of lives and leave girls, boys, women and men without access to enough food, water, education, health treatment G7 countries are making deliberate and deadly choices by cutting life-saving aid, enabling atrocities, and reneging on their international commitments Low and middle-income countries face reduced aid, rising debt, and trade barriers — a perfect storm that threatens development and recovery. OTTAWA, ON, June 10, 2025 /CNW/ - The Group of Seven (G7) countries, which together account for around three-quarters of all official development assistance, are set to slash their aid spending by 28 percent for 2026 compared to 2024 levels. It would be the biggest cut in aid since the G7 was established in 1975, and indeed in aid records going back to 1960, reveals a new analysis by Oxfam ahead of the G7 Summit in Kananaskis, Canada. "The G7's retreat from the world is unprecedented and couldn't come at a worse time, with hunger, poverty, and climate harm intensifying. The G7 cannot claim to build bridges on one hand while tearing them down with the other. It sends a shameful message to the Global South, that G7 ideals of collaboration mean nothing," said Oxfam International Executive Director Amitabh Behar. 2026 will mark the third consecutive year of decline in G7 aid spending – a trend not seen since the 1990s. If these cuts go ahead, G7 aid levels in 2026 will crash by $44 billion to just $112 billion. The cuts are being driven primarily by the US (down $33 billion), Germany (down $3.5 billion), the UK (down $5 billion) and France (down $3 billion). "Rather than breaking from the Trump administration's cruel dismantling of USAID and other US foreign assistance, G7 countries like the UK, Germany, and France are instead following the same path, slashing aid with brutal measures that will cost millions of lives," said Behar. "These cuts will starve the hungry, deny medicine to the sick, and block education for a generation of girls and boys. This is a catastrophic betrayal of the world's most vulnerable and crippling to the G7's credibility," said Behar. Canada allocated $10.17 billion to official development assistance in 2023/2024. Although its foreign aid budgets have been declining for the past two years, Canada is one of the few G7 countries that as not announced its intention to cut ODA. Oxfam Canada is calling on the federal government to clearly affirm its commitment to combating global inequality by maintaining its international aid budget for the coming years. "The Canadian government's recently announced intention to increase Canada's military spending to meet the NATO target of 2% of GDP makes the announcement all the more necessary. International aid makes a crucial contribution to global stability by focusing on prevention and providing essential services that strengthen social cohesion," said Lauren Ravon, Executive Director of Oxfam Canada. Economic projections show that aid cuts will mean 5.7 million more people across Africa will fall below extreme poverty levels in the coming year, a number expected to rocket to 19 million by 2030. Cuts to aid are putting vital public services at risk in some of the world's poorest countries. In countries like Liberia, Haiti, Malawi, and South Sudan, US aid had made up over 40 percent of health and education budgets, leaving them especially exposed. Combined with a growing debt crisis, this is undermining governments' ability to care for their people. Global aid for nutrition will fall by 44 percent in 2025 compared to 2022: The end of just $128 million worth of US-funded child nutrition programs for a million children will result in an extra 163,500 child deaths a year. At the same time, 2.3 million children suffering from severe acute malnutrition – the most lethal form of undernutrition – are now at risk of losing their life-saving treatments. One in five dollars of aid to poor countries' health budgets are cut or under threat: WHO reports that in almost three-quarters of its country offices are seeing serious disruptions to health services, and in about a quarter of the countries where it operates some health facilities have already been forced to shut down completely. US aid cuts could lead to up to 3 million preventable deaths every year, with 95 million people losing access to healthcare. This includes children dying from vaccine-preventable diseases, pregnant women losing access to care, and rising deaths from malaria, TB, and HIV. G7 countries are not just reneging on commitments to global aid and solidarity, they are fuelling conflicts by allowing grave violations of international law, like in Gaza where people are facing starvation. Whether in Ukraine, the occupied Palestinian territory, the Democratic Republic of the Congo or elsewhere, civilians must