Japanese company's lunar landing fails in commercial rush to moon
Ispace, a Tokyo -based company, declared its private lunar lander mission a failure after losing communication with the lander during its attempted touchdown on the moon.
Communication ceased less than two minutes before the scheduled landing, and a preliminary analysis suggests the laser system for measuring altitude malfunctioned, causing the lander to descend too fast.
CEO Takeshi Hakamada apologised for the failed mission, which carried a rover with a shovel for lunar dirt collection and a Swedish artist's toy-size red house.
The mission, named Resilience, aimed for a flat area in Mare Frigoris (Sea of Cold) a long and narrow region full of craters that stretches across the near side's northern tier.
The lunar landing was part of a growing trend of private companies targeting the moon, with more failures than successes, including previous crashes by ispace and Intuitive Machines.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Japanese rover smashes into moon in fresh disaster for embattled space company
Japanese company ispace has declared a second failure in a bid for its lunar lander to touchdown on the moon after communication was lost less than two minutes before the scheduled grounding A lunar lander from a Japanese company crashed while attempting a touchdown on the moon in the latest casualty in the commercial rush to the moon and the second failure for the same company. The Tokyo-based company ispace declared the mission a failure several hours after communication was lost with the lander. Flight controllers scrambled to gain contact, but were met with only silence and said they were concluding the mission. Communications ceased less than two minutes before the spacecraft's scheduled landing on the moon with a mini rover. Until then, the descent from lunar orbit seemed to be going well. CEO and founder Takeshi Hakamada apologized to everyone who contributed to the mission, the second lunar strikeout for ispace. Two years ago, the company's first moonshot ended in a crash landing, giving rise to the name 'Resilience' for its successor lander. Resilience carried a rover with a shovel to gather lunar dirt as well as a Swedish artist's toy-size red house for placement on the moon's dusty surface. Company officials said it was too soon to know whether the same problem doomed both missions. This is the second time that we were not able to land. So we really have to take it very seriously,' Hakamada told reporters. He stressed that the company would press ahead with more lunar missions. A preliminary analysis indicates the laser system for measuring the altitude did not work as planned, and the lander descended too fast, officials said. 'Based on these circumstances, it is currently assumed that the lander likely performed a hard landing on the lunar surface,' the company said in a written statement. Moon missions had previously been the preserve of governments but it became a target of private outfits in 2019, with more flops than wins along the way. Launched in January from Florida on a long, roundabout journey, Resilience entered lunar orbit last month. It shared a SpaceX ride with Firefly Aerospace's Blue Ghost, which reached the moon faster and became the first private entity to successfully land there in March. Another US company, Intuitive Machines, arrived at the moon a few days after Firefly. But the tall, spindly lander face-planted in a crater near the moon's south pole and was declared dead within hours. Resilience was targeting the top of the moon, a less treacherous place than the shadowy bottom. The ispace team chose a flat area with few boulders in Mare Frigoris or Sea of Cold, a long and narrow region full of craters and ancient lava flows that stretches across the near side's northern tier. Plans had called for the 7.5-feet Resilience to beam back pictures within hours and for the lander to lower the piggybacking rover onto the lunar surface this weekend. Made of carbon fibre-reinforced plastic with four wheels, ispace's European-built rover — named Tenacious — sported a high-definition camera to scout out the area and a shovel to scoop up some lunar dirt for NASA. The rover, weighing just 5kgs, was going to stick close to the lander, going in circles at a speed of less than two centimetres per second. It was capable of venturing up to two-thirds of a mile from the lander and should be operational throughout the two-week mission, the period of daylight. Besides science and tech experiments, there was an artistic touch. The rover held a tiny, Swedish-style red cottage with white trim and a green door, dubbed the Moonhouse by creator Mikael Genberg, for placement on the lunar surface. Minutes before the attempted landing, Hakamada assured everyone that ispace had learned from its first failed mission. 'Engineers did everything they possibly could' to ensure success this time, he said. He considered the latest moonshot 'merely a steppingstone' to its bigger lander launching by 2027 with NASA involvement. Ispace, like other businesses, does not have 'infinite funds' and cannot afford repeated failures, Jeremy Fix, chief engineer for ispace's US subsidiary, said at a conference last month. While not divulging the cost of the current mission, company officials said it's less than the first one which exceeded £74million. Two other US companies are aiming for moon landings by year's end: Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin and Astrobotic Technology. Astrobotic's first lunar lander missed the moon altogether in 2024 and came crashing back through Earth's atmosphere. For decades, governments competed to get to the moon. Only five countries have pulled off successful robotic lunar landings: Russia, the US, China, India and Japan. Of those, only the US has landed people on the moon: 12 NASA astronauts from 1969 through 1972. NASA expects to send four astronauts around the moon next year. That would be followed a year or more later by the first lunar landing by a crew in more than a half-century, with SpaceX's Starship providing the lift from lunar orbit all the way down to the surface. China also has moon landing plans for its own astronauts by 2030.
