
Economic Watch: U.S. tariff hikes deal blow to EU metals industry
As the U.S. tariff hike on steel and aluminum takes effect, European producers voice concerns over rising costs and industry impact.
BRUSSELS, June 6 (Xinhua) -- The U.S. government's decision to raise tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to 50 percent took effect Wednesday, escalating a trade dispute that threatens to further weaken the EU's metals sector and disrupt downstream manufacturing across the bloc.
European producers have warned that the steep new duties will inflict serious damage, compounding existing pressures and driving up costs for manufacturers dependent on competitively priced raw materials.
The latest levies, applied broadly to nearly all U.S.-imported steel and aluminum, followed a 25 percent tariff introduced in March. While that initial measure had limited overall impact on EU exports to the United States, analysts say doubling the rate will effectively price many European producers out of the American market.
"Most of the 3.8 million tonnes of EU steel exports to the United States are now under a de facto import ban: at a 50 percent blanket tariff," said Axel Eggert, director general of the European Steel Association (EUROFER). "Even Europe's highest-quality, most competitive steel products will be priced out," Eggert said following the implementation of the new tariffs.
Earlier in March, EUROFER had criticized Trump's "America First" trade policy, warning it could become the "final nail in the coffin" for Europe's steel industry.
The association noted that the overall market situation for European steel is much worse than in 2018, as the new measures remove all product exemptions and tariff rate quotas that the EU had previously negotiated.
With EU steel exports to the United States already having fallen by 1 million tonnes, the bloc stands to lose at least another 1 million tonnes. Moreover, the tariff now covers "derivative" steel products, potentially reducing export opportunities for a further 1 million tonnes, EUROFER said.
Germany, the EU's largest steel producer, is already contending with surging energy costs and delays in transitioning to low-carbon "green steel" technologies. Industry giants such as Thyssenkrupp and Salzgitter have unveiled major restructuring and cost-cutting plans. Thyssenkrupp plans to break up its business and cut around 11,000 jobs, while Salzgitter aims to reduce costs by 500 million euros (approximately 571.95 million U.S. dollars) by 2028, having already saved about 130 million euros (148.36 million dollars).
Gerhard Erdmann, managing director of the German Steel Employers' Association, told Bild newspaper that it remained unclear whether Washington would fully enforce the higher tariffs. However, he warned that if implemented, they would "further aggravate the already precarious state of Germany's steel industry."
He emphasized that the real threat lies not only in the loss of direct sales to the United States, but also in broader ripple effects, as key German industries -- such as automotive and machinery manufacturing -- depend heavily on steel and maintain strong export ties with the United States.
"If German car and machinery makers see sales decline due to tariffs, the consequences will hit our steel mills with full force," he said, warning of a painful and far-reaching industry restructuring.
European aluminum producers have voiced similar concerns. The industry association European Aluminium condemned the U.S. decision to double tariffs, warning that it would "further destabilize transatlantic trade relations and disrupt long-standing supply chains between two key economic partners."
In a statement, the association expressed deep concern that the move would "indirectly fuel scrap outflows from Europe and add further distortion to an already fragile trade environment."
Gavran Igor, an economic analyst from Bosnia and Herzegovina, said the tariff hikes reflect a protectionist mindset that violates international trade norms and undermines global economic stability. He told Xinhua the measures would "inevitably trigger retaliatory tariffs from other countries and ultimately harm the U.S. economy most in the long run," adding that such actions erode trust and treat global partners as subordinates rather than equals.
Igor called on major economies -- including China, the EU, Japan and India -- to take the lead in building a fair, rules-based global trading system.
Ljubo Jurcic, the former Croatian Minister of Economy, echoed the concern, noting that history shows tariff wars hurt the world economy and fuel uncertainty. He pointed out that while the Trump administration claimed high tariffs would protect domestic industry and reshore supply chains, experience from his first term showed they failed to boost the U.S. economy -- instead, they ended up hurting U.S. consumers.
