How Texas will improve virtual learning for students, educators
AUSTIN (KXAN) — On Tuesday, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott signed Senate Bill 569 into law, effective immediately.
According to the Texas Senate, SB 569:
Creates Chapter 30B of the Education Code, replacing outdated virtual learning laws
Allows for AP, dual-credit or specialized elective courses to be taken virtually
Enables students to complete up to two years of college coursework while in high school
Supports flexible scheduling for apprenticeships, career training and early graduation through hybrid learning
Prohibits mandatory virtual enrollment and ensures teachers cannot be forced to teach virtually without training and consent
Establishes standards and oversight for virtual education providers
The bill had bipartisan support, passing the Senate (28-2) and the House (109-32).
'SB 569 modernizes Texas' virtual learning framework for the more than 51,884 students currently enrolled statewide, with enrollment projected to double by 2028, and expands access to high-quality digital and hybrid instruction for the 5.5 million currently enrolled Texas public school students,' said Senator Paul Bettencourt, who authored the bill.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to KXAN Austin.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bill Cassidy Blew It
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. It's easy to forget that Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s assault on vaccines—including, most recently, his gutting of the expert committee that guides American vaccine policy—might have been avoided. Four months ago, his nomination for health secretary was in serious jeopardy. The deciding vote seemed to be in the hands of one Republican senator: Bill Cassidy of Louisiana. A physician who gained prominence by vaccinating low-income kids in his home state, Cassidy was wary of the longtime vaccine conspiracist. 'I have been struggling with your nomination,' he told Kennedy during his confirmation hearings in January. Then Cassidy caved. In the speech he gave on the Senate floor explaining his decision, Cassidy said that he'd vote to confirm Kennedy only because he had extracted a number of concessions from the nominee—chief among them that he would preserve, 'without changes,' the very CDC committee Kennedy overhauled this week. Since then, Cassidy has continued to give Kennedy the benefit of the doubt. On Monday, after Kennedy dismissed all 17 members of the vaccine advisory committee, Cassidy posted on X that he was working with Kennedy to prevent the open roles from being filled with 'people who know nothing about vaccines except suspicion.' [Read: The doctor who let RFK Jr. through] The senator has failed, undeniably and spectacularly. One new appointee, Robert Malone, has repeatedly spread misinformation (or what he prefers to call 'scientific dissent') about vaccines. Another appointee, Vicky Pebsworth, is on the board of an anti-vax nonprofit, the National Vaccine Information Center. Cassidy may keep insisting that he is doing all he can to stand up for vaccines. But he already had his big chance to do so, and he blew it. Now, with the rest of America, he's watching the nation's vaccine future take a nosedive. So far, the senator hasn't appeared interested in any kind of mea culpa for his faith in Kennedy's promises. On Thursday, I caught Cassidy as he hurried out of a congressional hearing room. He was still reviewing the appointees, he told me and several other reporters who gathered around him. When I chased after him down the hallway to ask more questions, he told me, 'I'll be putting out statements, and I'll let those statements stand for themselves.' A member of his staff dismissed me with a curt 'Thank you, sir.' Cassidy's staff has declined repeated requests for an interview with the senator since the confirmation vote in January. With the exception of Mitch McConnell, every GOP senator voted to confirm Kennedy. They all have to own the health secretary's actions. But Cassidy seemed to be the Republican most concerned about Kennedy's nomination, and there was a good reason to think that the doctor would vote his conscience. In 2021, Cassidy was one of seven Senate Republicans who voted to convict Donald Trump on an impeachment charge after the insurrection at the Capitol. But this time, the senator—who is up for reelection next year, facing a more MAGA-friendly challenger—ultimately fell in line. Cassidy tried to have it both ways: elevating Kennedy to his job while also vowing to constrain him. In casting his confirmation vote, Cassidy implied that the two would be in close communication, and that Kennedy had asked for his input on hiring decisions. The two reportedly had breakfast in March to discuss the health secretary's plan to dramatically reshape the department. 'Senator Cassidy speaks regularly with secretary Kennedy and believes those conversations are much more productive when they're held in private, not through press headlines,' a spokesperson for Cassidy wrote in an email. (A spokesperson for HHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment.) At times, it has appeared as though Cassidy's approach has had some effect on the health secretary. Amid the measles outbreak in Texas earlier this year, Kennedy baselessly questioned the safety of the MMR vaccine. In April, after two unvaccinated children died, Cassidy posted on X: 'Everyone should be vaccinated! There is no treatment for measles. No benefit to getting measles. Top health officials should say so unequivocally b/4 another child dies.' Cassidy didn't call out Kennedy by name, but the health secretary appeared to get the message. Later that day, Kennedy posted that the measles vaccine was the most effective way to stave off illness. ('Completely