logo
HIV prevention drug lenacapavir approved by FDA as twice-yearly injection

HIV prevention drug lenacapavir approved by FDA as twice-yearly injection

CBS News5 hours ago

What to know about the Trump administration's move to cut HIV vaccine research funding
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved the drug lenacapavir as a twice-yearly injection to prevent HIV.
The drug, called Yeztugo from company Gilead Sciences, was approved Wednesday based on data from clinical trials that showed 99.9% of participants who received it remained HIV negative.
Daniel O'Day, Gilead's chairman and chief executive officer, called the approval a "milestone moment in the decades-long fight against HIV."
"Yeztugo will help us prevent HIV on a scale never seen before. We now have a way to end the HIV epidemic once and for all," O'Day said in a news release.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there were 31,800 estimated new HIV infections in the United States in 2022, the most recent year with available data.
While the drug's approval meets an existing need, the Trump administration's funding decisions have rolled back progress for a vaccine.
Last month, the administration moved to end funding for a broad swath of HIV vaccine research, saying current approaches are enough to counter the virus.
Dr. Barton Ford Haynes, the director of the Duke Human Vaccine Institute, recently told CBS News lenacapavir is a "wonderful development for the field," but said there was still a need for a vaccine.
"For HIV vaccine design and development, we've begun to see light at the end of the tunnel after many years of research," Dennis Burton, an immunology professor at Scripps Research, previously told CBS News. "This is a terrible time to cut it off. We're beginning to get close. We're getting good results out of clinical trials."
Burton warned that their HIV vaccine research could not simply be turned back on, even if a future administration decided to change course on HIV funding. He said ongoing experiments would be shuttered, and researchers assembled to study the issue would be forced to refocus their careers on other topics.
"This is a decision with consequences that will linger. This is a setback of probably a decade for HIV vaccine research," Burton said.
and contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The #1 Protein to Eat More of if You Don't Eat Meat, According to Dietitians
The #1 Protein to Eat More of if You Don't Eat Meat, According to Dietitians

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The #1 Protein to Eat More of if You Don't Eat Meat, According to Dietitians