always be protected, and aid is often the first line of protection they get. G7 countries are illuminating a double standard that risks more global instability, conflict and atrocities. While G7 countries cut aid, their citizen billionaires continue to see their wealth surge. Since the beginning of 2025, the G7 ultra-rich have made $126 billion, almost the same amount as the group's 2025 aid commitment of $132 billion. At this pace, it would take the world's billionaires less than a month to generate the equivalent of the G7's 2025 aid budget. By taxing the super-rich, the G7 could easily meet their financial commitments to end poverty and climate breakdown, whilst also having billions in new revenue to fight inequality in their own countries. "The world is not short of money. The problem is that it is in the hands of the super-rich instead of the public. Rather than fairly taxing billionaires to feed the hungry, we see billionaires joining government to slash aid to the poorest in order to fund tax cuts for themselves," said Behar. Oxfam is calling on the G7 to urgently reverse aid cuts and restore funding to address today's global challenges. More than 50 years after the United Nations set the target of 0.7 percent for aid spending, most G7 countries remain well below this. Oxfam is also urging the G7 to support global efforts led by Brazil and Spain to raise taxes on the super-rich, and to back the call from the African Union and The Vatican for a new UN body to help manage countries' debt problems. NOTES TO EDITORS According to OECD Data Explorer, the combined annual aid expenditure of the G7 in 2024 was $156.694 billion. Canada spent $7.323 billion, the United States $61.821 billion, Japan $17.583 billion, France $15.047 billion, Germany $31.382 billion, Italy $6.534 billion, and the United Kingdom $17.005 billion. Donor Tracker estimates that the decline in combined annual aid spending of the G7 countries for the period 2024 to 2026 will be -$44,488 billion. In 2024, aid from G7 countries declined by 8 percent, and projections for 2025 point to a sharper drop of 19 percent. Modelling using finds that 5.7 million more Africans would fall below the US$2.15 extreme poverty income level in the next year if Trump's administration succeeds in its aid-reduction ambition. This assumes a 20 percent reduction of aid to Africa, considering that some US aid would be maintained as the US alone accounted for 26 percent of aid to Africa before the cuts. The dismantling of USAID and major aid reductions announced by Western donors threaten to undo decades of progress on malnutrition. A 44 percent drop in funding from 2022 levels could lead to widespread hardship and death. Up to 2.3 million children with severe acute malnutrition risk losing life-saving treatment, warns the Standing Together for Nutrition Consortium. There are 2,968 billionaires in the world, and 1,346 live in G7 countries (45 percent). For real-time updates, follow us on X and Bluesky, and join our WhatsApp channel tailored specifically for journalists and media professionals.
Cision Canada
2 hours ago
- Cision Canada
New Briefing from the Energy Transitions Commission (ETC) Addresses Global Trade Challenges in the Energy Transition
LONDON, June 11, 2025 /CNW/ -- The ETC's new briefing note, Global trade in the energy transition: principles for clean energy supply chains and carbon pricing, highlights how technology progress and carbon pricing can accelerate the global energy transition. However, growing concerns over concentrated supply chains and perceptions that carbon border adjustments are protectionist could significantly delay global progress. The ETC briefing proposes an optimal way forward on two crucial trade-related issues: Developing domestic supply chains: six principles for policy. Carbon pricing and carbon border adjustment mechanisms (CBAMs): gaining global agreement to policies which can drive decarbonisation of "hard to abate" sectors. Nearshoring clean technology supply chains: six principles for policy The cost of several clean energy technologies has plummeted in the last decade. Solar PV module prices dropped 94% since 2011, lithium-ion battery prices fell over 92% since 2010 while doubling in energy density, [1],[2] and in 2024, almost two-thirds of electric vehicles sold in China were cheaper than Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) vehicles of equivalent size and quality. [3] China has led this progress and now holds dominant market shares in multiple clean technologies: this primarily reflects strategic vision, low capital costs, technological innovation and dynamic entrepreneurship rather than simply low labour cost. In response to China's dominance, many countries seek to diversify supply chains through nearshoring. This reflects concerns about "energy security" and a desire to grow local value and employment, but badly designed nearshoring could add significantly to the cost of the energy transition. The ETC therefore proposes six principles to guide optimal policy: 1. Aim for diversified supply chains, not complete autarky (i.e. complete self-reliance). 