Marjorie Taylor Greene Grilled Point-Blank Over Her 'Very Racist' Statue Of Liberty Post
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) was challenged on Thursday to explain why she posted an image of the Statue of Liberty in a burqa following New York Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani's apparent victory in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary.
The far-right lawmaker, who has a history of anti-Islam remarks, captioned the picture: 'This hits hard.'
The post was widely condemned as Islamophobic and interpreted as a dig at Mamdani, who will become New York City's first Muslim mayor if elected in November. Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) blasted the post as 'very racist' and 'so outside the mainstream.'
Mamdani has been the subject of multiple Islamophobic attacks from the right since his win.
On The Hill's 'Rising' show, co-host Niall Stanage brought up the image of the Statue of Liberty (which, ironically, was initially conceived of as being a Muslim woman in traditional Islamic dress) with Greene and asked: 'What did you mean by that?'
Greene responded: 'Well, I'm an American woman and I have all the freedoms in the world to never have to bow to a religion that would force me to cover my body up and only see my eyes and my fingertips and that is a major threat for all American women, and I think that's something that hits hard for all women.'
When Stanage asked whether the post was a specific response to Mamdani's win, Greene appeared not to hear the question and said: 'Oh, a Muslim takeover or possibly Shariah law. That is a great threat to every single American woman, and I think that's something all women should never want or allow to happen in America.'
Stanage pushed back, noting, 'It's up to the voters of New York City to elect whoever they wish to elect, whether that person is Muslim or Christian or Jewish or anything else. So what is the evidence…'
Greene interrupted: 'Well, of course voters have the right to elect that and I'll maintain my right to say that I think Shariah law and women being forced to wear burqas is the greatest threat to our freedoms as American women.'
When asked directly whether she opposes Muslims holding elected office, Greene avoided answering and said instead: 'I am 100% opposed to Shariah law in America. 100% unapologetically opposed to Shariah law in America.'
Watch the exchange here:
The Statue Of Liberty Was Initially Designed To Be A Muslim Woman
Dem Sen. Patty Murray Trolls Trump With Hilariously Brutal Taste Of His Own Medicine
Karoline Leavitt's 'Have To Save Face' Jab Instantly Backfires
Mary Trump Exposes Uncle's 'Grotesque Exploitation' Of Religion With Some Family History
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Conservative Josh Hawley introduces bill to raise federal minimum wage to $15 an hour
WASHINGTON - Ultraconservative Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley introduced a bill on June 10 with Democratic Vermont Sen. Peter Welch to raise the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour, making him one of the few Republicans to support the cause. The bill, dubbed the 'Higher Wages for American Workers Act,' would raise the minimum wage starting in January 2026 and allow it to increase on the basis of inflation in subsequent years. The federal minimum wage is currently $7.25 per hour and it's been unchanged since 2009. It is unclear whether the legislation will be taken up for a vote. Members of Congress have previously tried to raise the minimum wage, but to no avail. In 2021, Democratic lawmakers tried to tack a $15 per hour minimum wage provision in former President Joe Biden's $1.9 trillion coronavirus package, but a Senate official ruled that the measure couldn't be included in the bill. President Donald Trump said in December 2024 that he would 'consider' raising the minimum wage. However, he revoked a 2024 executive order that set the minimum wage for federal contractors at $17.75. 'For decades, working Americans have seen their wages flatline," Hawley said in a statement. One major culprit of this is the failure of the federal minimum wage to keep up with the economic reality facing hardworking Americans every day." Welch, a member of the Senate Finance Committee, echoed a similar sentiment. 'Every hardworking American deserves a living wage that helps put a roof over their head and food on the table–$7.25 an hour doesn't even come close,' he said. The Employment Policies Institute, a think tank dedicated to researching employment growth, opposed Hawley and Welch's push, arguing that it would result in a loss of jobs. 'Sen. Hawley should know better,' Rebekah Paxton, research director of the institute, said in a news release. 'This proposal would more than double the minimum wage and slash over 800,000 jobs. An overwhelming majority of economists agree that drastic minimum wage hikes cut employment, limit opportunities for workers, and shutter businesses.' The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found in an analysis that raising the minimum wage would 'raise the earnings and family income of most low-wage workers' but would cause other low-income workers to lose their jobs and their family income to fall. Hawley in February teamed up with progressive firebrand Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders to introduce a bill capping credit card interest rates at 10%, saying it would "provide meaningful relief to working people." He's also been a vocal critic of Medicaid cuts. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Josh Hawley introduces bill to raise federal minimum wage to $15