Reviewed by Dietitian Kelli McGrane, M.S., RDPulses, including lentils, beans and peas, are the #1 protein to eat more of if you don't eat meat. Pulses are affordable, versatile and incredibly nutritious. They provide protein, fiber, potassium and iron and may reduce the risk of chronic it comes to eating a plant-based diet, some folks worry about getting enough protein. The good news? It's absolutely possible to meet your protein needs through plant-based foods. While it's best to consume a variety of plant-based proteins, after talking with dietitians, one group of foods consistently stood out: pulses. The umbrella term for dried legumes—including lentils, beans, chickpeas and split peas—pulses offer numerous benefits for a meatless diet. "When I counsel vegetarian or vegan clients, what's the one protein source I find myself recommending most often? Lentils and beans," says Natalie Allen, RD, adding "They're versatile, affordable, rich in protein and fiber and provide key nutrients like iron and folate that vegetarians often need more of." Here, dietitians explain why pulses are the #1 protein source to eat more of if you don't eat meat. "One of the key questions many people ask is whether pulses can provide the same nutritional value as meat. The short answer is yes, especially when consumed as part of a varied and balanced diet," says Lina Begdache, PhD, RDN. Here's a closer look at the nutritional benefits of pulses. Don't let their humble appearance fool you, pulses pack an impressive protein punch. For example, 1 cup of black beans provides 15 grams of protein, and 1 cup of cooked lentils offers a whopping 18 grams. What's more, unlike meat, pulses provide protein without contributing saturated fat or cholesterol. Some pulses, like beans and lentils, are low in methionine and cysteine—two essential amino acids—and are considered incomplete proteins. However, because these amino acids are found in other plant-based foods, getting adequate amounts of all nine essential amino acids generally isn't a concern on a plant-based diet. "As long as you eat a variety of plant proteins over the course of the day, your body can pool amino acids and meet its needs," says Allen. While not as popular as beans and lentils, split peas are considered a complete protein source and are also a good source of protein, with 16 grams per 1 cup of cooked green split peas. Besides protein, perhaps the most notable benefit of pulses is their impressive fiber content. One cup of cooked beans or lentils provides around 15 grams of fiber—about 50% of your daily fiber needs. Fiber is a key nutrient that many people don't get enough of on a daily basis. It supports regular bowel movements, helps lower cholesterol levels and aids in blood sugar management. High fiber intake is also linked with a reduced risk of developing and dying from several chronic diseases. Concerned about iron without meat? Pulses deliver. That cup of lentils provides about 6.6 mg of iron, more than a 3-ounce serving of beef. While plant-based protein isn't as readily absorbed as iron from animal foods, pairing your pulses with vitamin C-rich foods—like tomatoes, peppers or citrus fruits—can boost absorption. Pulses are potassium powerhouses. For example, 1 cup of cooked white beans provides 1,000 mg—nearly three times the amount in 1 cup of chopped chicken breast. This essential mineral helps regulate blood pressure and supports heart health. Regularly eating pulses has been linked with a reduced risk of heart disease, type 2 diabetes and obesity. It's also been associated with improvements in blood sugar, blood pressure, waist circumference, chronic inflammation and cholesterol levels. It's also worth noting you don't have to follow a fully plant-based diet to reap the benefits of pulses. One study found that replacing 6–8 ounces of animal protein with 1.5–2 cups of pulses led to improvements in diet quality and cholesterol levels. "In terms of benefits, pulses have several advantages compared to meat. They are naturally low in saturated fat and contain no cholesterol,' says Dr. Begdache, adding 'This makes them a heart-healthy option, particularly for individuals looking to manage their cholesterol levels or reduce their risk of cardiovascular disease.' In addition to being incredibly nutritious, pulses are budget-friendly and have long shelf-lives, meaning you can safely buy them in bulk. Another benefit? They're an eco-friendly protein option. One study found that pulse crops had the lowest environmental footprint among protein sources studied and offered exceptional nutrient density per dollar. Begdache says that incorporating pulses into everyday meals can be simple and delicious, adding that she likes to add lentils into soups and stews, or use black beans as a hearty base for tacos or salads. 'Another idea is lentil curry with turmeric and garlic,' she says. 'These meals are satisfying and flavorful, and deliver a strong nutritional portfolio." Here are a few easy applications for adding more pulses to your plate (or bowl): Soup Power: One of the easiest places to start is by adding beans, lentils or split peas to your favorite soup, stew or chili recipe. Salad Boosters: Top greens with chickpeas, beans or lentils for an affordable protein boost. If you have time, roasted chickpeas are particularly tasty, adding a satisfying crunch to salads. Bowl Basics: Pulses are an ideal protein source for grain bowls. While canned beans and lentils are handy in a pinch, you can also prepare a batch of dried pulses for the week to help cut back on added sodium. Snack Smart: Thanks to their fiber and protein content, pulses make for an excellent snack option as they help keep you full and your blood sugar levels stable. Hummus is an easy go-to, but you can also experiment with bean dips and roasted split peas. Pasta Upgrades: Easily boost the nutritional content of your pasta dishes by adding lentils or white beans into pasta sauces. You can also look for pulse-based pasta alternatives at the grocery store. Thanks to their impressive nutrition profile, affordable price point and versatility, pulses are a clear winner for anyone looking to eat a more plant-based diet. "For anyone looking to reduce their meat intake or simply diversify their protein sources, pulses offer an affordable, nutritious and versatile solution. With health and environmental benefits that extend beyond the dinner plate, pulses are more than just a meat alternative, they're a smart choice for every table,' says Begdache. Read the original article on EATINGWELL

Is One Fasting Method Better Than Another?
Is One Fasting Method Better Than Another?

Medscape

time25 minutes ago

  • Medscape

Is One Fasting Method Better Than Another?

Various intermittent fasting strategies and calorie restriction diets similarly improved body weight compared with ad libitum diets; only alternate-day fasting delivered small-to-moderate additional benefits in weight loss, body composition, lipid levels, and systolic blood pressure — benefits not observed with other intermittent fasting approaches. METHODOLOGY: Weight loss reduces cardiometabolic risks and the burden of chronic disease. Intermittent fasting — alternating periods of eating and fasting — may be a more sustainable alternative to daily calorie restriction, but its benefits compared with those of continuous calorie restriction or ad libitum diets remain unclear. Researchers conducted a systematic review and network meta‐analysis of 99 randomized clinical trials to compare intermittent fasting regimens with continuous calorie restriction and ad libitum diets. Intermittent fasting regimens were time-restricted eating (16-hour fasting period followed by an 8-hour eating window), alternate-day fasting (24-hour fast on alternate days), and whole-day fasting (5 days of unrestricted eating and 2 days of fasting). The included trials, which ranged from 3 to 52 weeks, involved 6582 adults (median age, 45 years; median BMI, 31.3; 66% women), of whom 5862 had existing health conditions such as diabetes, metabolic syndrome, or metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease. The primary outcome was body weight, and secondary outcomes encompassed anthropometric measures, glucose metabolism markers, blood pressure, lipid profiles, liver function, and C-reactive protein levels. TAKEAWAY: A total of 54 studies evaluated ad libitum diets, 53 assessed continuous calorie restriction, 25 examined alternate-day fasting, 40 investigated time-restricted eating, and 38 focused on whole-day fasting. All intermittent fasting and continuous calorie restriction strategies reduced body weight compared with ad libitum diets, with alternate-day fasting showing additional benefit over continuous calorie restriction (mean difference, -1.29 kg; 95% CI, -1.99 to -0.59). Alternate-day fasting led to greater weight reduction than time-restricted eating (mean difference, -1.69 kg; 95% CI, -2.49 to -0.88) and whole-day fasting (mean difference, -1.05 kg; 95% CI, -1.90 to -0.19). The slightly greater weight loss benefits with alternate-day fasting were observed only in the 76 trials with less than 24 weeks of follow-up; however, the 17 moderate-to-long-term trials (≥ 24 weeks) demonstrated greater weight loss for all diet strategies, with no differences between intermittent fasting strategies. Alternate-day fasting was associated with greater reductions in BMI, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and triglyceride levels compared with time-restricted or whole-day fasting. IN PRACTICE: 'The value of this study is not in establishing a universally superior strategy but in positioning alternate-day fasting as an additional option within the therapeutic repertoire,' experts wrote in an accompanying editorial. 'Intermittent fasting does not aim to replace other dietary strategies but to integrate and complement them within a comprehensive, patient-centered nutritional care model,' they added. SOURCE: The study was led by Zhila Semnani-Azad, Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston. It was published online on June 18, 2025, in BMJ . LIMITATIONS: While diet quality on nonfasting days may influence fasting outcomes on alternate days, this relationship has not yet been systematically evaluated in clinical trials. Considerable heterogeneity and incoherence in body weight outcomes across the diet strategy comparisons led to a downgrade in the certainty of the evidence. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported by the Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and other sources. Some authors received research support, honoraria, grants, speaker fees, served on advisory boards, and had several other ties with certain pharmaceutical companies and institutions.