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
Nintendo Switch 2 review: What our gaming experts like (and dislike) about the console
Nintendo Switch 2 design Alex Lee: When the courier handed me the Switch 2 inside a plain cardboard box (wait, no fireworks?), I was weirdly thrown by how compact the package felt. But I opened it cross-legged on the floor, and the console itself is… huge. Almost an inch bigger than the OLED, and once the new Joy-Con 2's snap on, it's basically a mini tablet. It's not far off the size of an iPad mini, but it's almost double the weight (and it's noticeable). There's now a USB-C port on the top – a small but huge quality-of-life tweak. I can play it in tabletop mode now while charging, without the cable jutting out from the bottom and making things wobbly. The new Joy-Cons are sleeker too, with a matte texture and rounded edges, making them feel less toy-like, though again, chunkier than the OLED ones. I really like the new kickstand, too. It's sturdier than the OLED's and adjusts a little more smoothly. You can still expand the storage, but your old microSD cards won't work on this one – you'll need to buy the new microSD Express cards. Then there's the dock. Refined to an inch of its life, it's narrower, more polished, and I love that I don't have to tear off the back cover to unplug cables – everything's accessible even with the plate on. It's not a huge redesign overall, but it's all a lot sturdier – I'm not scared of breaking it, as I was with the OG Switch or even the OLED. Jake Brigstock: One thing to add about the packaging – maybe a weird detail to call out – is how smartly it's done. The first thing you see is the console and Joy-Con, and for anyone eager to power it on straight away (no judgement), Nintendo has set things up so you can unpack gradually. Its design feels almost identical to the original Switch – just bigger, and without the bright, colourful Joy-Cons that became so synonymous with the first console. Looking at the unit itself, it's unmistakably a Switch. There's a real sense of familiarity for anyone who's used the original. My first impression? It feels like an upgrade rather than something completely new, and that becomes even more apparent once it's powered on. Nintendo Switch 2 set-up Jake: The onboarding process walks you through everything gradually. It doesn't rush you, and you don't feel overwhelmed. It teaches you how to connect the Joy-Cons, set up the dock and shows you the different ways the console can be used. Data transfer is easy. Setting up a new console sometimes makes me anxious, but moving games and saving data from the original Switch to the Switch 2 was the easiest I've ever seen it. It's quick, too. Once you're in and the home screen pops up, you'll notice one thing straight away – the UI looks more or less identical to the latest version on the original Switch. Again, there's a feeling of familiarity. It isn't necessarily a bad thing, but it doesn't always capture that 'new console feel'. It has been eight years since the Switch launched after all, but if it ain't broke... Alex: Jake's not wrong – this is the least stressful Nintendo setup I've ever experienced. I signed into my account, continued the transfer from my Switch OLED, and it all just worked. I didn't even have to keep the two consoles in the same room. It was super polished, and nothing went wrong. One thing to flag – and it's a big deal for anyone who needs it – is that while Nintendo has finally introduced a proper suite of accessibility features on the Switch 2 (a huge step for the access-averse company), you can't turn any of it on during setup. You have to get through the entire onboarding process before you can enable things like magnification, text-to-speech or high-contrast mode. Even then, features like text-to-speech still don't work across the whole system, including in places like the eShop. While Jake found the familiar UI comforting, I think it's a bit stale. The interface looks almost exactly the same as the original Switch, and Nintendo could've done more to make it feel like a true generational leap. That said, I'm happy to report that the eShop finally got the upgrade it needed. It's way snappier now – no more waiting around for game pages to load or menus to catch up. It's so much smoother and easier to navigate. Nintendo Switch 2 performance and play Alex: I'm mostly a TV gamer, so I've mainly been playing with the Switch 2 hooked up to my 4K HDR TV, and while it does look better than ever, most of the real upgrades aren't for docked play. When plugged in, you'll get prompted to calibrate HDR (a nice touch), and games like Mario Kart World look crisp, vibrant and colourful. However, there's still a lot