
How Nato's ‘Daddy strategy' finally conquered Donald Trump
You might call it the 'Daddy strategy'. When Nato chiefs pondered how to handle Donald Trump at their summit in The Hague, they appear to have decided that mere praise and flattery were inadequate for the task. Instead, they turned high diplomacy into the art of calculated subservience.
Just as the Congress of Vienna of 1814-1815 was arranged around glittering balls and concerts – with a symphony conducted by Beethoven himself and the British delegation alone getting through 10,000 bottles of wine – so this summit in The Hague was designed to serve one purpose and one alone: satisfying Mr Trump's wants, needs and wishes.
If Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary general, had believed that Mr Trump yearned for 10,000 bottles of vintage, he would have arranged for their supply. Had he thought that Mr Trump wished to meet Beethoven, Mr Rutte would have attempted a resurrection.
As it turned out, the man who became the longest-serving prime minister in Dutch history – and happens to be 58 years old – publicly hailed Mr Trump as 'Daddy'.
When the president spoke of Iran and Israel as if they were squabbling children who had to be separated, Mr Rutte helpfully interjected: 'Daddy has to sometimes use strong language.' He was rewarded with a self-satisfied smile from the target of the adulation.
On arrival at The Hague, Mr Trump was swept to the elegant 17th-century splendour of Huis Ten Bosch palace – the Dutch version of Buckingham Palace – where he dined with other Nato leaders before staying overnight as the guest of King Willem-Alexander and Queen Máxima of the Netherlands.
Then, on Wednesday morning, as most leaders were bombarded with questions from the media as they drew up at the summit venue, Mr Trump was allowed to make his own entrance via a separate door. He would not have to deign to share the limelight with the small fry, namely the other 31 members of the alliance.
The summit sessions themselves were compressed into a three-hour sprint and the declaration cut to the barest minimum. One Nato official used to describe summit conclusions as 'our Bible' because they described everything that alliance headquarters in Brussels was charged with implementing.
But the Bible has been getting shorter. The Vilnius summit declaration in 2023 exceeded 11,000 words. Last year's conclusions in Washington totalled nearly 5,000 words. And the summit with 'daddy' Trump at The Hague? Just 424 words in five paragraphs.
All of this reflects the central fact about Nato, present since the alliance's birth in 1949. Its founding purpose was described by Lord Ismay, the first secretary general, as: 'Keeping the Russians out, the Americans in and the Germans down.'
The last goal has thankfully fallen away, but the first two are more urgent than ever. Alas they are also inter-dependent: keeping the Russians out requires the Americans to stay in. Why? Because one fact has remained constant since 1949 – and will not change in the foreseeable future: America is the pre-eminent superpower whose military strength towers over all of Europe combined.
The United States alone accounts for 66 per cent of total Nato defence spending; the other 31 allies provide only a third put together.
Hence Mr Trump's rage – which was shared by his predecessors – that America is paying too much and the Europeans are shamelessly free-riding. These European allies expect the US to honour its pledge under Article V of the Washington Treaty to come to their defence – even at the risk of nuclear war – and yet they consistently fail to pay their way.
European leaders privately admit that this extraordinary imbalance amounts to the biggest threat to Nato's future. They know that it must change. They are also aware that Europe's willingness to skimp on defence has created an extraordinary disparity of power around the Nato summit table.
Very few international clubs have one member providing fully two thirds of the heft. This stark fact gives Mr Trump what he prizes most and positively enjoys using: leverage over other nations. Hence the imperative of giving him what he wants. The only alternative, as Mr Rutte once put it, is to 'learn Russian'.
The summit's brief communiqué reflects this yawning imbalance of power. All allies, including America, reaffirm their 'ironclad commitment to collective defence as enshrined in Article V'. But in return for getting Mr Trump to sign up to this pledge, Europe has agreed to raise defence spending from the current target of 2 per cent of GDP to 3.5 per cent, with another 1.5 per cent on top for related infrastructure.
Put simply, they have given 'Daddy' everything he wants while gilding the substance with artful subservience.
Asked why he had called Mr Trump 'Daddy', Mr Rutte conceded that 'it's a bit of a question of taste', but denied that it was demeaning. 'He's a good friend,' said Mr Rutte, pointing out how the president was 'forcing' Europe to spend more on defence. 'Doesn't he deserve some praise?' he asked.
Daddy himself certainly thinks so. When he appeared at the final press conference, tired on his feet but visibly elated by the attention, Mr Trump's words revealed the triumph of Mr Rutte's 'daddy strategy'.
'It was a fairly long trip but worth it,' said Mr Trump. 'Tremendous things have been accomplished.'
