Japan, NATO agree to collaborate on Iran, Ukraine, N Korea issues
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, right, and Japans Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya speak with the media on the sidelines of the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands, on Tuesday.
Japan and NATO agreed Tuesday to closely collaborate to address "security challenges" such as the Middle East crisis, Russia's war against Ukraine and North Korea's past abductions of Japanese nationals.
During their talks in The Hague, Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte also affirmed that they would work to elevate their cooperation to "a new height" in various fields including defense industries, the Japanese Foreign Ministry said.
The talks came as the United States, a NATO member and Japan's close ally, conducted airstrikes on key Iranian nuclear facilities amid the conflict between Israel and Iran, although the regional rivals said earlier Tuesday they had agreed to a cease-fire.
Russia and North Korea have been strengthening their military partnership as Moscow's full-scale invasion of Ukraine -- which began in 2022 -- drags on and Pyongyang continues its missile and nuclear development.
NATO has been stepping up cooperative ties in recent years with its Indo-Pacific partners of Japan, Australia, New Zealand and South Korea, sharing the view that security in the Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific regions is inseparable.
Iwaya met with Rutte on the sidelines of an ongoing NATO summit as a stand-in for Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, who canceled his planned visit to the Dutch city at the last minute due to the absence of other Indo-Pacific leaders and concerns over the Middle East situation.
© KYODO
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NHK
33 minutes ago
- NHK
Trump Middle East strategy may have Asian impact
Former senior US diplomat Kurt Campbell, well-versed in US Asia policy, tells NHK that his country's involvement in the Middle East may affect its Asian activities.
The Mainichi
an hour ago
- The Mainichi
UN to reduce staff by 20%, mull realignment as US cuts funding
NEW YORK (Kyodo) -- The United Nations will reduce its staff by 20 percent and consider realigning more than 140 related institutions, senior officials said Tuesday, as the organization faces funding cuts from the United States. Guy Ryder, U.N. undersecretary general for policy and chair of a task force for restructuring, and other officials told a meeting at the U.N. headquarters in New York that the targeted institutions include the United Nations Children's Fund and the Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees. The United Nations, which is marking its 80th anniversary this year, plans to reduce 2,000 personnel, mainly in New York and Geneva, and cut its 2026 budget by 15 to 20 percent from this year's level. The move follows the decision by the United States, the largest financial contributor to the United Nations, to reduce or freeze its funding under President Donald Trump's "America First" policy. The country provided 22 percent of its $3.72 billion regular budget for this year. Japan was the third-largest contributor at 6.9 percent, coming after China at 20 percent. The organizational restructuring is expected to start in 2027 at the earliest. The task force is reviewing the targeted organizations under seven clusters including development, peace and security and human rights.
The Mainichi
2 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Editorial: Trump's 'peace by force' plants seed of future evils
U.S. President Donald Trump has announced that Israel and Iran have agreed to a "complete and total" ceasefire in their ongoing conflict. To prevent an escalation and put an end to the mutual attacks, we urge both parties to steadily implement the accord. The war in the Middle East has entered a new phase. It must lead to stability in the region. Israel launched attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities and air defense systems claiming Tehran was close to developing an atomic weapon. It killed senior officers of Iran's elite Revolutionary Guard Corps and multiple scientists involved in its nuclear development program. Iran countered with ballistic missiles and drones, leading to a large-scale exchange of fire. Then in a sudden turn of events, the United States unleashed strikes against Iran, bombing three Iranian nuclear facilities in the name of collective self-defense. Israel's heavy responsibility The Iranian leadership's promises of retaliation against the U.S. prompted concerns that tensions in the Middle East would escalate further. The Iranian parliament voted to close the Strait of Hormuz, a major artery for crude oil shipments, raising fears for the global economy. But Iran's retaliation was subdued. While Tehran fired missiles at a U.S. military base on the outskirts of Doha, Qatar, prior to the ceasefire agreement, no damage was reported. Iran had warned Washington and Qatar before the attack. What is concerning is that the U.S. air attacks could allow the strategy of "peace by force" to go unchallenged. Washington, while hinting at its readiness to pursue negotiations, resorted to military action to force Iran into submission. This approach is unacceptable. Israel has justified its strikes as acts of self-defense. However, negotiations between Tehran and Washington over Iran's nuclear program were ongoing at the time, and it is inconceivable that there was imminent threat. Israel's actions run counter to international law and the United Nations Charter, both of which constrain the use of force. Regarding its bombing of Iran, Washington also claimed that it had exercised its right to collective self-defense to rid the world of a source of anxiety and defend its ally, Israel. This, however, is nothing but a gross overextension of the interpretation of collective defense. Furthermore, it cannot be overlooked that Israel and Washington targeted Iran's nuclear facilities in their attacks. International Atomic Energy Agency Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi has sounded the alarm, stating, "I have repeatedly stated that nuclear facilities must never be attacked," and, "the IAEA has consistently underlined that 'armed attacks on nuclear facilities could result in radioactive releases with grave consequences within and beyond the boundaries of the State which has been attacked.'" In Ukraine, Russia attacked the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power station in the south, sparking a blame game between Kyiv and Moscow. International rules are being neglected through "the logic of the strong." Meanwhile, the U.N. Security Council has been dysfunctional when it ought to be responsible for global peace and stability. Russia, a permanent member of the Security Council, invaded its neighbor, while the U.S., fellow permanent member, had a part in Israel's attacks on Iran. The rules of law must be restored What was recently brought into sharp relief was the double standard of the international community, primarily the U.S. and Europe. Nations strongly condemned Russia over its invasion of Ukraine and imposed severe sanctions against Moscow, while remaining silent about Washington's behavior. The leaders of Britain, France and Germany have stressed that it remains their goal to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, while avoiding direct evaluation on the U.S. strikes. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte also told a press conference, "My biggest fear would be for Iran to own and be able to use and deploy a nuclear weapon," and, "I would not agree that this is against international law -- what the U.S. did." Regarding the U.S. strikes, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said they were "a show of Washington's resolve to thwart Iran's acquisition of nuclear arms." However, the rubber-stamp stance of Japan and Europe on Washington's self-righteous behavior will only result in them losing the confidence of the emerging and developing countries of the Global South. What was destroyed in the latest strikes was not just Iran's nuclear facilities. These events have taken a heavy toll on the post-World War II international order, established by humanity in search of a world without wars, borne of their remorse over the two global conflagrations of the 20th century. The roles to be played by middle powers like countries in Europe and Japan are to commit themselves to rebuilding international norms. It is essential to restore the rule of law, tarnished by the high-handed behavior of superpowers, and put the brakes on the descent into turmoil.