missing compared to next-gen consoles. There's no HDMI 2.1 support, so if your TV can do 120Hz or VRR, you won't be taking advantage of it. There's no Dolby Atmos either – a bit of a letdown when you consider the Switch 2 does support spatial audio in handheld mode. That said, DLSS is doing some noticeable work when docked, especially with backwards-compatible games. Titles that looked soft on the original Switch, such as Super Mario Odyssey, now get surprisingly close to 4K. Handheld mode is where the Switch 2 really flexes. The bigger 1080p LCD screen might not be as rich or inky as the OLED panel on the Switch OLED, but it's sharp, bright, and looks brilliant in motion, especially at 120Hz. I'm a bit disappointed that there's no streaming support for Netflix, Disney+, Prime Video, BBC iPlayer, and the YouTube app isn't compatible (at launch, anyway). I think this is one thing that'll stop it from competing with Microsoft and Sony. It has the games and the fans, but it doesn't have the full entertainment platform to match its rivals. Jake: I'm also traditionally a console gamer, so my preferred way to play is curled up on the sofa, using the Switch 2 in docked mode – and it's in the display and performance where the upgrade really comes to the fore. When docked, the console can run at 4K resolution at up to 60fps, and the games I've played so far look incredible. HDR makes a noticeable difference here, too, adding more depth and richness to the image. That said, handheld mode has seriously impressed me. The 8in display runs at 1080p with support for 120fps, and the bigger screen makes a huge impact. It's sharp, fluid, and feels much more modern than what we had before. The backwards-compatible games I've tested that haven't had any updates seem to benefit. They load faster, run more smoothly and generally look better. As someone with a mountainous Nintendo back catalogue, the Switch 2 feels like the best way to revisit it all in glorious 120fps. Nintendo Switch 2 Joy-Cons Jake: The new Joy-Con controllers are bigger, and that's an incredibly welcome change. They feel more comfortable to hold, especially in longer sessions. One slight disappointment is that the wrist strap attachments no longer include the shoulder buttons like the original Switch, which made the controllers feel a bit more protected and functional when used horizontally. The Joy-Cons themselves feel familiar if you've used the original ones, just with a couple of key upgrades. The rumble has been improved (HD Rumble 2 is noticeably more precise), and the big new feature is the addition of mouse-style motion controls. I first tried these at Nintendo's preview event back in April, and they felt fun and intuitive in the right context. I gave them another go while playing Cyberpunk 2077, but to be honest, it wasn't really for me. As a console-first player, I naturally gravitated to the new Pro controller, which Nintendo kindly sent me to test. It's very similar to the last-gen one but includes a C button, HD Rumble 2, and now an aux port, which is great if you want to plug in wired headphones or a mic. Alex: One thing I keep doing – out of sheer muscle memory – is sliding the Joy-Cons on the old way. You don't need to anymore. The new magnetic attachment system means they just snap into place with a satisfying click, and it's so much easier than the old rail system. I didn't realise how awkward the original design was until I stopped using it. I'd also add that the HD Rumble 2 is absolutely fantastic – the vibrations are sharper and more detailed. It's frightening when you get shocked by lightning or blue-shelled in Mario Kart World. The Joy-Cons feel great overall, though I do find they're maybe a bit too big for my hands. It's not uncomfortable, just something I've noticed over longer sessions. The new dedicated GameChat button is a nice touch too, letting you quickly mute or jump into a chat during online games, something Nintendo's never really tackled before. However, the mouse controls are finicky and a little inaccurate. I think it's a nice feature to have, but I'll need to try it out with more compatible games. Right now, I don't think I'll be using it very often. It's worth flagging that older Joy-Cons don't work on the Switch 2, though the older Pro controller does work with the new system. While the new design feels sturdier, there's no official word yet on whether Nintendo has finally fixed the Joy-Con drift issue. Fingers crossed, but we'll have to wait and see. Nintendo Switch 2 features Alex: One of the biggest new features on the Switch 2 is GameChat – Nintendo's attempt at building social features directly into the console, so you can say goodbye to Discord calls. It's baked into the UI and