Microbes That Keep Ecosystems in Balance Can Fall Apart Easily, New Study Finds
Microbes That Keep Ecosystems in Balance Can Fall Apart Easily, New Study Finds

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Microbes That Keep Ecosystems in Balance Can Fall Apart Easily, New Study Finds

Institute for Systems Biology research shows how microbial teamwork vital to clean water and healthy soils is becoming more fragile SEATTLE, June 18, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Beneath the surface of soil, wetlands, and waterways, microbial communities perform some of the planet's most important – and invisible – work. But research from the Institute for Systems Biology (ISB) reveals that the partnerships microbes rely on to get these jobs done become surprisingly vulnerable to disruption in contaminated environments. Denitrification: A Microbial Balancing Act The study, published in The ISME Journal, focuses on denitrification, a critical part of the nitrogen cycle. In this process, microbes work together to convert nitrates into harmless nitrogen gas. In some contexts, such as when nitrate levels exceed a threshold due to fertilizer run-offs, this process fails to function smoothly. As a result, nitrate is partially reduced to nitrous oxide, a potent greenhouse gas that has contributed significantly to the warming of our planet and the depletion of ozone in the atmosphere. 'Until now, we have had a limited understanding of how this kind of microbial cooperation forms and how resilient it is to stress,' said Dr. Alex Carr, lead author of the study and a postdoctoral fellow in ISB's Baliga Lab. 'Through laboratory reconstitution of key players from a natural microbial community, we observed how different strains organized themselves to carry out the multi-step denitrification process.' This cooperative behavior emerged without human intervention – each strain performing its role in concert with others. While the microbes and their interactions are resilient to natural environmental changes, harmony proved fragile when there was excess nitrate. In these contaminated environments, when researchers introduced common changes such as oxygen or shifting the nutrient supply, the collaboration broke down, and the community lost its ability to complete the denitrification cycle. Lasting Consequences for Ecosystems In some cases, even when original conditions were restored, the system failed to recover. 'These findings are a reminder that, in contaminated environments, microbial ecosystems lose their remarkable capacity of being self-healing machines,' said ISB Professor, Director, and Senior Vice President Dr. Nitin Baliga, senior author of the study. 'Even small environmental changes can push them past a tipping point, with long-lasting ecological consequences.' The implications reach beyond the lab. Denitrifying microbes help keep waterways clean, limit greenhouse gas emissions, and maintain the fertility of agricultural soils. If the microbial partnerships are tuned to operate within the limits of their evolutionary experiences, it raises important questions about how climate change, pollution, and human intervention could rapidly drive such ecosystems to undesirable states and even to the brink of collapse. The research also carries lessons for the design of microbial systems in engineered settings, such as wastewater treatment facilities or bioremediation efforts. 'Simply assembling the right strains may not be enough,' said Carr. 'Long-term function depends on keeping the environment stable and the community intact.' About ISB Institute for Systems Biology (ISB) is a collaborative and cross-disciplinary non-profit biomedical research organization based in Seattle. We focus on some of the most pressing issues in human health, including aging, brain health, cancer, chronic illness, infectious disease, and more. Our science is translational, and we champion sound scientific research that results in real-world clinical impacts. ISB is an affiliate of Providence, one of the largest not-for-profit healthcare systems in the United States. Follow us online at and on YouTube, Facebook, LinkedIn, X, Bluesky, and Instagram. CONTACT: Joe Myxter Institute for Systems Biology jmyxter@ in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store