Australia's Albanese confident on AUKUS after British leader says it will proceed
SYDNEY: Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese (pic) welcomed comments by his British counterpart at the G7 that Britain and the United States will proceed with the AUKUS nuclear submarine treaty with Australia, despite a Pentagon review.
"We're proceeding with that, it's a really important deal to both of us," British Prime Minister Keir Starmer told reporters when asked about AUKUS, standing next to US President Donald Trump after they met on Monday (June 16) to discuss trade and security.
"I think the president is doing a review, we did a review when we came into government so that makes good sense to me," he added.
Albanese had been scheduled to hold his first meeting with Trump the next day to press support for AUKUS, however the White House announced Trump would leave the G7 early and Australian officials said they did not expect a meeting would happen.
"Given what is occurring the Middle East, this is understandable," Albanese's spokesperson said in a statement.
Albanese earlier told reporters that AUKUS held "great advantages" for the three partners.
"That is why we support AUKUS and that is why I am confident that all three nations will continue to provide support for it," he told reporters in Calgary.
In 2023, the United States, Australia and Britain unveiled details of the plan to provide Australia with nuclear-powered attack submarines from the early 2030s to counter China's ambitions in the Indo-Pacific.
A Pentagon official said last week the administration was reviewing AUKUS to ensure it was "aligned with the President's America First agenda". - Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
30 minutes ago
- The Sun
Need for harmonisation of federal and state human rights laws
PUTRAJAYA: The federal and state governments need to harmonise human rights laws to ensure the welfare of the people, particularly on issues concerning family, marriage, and children's rights, said Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Fadillah Yusof. He highlighted the legal dilemmas arising from Malaysia's dual legal system, where British-based laws coexist with Islamic laws focused on family matters. 'Our dilemma in Malaysia stems from the country's historical legal framework because many of our practices are rooted in British laws, alongside the introduction of Islamic laws that emphasise family. 'This has caused conflicts between the laws themselves. So this is what we have to resolve prudently, otherwise it will cause political polemics due to the background of the people (who are multi-racial),' he said at the closing ceremony of the Muzakarah on Human Rights Issues from the Maqasid Shariah perspective, here today. Also present were Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Religious Affairs) Datuk Dr Mohd Na'im Mokhtar and Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) chairman Datuk Seri Mohd Hishamudin Yunus. Fadillah stressed that legal administrative coordination is crucial to address issues such as unregistered marriages conducted abroad, which affect the status and rights of children born from such unions. 'If a marriage is not registered in Malaysia, it creates administrative problems. The child cannot be recognised as legitimate and cannot be registered with the National Registration Department (NRD). 'This not only affects the couple but also has serious implications for the child, as they lose entitlements under national policies and laws,' he explained. He further pointed out the need to resolve questions surrounding mixed marriages, especially regarding eligibility for Malay reserve land ownership and the status of children under state laws, particularly in Sabah and Sarawak. 'For example, in a marriage between a Malay and a Chinese, questions arise over whether the couple qualifies for Malay reserve land, especially if the non-Malay spouse, even after converting to Islam, cannot speak the Malay language,' he said. Fadillah also stressed the importance of regular consultations and dialogues with state governments to align policies and avoid contradictions with state administrations. He also linked the importance of human rights to the principles of Malaysia MADANI mooted by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. 'Under the MADANI Government administration, human rights principles and Maqasid Shariah are interconnected to foster inclusive, just, and ethical governance. Both serve as a guide to ensure balanced national development spiritually, socially, and economically. 'The initiatives taken by the MADANI Government also demonstrate Malaysia's commitment to lead the human rights agenda domestically, regionally, and internationally,' he added.
New Straits Times
36 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Judge to rule on legality of Trump's Los Angeles troop deployment
SAN FRANCISCO: A California court will hear arguments Tuesday on whether US President Donald Trump must give up control of the state's National Guard after he sent troops to protest-hit Los Angeles against the wishes of local officials. Trump has deployed more than 4,000 guardsmen – as well as 700 Marines – to the second-largest US city, where his immigration crackdown has sparked fierce, mostly peaceful opposition with some violence and vandalism. In a show of political muscle, Trump ignored the objections of Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, who would usually oversee the Guard. A judge said Thursday that the Republican president's actions were "illegal" and ordered that he return control of the force to Newsom. But a higher court paused that ruling until Tuesday after the Trump administration lodged an appeal and slammed the judge's order as an "extraordinary intrusion on the President's constitutional authority as Commander in Chief." The midday hearing in San Francisco will likely at least determine whether the freeze on the order should be extended, effectively allowing Trump to maintain control over California's National Guard. The fatigue-wearing troops have been tasked with protecting federal property in Los Angeles, stationed outside buildings with helmets and large shields. US law restricts them from arresting citizens, though some guardsmen have fired tear gas and non-lethal rounds towards protesters, according to local media. California officials have heavily criticized Trump over his use of the military, saying it has escalated demonstrations that Los Angeles law enforcement could have handled. It was the first time since 1965 that a US president deployed the National Guard over the wishes of a state's governor. "His plan is clear: Incite violence and chaos in blue states, have an excuse to militarise our cities, demonise his opponents, keep breaking the law and consolidate power," Newsom wrote on X on Monday. Karen Bass, the mayor of Los Angeles, accused the Trump administration of "manufacturing a crisis." Trump has been unrepentant, taking credit for making Los Angeles "safe" and declaring that Newsom – a contender for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028 – had "totally lost control." The dispute mirrors multiple other tussles over Trump's attempts to expand the limits of presidential power, but is the first to involve troops. Like other cases, it could go all the way to the Supreme Court, where Republican appointees hold a 6-3 majority. Many in Los Angeles are angry about immigration raids carried out as part of Trump's ambition to deport vast numbers of undocumented migrants around the country. Outrage at the use of masked, armed immigration agents has also sparked protests in other cities, including San Francisco, New York, Chicago and San Antonio, Texas.--AFP
Barnama
38 minutes ago
- Barnama
Need For Harmonisation Of Federal And State Human Rights Laws
GENERAL PUTRAJAYA, June 17 (Bernama) -- The federal and state governments need to harmonise human rights laws to ensure the welfare of the people, particularly on issues concerning family, marriage, and children's rights, said Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Fadillah Yusof. He highlighted the legal dilemmas arising from Malaysia's dual legal system, where British-based laws coexist with Islamic laws focused on family matters. 'Our dilemma in Malaysia stems from the country's historical legal framework because many of our practices are rooted in British laws, alongside the introduction of Islamic laws that emphasise family. 'This has caused conflicts between the laws themselves. So this is what we have to resolve prudently, otherwise it will cause political polemics due to the background of the people (who are multi-racial),' he said at the closing ceremony of the Muzakarah on Human Rights Issues from the Maqasid Shariah perspective, here today. Also present were Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Religious Affairs) Datuk Dr Mohd Na'im Mokhtar and Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) chairman Datuk Seri Mohd Hishamudin Yunus. Fadillah stressed that legal administrative coordination is crucial to address issues such as unregistered marriages conducted abroad, which affect the status and rights of children born from such unions. 'If a marriage is not registered in Malaysia, it creates administrative problems. The child cannot be recognised as legitimate and cannot be registered with the National Registration Department (NRD). 'This not only affects the couple but also has serious implications for the child, as they lose entitlements under national policies and laws,' he explained. He further pointed out the need to resolve questions surrounding mixed marriages, especially regarding eligibility for Malay reserve land ownership and the status of children under state laws, particularly in Sabah and Sarawak.