works incredibly well. I tested this with another group of reporters, and I could jump into a group call from anywhere – whether I was mid-game or was just on the home screen, even if we were all playing different games. The new GameChat button on the Joy-Con and Pro controller made it easy to open up the menu, mute myself, turn on or off the camera or share my screen. I think it'll be a big deal for competitive gamers. The built-in mic is genuinely really good. It picks up my voice clearly from across the room and filters out background noise well enough that I didn't feel the need to grab a headset. It's not quite Discord-level quality, but it's really impressive. Then there's the new plug-in 1080p camera. Right now, there's not a huge amount you can do with it – it's mostly used for showing your mates' faces on screen while you play. When you're racing against your friends in Mario Kart World, their little face pops up above their kart in real-time. It's a bit uncanny and very Nintendo. What I did like was that, even when I was playing solo but plugged into a GameChat session, I could still see faces below the game screen, making it feel less lonely. The camera's not the best quality, but it's decent enough. There's definitely room for Nintendo to build on this. AR minigames are the big one – and the company's already hinted at this for Super Mario Party Jamboree. I've also seen some reports that third-party cameras work too, so you could get a higher-res one (and it might be cheaper, too). Another addition is GameShare, which lets someone else play your game locally, even if they don't own it. I've not been able to test this one yet, but it's a nice way to share games without splashing out on a second copy. It's a feature that was on the old Nintendo DS – I remember playing Super Mario Bros. with friends who didn't have a copy. Jake: GameChat is a great addition – and not just because it lets you see people's faces mid-race. What stood out to me was how much more social it made everything feel. When we played a Knockout Tour with three other reporters (including Alex), it was hilarious to watch everyone's reactions in real-time when the inevitable Mario Kart item chaos hit. I'm sure there was a collective groan when I crossed the line in first and celebrated with a smug fist bump – sorry, Alex. I'm especially excited to see how this plays out in Super Mario Party Jamboree TV Switch 2 Edition – the minigames are chaotic enough already, and seeing everyone's faces as it unfolds will only add to the fun. Nintendo Switch 2 games Jake: Now on to the most important part – games. A console is nothing without them. Aside from Mario Kart World (which I'll leave to Alex, as he's spent more time with it), the first-party launch line-up includes Nintendo Switch Welcome Tour. I'm firmly in the camp that if Astro's Playroom was free on the PS5, then Welcome Tour should be too. It's fine for what it is – a quick way to show off the new console features – but it's unremarkable. More exciting are the Switch 2 Editions of The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild and Tears of the Kingdom, both of which look and run so much better than on the original console. Watching comparison footage is one thing, but experiencing it firsthand is another. Cyberpunk 2077 has been dubbed a 'miracle port' by some tech experts, and while CD Projekt Red downplayed how tough it was to get it running, it's still impressive, especially in handheld. From what I've seen, the game has stayed within the advertised performance limits, and – hot take, maybe – keeping motion blur on actually helps here. It adds to the cinematic look and smooths things out in a way that feels necessary. If a demanding title like this can run well on Switch 2, it could open the floodgates for more ambitious third-party games down the line. It's also great to see other titles like Split Fiction available at launch. While there are a few backwards compatibility quirks floating around, the vast majority of older games seem to run without issue, and I haven't encountered any problems myself. Alex: I'm more into my first-party Switch titles, so I've stuck to Mario Kart World, but I've also played Survival Kids – one of the new Switch 2 launch titles. I'm conflicted. Visually, Mario Kart World is one of the best-looking Nintendo games I've ever played. The art direction is stunning, and it really shines on the Switch 2's brighter screen. But the whole open world just feels... lonely? Soulless? You drive long straight stretches between tracks in Grand Prix mode, often through massive, empty spaces, just holding accelerate and praying for a coin. The intermissions between tracks feel more like corridors than actual