agree,' Cassidy responded.) All things considered, that's a small victory. Despite Kennedy's claims that he is not an anti-vaxxer, he has enacted a plainly anti-vaccine agenda. Since being confirmed, he has pushed out the FDA's top vaccine regulator, hired a fellow vaccine skeptic to investigate the purported link between autism and shots, and questioned the safety of childhood vaccinations currently recommended by the CDC. As my colleague Katherine J. Wu wrote this week, 'Whether he will admit to it or not, he is serving the most core goal of the anti-vaccine movement—eroding access to, and trust in, immunization.' [Read: RFK Jr. is barely even pretending anymore] The reality is that back channels can be only so effective. Cassidy's main power is to call Kennedy before the Senate health committee, which he chairs, and demand an explanation for Kennedy's new appointees to the CDC's vaccine-advisory committee. Cassidy might very well do that. In February, he said that Kennedy would 'come before the committee on a quarterly basis, if requested.' Kennedy did appear before Cassidy's committee last month to answer questions about his efforts to institute mass layoffs at his agency. Some Republicans (and many Democrats) pressed the secretary on those efforts, while others praised them. Cassidy, for his part, expressed concerns about Kennedy's indiscriminate cutting of research programs, but still, he was largely deferential. 'I agree with Secretary Kennedy that HHS needs reform,' Cassidy said. Even if he had disagreed, an angry exchange between a health secretary and a Senate committee doesn't guarantee any policy changes. Lawmakers may try to act like government bureaucrats report to them, but they have limited power once a nominee is already in their job. Technically, lawmakers can impeach Cabinet members, but in American history, a sitting Cabinet member has never been impeached and subsequently removed from office. The long and arduous confirmation process is supposed to be the bulwark against potentially dangerous nominees being put in positions of power. Cassidy and most of his Republican colleagues have already decided not to stop Kennedy from overseeing the largest department in the federal government by budget. Now Kennedy is free to do whatever he wants—senators be damned. Article originally published at The Atlantic
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Houston Democrat sponsoring Saturday ‘No Kings' Capitol protest
AUSTIN (KXAN) — The 'No Kings' protest scheduled for this Saturday at the Texas Capitol — one of two confirmed cities where the governor has called in the Texas National Guard — was sponsored by Houston Democratic state lawmaker Rep. Gene Wu, KXAN confirmed through the State Preservation Board. A sponsor is 'required for approval of all events' held at the Texas State Capitol grounds and can include the governor, lieutenant governor or state lawmaker, according to the Texas Capitol Events Sponsorship Form. The form notes it will be considered 'incomplete' if it isn't signed by an official sponsor. 'For three decades, Texans have watched Republicans like Greg Abbott and Donald Trump sell out working families while stripping away our freedoms and driving up costs. I'm sponsoring the 'No Kings' protest at our Capitol to give every Texan a chance to make their voices heard when they've been systematically ignored by those in power,' Wu said in a statement when asked about his involvement. 'The group organizing Saturday's protest has a well-established record of peaceful advocacy and responsible civic engagement, and the event was approved by the State Preservation Board (of which Gov. Abbott and Lt. Gov Patrick both are members) with the expectation of a safe, respectful gathering,' he added. Hands Off Central TX, one of the organizers of Saturday's event at the Capitol, said its relationship with Wu began in February when he attended a protest 'to show solidarity with the people.' 'Since then, he's sponsored the majority of permits for our events, and has continued to show the same commitment to the foundational principles of democracy,' said Hands Off Central TX Vice President Melody Tremallo in a statement Texas National Guard on standby for 'No Kings' protests in Austin, San Antonio On Thursday, Gov. Abbott released new details related to his decision to bring in reinforcements to undisclosed locations. The mayors of Austin and San Antonio said they were informed that Texas National Guard soldiers will be on standby in their cities. More than 5,000 Texas National Guard soldiers and more than 2,000 Texas Department of Public Safety troopers will be 'strategically positioned' to bolster local law enforcement in response to planned protests advertised across the state, fueled by recent immigration enforcement actions, the governor said. Tremallo called that a 'gross overreaction' to Texans exercising their First Amendment right to protest. She said Saturday's carnival-themed event at the Capitol, also called 'Kick Out The Clowns,' was planned weeks ago and will include 'audacious activities such as face painting, juggling … drag performers, the chicken dance and circus acts.' 'We strongly condemn [Abbott's] attempt to intimidate and suppress … constitutional rights,' she added. KXAN previously found at least 63 Texas locations listed online where anti-Trump demonstrations are advertised to take place on June 14. 'Peaceful protests are part of the fabric of our nation, but Texas will not tolerate the lawlessness we have seen in Los Angeles in response to President Donald Trump's enforcement of immigration law,' Abbott said in a statement. 'Anyone engaging in acts of violence or damaging property will be arrested and held accountable to the full extent of the law. Don't mess with Texas — and don't mess with Texas law enforcement.' Democratic Congressman Greg Casar is one of Saturday's scheduled speakers at the Capitol. He said that the protests are meant to highlight concerns over mass deportations. 