The stay in the Palace was evidently a home-run for the hosts. Mr Trump announced that he had 'slept beautifully' and the King and Queen were 'beautiful people'. In fact, the royal couple were worthy of his highest accolade: 'They're central casting,' he said.
And the overall effect was exactly what the secretary general was hoping for. 'I came here because it was something I was supposed to be doing,' said Mr Trump. 'But I left here a little bit different.'
He described how every leader had spoken with 'love and passion' about their countries. 'They want to protect their country,' said Mr Trump. 'They were so respectful of me.'
He continued: 'Almost every one of them said 'thank God for the United States, without the United States we couldn't have Nato.'
Then Mr Trump said the vital words which signalled that all had been forgiven. 'It's not a rip off,' he declared of Nato. 'And we're here to help them.'
Now, instead of 31 delinquents, there was only one. Spain has refused to increase its defence budget to 5 per cent of GDP and Mr Trump denounced this decision as 'very terrible'. He vowed to conduct trade negotiations with Spain in person – apparently unaware that such matters are handled by the EU – and promised to 'make them pay twice as much'. Daddy is not nice to all his children.
And the family had made another gesture for the sake of his happiness. The summit declaration was the first since 2022 that failed to condemn Russia's invasion of Ukraine. One sentence in paragraph three stated that the allies 'reaffirm their enduring sovereign commitments to provide support to Ukraine,' but without saying why that support was necessary.
If they had told the truth and blamed Daddy's other friend, Vladimir Putin, he would not have approved. Daddy went home happy, but pleasing him carries a price.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
'I didn't call him daddy!' Nato chief insists he did not call Donald Trump daddy... like that
Nato chief Mark Rutte has been forced to backtrack on an embarrassing remark - where he apparently called US president Donald Trump 'daddy.' During a meeting of the defence bloc in the Hague yesterday, Rutte and Trump met following the US president's crass comment on the Iran-Israel war. It was there that the US President he said: 'We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f*** they're doing.' Rutte said on Wednesday that 'Daddy has to use strong language' to get Israel and Iran to sort things out, to which Trump agreed. 'You have to use strong language. Every once in a while you have to use a certain word,' the president said. But the Nato chief's comments raised eyebrows across the world, and later in the day Rutte, the former prime minister of the Netherlands, was forced to backtrack. He said: 'The daddy thing, I didn't call [Trump] daddy, what I said, is that sometimes... In Europe, I hear sometimes countries saying, "hey, Mark, will the US stay with us?" 'And I said, "that sounds a little bit like a small child asking his daddy, 'hey, are you still staying with the family'"? So in that sense, I use daddy, not that I was calling President Trump daddy.' But Trump himself appeared to enjoy being called 'daddy' as he was referred to at Wednesday's Nato Summit in the Hague by Rutte, who has led the defence bloc since October 2024. During Trump's whirlwind press conference that marked his final appearance at the summit, a reporter asked him how he felt when Rutte had referred to the American president as 'daddy' earlier in the day. Secretary of State Marco Rubio (right) giggles behind President Donald Trump (left) as he answered questions about being called 'daddy' by Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte during the Wednesday conference in the Hague, Netherlands 'No, he likes me, I think he likes me! If he doesn't I'll let you know and I'll come back and I'll hit him hard OK?' Trump told the journalist. 'He did it very affectionately though,' Trump continued. '"Daddy, you're my daddy,"' the president said with a smile. Alongside Trump was the usually stoic Secretary of State Marco Rubio. But the former Florida senator couldn't contain his laughter, bending down and giggling during the back-and-forth. The president had previously mouthed the F-word at a campaign rally in 2016 and used the word 'bulls***' while making a briefing room appearance earlier this year. Trump also said during his meeting with Rutte that he believed the Iran-Israel ceasefire will hold. 'They're not going to be fighting each other, they've had it,' the president argued. 'Like two kids in the schoolyard, they fight like hell, you can't stop them. Let them fight for two or three minutes then it's easy to stop them.' The 'schoolyard' comment prompted Rutte's 'daddy' observation. During Trump's press conference, the reporter followed up by asking if the U.S. president viewed 'your Nato allies as sort of children?' 'They're obviously listening to you and they're spending more, and are obviously appreciative of that. But do you think they can actually defend Europe on their own, without you?' the journalist asked. Trump said he believed the European nations would 'need a little help at the beginning.' 'And I think they'll be able to,' he continued. 'And I think they're going to remember this day and this is a big day for Nato, this is a very big day.' Earlier on Wednesday the Nato nations agreed to something Trump had long pushed - a massive increase in defence spending. Most of the 32 Nato countries agreed to language that said 'allies commit to invest 5 percent of GDP annually on core defense requirements as well as defense-and security-related spending by 2035.' But Nato member Spain pushed back on the agreement, and said it would increase its spending to just 2 per cent, which Trump said he would respond to by forcing high tariffs on the nation. He said he doesn't know what 'the problem' with Spain, calling the country's position unfair to other members of the Nato alliance. 