
Threat is MUCH closer than we think, Keir warns as UK prepares for war on home soil & Nato confirms 5% defence boost
SIR Keir Starmer has chillingly warned that threats to national security are closer to home than we think.
Speaking at the Nato summit in The Hague, the PM said the UK is "regularly" the victim of cyber attacks by Russia and Iran.
7
Prime Minister Keir Starmer speaks during a media conference at the end of the NATO summit on June 25
Credit: Getty
7
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte (R) and Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof (L), welcome British Prime Minister Keir Starmer (C) to the World Forum for the NATO Summit in The Hague
Credit: EPA
7
Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky meet with soldiers from the Operation Interflex at Downing Street
Credit: EPA
Speaking in the wake of the UK's new strategic review, he reiterated: "It is a mistake to think that the only threat we face is external and far off."
"They are ever more sophisticated, and we need to have the capability to deal with them.
"Equally in relation to energy that has been weaponised quite obviously in the last few years.
"There are very many attempts to penetrate our systems having been dealt with by our security and intelligence services, but the fact that they are very good their job shouldn't detract from the fact that that is a real threat to our country, which we have to take seriously."
It comes after all Nato members agreed to raising defence and security spending to five per cent of GDP by 2035 to make it "stronger, fairer and more lethal than ever".
The UK will also provide "hundreds more defence missiles" to protect Ukraine.
These will be paid for with money from frozen Russian assets.
Most read in The Sun
It follows a
chilling new national security blueprint which set out what the UK can expect as
Russia,
China
and
ramp up threats.
A strategic defence review, unveiled on Tuesday, announced that the UK will perform annual drills to anticipate what war on UK soil may look like.
Britain will now hold the yearly drills to prepare for a wide range of enemy attacks.
The new national security strategy included plans for the exercises designed to test the country's "whole-of-society preparedness".
These will include
7
Royal Navy warships shadow Russian vessels in the English Channel and waters off the Outer Hebrides
Credit: Royal Navy
7
Prime Minister Keir Starmer speaks to British and Albanian troops at Berzite military museum in Tirana, Albania
Credit: AP
Ministers have committed to the annual drills which will test the response to the Government,
Possible drills may include a missile strike by a foreign state, a mass terror attack, cyber attacks or the assassination of a public figure.
The first drill will be held this autumn and will be codenamed "Pegasus".
It will test how the Government and other public bodies would respond to a new global pandemic - five years after Covid-19 wrecked havoc across the country, triggering multiple lockdowns.
A part of these preparedness drills will include mock-ups of Cobra meetings, which are held in an emergency.
Tuesday's report also promised "greater vigilance to the public" going forward.
This may lead to a return of Cold War-style "protect and survive" information films.
They were used between 1974 and 1980 and advised the public on how to survive a nuclear attack.
Instructions included how to prepare a fallout room, stockpiling supplies like food and water, and recognising warning signals.
The new plan focuses on three key areas - protecting the UK at home, working with allies to strengthen
The warning comes after Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary general, declaring that without a major increase in defence spending, the British 'better learn to speak Russian'.
The strategy said threats from other countries are on the rise.
It revealed that the UK has been "directly threatened by hostile activities including assassination, intimidation, espionage, sabotage, cyber attacks and other forms of democratic interference".
The stark message came as the PM jetted into The Hague for a crunch NATO summit, where leaders confirmed plans for all allies to spend five per cent of GDP on defence and security by 2035.
Sir Keir Starmer admitted the country faces 'daily challenges on the home front' when asked about the growing threat after the security strategy's release.
The Government's strategy lays bare the scale of the
'For the first time in many years, we have to actively prepare for the possibility of the
The strategy said the UK's enemies are spreading disinformation and using social media to "stoke tensions between generations, genders and ethnic groups".
Critical infrastructure such as undersea cables will "continue to be a target", the document added.
It comes after
The F-35As will be based at RAF Marham in Norfolk, which housed Britain's air-launched nuclear weapons until 1998.
That was the year then—PM Tony Blair scrapped Britain's air-launched bomb, the WE-177.
Read more on the Irish Sun
The new B-61 bombs, made by US-firm Lockheed Martin, can take out small areas — unlike Trident 2 missiles on Britain's submarines which can obliterate whole cities.
The F-35As can also carry conventional weapons.