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump Management 101: World leaders adapt to his erratic diplomacy with flattery and patience
LONDON (AP) — If world leaders were teaching a course on how to deal with U.S. President Donald Trump early in his second term, their lesson plan might go like this: Pile on the flattery. Don't chase the policy rabbits he sends running across the world stage. Wait out the threats to see what, specifically, he wants, and when possible, find a way to deliver it. With every Oval Office meeting and summit, the leaders of other countries are settling on tactics and strategy in their pursuit of a working relationship with the emboldened American leader who presides over the world's largest economy and commands its most powerful military. The results were there to see at NATO, where leaders heaped praise on Trump, shortened meetings and removed contentious subjects from the agenda. Given that Trump dominates geopolitics, foreign leaders are learning from each other's experiences dating to Trump's first term, when he reportedly threatened to withdraw the U.S. from the alliance. Among the learnable Trumpisms: He disdains traditional diplomacy. With him, it's ' America first,' it's superlative — and ' it's not even close. ' He goes with his gut, and the world goes along for the ride. They're finding, for example, that the sheer pace of Trump's orders, threats and social posts can send him pinging from the priority of one moment to another. He describes himself as 'flexible' in negotiations, such as those in which he threatened big tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China only to back down during talks. And while Trump claimed credit for the ceasefire in the Iran-Israel war, he also has yet to negotiate ending the conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza as promised. Trump's threat this week to levy retaliatory tariffs on Spain, for example, 'is a mystery to everyone,' Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever told reporters Thursday during a summit in Brussels. If the tariffs never happen, he said, 'It won't be the first time that things don't turn out as bad as they seem at first glance. Or that he changes his mind. I'm not the kind of leader who jumps every time Mr. Trump says something.' Trump management 101: Discipline vs 'daddy diplomacy' Two summits this month, an ocean apart — the Group of Seven in Canada and NATO in The Netherlands — illustrate contrasting approaches to the American president on the brink of his 6th month back in office. Meeting in mid-June in Alberta, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney welcomed Trump at a press conference by wishing him a happy birthday and adding a smidgen of flattery: 'The G7 is nothing without U.S. leadership and your personal leadership of the United States.' But when Trump turned partisan, Carney cut off the event, saying: 'We actually have to start the meeting.' Trump appeared to nod in agreement. But later, on Monday, June 16, he abruptly departed the summit a day early as the conflict between Israel and Iran intensified. Trump ordered U.S. pilots to drop 30,000-pound bombs early Sunday on two key underground uranium enrichment plants in Iran, and by Wednesday announced on social media 'a Complete and Total ceasefire.' What followed was a 48-hour whirlwind during which Trump veered from elated to indignant to triumphant as his fragile Israel-Iran ceasefire agreement came together, teetered toward collapse and ultimately coalesced. Trump publicly harangued the Israelis and Iranians with a level of pique and profanity that was notable even for him. Chiding the two countries for attacking each other beyond a deadline, he dropped the f-word. Not finished, he then cast doubt on his support for NATO's mutual defense guarantee. Such was the president's mood as he winged toward a meeting of the trans-Atlantic alliance he had disparaged for years. NATO was ready for Trump with a summit set to please him NATO is essentially American, anyway. The Europeans and Canadians cannot function without American heavy lift, air refueling, logistics and more. Most of all, they rely on the United States for its range of nuclear weapons for deterrence. The June 25 summit was whittled down to a few hours, and one Trump-driven subject: Raising the amount of money the member nations spent on defense to lighten the load carried by the United States. Emphatically not on the agenda: Russia's ongoing war with Ukraine. Trump did, however, meet with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who has climbed his own learning curve on Trump management since Trump berated him in the Oval Office in February. The Ukrainian leader has deployed a conciliatory approach and mirrored Trump's transactional style. The goal, widely reported, was to avoid doing anything that might cause Trump to blow up the event or leave. Trump was invited to stay at the royal palace in The Hague and dine with the royal family. It was expected that most members would endorse the plan to raise their spending targets for their one-for-all defense against Russia. The other NATO ambassadors had told Secretary-General Mark Rutte to deploy his Trump-whispering skills. He sent the president a private, presummit text predicting Trump would achieve 'BIG' success there, which Trump posted on his own socials for all to see. At the summit, Rutte likened Trump's role quieting the Iran-Israel war to a 'daddy' interdicting a schoolyard brawl. 'He likes me,' Trump explained. Backlash was stiff. Lithuania's former foreign minister called Rutte's approach 'the gushings of weakness and meekness.' 