2. Clarify different dimensions of "security" - economic vs national security – with different implications in different sectors. 3. Tailor policy by technology, focussing nearshoring efforts on sectors where cost-competitive domestic production can be achieved. 4. Base any use of tariffs on factual analysis of current subsidies in compliance with World Trade Organization (WTO) rules. 5. Focus primarily on the location of employment and value-add rather than ownership, recognising that inward investment can be a major driver of technology transfer. 6. Work with China to increase climate finance flows to lower-income countries, supporting accelerated deployment of clean technologies. "In an ideal world, free from geopolitical tensions or supply chain risks, China's stunning technological progress and cost reduction would be welcomed as enabling a faster and cheaper energy transition worldwide. But there are economic and security-related reasons for seeking to develop domestic supply chains. Well-designed policy can ensure that those objectives are met in a way that drives further technological progress and cost reduction," said Adair Turner, Chair of the Energy Transitions Commission. Carbon pricing and CBAMs: gaining global agreement to a vital policy lever In some sectors of the economy, low-carbon technologies are already cost-competitive, but in "hard to abate" sectors such as steel, cement, chemicals and shipping, using available decarbonisation technologies will entail a "green cost premium". Carbon pricing is therefore required to make decarbonisation in these sectors economically feasible. While 53 countries now have some form of carbon pricing, covering over 20% of global emissions, [4] only the EU has prices high enough to significantly influence the economics of decarbonisation. But if one country or bloc, such as the EU, imposes carbon prices on energy-intensive internationally traded sectors, production will shift to other countries which do not impose carbon prices, and no emissions reduction will be achieved – unless equivalent carbon prices are in place. The ideal solution would be globally agreed carbon prices applied to "hard to abate" sectors, and the International Maritime Organization recently agreed a crucial step towards that approach for shipping. [5] Until that approach is in place for other "hard to abate" sectors, CBAMs are essential to support decarbonisation, are not protectionist, and are the only way by which developed countries can take responsibility for imported emissions. The ETC therefore strongly supports the EU imposition of a CBAM and its recent commitment to make the CBAM more robust. Progress towards the ideal internationally agreed solution should, however, be fostered by: Seeking agreement, for instance through the WTO, on international standards for the measurement of carbon intensity. Providing technical assistance to developing countries seeking to deploy carbon pricing. Allocating some of the revenues which will accrue to the EU CBAM to support climate finance flows to lower-income countries. "The world is entering a new industrial era powered by clean energy. Clean industrial projects are flourishing in diverse geographies, opening opportunities for new trade dynamics. But well-designed policies, including carbon pricing, supply-side financial incentives, and demand-side regulations are essential to make projects viable and precipitate final investment decisions." said Faustine Delasalle, Vice-Chair of the Energy Transitions Commission and CEO of Mission Possible Partnership. Global trade in the energy transition: principles for clean energy supply chains and carbon pricing builds on existing ETC analysis, Better, Faster, Cleaner: Securing clean energy technology supply chains. However, the institutions with which ETC's Commissioners are affiliated have not been asked to formally endorse this briefing. [1] Note: Volume-weighted average across passenger EVs, commercial vehicles, buses, 2- and 3-wheelers, and stationary storage; includes cell and pack. 2024 saw a 20% year-over-year decrease from 2023, the largest drop since 2017. See BNEF (2024), 2024 Lithium-Ion Battery Price Survey. [2] BNEF (2023), Long-term Electric Vehicle Outlook. [3] IEA (2025), Trends in electric car affordability. [4] World Bank (2025), Carbon Pricing Dashboard. [5] Reuters (2025), UN shipping agency strikes deal on fuel emissions, CO2 fees.