'They want a little bit of a free ride, but they'll have to pay it back to us on trade,' he said, making up for it through higher tariffs. But Spain belongs to the European Union, the world's largest trading bloc, which negotiates trade deals on behalf of all 27 member countries. They are not meant to negotiate trade deals individually. Asked about that, Trump said, 'I'm going to negotiate directly with Spain. I'm going to do it myself.' The reporter pressed again asking Trump if the European nations could defend themselves without the U.S. 'Well ask Mark, I think you have to ask Mark, OK?' Trump said. The president was previously nicknamed 'daddy' by former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who broke with Trump recently over the president's decision to bomb Iran's three nuclear sites this past weekend. The president has since left The Hague after spending less than 24 hours there for the NATO summit. The summit wrapped up Wednesday and Trump held a subsequent press conference. Air Force One, which had touched down on Tuesday at 7:36 p.m. local time, took off from Amsterdam Airport Schiphol shortly before 6 p.m. local time. The flight was expected to take more than six hours, putting Trump back at the White House on Wednesday evening.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
From saluting SS camps to playing with Goering's model trains - new podcast reveals how Hitler manipulated a 'deluded' Edward VIII into becoming a 'Nazi puppet'
On the final instalment of the Mail's three-part podcast miniseries examining Edward VIII and Wallis Simpson, royal biographer Robert Hardman and historian Kate Williams examine how deeply the exiled couple became entangled with Nazi Germany. After abdicating in December 1936, Edward and his twice-divorced wife Wallis found themselves seeking new allies, having been effectively ostracised by the British establishment and denied the full privileges of royalty. Buoyed by the propaganda triumph of that summer's Berlin Olympics, Hitler saw in the royal couple an opportunity to lend his regime further international legitimacy. Wanting to still appear a statesman, Edward accepted an invitation to visit Nazi Germany in 1937, a decision that prompted his brother King George VI to write to Edward's political advisor Walter Monckton that the plan was 'a bombshell, and a bad one'. By 1937, Europe was well aware of Nazi Germany's dismantling of democracy, persecution of Jews through the Nuremberg Laws, illegal rearmament, and aggressive territorial ambitions, making Edward's visit a highly controversial legitimisation of an openly authoritarian regime. The photographs from the visit and the rumours it generated would forever tarnish the former King's reputation. This episode of Queens, Kings and Dastardly Things explores what the couple did in Germany and investigates whether Edward was truly willing to collaborate with the Nazis should they occupy Britain. Edward and Wallis's 1937 Tour of Nazi Germany Beyond mere self-aggrandisement, royal biographer Robert Hardman believes Edward and Wallis agreed to the tour because they harboured fascist sympathies. In the late 1930s, this was seen as problematic but not entirely unusual among the British upper classes. Across Europe, many aristocrats viewed fascism as a bulwark against the spread of communism. 'Throughout the story of Edward and Wallis Simpson, there is a swastika', Hardman said. 'There was Nazi influence all the way through. In the run up the abdication, Hitler was issuing instructions to his diplomats in London to try and stop it. Hitler believed Edward was on his side. 'There are well documented stories Simpson's links to Nazi politicians and diplomats in London. 'It was clear by 1937, that Edward VIII would, in any given situation, lean towards the Nazi side.' Upon arrival in Germany, Edward foolishly sees himself as a 'peacemaker', as Kate Williams told the podcast. 'That vision he had of himself was hopelessly naive', Williams described. 'Because for Nazi Germany, the former King turning up and having the red carpet laid out for them is giving consent to the regime. 'It's treated like a Royal progress – crowds' wave away. The couple are greeted by the British national anthem accompanied by Nazi salutes. They dine with high-ranking Nazis including Goering, Goebbels, Ribbentrop and Speer. 'All of the Nazi charm is brought out to bear on Edward and Wallis, and they are there with their eyes closed to the reality of the situation.' During the tour, Edward is taken to munitions factories, SS training camps and Hitler's Salzburg Mountain retreat, the Berghof. An SS trooper would later recount how Edward relished in saluting the soldiers and declaring the shared racial ties between the British and German peoples. Visiting Berchtesgraden for a private meeting with Hitler, Edward reportedly killed time waiting for the Fuhrer by viewing Goering's prized model train set. Hardman explained: 'There's a hilarious lunch where Goering entertains the couple: he lays on this chorus of mountain huntsman with these horns to serenade them Get your weekly dose of Royal scandals and palace intrigue on this Mail podcast Hosted by Royal Historians Robert Hardman and Professor Kate Williams, Queens, Kings, and Dastardly Things looks at the Royal Family - the secrets, the palace intrigues, and the Crown's bloodiest moments. Listen wherever you get your podcasts now. 'Of course, they feel terribly important. At last, Edward thinks, I am being treated like the King I once was, and my wife, the Queen she should have been. 