logo
Keir's long-overdue grooming gang inquiry does NOT go far enough – Labour won't get us justice, slam survivors' families

Keir's long-overdue grooming gang inquiry does NOT go far enough – Labour won't get us justice, slam survivors' families

The Sun16 hours ago

GROOMING gang survivors and their families said Sir Keir Starmer's long-overdue inquiry does not go far enough - and warned they' have got no trust in Labour to deliver justice.
They told how they were ignored, blamed and even punished by professionals who were supposed to protect them.
3
And said only a fully independent probe will expose the truth and hold people to account.
Their comments came after the PM finally agreed to a national inquiry, months after dismissing calls as a 'far-Right bandwagon'.
He was forced into a U-turn after a devastating report by Baroness Casey, which revealed that police and council leaders deliberately covered up the abuse - predominantly by men of Pakistani origin - because they feared being called racist.
The review also found that asylum seekers and foreign nationals are involved in a 'significant proportion' of live investigations into grooming gangs across the UK.
At a press conference hosted by Tory leader Kemi Badenoch, survivors and campaigners said the abuse is still happening and warned the system that failed them must now be held to account.
Marlon West, whose daughter Scarlett was groomed and trafficked from the age of 14, said his main concern is that the inquiry will be locally led - and warned councils should not be 'answering their own homework'.
He later added: 'I've met with Jess Phillips [Labour's safeguarding minister], I've been campaigning for this for the last years and I've just had the door closed on my face.
'I do not trust them, so they still need challenging. Like I said, there's more questions and answers.'
Fiona Goddard, a survivor who bravely waived her anonymity, said she was repeatedly blamed and labelled a 'brothel-runner' at 16 by those who should have protected her.
She called for survivor-led education in schools to help children spot signs of grooming and abuse.
Teresa, whose son was abused aged 13 and later died before he could finish giving evidence, said she was warned not to dig for answers or her son 'would suffer the consequences'.
She criticised the inquiry's narrow scope, saying: 'It's not just girls. Boys are being abused too, and they need to know it's not their fault.'
Lucia, a campaigner who has supported survivors for years, said: 'We're hoping this inquiry will give regular updates to restore the public trust and survivors' trust more importantly because we do believe that is at an all-time low.'
Ms Badenoch, who first called for a national inquiry in January, said: 'What we need right now is the moral courage to do the right thing, rather than continually finding reasons to kick stuff into the long grass.'
Asked why the Tories did not hold a specific inquiry during their years in power, she insisted the party 'did a lot' and set up a taskforce under Rishi Sunak that identified hundreds of perpetrators.
She said her previous apology to victims still stood, but added: 'Apologies are easy. What we need is action.'
On whether the crisis had become a border issue, the Tory leader replied: 'Yes, I think this does go into borders beyond criminal justice.'
Appearing alongside her, Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'The lack of control at the border is fuelling the risk here.'
Mr Philp also said the Conservatives wanted the inquiry to take two years, focus on 'all 50 towns affected' and 'look at the role of ethnicity in the cover-up'.
But appearing in front of the Commons Home Affairs Committee on Tuesday morning, Baroness Casey urged people to 'keep calm' on the subject of ethnicity.
Pointing out that her report had said data on the ethnicity of perpetrators was 'incomplete and unreliable', she said: 'If you look at the data on child sexual exploitation, suspects and offenders, it's disproportionately Asian heritage.
'If you look at the data for child abuse, it is not disproportionate, and it is white men.
'So again, just (a) note to everybody really, outside here rather than in here, let's just keep calm here about how you interrogate data and what you draw from it.'
Baroness Casey's report, published on Monday, found the ethnicity of perpetrators had been 'shied away from', with data not recorded for two-thirds of offenders.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper told MPs that officials had dodged the issue of ethnicity among groups of sex offenders for fear of being called racist, and called for 'much more robust national data'.
Baroness Casey also told the Home Affairs Committee that a national inquiry should be done within three years, rather than the two called for by the Conservatives.
She believed three years would be 'achievable' to carry out the national and local inquiries.
The crossbench peer also urged for local areas to 'think carefully' about not being open to scrutiny and to change.
On the five local inquiries announced in January, she said 'only Oldham bit the bullet', adding: 'My understanding is nobody else volunteered for that. So that tells you something, doesn't it? It tells you something, and it doesn't tell you something I certainly would want to hear if I was a victim.'
A Downing Street spokesman said the format and chairperson of the inquiry would be set out at a later date, adding that it would have the power to compel people to give evidence.
The spokesman said: 'We want to get on with this, but we must take the time to sort out exactly how that works and get the process right.
'But to be absolutely clear, the grooming scandal was one of the greatest failures in our country's history, with vulnerable people let down time and again, and the Prime Minister is determined to finally get them justice.'
He added that the Government had accepted all of Baroness Casey's recommendations, including making it mandatory for the police to collect data on the ethnicity of suspects.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Disgraced popstar Gary Glitter refused prison release
Disgraced popstar Gary Glitter refused prison release

The Independent

time21 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Disgraced popstar Gary Glitter refused prison release

