logo
Trump says two weeks is 'maximum' for Iran decision

Trump says two weeks is 'maximum' for Iran decision

Nahar Net13 hours ago

by Naharnet Newsdesk 21 June 2025, 12:42
U.S. President Donald Trump said overnight that Iran had a "maximum" of two weeks to avoid possible U.S. air strikes, indicating he could take a decision before the fortnight deadline he set a day earlier.
Trump added that he was not inclined to stop Israel attacking Iran because it was "winning," and was dismissive of European efforts to mediate an end to the conflict.
"I'm giving them a period of time, and I would say two weeks would be the maximum," Trump told reporters when asked if he could decide to strike Iran before that.
He added that the aim was to "see whether or not people come to their senses."
Trump had said in a statement on Thursday that he would "make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks" because there was a "substantial chance of negotiations" with Iran.
Those comments had been widely seen as opening a two-week window for negotiations to end the war between Israel and Iran, with the European powers rushing to talks with Tehran.
But his latest remarks indicated Trump could still make his decision before that if he feels that there has been no progress towards dismantling Iran's nuclear program.
Trump meanwhile dismissed talks that European powers Britain, France, Germany and the EU had with Iran's foreign minister in Geneva on Friday.
- Europe 'didn't help' -
"They didn't help," he said as he arrived in Morristown, New Jersey, ahead of a fundraising dinner at his nearby golf club.
"Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help in this."
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said after the talks in Geneva that Tehran would not resume negotiations with the United States until Israel stopped its attacks.
But Trump was reluctant.
"It's very hard to make that request right now," Trump said.
"If somebody's winning, it's a little bit harder to do than if somebody's losing, but we're ready, willing and able, and we've been speaking to Iran, and we'll see what happens."
Trump meanwhile doubled down on his claims that Iran is weeks away from being able to produce a nuclear bomb, despite divisions in his own administration about the intelligence behind his assessment.
Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's director of national intelligence, said in a report in March that Iran was not close to having enough enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon.
"She's wrong," Trump said of Gabbard, a longtime opponent of U.S. foreign intervention whom Trump tapped to coordinate the sprawling U.S. spy community.
Iran says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran warns: Any country that supplies Israel with arms is a legitimate target
Iran warns: Any country that supplies Israel with arms is a legitimate target

Ya Libnan

time2 hours ago

  • Ya Libnan

Iran warns: Any country that supplies Israel with arms is a legitimate target

Iranian Armed Forces Spokesman was quoted as that 'any country that is sending military equipment to Israel is considered as complicit in the aggression and a legitimate target for us' The spokesman for the Khatam al-Anbia Headquarters, affiliated with the Iranian Armed Forces, stated in a televised speech that, 'Based on the intelligence of the Iranian Armed Forces, the aggressive Zionist regime—despite possessing the most modern and expensive air defense systems in the world, and with comprehensive support from the United States—has lost a significant portion of its radar and defensive capabilities as a result of the effective and painful strikes launched by the Iranian Armed Forces' missile and drone units, and is now facing a shortage of ammunition and military equipment.' He noted, 'In this context, we warn that the sending of any military equipment or radar systems by sea or air by any country with the aim of supporting the Zionist regime will be considered as complicity in the aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran and will be considered a legitimate target for the Islamic Republic's Armed Forces.' This comes as Israeli attacks on Iranian territory continue, while the Iranian Revolutionary Guard has responded to Israel with waves of missiles and drones since June 13. ELNASHRA

Israel-Iran war live: ‘No nuclear material' at Iran centrifuge workshop hit by Israel, IAEA says
Israel-Iran war live: ‘No nuclear material' at Iran centrifuge workshop hit by Israel, IAEA says

Ya Libnan

time2 hours ago

  • Ya Libnan

Israel-Iran war live: ‘No nuclear material' at Iran centrifuge workshop hit by Israel, IAEA says