'The wording appears to have been stolen from the adult entertainment industry,' Gabrielius Landsbergis tweeted. 'It reduces Europe to the state of a beggar — pitiful before our Transatlantic friends and Eastern opponents alike.' It was the latest confirmation that complimenting is a favorite way for leaders to deal with him, if not a popular one in some circles. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been using the tactic since at least 2018, when he called Trump 'the greatest friend Israel has ever had,' and even named a settlement in the Golan Heights after him. The late Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe plied him with multiple rounds of golf. French President Emmanuel Macron invited Trump to be the guest of honor at Bastille Day in 2017, featuring an elaborate military parade. What Trump left behind Rutte found a way to make Trump's demand that member countries spend 5% of their gross domestic product on defense work. Their military support to Ukraine could count as a substantial slice of that money. But the agreement left big issues unresolved, including a U.S. troop reduction that is likely to be announced later in the year, and the potential for a resulting security vacuum. Posters on social media referred to NATO as the 'North Atlantic Trump Organization.' 'This summit has all been about managing him, and it's all been about trying to get him to say the right thing in the right moment,' Fiona Hill, a former senior White House national security adviser to three U.S. presidents, including Trump, told the BBC. By the end of the summit, participants were declaring it a success as much for what it prevented as for what was accomplished. Trump showed up. He did not blow it up, leave early or start fights. And critically, NATO survived — indeed, with Trump declaring himself a changed man where the alliance is concerned. And his night in the palace? He said he'd 'slept beautifully.'
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Supreme Court delivers for Trump
Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here THE SUPREME COURT on Friday delivered a victory for President Trump by limiting the ability of federal judges to issue nationwide injunctions on a birthright citizenship case. Trump called the 6-3 decision, which cut along ideological lines, a 'monumental victory for the Constitution, the separation of powers and the rule of law.' 'I was elected on a historic mandate but in recent months we've seen a handful of radical left judges effectively try to overrule the rightful power of the president,' Trump said at an impromptu press conference that also served as a victory lap. 'It was a grave threat to democracy, frankly, and instead of merely ruling on the immediate cases before them, these judges have attempted to dictate the law for the entire nation,' he added. Federal district court judges have issued dozens of nationwide injunctions blocking Trump's orders on tariffs, immigration and many other issues. Attorney General Pam Bondi said 35 of the 40 nationwide injunctions issued this year had come from five of the nation's 94 federal judicial districts. 'They turned district courts into the imperial judiciary,' she said. 'Active liberal judges have used these injunctions to block nearly all of President Trump's polices.' The ruling deals a blow to Democratic efforts to block some of Trump's more controversial executive orders from going into effect. 'These injunctions — known as 'universal injunctions' — likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has granted to federal courts,' Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote, representing the six conservative justices. Trump said the ruling gives him free range to press ahead on all of the cases that have been blocked by nationwide injunctions. 'Thanks to this decision, we can now properly file to proceed with these numerous policies and those that have been wrongly enjoined on a nationwide basis, including birthright citizenship, ending sanctuary city funding, suspending refugee resettlement, freezing unnecessary funding, stopping federal taxpayers from paying for transgender surgeries and numerous other priorities of the American people,' Trump said. BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP HANGS IN THE BALANCE The ruling was ostensibly about Trump's executive order restricting birthright citizenship, which had been blocked by a nationwide injunction. That order can go into effect in some parts of the country for now, although the issue has not been resolved. The Hill's Zach Schonfeld explains: 'For now, the justices narrowed the lower court rulings to only block Trump's order as applied to the 22 Democratic-led states, expectant mothers and immigration organizations that are suing. The Trump administration can now resume developing guidance to implement the order, though they must wait 30 days before attempting to deny citizenship to anyone.' The ruling will allow plaintiffs to coordinate class action lawsuits against Trump's birthright citizenship order, which curbs birthright citizenship for people born on U.S. soil if they don't have at least one parent with permanent legal status. Every lower court has so far found the order unconstitutional. And the three liberal justices issued a fiery defense. 'No right is safe in the new legal regime the Court creates,' Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote on behalf of the liberal justices. 