Cision Canada
2 hours ago
- Cision Canada
Comet Lithium to Launch 2025 Exploration Program at Triple L and Elmer East Properties, Targeting Copper-Nickel and Lithium Anomalies
Highlights: Fieldwork to commence on June 13th at the Triple L and Elmer East properties, in collaboration with Dahrouge Geological Consulting Ltd. Intensive surface exploration program will include 35 traverses across high-priority targets. Triple L Property exploration will focus on refining MAG and TDEM anomalies using a Beep Mat to identify potential copper-nickel mineralization. The 17-day program will involve two experienced field teams, with Comet's VP of Exploration, Vincent Cardin-Tremblay, actively participating in the exploration efforts. ROUYN-NORANDA, QC, June 10, 2025 /CNW/ - Comet Lithium Corporation (TSXV: CLIC) (FSE: 8QY) ("Comet Lithium" or the "Corporation") is pleased to announce the launch of its 2025 Phase 1 Exploration Program, set to begin on June 13, 2025, on its 100%-owned Triple L and Elmer East properties in the Eeyou Istchee James Bay region of the province of Québec. Prospecting Program: A Targeted, First-Pass Program Comet's 17-day field campaign will be conducted in partnership with Dahrouge Geological Consulting Ltd., adding proven technical expertise to the Corporation's exploration efforts. Two experienced field teams will carry out investigation, detailed mapping, sampling, and traverses across 35 planned lines in areas deemed most prospective for mineralization (shown in red in Figures 1 to 5 below). Triple L Property High-priority targets at Triple L Property were identified and selected through the interpretation of 2024 high-resolution magnetic (MAG) and time-domain electromagnetic (TDEM) survey results, alongside satellite image interpretation. Several prospective anomalies will be investigated by the field team, with support from a Beep Mat to refine target detection for potential copper-nickel mineralization. These high-priority zones are highlighted in red on the maps (see Figure 1). Geophysical surveys are not definitive, and the results are still at an early stage of interpretation, with no guarantee of a mineral discovery. The Beep Mat is a portable electromagnetic survey instrument that continuously records subsurface readings as it is pulled along the ground by an operator. It emits a distinctive audible "beep" when a conductive body is detected within approximately three metres. Elmer East Property At the Elmer East Property, priority prospecting targets were identified via satellite image analysis. The high-priority zones, shown in red (Figure 2), represent areas where bedrock is most likely outcropping or sub-outcropping, with potential for lithium-bearing pegmatites. Several outcrops have been identified in the southern block of the Elmer East Property. "We're excited to kick off the 2025 exploration program at our Triple L and Elmer East properties," said Vincent Metcalfe, Chair and CEO of Comet Lithium. "This initial phase is a critical step in advancing our portfolio, and our systematic, first-pass approach is designed to efficiently evaluate multiple high-priority target areas. At Triple L, identifying copper-nickel showings is a key focus, and our early geophysical interpretation and satellite analysis have revealed highly promising anomalies. With the expertise of our field teams and partners, we're well positioned to uncover meaningful mineralization and unlock the broader potential of both properties." Qualified Person Vincent Cardin-Tremblay, P. Geo (ogq #1386, PGO #3347), registered in the Provinces of Québec, and Ontario is Vice President Exploration to Comet Lithium, is a qualified person under National Instrument 43‑101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. He has reviewed the technical contents of this news release and has approved the disclosure of the technical information contained herein. About Dahrouge Geological Consulting Ltd. Dahrouge Geological Consulting Ltd. Is a global mining and mineral exploration consulting group providing expertise in professional geological, logistical, and project management services through all stages of the mining value chain. Based in Edmonton, AB, CAN, Montreal, QC, CAN, and Denver, CO, USA, Dahrouge and its predecessor, Halferdahl and Associates, have advised and assisted clients in identifying, exploring, developing, and optimizing mineral projects and resources since 1971. About Comet Lithium Corporation Comet Lithium is a dynamic exploration company with a growing portfolio of highly prospective assets located in Québec, including several properties in the prolific James Bay District. The Company's land package includes the Liberty Property, located adjacent to Winsome Resources' Adina lithium discovery, and the Troilus East Property, positioned next to Troilus Gold's gold-copper project. Comet's strategy is focused on systematic exploration and unlocking the value of its diverse property portfolio through targeted fieldwork and strategic partnerships. Forward-Looking Statements This news release contains statements that may constitute "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking information may include, among others, statements regarding the future plans, costs, objectives or performance of Comet Lithium, or the assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. In this news release, words such as "may", "would", "could", "will", "likely", "believe", "expect", "anticipate", "intend", "plan", "estimate" and similar words and the negative form thereof are used to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements should not be read as guarantees of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of whether, or the times at or by which, such future performance will be achieved. No assurance can be given that any events anticipated by the forward-looking information will transpire or occur, including if any planned exploration programs on the Triple L and Elmer East Properties, including the planned phase 1 exploration program described in this press release, will occur, the timing to conduct such exploration program and the results of such exploration programs, and if it does so, what benefits Comet Lithium will derive from any such exploration programs. Forward-looking information is based on information available at the time and/or management's good-faith belief with respect to future events and are subject to known or unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other unpredictable factors, many of which are beyond Comet Lithium's control. These risks, uncertainties and assumptions include, but are not limited to the risks, uncertainties and assumptions described under "Financial Instruments" and "Risk and Uncertainties" in Comet Lithium's Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, a copy of which is available on SEDAR+ at and could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements. Comet Lithium does not intend, nor does it undertake any obligation, to update or revise any forward-looking information contained in this news release to reflect subsequent information, events or circumstances or otherwise, except if required by applicable laws. Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of the release.