The UN nuclear watchdog confirmed Saturday that an Israeli strike had hit a centrifuge manufacturing workshop at Iran's Isfahan nuclear site, but said that the attack would have 'no radiological consequences' due to the lack of nuclear material at the site. SUMMARY The Israeli military Saturday said it launched a fresh wave of strikes on Saturday in the area of southern Iran's Bandar Abbas, targeting drones storage sites and a weapons facility. As Israel continues to strike Iran's nuclear facilities and military targets, Foreign Minister Gideon Saar claimed said in an interview that by his country's own assessment, it had 'already delayed for at least two or three years the possibility for them to have a nuclear bomb'.Loud blasts were heard Saturday in the Iranian capital, AFP journalists said, as fighting raged between the two foes for the ninth day. It was not immediately clear whether the blasts heard in central and northern Tehran were the result of incoming Israeli strikes or Iranian air defence fire. Loud blasts were heard Saturday in the Iranian capital, AFP journalists said, as fighting raged between the two foes for the ninth day. It was not immediately clear whether the blasts heard in central and northern Tehran were the result of incoming Israeli strikes or Iranian air defence fire. AFP FRANCE 24

Pakistan to nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize
Pakistan to nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize

Ya Libnan

time2 hours ago

  • Ya Libnan

Pakistan to nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize

Pakistan to nominate President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for helping end the India Pakistan war Highlights ISLAMABAD, June 21 (Reuters) – Pakistan said on Saturday it would recommend U.S. President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, an accolade that he has said he craves, for his work in helping to resolve the recent conflict between India and Pakistan. Some analysts in Pakistan said the move might persuade Trump to think again about potentially joining Israel in striking Iran's nuclear facilities. Pakistan has condemned Israel's action as a violation of international law and a threat to regional stability. In May, a surprise announcement by Trump of a ceasefire brought an abrupt end to a four-day conflict between nuclear-armed foes India and Pakistan. Trump has since repeatedly said that he averted a nuclear war, saved millions of lives, and grumbled that he got no credit for it. Pakistan agrees that U.S. diplomatic intervention ended the fighting, but India says it was a bilateral agreement between the two militaries. 'President Trump demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship through robust diplomatic engagement with both Islamabad and New Delhi, which de-escalated a rapidly deteriorating situation,' Pakistan said. 'This intervention stands as a testament to his role as a genuine peacemaker.' Governments can nominate people for the Nobel Peace Prize. There was no immediate response from Washington. A spokesperson for the Indian government did not respond to a request for comment. Trump has repeatedly said that he's willing to mediate between India and Pakistan over the disputed Kashmir region, their main source of enmity. Islamabad, which has long called for international attention to Kashmir, is delighted. But his stance has upended U.S. policy in South Asia, which had favored India as a counterweight to China, and put in question previously close relations between Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. On Friday, Trump gave a long list of conflicts he said he had resolved, including India and Pakistan and the Abraham accords in his first term between Israel and some Muslim-majority countries. He added: 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do.' Pakistan's move to nominate Trump came in the same week its army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, met the U.S. leader for lunch. It was the first time that a Pakistani military leader had been invited to the White House when a civilian government was in place in Islamabad. Trump's planned meeting with Modi at the G7 summit in Canada last week did not take place after the U.S. president left early, but the two later spoke by phone, in which Modi said 'India does not and will never accept mediation' in its dispute with Pakistan, according to the Indian government. Mushahid Hussain, a former chair of the Senate Defence Committee in Pakistan's parliament, suggested nominating Trump for the peace prize was justified. 'Trump is good for Pakistan,' he said. 'If this panders to Trump's ego, so be it. All the European leaders have been sucking up to him big time.' But the move was not universally applauded in Pakistan, where Trump's support for Israel's war in Gaza has inflamed passions. 'Israel's sugar daddy in Gaza and cheerleader of its attacks on Iran isn't a candidate for any prize,' said Talat Hussain, a prominent Pakistani television political talk show host, in a post on X. 'And what if he starts to kiss Modi on both cheeks again after a few months?' Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store