'Today, the threat is to birthright citizenship. Tomorrow, a different administration may try to seize firearms from law-abiding citizens or prevent people of certain faiths from gathering to worship,' she added. The birthright citizenship case is expected to return to the Supreme Court in the fall after the high court's summer break. TRUMP CELEBRATES LGBTQ RULING The Supreme Court on Friday also ruled 6-3 along ideological lines in favor of a group of Maryland parents seeking to opt their children out of classroom sessions using books with LGBTQ themes. 'In the absence of an injunction, the parents will continue to be put to a choice: either risk their child's exposure to burdensome instruction, or pay substantial sums for alternative educational services,' Justice Samuel Alito wrote on behalf of the six conservative justices. 'As we have explained, that choice unconstitutionally burdens the parents' religious exercise.' The court's three liberal justices dissented. 'The result will be chaos for this Nation's public schools,' Sotomayor wrote. 'The harm will not be borne by educators alone: Children will suffer too,' she added. 'Classroom disruptions and absences may well inflict long-lasting harm on students' learning and development.' The parents were represented by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty and backed by the Trump administration. 'It's a great ruling for parents,' Trump said. 'They lost control of the schools, they lost control of their child.' The authors in the LGBTQ case called the ruling 'discriminatory and harmful.' MORE COURT ACTION • The Supreme Court ruled that Texas's age-verification law for porn websites is constitutional and does not violate the First Amendment. • The court upheld a multibillion-dollar subsidy program that funds phone and internet services in rural areas and schools, rejecting a conservative group's claims that Congress delegated too much power in setting it up. • Justices upheld the constitutionality of an ObamaCare requirement that insurance companies cover certain preventive care recommended by an expert panel. • The Supreme Court will hear a new round of arguments over Louisiana's addition of a second majority-Black congressional district, which could have ramifications over the future of the Voting Rights Act. 💡Perspectives: • The Hill: Trump defies the skeptics and conquers Europe. • The Hill: Trump must provide maximum support for Iran's people. • The Atlantic: Trump's deportation goals are unrealistic. • Jerusalem Post: 12 observations following the 12 day war. Read more: • Barrett, Jackson spar in birthright citizenship case opinions. • US signs agreements with Guatemala, Honduras to take asylum-seekers. • Abrego Garcia asks to delay release from jail amid threats of deportation. President Trump said Friday he's suspending trade talks with Canada and would announce within a week a higher tariff rate on the U.S.'s northern neighbor. The Trump administration reached an agreement with China focused on rare earth exports to the U.S., building on previous talks between the two nations that eased tariffs on imports from Beijing. Stocks reached record highs before retreating on the Canada trade talk news. Iranian leaders say they'll no longer cooperate with the United Nation's watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), following U.S. strikes on Tehran's nuclear facilities. Trump said Friday he'd consider bombing Iran again if the U.S. gathers intelligence that raises concerns about the country's uranium enrichment capabilities © Greg Nash Senate Republicans are regrouping after Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough dashed their plan to achieve billions in savings through cuts to Medicaid. The Senate referee determined that the Medicaid cuts in President Trump's agenda bill did not adhere to the Byrd Rule, and therefore would be subject to a Democratic filibuster, which would require 60 votes to overcome. Republicans don't appear to even have a simple 51-vote majority for the bill at this point, so they're on the hunt for a workaround. The surprise decision on Medicaid means Republicans must find hundreds of billions in additional spending cuts in order to account for the lost government revenue from their efforts to make some tax cuts permanent. 'We have contingency plans, plan B, plan C,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), who met with Trump at the White House on Thursday. The Senate's work is poised to spill into the weekend, with senators saying Friday afternoon they expect the first vote on Saturday. Trump said Friday his July 4 deadline for passage is 'not the end all,' suggesting he's open to giving lawmakers more time to find consensus. The Senate Parliamentarian has so far struck nearly two dozen pieces from the megabill, most recently ruling against religious college tax carve-outs, gun silencer deregulation and text that would prohibit federal subsidies for health plans that cover abortion services. Thune said he won't seek to override the parliamentarian, earning the ire of conservative hardliners. 'Thune needs to over rule her or FIRE HER!!!' Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) posted on X. 'We need leaders with courage not weak men who refuse to use their power in order to do the right thing!!!' Trump said Friday that MacDonough has 'been a little difficult.' 