7
The Government said the jets would support Nato's nuclear mission
7
Sir Keir Starmer addresses a press conference during the NATO summit in The Hague
Credit: AP

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Irish Sun
an hour ago
- The Irish Sun
Zelensky tries new formal look for crunch meeting with Trump at Nato as Don says war leader ‘couldn't have been nicer'
VOLODYMYR Zelensky swapped his signature battlefield khakis for a slick black suit today – just in time for a high-stakes huddle with Donald Trump at the Nato summit. Both leaders were snapped in 5 Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky ditches his khakis for a sharp black suit at the Nato summit in The Hague Credit: Splash 5 Zelensky shows Donald Trump battlefield updates as the pair meet for crunch talks on Ukraine's future Credit: AFP 5 Trump previously criticised the Ukrainian leader for his attire at their fiery Oval Office showdown Credit: AFP 5 Both presidents hailed their meeting as positive Credit: EPA The outfit change didn't go unnoticed – especially after Trump This time, the Ukrainian leader went full statesman mode in head-to-toe black, looking ready for diplomacy as he pushed for American air defence systems and co-production of drones. Writing on X, Zelensky said: 'We discussed the protection of our people with the President — first and foremost, the purchase of American air defense systems to shield our cities, our people, churches, and infrastructure.' 'Ukraine is ready to buy this equipment and support American weapons manufacturers. Europe can help.' Read more on world news He added: 'Putin is definitely not winning. I presented the President with the facts about what is really happening on the ground.' Trump, meanwhile, described their meeting as a roaring success. At a press conference following the Nato summit, he said it 'couldn't be nicer' and praised Zelensky for 'fighting a brave battle'. He also claimed Zelensky 'wants a ceasefire' and hinted at personally speaking with Vladimir Putin to end the war, though he admitted the Russian leader has been 'more difficult' than expected. Most read in The US Sun The face-to-face came on the sidelines of what's being dubbed 'Daddy' Trump stopped Israel and Iran war, Nato chief tells 'strong' Don 'The bombing of Iran has reasserted US military power and showed the strength of America,' Trump said. He also hailed Nato's new five per cent GDP defence spending pledge as 'historic', branding it a 'monumental win for the US' and a 'big win for civilisation'. As leaders gathered under the Nato and Ukrainian flags, Trump even joked about being called 'Daddy' by Dutch PM and Nato chief Mark Rutte, saying: 'He's very affectionate. 'Daddy, you're my daddy'.' While Trump's diplomatic style was as brash as ever, Zelensky struck a more sombre tone, speaking of fallen soldiers and forensic efforts to identify Russian bodies handed back to Ukraine. 'I also informed the President about how the technical team's meetings in Istanbul went, as well as the exchanges of prisoners and the fallen,' Zelensky said. Elsewhere at the summit, Trump said the US may make Patriot missile systems available to Ukraine to help defend against nightly drone and rocket attacks by Russian forces. The advanced anti-air batteries could be a major game-changer on the battlefield, if approved. He also touched on fears of future aggression by the Kremlin, saying it was 'possible' Putin harbours ambitions beyond Ukraine, in response to a question about US intelligence assessments. The Hague event has seen Trump bask in praise for helping bring a halt to the recent 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran, with even his critics calling it a major moment of statesmanship. 'Israel fought a hell of a war, they fought very hard,' he said. 'Both were satisfied to go home and get out.' Zelensky's meeting with Trump followed talks with the prime ministers of Denmark and New Zealand. The Ukrainian leader continues to push Western allies for weapons, funding, and diplomatic muscle as Kyiv braces for a fresh Russian offensive. 5 From left: Keir Starmer, Giorgia Meloni, Volodymyr Zelensky, Mark Rutte, Emmanuel Macron, Donald Tusk and Friedrich Merz pose at the Nato summit Credit: AFP

The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Nato members have agreed to spend 5% of their GDP commits to 5% GDP spend increase and gives 'ironclad' commitment to mutual defence
NATO COUNTRIES HAVE agreed to increase their defence spending from 2% of GDP to 5% in the next decade, amid a renewed focus on the importance of military strength. The move will see an increase of billions of euros to be spent on defence in the coming years. At the Nato summit in The Hague, the 32 member countries strongly reinforced their commitment to defend each other in case of an attack. In a joint statement, the countries said that there is an 'ironclad' commitment to mutual defence if any member country is attacked. The 32 Nato members also declared Russia to be a 'long term threat' – but did not go as far as condemning the war in Ukraine. There had been concerns that the US would not want to honour its commitments to defending other Nato allies; Donald Trump had given mixed messages en route to the summit. As a presidential candidate in 2016, Trump suggested that as president he would not necessarily abide by the alliance's mutual defence guarantees. On his way to The Hague, aboard Air Force One, Trump said that his commitment to mutual defence 'depends on your definition'. 