Forest & Bird Says National Parks Not Game Parks
The week after the Government published an action plan which skirts around a $1.5 billion gap in funding for conservation, Forest & Bird is baffled by the prioritisation of government time and energy into helping 512 hunters shoot 86 deer in a national park.
'It's hard to put into words just how questionable this decision is,' says Forest & Bird Chief Executive, Nicola Toki.
'The Minister has today announced he is going to start a process to provide special protected status to Wapiti deer, an introduced feral species contributing to biodiversity damage in Fiordland National Park – home to unique and much-loved endangered species such as kākāpō, kiwi, kea, pīwauwau rock wren, and whio blue duck.'
Fiordland National Park forms part of Te Wāhipounamu – South West New Zealand World Heritage Area, which covers 2.6 million hectares (almost 10% of Aotearoa New Zealand's total land area). It is recognised by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) as the largest and least modified area of New Zealand's natural ecosystems and the world's best intact modern representation of the ancient biota of Gondwana.
"Instead of trying to ensure Fiordland can welcome kākāpō back to their home, this Government is instead looking at changing the law to let a North American deer species use the national park as a glorified vege patch – eating away at the very natural heritage that these sanctuaries have been legally designed to protect. What's next? A sanctuary for stoats?' Ms Toki says.
'New Zealanders expect our Government to look after public conservation land and our national parks have always been the jewels in the crown. That's why in 2010 the previous National government had to do an embarrassing U-turn on its plan to mine in national parks after a massive public outcry.'
Undermining the incredible landscapes and habitats of Fiordland National Park so that a few hunters can shoot a small number of deer each year, is catering to a handful of vested interests at the expense of all New Zealanders.
Forest & Bird is appalled at the ongoing attacks on conservation land.
"This is merely the latest salvo in this government's war on nature,' Ms Toki says. 'Is there nothing that this Government won't do to our precious places including conservation land and national parks? Mining on the Denniston plateau, commercial fishing carve-outs in the Hauraki Gulf, selling off conservation land, and now game parks instead of national parks.
'New Zealanders are deeply concerned at this constant erosion of conservation in the very places that the Government has been charged with protecting.
'To be clear, Forest & Bird is not anti-hunting. Hunting is part of the toolbox in tackling the out-of-control numbers of browsing animals that are causing significant damage to New Zealand's environment and many of our members are keen hunters. Forest & Bird is supportive of the role the hunting community can and does play in helping to stem the tide of deer, pig, and goat numbers. However, we are equally clear that putting precious time and taxpayer money into a Herd of Special Interest (HOSI) is not a priority.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
IWCNZ Demands Immediate Justice And Urgent Action On Gaza Crisis, Citing Grave Violations Of International Law
Press Release – Islamic Women's Council of New Zealand This is not just a Palestinian issueit is a human rights crisis that demands urgent intervention. We urge New Zealanders, activists, and civil society groups to challenge misinformation, amplify Palestinian voices, and demand justice. As Eid approaches, it is a time for reflection, compassion, and togetherness. Yet, while many prepare to celebrate, our thoughts are with those in Gaza who are facing unimaginable hardship. The Islamic Women's Council New Zealand (IWCNZ) stands in unwavering solidarity with the Palestinian people, condemning the ongoing atrocities and humanitarian crisis in Gaza. As mothers, daughters, sisters, and advocates for justice, we cannot remain silent as innocent lives—especially women and children—continue to suffer under relentless attacks and unjust occupation. The military assault on Gaza is more than a conflict—it is a humanitarian catastrophe fuelled by systemic oppression, ethnic cleansing, and violations of international law. Entire families have been destroyed, homes flattened, hospitals bombed, and basic human needs deliberately denied. The international community has an obligation to act, yet far too little is being done. 'The systematic targeting of civilians and the deliberate denial of humanitarian aid in Gaza constitute grave breaches of international law,' states Dr. Maysoon Salama. IWCNZ. 'New Zealand has a proud history of advocating for peace and human rights on the global stage. We urge our government to live up to these values and take concrete action to halt this humanitarian catastrophe.' The continued violence against Palestinians is in direct violation of international law, including: The Fourth Geneva Convention (1949) – Prohibits occupation forces from targeting civilians, imposing collective punishment, and blocking humanitarian aid. The Rome Statute of the ICC – Defines war crimes, including indiscriminate bombings and forced starvation of civilians. The 1948 Genocide Convention – Holds nations accountable for acts that seek to erase a people through mass killings, destruction, and denial of survival resources. United Nations Resolutions – Numerous UN resolutions condemn Israeli occupation and reaffirm Palestinian sovereignty, yet enforcement remains weak due to global political bias. The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) – Guarantees safety, education, healthcare, and basic human needs for every child, all of which have been stripped from Palestinian children in Gaza. The UN Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) – Recognizes the impact of conflict on women, calling for their protection and inclusion in peace processes —which has been ignored entirely in Palestine. New Zealand has long advocated for peace and human rights, but words are not enough. The Islamic Women's Council of New Zealand demands that the New Zealand Government: Publicly denounce Israel's violations of international law and demand accountability. Advocate for an immediate ceasefire and halt military funding that supports occupation forces. Enforce diplomatic and economic sanctions until Israel adheres to international law. Enhance humanitarian aid contributions to ensure medical relief reaches Palestinian families. Support Palestinian sovereignty by recognizing Palestine's right to self-determination. This is not just a Palestinian issue—it is a human rights crisis that demands urgent intervention. We urge New Zealanders, activists, and civil society groups to challenge misinformation, amplify Palestinian voices, and demand justice. As Muslim women, we feel the deep pain of mothers watching their children suffer, the anguish of families torn apart, and the urgency for a world where peace is more than just words. We will not stay silent. We will continue to advocate, amplify, and demand change until Palestine is free from occupation, oppression, and genocide.