'I'd say I disagree with the parliamentarian on some things, and in other ways she's been fine, but we'll have to see,' he said. The Republicans got one win Friday, with the parliamentarian green-lighting their rewritten text that would require states to cover a share of food benefits under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. The Trump administration is engaged in a maximum pressure campaign on Congressional Republicans amid deep divisions over spending, taxes and Medicaid cuts. The president held an event at the White House on Thursday with 'ordinary Americans' he says the bill will help, including tipped workers, border patrol and law enforcement. Even if the bill makes it through the Senate, opposition is mounting in the House over the upper chamber's changes to the bill. Five House Republicans say they'll oppose the bill if it includes a provision to sell public lands for development. However, House Republicans from high-tax blue states are honing in on an agreement with the Trump administration for the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap, which has been a major point of contention. Still, the deal will have to be approved by Senate Republicans to be finalized. 'There's a tentative deal between the SALT and White House, but not the Senate [which is] still talking through that,' Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) said. Republicans are in a tough spot, with every new deal or concession by one faction of the caucus resulting in opposition from another. 'The perfect cannot be the enemy of the good,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Friday. 💡Perspectives: • L.A. Times: Social Security is headed for a cliff. When will voters care? • Roger Marshall: Medicaid is broken. Republicans are trying to save it. • The Liberal Patriot: Industrial policy and the fight for America's future. Read more: • How Medicaid ruling could blow up Senate GOP's plans. • Republicans float revamped proposal for CFPB cuts. • House GOP advances bill 'gutting' government watchdog. • Iran briefing leaves Democrats asking questions. A majority of Americans say the U.S. is on the wrong track, according to the latest survey from Emerson College. Fifty-three percent in the poll said the U.S. is going in the wrong direction, compared to 47 percent who said it's headed in the right direction. President Trump's approval rating is near break-even in the poll, at 45 percent positive and 46 percent negative, down slightly from January, when he was at 49 percent positive and 41 percent negative. Who will become the GOP torchbearer once Trump leaves office? The Emerson survey found Vice President Vance as the clear front-runner at 46 percent support, followed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio at 12 percent and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis at 9 percent. The survey also found that former Vice President Kamala Harris's star has fallen since her election defeat in 2024. The Emerson survey finds former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg leading the pack of potential Democratic presidential contenders at 16 percent, followed by Harris at 13 percent, California Gov. Gavin Newsom at 12 percent and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.) and Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro at 7 percent. A plurality of Democrats, 23 percent, are undecided. ©In a November Emerson survey taken after Harris's election defeat, she held a wide lead over the pack with 37 percent support, a 24-point fall in the latest survey. Politico reports that lack of enthusiasm extends to Harris's potential bid for governor of California, where the donor reception has been cool to her potential candidacy. MEANWHILE… CNN is reporting that former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D), facing a Friday deadline to remove himself from the New York City mayoral race after losing the Democratic primary to Zohran Mamdani, plans to stay on the ballot and run representing the 'Fight and Deliver' party. That means the New York City mayoral race will feature a crowded general election field, including Cuomo, Mamdani, current New York City Mayor Eric Adams (who is running as an independent) and Republican Curtis Sliwa. The Hill's Julia Manchester reports that Republicans will be looking to tie all Democrats to Mamdani's democratic socialist platform in the 2026 midterms, believing they can cast their rivals as too extreme. 'Every Democrat in America is going to have to answer for these insane positions,' Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) told The Hill. 'They own him. This is how radicalized their party has become.' Stefanik appears to be angling to run against Gov. Kathy Hochul (D-N.Y.) in 2026. Mamdani has been met with some criticism from mainstream Democrats. On Friday, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) called on him to denounce the phrase 'globalize the intifada' after he previously defended it. 💡Perspectives: • The Hill: 6 lessons from Zohran Mamdani's victory. • Bernie Sanders: Will Democrats learn from Mamdani's victory? • Whole Hog Politics: New York's not big enough for Cuomo and Adams. • Spiked: Mamdani's progressive intifada will be a disaster for New York. • Salon: The Trump resistance is still 'muscle-building'. Read more: • Gavin Newsom suing Fox News. • House Republicans subpoena Harvard president. • 6 Southern public university systems form new accreditation body. • Seven Democrats vote for GOP resolution condemning LA protests Here's who's talking Sunday… NewsNation's 'The Hill Sunday': Rep. Lori Trahan (D-Mass.); former Sen. Carol Moseley Braun (D-Ill.). Fox's 'Sunday Morning Future': President Trump. Fox's 'Fox News Sunday': Sens. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) and Chris Coons (D-Del.). ABC's 'This Week': Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.); House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.). NBC's 'Meet the Press': New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani (D); Sens. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) and Chris Murphy (D-Conn.). Someone forward this newsletter to you? Sign up to get your own copy: See you next time!
