St. Norbert professors vote 'no confidence' in college president after major cuts recommended
DE PERE - St. Norbert College faculty voted no confidence in college president Laurie Joyner on Tuesday, more than a month since the college recommended cutting faculty and 13 academic majors.
"In light of the overwhelming evidence of failed leadership, we, the faculty of St. Norbert College, formally declare no confidence in the Presidency of Laurie Joyner and call for immediate action by the Board of Trustees to restore leadership that aligns with the mission, values and sustainability of the college," the resolution, shared with the Press-Gazette, reads.
Faculty voted 66-11 to pass the motion, with two abstentions: 85% of voting faculty and administrators in total voted no confidence, according to multiple faculty members who attended the vote. The resolution calls for a pause on faculty and program eliminations, an independent financial review and a leadership change.
While no confidence votes are symbolic, they show significant opposition among the faculty to leadership. Administrators who receive no confidence votes leave office within a year about half the time, according to the Chronicle of Higher Education.
The Press-Gazette reached out to St. Norbert with questions on whether the vote will impact recommendations to cut faculty or influence any other changes. The college did not respond, but provided statements from Patti Brash McKeithan, chair of the college's board of trustees, and the abbot of St. Norbert Abbey, Dane Radecki, who stated the board and the Norbertines will both continue to back Joyner.
"We are deeply disappointed by the vote of no confidence. This vote, unfortunately, adds to the misguided and misinformed campaign attempting to diminish President Joyner's efforts and trust in her leadership. We stand firmly with President Joyner, and we urge the community to see the bigger picture and the progress we have made under her leadership," a portion of the letter from McKeithan reads. "Votes of no confidence have become weapons of resistance rather than genuine warnings of leadership failure. We call on faculty, staff, students, and alumni to focus on constructive engagement—working with the administration to navigate challenges rather than seeking to delay, deny, and delegitimize the leadership charged with enacting essential changes to ensure St. Norbert College continues its inspiring mission."
The statement comes less than two weeks after McKeithan released an initial letter backing Joyner.
This is the second no confidence vote Joyner has faced in her career. At Saint Xavier University, faculty members voted no confidence 71-33 after university administration reportedly stopped recognizing the faculty union and rewrote faculty bylaws. Joyner left Saint Xavier, which is in Chicago, for St. Norbert in 2023, just under two years after the vote.
St. Norbert faculty were first notified they'd been recommended for cuts on Jan. 15. The college still hasn't made a decision on whether those cuts will be finalized, which some professors have said leaves them in limbo on what their futures will look like. Faculty members declined to speak on the record before cuts have been finalized.
The recommended cuts would eliminate 13 majors, including theology, and revise four more, and administrators said at a town hall that there would 'probably' be a fourth round of cuts in the future. St. Norbert hasn't released the final number of faculty recommended to be cut or what that timeline looks like.
From a former president: 'Snuffing out the light': Former St. Norbert president opposes recommended cuts in letter to trustees
Students were told the college would ensure they'd be able to fulfill their degree requirements and that the administration was exploring options including online programs, working with partners like UW-Green Bay and hiring adjunct professors.
St. Norbert's faculty handbook forbids the college from hiring new professors in academic areas where tenured faculty have been terminated unless the terminated professor was offered and rejected reinstatement. When asked about this, marketing communications director Morgan Bobinski said the college's leadership is following faculty handbook guidelines 'exactly as written.'
On Jan. 31, the American Catholic Historical Association announced it was canceling its 2025 spring conference, which was scheduled to be held at St. Norbert, due to news of the college's recommended cuts to the humanities. The association urged the college not to go through with the recommendations.
No confidence votes aren't unheard of in Wisconsin. Last year, both the University of Wisconsin Oshkosh and Marquette University voted no confidence in their administration.