'There's numerous definitions of Article 5 [of the Nato Treaty which enshrines mutual defence]. You know that, right? But I'm committed to being their friends,' he said. Advertisement He signalled that he would give a more precise definition of what Article Five means to him once he was at the summit. When Trump arrived he changed his tune and told reporters: 'We're with them all the way.' The US president was referencing a growing debate across Nato on what Article Five means. One definition has been that the US's nuclear weapons are a backstop for the entire organisation, acting as a guaranteed response to aggression. Another interpretation of Article Five is that it merely binds members to providing support to a State, which could be anything from access to airspace to fighting in a war alongside them. Mark Rutte, Nato's Secretary General, after a flurry of unctuous messages to Donald Trump, said that the US was 'totally committed' to the mutual defence clause. 'For me, there is absolute clarity that the United States has totally committed to Nato, totally committed to Article Five,' Rutte said. The spending increase from 2% of GDP to 5% is something that the US – and Trump himself – has long fought for. This will also cover investment in military industry and supercharge manufacturing. But not everyone has agreed to it. Spain said it could not meet the 5% recommendation, but the Spanish Economy Minister Carlos Cuerpo said it would meet all its military capability commitments for Nato. Spain has said it will commit to 2.1% of GDP on the basis that its military commitments can be met at that level. In his press conference after the summit, Trump said that he would put pressure on Spain in a trade deal to pay more. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Vote on Keir Starmer's disability cuts Bill faces major challenge from Labour rebels
Britain's prime minister Keir Starmer next week faces the biggest test of his authority since winning last July's election, as his government tries to steer through deep cuts to disability benefits in the face of a growing backbench rebellion. MPs are due to vote next Tuesday on a Bill to save £5 billion (€5.86 billion) by cutting eligibility for personal independence payments (Pip), which are top-up benefits for disabled people. More than 120 Labour rebels, however, have put forward an amendment that would kill the Bill. If the Labour rebels vote against the Bill next week and all the main opposition parties also vote against the government's proposals, Starmer faces the prospect of a humiliating defeat in the House of Commons , despite Labour's 165-seat majority. That would seriously weaken his standing as leader of party and country. Senior Labour figures have been frantically trying to win rebels around in recent days. The Irish Times has seen messages sent by senior Labour figures to some of the rebels, criticising them for undermining the government. READ MORE Downing Street argues that ballooning Pip payments act as a disincentive for some people to work, and says the 'moral and progressive' thing to do is to reform the system. The overall cost of Pip has doubled since the pandemic, while the UK's overall disability and sickness benefits bill has risen by £20 billion to £80 billion. [ 'What's the point of Labour?' Starmer in backlash over £5bn in benefits cuts Opens in new window ] Starmer, who was in The Hague on Wednesday at a summit of the Nato military alliance, said up to 1,000 new people per day were moving on to Pip, the equivalent of the population of the city of Leicester over a year. 'It traps people and it has to be reformed,' he said. The issue has forced a showdown with the left wing of his party, as well as other more centrist MPs who fear the loss of Pip payments will hurt their constituents. The government's impact assessment acknowledges the changes would push 250,000 people into relative poverty. The rebels have put forward a 'reasoned amendment' to the Bill that would effectively end it at second reading on Tuesday, a blunt tactic. Its deployment is being seen as a sign of the government's dislocation from MPs who represent Labour's working class heartlands, as well as political naivety in Starmer's Downing Street operation. The amendment, which would have to be called by the speaker Lindsay Hoyle on Tuesday, has been signed by more than 120 MPs, including about 13 committee chairs. 'The government needs to think again,' said Anneliese Midgley, the MP for Knowsley in Merseyside and a leading rebel. She was previously deputy chief of staff for former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. 'The proposals are rushed. They will financially penalise disabled people and risk pushing some people away from work,' she said. Other rebels include Louise Haigh, the former transport secretary who was forced to resign by Downing Street last November over an old conviction. [ 'Absolute fear': UK's planned benefit cuts alarm vulnerable people in Northern Ireland Opens in new window ] But as well as left-wing standard bearers not close to Starmer, such as John McDonnell and Diane Abbott, the list also includes younger, ambitious MPs not expected to rebel, such as Adam Jogee. Meg Hillier, chair of the Treasury select committee, is one of the leaders of the rebel group. Downing Street now faces the choice of pulling next Tuesday's vote, which so far it has insisted it will not do, or negotiating with the rebels to water down the original proposals to restrict Pip. Alternatively, Starmer could try the politically risky move of calling the rebels' bluff, or the government could even try to win the vote with backing from the opposition – another politically unpalatable prospect.