racing, and I don't feel like the 24-person races add anything because of the vastness of the tracks. Worse still, most Grand Prix races only give you one lap on a proper circuit. I don't mind Nintendo trying something new, but I just wish there was an option for classic three-lap Grand Prix races (which I guess is just VS mode). Maybe it's just me being too used to Mario Kart 8 Deluxe, but everything here feels a bit too spread out. I needed a palate cleanser after the colourful, attention-grabbing Mario Kart World, so I gave Survival Kids a go. You and up to three friends are shipwrecked on an island, and the goal is to survive by chopping wood, cooking food, building tools and gliding over ravines with makeshift umbrellas. There's no real peril, it's just a nice, slow and gentle. Nintendo Switch 2 battery life Alex: Nintendo says the Switch 2 should last between two and six-and-a-half hours on a full charge, depending on what you're doing. I found that I got closer to the lower end of that spectrum while playing Mario Kart World and using GameChat. It'll probably last longer if you're not playing a CPU-intensive game and running GameChat at the same time, but at least it's easier to charge while gaming now. Jake: I got around two-and-a-half hours out of it while playing Mario Kart World with a few game downloads running in the background. You're not always going to be downloading while gaming, of course, but it's probably smart to top up before long sessions. Also, a small but welcome new feature is the option to cap charging at 90 per cent to help preserve battery health long-term. The console is physically bigger than the original, which makes it slightly less portable, but not to the point where I'd leave it behind.
North Wales Chronicle
10 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Japanese lunar lander crashes while attempting touchdown on the Moon
Tokyo-based company ispace declared the mission a failure several hours after communication was lost with the lander. Flight controllers scrambled to gain contact, but were met with only silence and said they were concluding the mission. Communications ceased less than two minutes before the spacecraft's scheduled landing on the Moon with a mini rover. Until then, the descent from lunar orbit seemed to be going well. Takeshi Hakamada, ispace chief executive officer and founder, apologised to everyone who contributed to the mission, the second lunar strikeout for the company. Two years ago, the company's first moonshot ended in a crash landing, giving rise to the name Resilience for its successor lander. Resilience carried a rover with a shovel to gather lunar dirt as well as a Swedish artist's toy-size red house for placement on the Moon's dusty surface. Company officials said it was too soon to know whether the same problem doomed both missions. 'This is the second time that we were not able to land. So we really have to take it very seriously,' Mr Hakamada told reporters. He stressed the company would press ahead with more lunar missions. A preliminary analysis indicates the laser system for measuring the altitude did not work as planned and the lander descended too fast, officials said. 'Based on these circumstances, it is currently assumed that the lander likely performed a hard landing on the lunar surface,' the company said in a written statement. Long the province of governments, the Moon became a target of private outfits in 2019, with more flops than successes along the way. Launched in January from Florida on a long, roundabout journey, Resilience entered lunar orbit last month. It shared a SpaceX ride with Firefly Aerospace's Blue Ghost, which reached the Moon faster and became the first private entity to successfully land there in March. Another US company, Intuitive Machines, arrived at the Moon a few days after Firefly. But the tall, spindly lander face-planted in a crater near the south pole and was declared dead within hours. Resilience was targeting the top of the Moon, a less treacherous place than the shadowy bottom. The ispace team chose a flat area with few boulders in Mare Frigoris or Sea of Cold, a long and narrow region full of craters and ancient lava flows that stretches across the near side's northern tier. Plans had called for the 7.5ft Resilience to beam back pictures within hours and for the lander to lower the piggybacking rover onto the lunar surface this weekend. Made of carbon fibre-reinforced plastic with four wheels, ispace's European-built rover — named Tenacious — sported a high-definition camera to scout out the area and a shovel to scoop up some lunar dirt for Nasa. The rover was going to stick close to the lander, going in circles at a speed of less than one inch per second.