Gary Glitter, the disgraced pop star convicted of multiple child sex offences, will remain in jail after his bid for release was rejected. The Parole Board announced its decision following a paper review of Glitter's case, whose real name is Paul Gadd. Glitter, 81, was sentenced to 16 years in 2015 for the sexual abuse of three schoolgirls between 1975 and 1980. Having served half of his sentence, he was automatically released from HMP The Verne on Portland, Dorset in February 2023. Less than six weeks after his release, Glitter was rearrested and imprisoned for breaching his licence conditions. Reports indicated that he had attempted to access the dark web and view downloaded images of children. In a statement, a spokesman for the Parole Board said: 'We can confirm that a panel of the Parole Board refused the release of Paul Gadd following a paper review. 'Parole Board decisions are solely focused on what risk a prisoner could represent to the public if released and whether that risk is manageable in the community. 'A panel will carefully examine a huge range of evidence, including details of the original crime, and any evidence of behaviour change, as well as explore the harm done and impact the crime has had on the victims.' Parole judges review the cases of criminals who are recalled to prison to decide whether they should be re-released or stay behind bars for the rest of their sentence. Glitter's last parole hearing happened in January 2024. If the Parole Board does not recommend him for release in future, he will walk free when his sentence expires in February 2031. 'Parole reviews are undertaken thoroughly and with extreme care. Protecting the public is our number one priority,' the Parole Board spokesman added. 'Under current legislation, he will be eligible for a further review in due course. The date of the next review will be set by the Ministry of Justice.' In April, Glitter was made bankrupt after failing to pay more than £500,000 in damages to one of his victims, her lawyers said. Richard Scorer, head of abuse law and public inquiries at Slater and Gordon – who represents one of Glitter's victims, said the decision is 'absolutely right' but warned of the 'nightmare' his client faces each time the 81-year-old is up for review. 'The decision made by the parole board is absolutely right,' Mr Scorer said. 'My client is relieved at this ruling but is understandably apprehensive about the continued nightmare of Gadd coming up for parole again, and the fear of him being let out on licence. 'This is unfair on victims and it would be better if our clients could be assured that he would serve the rest of his sentence.'

Gary Glitter denied jail release
Gary Glitter denied jail release

The Independent

time31 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Gary Glitter denied jail release

Gary Glitter, the convicted child sex offender, will remain in jail after the Parole Board rejected his bid for release following a paper review of his case. Glitter, whose real name is Paul Gadd, was sentenced to 16 years in 2015 for the sexual abuse of three schoolgirls and was automatically released in February 2023 after serving half of his sentence. He was rearrested less than six weeks after his release for breaching his licence conditions, with reports indicating he attempted to access the dark web and view images of children. The Parole Board stated that its decisions are solely focused on the risk a prisoner could represent to the public if released and whether that risk is manageable in the community. Richard Scorer, representing one of Glitter's victims, said the decision was 'absolutely right' but warned of the 'nightmare' his client faces each time Glitter is up for review.

I was with PM as hungry bears and Donald Trump threatened to unleash chaos
I was with PM as hungry bears and Donald Trump threatened to unleash chaos

Daily Mirror

time32 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

I was with PM as hungry bears and Donald Trump threatened to unleash chaos

World leaders had one more security issue to worry about as they gathered in the Canadian Rockies this week for the G7 summit - grizzly bears. In the weeks leading up to annual gathering authorities were hard at work fortifying a lodge in Kananaskis, Alberta, not just from the usual threats, but also the local wildlife. Buffaloberry bushes - popular with bears - were removed from around the venue, eight-foot electric fences installed to keep the predators at a safe distance, and drones deployed to monitor the 65 grizzlies estimated to inhabit Banff National Park. But it was not enough for one delegation at the summit, who spotted a grizzly on a nearby golf course. It was later identified as the "Boss Bear" - one of the most famous in the region. Fortunately the closest Keir Starmer got to the local wildlife during the three-day event was a persistent chipmunk that repeatedly approached the PM's feet during a series of broadcast interviews. But perhaps none of the world leaders could prepare for the arrival of Donald Trump. Just hours after Air Force One touched down on the tarmac Calgary International Airport, Alberta, the US President was already making a scene. "The G7 used to be the G8," the American leader moaned as he stood alongside the host of this year's summit and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. Despite Vladimir Putin's illegal annexation of Crimea in 2014, it was a "very big mistake", he said, to boot Russia out of the close-knit club of nations that gather annually. Perhaps not the most diplomatic approach to the imminent arrival of Ukraine's war-time leader President Zelensky as a special guest of the G7 leaders. Trump was then signing off a long-awaited UK-US trade deal with Keir Starmer. As the two leaders gathered in front of the waiting media pack, the US President mistakenly referred to the deal with the European Union and dropped the papers on the floor. "It's a little windy out here," he joked. Rushing to his assistance, the PM knelt down and brushed them up, fearing anyone else lending a hand could be tackled to the ground by the President's security detail. And then it became the G6. The US President announced his abrupt departure from the summit - walking out a day early and missing key talks with Zelensky to help reach a ceasefire in Ukraine. French President Emmanuel Macron valiantly attempted to suggest Mr Trump had flown home in an attempt to negotiate a ceasefire in the Middle East. How did the US President respond? 'Publicity seeking President Emmanuel Macron, of France, mistakenly said that I left the G7 Summit, in Canada, to go back to D.C. to work on a 'cease fire' between Israel and Iran," he said. "Wrong!' He has no idea why I am now on my way to Washington, but it certainly has nothing to do with a Cease Fire. Much bigger than that. Whether purposely or not, Emmanuel always gets it wrong. Stay Tuned!' It was clear as Mr Starmer jetted into the G7 from London over the weekend the conflict in the Middle East would overshadow the summit. He told reporters onboard the flight that British fighter jets, including Typhoons, were being deployed to the region to protect UK assets. Downing Street had been hoping that the leaders gathered at the summit this week would urge both the Iranian regime and Benjamin Nentayahu to rapidly de-escalate. Mr Starmer even told reporters he did not believe the US would become involved in the Israeli assault on Tehran. "There is nothing the President said that suggests he's about to get involved in this conflict, on the contrary, the G7 statement was about de-escalation," he said. But just moments later the erratic President was back on Truth Social blowing up attempts to de-escalate the crisis. He claimed America was in control of the Iranian skies and was not going to assassinate the country's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, "at least for now". Without further explanation, he went on: "UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store