'After lunch, Goering shows them his model railway set, and they're utterly charmed by this. You get these amazing glimpses into what a bunch of crackpots these guys all were.' Exactly what the former King and Hitler discussed in their private meeting remains unknown to this day. According to his advisor Dudley Forwood, Edward told the dictator that the 'British and German races are one and they should always remain one.' In 1966, Edward told a reporter that he and Hitler had discussed the need to destroy communist Russia. Williams said: 'The King later says of the meeting that Hitler made him realise Red Russia was the true enemy. 'He convinced him that Great Britain and Europe should encourage Germany to march East and crush communism once and for all. 'The Duke of Windsor becomes obsessed with the idea that he and the Nazis can be best friends – he's impossibly naive about the realities of the regime.' Following their meeting, rumours would dog Edward that he had tacitly agreed to replace his brother as King in the event of a Nazi occupation of Great Britain. Addressing the veracity of these rumours, Hardman said: 'I do think Edward was deluded – his sympathies did lie strongly with the Nazi cause. 'But it's probably pushing it too far to suggest that there was a plot to put the Duke of Windsor on the throne. 'What is true is that when asked whether he would ever come back to Britain to be President if we ever became a republic – he said yes. 'He was happy to countenance the fall of the monarchy and taking over some sort of head of state role. 'Whether he would be willing to do that under the aegis of Nazi Germany is a deeper question.' To hear about the political fallout of the visit and how Edward and Wallis spent the war, search for Queens, Kings and Dastardly Things now, wherever you get your podcasts.


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
CIA director says Iran's nuclear sites 'severely damaged'
The head of the CIA has said US strikes "severely damaged" Iran's nuclear facilities and set them back years, diverging from a leaked intelligence report that angered President Donald Trump by downplaying the raid's Ratcliffe, the US spy agency's director, said key sites had been destroyed, though he stopped short of declaring Iran's nuclear programme had been eliminated comes a day after a leaked preliminary assessment from a Pentagon intelligence agency suggested core components of Iran's nuclear programme were only lightly damaged by the US Trump again maintained the raid had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear facilities. The Republican president took to social media on Wednesday to post that the "fake news" media had "lied and totally misrepresented the facts, none of which they had".He said Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth and other military officials would hold an "interesting and irrefutable" news conference on Thursday at the Pentagon "in order to fight for the Dignity of our Great American Pilots".It came as Israel and Iran seemed to honour a fragile ceasefire that Trump helped negotiate this week on the 12th day of the at The Hague where he attended a Nato summit on Wednesday, Trump said of the strikes: "It was very severe. It was obliteration."He also said he would probably seek a commitment from Iran to end its nuclear ambitions at talks next week. Iran has not acknowledged any such US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff told US network NBC there has been direct and indirect communication between the countries. Ratcliffe's statement said the CIA's information included "new intelligence from an historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years".Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has also come out in support of Trump's assessment on the damage to Iranian nuclear facilities."If the Iranians chose to rebuild, they would have to rebuild all three facilities (Natanz, Fordo, Esfahan) entirely, which would likely take years to do," she wrote on US operation involved 125 military aircraft, targeting the three main Iranian nuclear facilities on satellite images show six craters clustered around two entry points at Fordo, with similar craters spotted at Isfahan. But it is unclear if the nuclear facilities located deep underground were wiped out.A report from the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency was leaked to US media on Tuesday, estimating that the US bombing had set back Iran's nuclear programme "only a few months".The US defence secretary said the assessment was made with "low confidence". Officials familiar with the evaluation cautioned it was an early assessment that could change as more information emerges. The US has 18 intelligence agencies, which sometimes produce conflicting reports based on their mission and area of nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi said on Wednesday that there is a chance Tehran moved much of its highly enriched uranium elsewhere as it came under Iran Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei told Al Jazeera on Wednesday: "Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that's for sure." He did not elaborate.A report by the Israeli Atomic Energy Commission said the strike on Fordo "destroyed the site's critical infrastructure". The damage across all the sites, the report said, has pushed Iran's timeline for nuclear weapons back by "many years".Yet Mehdi Mohammadi, an adviser to the chairman of the Iranian parliament, said shortly after the US strikes that "no irreversible damage was sustained" at has long maintained that its nuclear programme is peaceful. US intelligence agencies have previously said Tehran was not actively building atomic weapons.