This article originally appeared on Green Bay Press-Gazette: St. Norbert professors vote 'no confidence' in president after cuts

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Capitol View: Columnist John Brummett, ATA president Shannon Newton
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. – Late last week, there was a dustup between President Donald Trump and billionaire businessman Elon Musk as a war of words divided the two. Capitol View host Roby Brock met with Arkansas Democrat-Gazette columnist John Brummett to discuss how the separation in the political relationship could play out. Roby then met with Arkansas Trucking Association president Shannon Newton to talk about the impact that the legislative session had on the industry. Capitol View airs on Sundays at 8:30 a.m. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Fox News
9 hours ago
- Fox News
TIM GRAHAM: Hostile journalists pose as heroes while Trump faces their questions daily
Jack Blanchard at Politico's Playbook newsletter made the leftists angry by praising President Donald Trump's energetic availability to the press. While CBS star Scott Pelley wailed at a college commencement that they are "the fierce defenders of democracy," "the seekers of truth" and "the vanguard against ignorance," Trump grants them wrote on May 28 that by lunchtime, "it will have been 48 hours since Donald Trump stepped in front of a TV camera for a speech or Q&A -- the first time that's happened (outside of the weekends) since he returned to the White House on Jan. 20. Whatever your politics, that's a remarkable record of public availability, especially when compared to his famously sheltered predecessor." THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION'S TOP MEDIA MOMENTS AND CLASHES OVER FIRST 100 DAYSFormer President Joe Biden was hidden away from the press for four years, and this never drew angry commencement speeches -- because Scott Pelley was eager to please Team Biden, which allowed him to join the other privileged Biden softball-throwers like Drew Barrymore and Ryan Seacrest. He didn't seem to grasp how they make him look by association. Blanchard infuriated the Biden boosters by arguing "the Joe Biden experience shows just how important it is that leaders are held up to regular scrutiny. Trump's answers may sometimes be rambling, erratic -- or even downright unpleasant -- but every American voter can see where he's at."This is where the Pelleys scream, "But he lies! All the lies!" They will try to sully all this acceptance of hostile questions by disparaging all the answers as dangerous Stelter, and Oliver Darcy, and their partisan squad adored Pelley's lecture, but ignored what Blanchard pointed out. They should just deal with his count: "A quick trawl through the archives suggests Trump 2.0 has done media on 111 of his 138 days back in office -- an 80 percent hit rate that includes weekends and must put him on course to being just about the most-accessible president in modern history." When Trump accepts a hostile interview on NBC's "Meet the Press," it's actually used by NBC to congratulate itself. Incoming "Nightly News" anchor Tom Llamas told an interviewer he accepted this battle "because he knows he's going to get a fair shake. It's because Kristen Welker has done a masterful job of helping Americans get information and being fair with President Trump." CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINIONTrump was sparring with Welker in real time, telling her it was unfair to raise the prospect of empty store shelves in the midst of his global trade disputes. "This is such a dishonest interview already," he said. But he accepted it. How many times did Biden appear on "Meet the Press"? None, but nobody cares. They would rather fuss about Trump fighting back against the press by his lawsuits and threats of regulatory scrutiny at the FCC. None of these arrogant media partisans grasp that they boosted every ounce of regulatory scrutiny and lawsuits and lawfare against Trump over the last eight years. Every Trump-trashing tactic they support is automatically defined as "democracy" and "truth-seeking." CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APPThey define "independence" and "freedom of the press" as the freedom to smear Trump as a criminal or as Hitler, and any attempt to respond in kind is described as nasty pages in the "authoritarian playbook." Then they wonder why no one outside their reinforced leftist bubble trusts them as actually objective or nonpartisan.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Judge halts deportation of Colorado suspect's family
A US judge has temporarily halted deportation proceedings against the family of a man accused of Sunday's petrol-bomb attack on Jewish demonstrators in Boulder, Colorado. Mohamed Sabry Soliman, 45, is accused of a federal hate crime and other charges. Officials say his family, who are not charged in the attack, are Egyptian citizens. US District Judge Gordon Gallagher, a Biden appointee, ordered deportation proceedings to be halted, a day after the White House said it had six one-way tickets to deport the wife and five children from the US. The decision was one of three immigration rulings on Wednesday against Trump by federal judges as he seeks to deliver on his pledge for mass deportations. "The court finds that deportation without process could work irreparable harm and an order must issue without notice due to the urgency this situation presents," Judge Gallagher wrote in his order on Wednesday. Lawyers for the defence had accused the government of unfairly targeting the family, who say they were unaware of Mr Soliman's violent plans and have co-operated with investigators. "It is patently unlawful to punish individuals for the crimes of their relatives," the family's lawyers said in a lawsuit challenging their immigration detention. "Such methods of collective or family punishment violates the very foundations of a democratic justice system." The family members include Mr Soliman's wife, Hayam El Gamal, 41, as well as the couple's 17-year-old daughter, two other daughters and two sons. They are being held at an immigration detention centre in Texas, over 900 miles (1,450km) from their home in Colorado. Department of Homeland Security officials have said that Mr Soliman arrived in the US on a tourist visa in August 2022. That visa expired the following year. He made an asylum claim in September 2022. According to police documents, the suspect told officials that he "never talked to his wife or his family" about his plans, and that he had left a phone in a desk drawer with messages to his wife and children. His wife turned the phone in to authorities. One of Mr Soliman's daughters was recently awarded a scholarship by a local newspaper in Colorado Springs. A profile in the Gazette newspaper noted she "was born in Egypt but lived in Kuwait for 14 years" and relocated to the US two years ago. After his arrest, Mr Soliman told police he planned the attack to take place after his daughter's high school graduation, according to the FBI. On Wednesday, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said the agency was "investigating to what extent his family knew about this heinous attack, if they had knowledge of it, or if they provided support to it". The judge's order is the latest setback for the Trump administration on immigration. On Wednesday, another federal judge ruled that over 100 Venezuelan migrants deported to a jail in El Salvador must be given a chance to challenge their removal. Judge James Boasberg said the US had "plainly deprived" the migrants of their constitutional right to oppose their detention. But the ruling does not apply Venezuelan migrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran native deported from the US at the same time. It also emerged on Wednesday that the US had flown a Guatemalan man back to the US, after deporting him to Mexico. A federal judge in Boston last month found that prosecutors had incorrectly declared the man was not afraid for his safety in Mexico. The individual, identified in court papers only as OCG, was returned on a commercial flight on Wednesday, according to his lawyers. Family of Boulder suspect detained by immigration officers