'No Kings' protest organizer calls TX National Guard an overreaction 'These are concerning things that people should be allowed to bring up without the governor trying to crush that message and intimidate people by sending in the National Guard,' Casar said. The event's sponsor, Wu, previously served as a prosecutor in the Harris County District Attorney's Office before being elected in 2012 and is currently an attorney in private practice, according to his official biography. He is the vice chair of the House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee. 'I categorically condemn any escalation into violence and vehemently support the right of Texans to exercise their First Amendment without intimidation or fear from the Governor or the President,' Wu said. 'In America and in Texas, we have no kings – and we will not be bullied into surrendering our constitutional rights.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
LIVE: 'No Kings' Anti-Trump protest in Austin expected to draw crowds, police presence
As the city anxiously anticipates the first large-scale protest since Austin's anti-ICE demonstration Monday, which resulted in 13 arrests, organizers have asserted the Saturday protest will be safe, peaceful, and focused on 'fun,' embracing a circus theme. The 'No Kings' protest in Austin — set to begin at the Texas Capitol at 5 p.m. Saturday — is one of more than 1,800 planned across the country, aimed at garnering significant crowds to oppose what protesters describe as President Donald Trump's authoritarian-like rule. It coincides with Trump's birthday and a military parade in Washington, D.C., which protesters have critiqued as a lavish use of taxpayer dollars. More: 'No Kings' protests planned across US on June 14: See map of locations in Texas Here's what we know about planned protests in Austin and across Texas: Gov. Greg Abbott, a close ally of Trump, said Thursday that he deployed more than 5,000 Texas National Guard troops across the state for expected demonstrations, which Austin leaders have said is unnecessary. The Texas Department of Public Safety also announced Friday that it will close the Capitol building at 4 p.m. Saturday to 'ensure the safety' of visitors. Despite the protest occurring at this heated moment, Hands Off Central Texas began planning the protest weeks before the highly tense anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles, where Trump called the National Guard and military to intervene before a judge stopped the action, Paul Vonderhaar, treasurer of Hands Off Central Texas, said. Vonderhaar expects a crowd of 10,000 to 15,000 people, unless rain dampens the size, more than the past protests Hands off Central Texas has hosted this year without incident. He said he has been in contact with local law enforcement, state troopers, and professional de-escalation experts. More: Internal documents show Texas National Guard scrambling to find trained soldiers for protests The protests also come as news breaks of the assassination of a Democratic Minnesota lawmaker and her husband in what Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz described as an act of "targeted political violence." Another lawmaker and his wife were also injured at their homes by a person impersonating law enforcement. In an interview before the assassination, Vonderhaar said that in a crowd of the size organizers expect, agitators and conflict are possible, but the city and organizers are prepared to de-escalate and are committed to nonviolence. 'I want to make it 100% clear, this is going to be a safe event,' Vonderhaar said. 'We really want to get a circus atmosphere. We want this to be a fun time. Because we've noticed things have been a little scary out there, but it's hard to be scared when you're looking at a guy juggling three pins.' More: Why legal rulings on Trump's National Guard deployment won't impact Texas' troop dispatch Rachel O'Learly Carmona, executive director of the Women's March, Inc, which is organizing the "Kick Out the Clowns" part of Saturday's "No King" protest, criticized Abbott and Trump's deployment of the National Guard as 'stark political intervention" in an interview with the American-Statesman, and said the Women's March is committed to nonviolence and peaceful demonstration to counter "state violence." 'We've been hearing very clearly from courts about the illegality of the overreach that has happened,' she said, referring to the judge's decision to block Trump's deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles. 'You don't fight fire with fire. You fight fire with water.' More: Gov. Abbott deploys 7,000 personnel to anti-ICE protests: Texas lawmakers critical Both organizers said Saturday's protest is designed to highlight the 'absurdity' in politics today and provide levity through humor, satire, circus-themed acts, and a showcase of community, giving people a productive and lawful channel to advance change. Vonderhaar recruited performers from an Austin juggling club and clown colleges, he said, and Austin's U.S. Democratic Representatives Lloyd Doggett and Greg Casar are also expected to speak. Local performers Brigitte Bandit and ResistDance will also perform, he added. The Los Angeles Protests and the ICE raids that prompted them have "been a real wake-up call of, wow, people need to get out there," Vonderhaar said. "But they need to get out there in the right way," he added. 'This is the right event for the moment." Check back for live updates as the Austin 'No Kings' protest unfolds. This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: LIVE: Anti-Trump 'No Kings' protest in Austin will be 'a safe event'