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
The House: Parliamentary Week Achieves Two Out Of Three Goals
Sanctions against Te Pti Mori MPs were historic, but they weren't the only thing that happened in the house. , Editor: The House While Parliament's week was dominated by its final event – Thursday's debate on the report from the Privileges Committee into a haka performed in the chamber – the rest of the week focussed on other business that, while more mundane, was still worthy of note. The Government appeared to have three objectives for this week in the house. Crucial to the administration's continuance, the first goal was to successfully complete the initial debate on the budget. The long initial budget debate could no longer dribble on over weeks, so the house spent six hours of the week completing the second reading debate, which is the first debate a budget gets. The reading was accomplished and so the Government continues. This may sound silly, but a Government cannot survive, if the house votes against its budget. Agreeing to vote for budget and taxation bills are the 'supply' portion of the 'confidence and supply' agreement that is the foundation of any coalition agreement. The budget focus now turns to select committees and what is called 'Scrutiny Week', when ministers appear before various subject committees to defend their budget plans. Scrutiny Week begins on 16 June. Slow seconds A second objective was possibly not in earlier plans for this week – to finally polish off the bills originally slated for completion two weeks ago during budget week urgency. Then, the Leader of the House had asked the house to accord urgency for 12 bills the Government hoped to progress through 30 stages of parliamentary debate. The plan was ambitious and it did not succeed. Despite day-long sittings until midnight Saturday (when urgency must end), only two bills were completed, others were untouched, and 13 stages were unfinished or unstarted. This week's plan for the house had MPs returning to the well for more of the same. Just like last time, progress was at a snail's pace. After quite a few hours, the Government had slugged its way through just a few more stages. The plan was slowed to a crawl by bills' committee stages (formally known as the Committee of the Whole House). Committee stages are a crucial way for MPs to publicly interrogate the minister in charge of a bill. With patience, they can tease out a lot about both a government's development of legislation and its intended real-world impacts. Because the committee stage has no set duration, it is also a way for the opposition to make the Government really work for progress. The Government did achieve progress on the bills left incomplete from budget week, but again, it was probably not what was hoped for. They will need to come back yet again in three weeks to have a third crack. The Opposition is showing itself to be quite effective at the filibuster. The Government's third objective was to have the debate on the recent Privileges Committee Report on three Te Pāti Māori MPs done by the week's end. As Leader of the House Chris Bishop said in re-initiating the debate: 'My encouragement would be for everybody to finish this debate today. 'Have a robust debate, but let's end this issue once and for all, and deal with the issue and get back to the major issues facing this country.' That wish was fulfilled with apparent agreement from across the house. As 6pm neared, the MP who eventually moved that a vote be taken was Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi. The frankly fascinating debate on the report will be reported separately.
Scoop
6 hours ago
- Scoop
The House: Parliamentary Week Achieves Two Out Of Three Goals
, Editor: The House While Parliament's week was dominated by its final event - Thursday's debate on the report from the Privileges Committee into a haka performed in the chamber - the rest of the week focussed on other business that, while more mundane, was still worthy of note. The Government appeared to have three objectives for this week in the house. Crucial to the administration's continuance, the first goal was to successfully complete the initial debate on the budget. The long initial budget debate could no longer dribble on over weeks, so the house spent six hours of the week completing the second reading debate, which is the first debate a budget gets. The reading was accomplished and so the Government continues. This may sound silly, but a Government cannot survive, if the house votes against its budget. Agreeing to vote for budget and taxation bills are the 'supply' portion of the 'confidence and supply' agreement that is the foundation of any coalition agreement. The budget focus now turns to select committees and what is called 'Scrutiny Week', when ministers appear before various subject committees to defend their budget plans. Scrutiny Week begins on 16 June. Slow seconds A second objective was possibly not in earlier plans for this week - to finally polish off the bills originally slated for completion two weeks ago during budget week urgency. Then, the Leader of the House had asked the house to accord urgency for 12 bills the Government hoped to progress through 30 stages of parliamentary debate. The plan was ambitious and it did not succeed. Despite day-long sittings until midnight Saturday (when urgency must end), only two bills were completed, others were untouched, and 13 stages were unfinished or unstarted. This week's plan for the house had MPs returning to the well for more of the same. Just like last time, progress was at a snail's pace. After quite a few hours, the Government had slugged its way through just a few more stages. The plan was slowed to a crawl by bills' committee stages (formally known as the Committee of the Whole House). Committee stages are a crucial way for MPs to publicly interrogate the minister in charge of a bill. With patience, they can tease out a lot about both a government's development of legislation and its intended real-world impacts. Because the committee stage has no set duration, it is also a way for the opposition to make the Government really work for progress. The Government did achieve progress on the bills left incomplete from budget week, but again, it was probably not what was hoped for. They will need to come back yet again in three weeks to have a third crack. The Opposition is showing itself to be quite effective at the filibuster. The Government's third objective was to have the debate on the recent Privileges Committee Report on three Te Pāti Māori MPs done by the week's end. As Leader of the House Chris Bishop said in re-initiating the debate: "My encouragement would be for everybody to finish this debate today. "Have a robust debate, but let's end this issue once and for all, and deal with the issue and get back to the major issues facing this country." That wish was fulfilled with apparent agreement from across the house. As 6pm neared, the MP who eventually moved that a vote be taken was Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi. The frankly fascinating debate on the report will be reported separately. - RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk. Enjoy our articles or podcast at RNZ.