European Commissioner for Trade and Economic Security Maros Sefcovic warned Wednesday that Washington's decision to raise tariffs on steel and aluminum "clearly doesn't help the ongoing negotiations" and risks undermining recent progress. He emphasized that the EU stands ready to defend its interests and will do its utmost to rebalance bilateral trade should negotiations collapse.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trade war: US-China trade talks in London next week; Trump says 'meeting should go very well'
Donald Trump and Xi Jinping US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer are all set to meet officials in London on Monday for trade negotiations, President Donald Trump announced on Friday. "The meeting should go very well," the president wrote on Truth Social on Friday afternoon. "Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Trump's post on Truth Social Trump disclosed the planned trade discussions following an extensive telephonic conversation with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday. This scheduling update emerged amid ongoing tensions between the US and China, as both nations navigate through a significant trade dispute affecting their economies. The two nations, whose combined goods trade reached $582 billion last year, recently reduced most reciprocal tariffs after successful trade negotiations in Geneva, Switzerland, last month. However, China has since expressed concerns about American actions undermining the progress. Beijing voiced opposition to the US Commerce Department's advisory against using Chinese semiconductors. Additionally, China criticised the Trump administration's decision to cancel certain Chinese students' visas in the US Conversely, the Trump administration claims Beijing is delaying its Geneva commitment to authorise additional rare earth mineral exports to the United States. Following Thursday's conversation with Xi, Trump stated, "There should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of Rare Earth products." No further clarification was provided. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
"When I saw the name Pahalgam, it really hit me hard": Former German Ambassador Thomas Matussek
Berlin [Germany], June 7 (ANI): Former German Ambassador to India Thomas Matussek advised his government that India, the biggest democracy in the world, should certainly be at the 'forefront' as our strategic partner for future in a world where old alliances 'show cracks'. Matussek told ANI, '... Germany is interested in stability. And stability means resolving issues through negotiations rather than by exchanging fire on both sides. In this world, where old alliances show cracks, we need to look beyond the fence to possible partners. Here we have the biggest democracy in the world, and if I were to advise my government, who should be our strategic partners for the future? India certainly should be at the forefront. He also called for deepening the strategic cooperation of Germany with India, as the country is 'fighting the same enemies of democracy'. He added, 'If we look at China or the US, our closest partner, going through a period of instability and chaos, it's important that we mend our offences with India and come to an arrangement on trade and deepen our strategic cooperation with India... India in the long run is fighting the same enemies of democracy. It would be every rupee well spent to invest in that bilateral strategic defence partnership...' The former envoy said that the Pahalgam terror attack 'really hit him hard' and said that it is no longer a secret who is standing up behind the terrorists. 'It's very important that this high-level delegation came at this moment because we have a new German government and it's very important to have some continuity... It was a great pleasure to meet some old friends like MJ Akbar... This delegation is very welcome. We are delighted that they're here... When I saw the name Pahalgam, it really hit me hard. We have seen a long period of exchange of weapons, of terrorism, counter terrorism between India and Pakistan, but since both countries are nuclear powers, it has reached a new quality, and I can only recommend the Indian government for being so measured in their response. Because we know exactly who the terrorists are. We know exactly who is behind the terrorists. I prayed that India's answer would not be an awful...,' he added. The delegation led by Ravi Shankar Prasad arrived in Germany after concluding their visit to Belgium. The other delegates are BJP MPs Daggubati Purandeswari, MJ Akbar, Gulam Ali Khatana, and Samik Bhattacharya; Congress MP Amar Singh, Priyanka Chaturvedi from Shiv Sena (UBT), AIADMK MP M Thambidurai and former diplomat Pankaj Saran. Earlier, Ravi Shankar Prasad said they raised strong concerns about terrorism during their visit to Brussels and generals of Pakistan 'run that country with the help of a military terrorist coalition', which is a 'threat' to democracy and humanity. This diplomatic effort forms part of India's global outreach following Operation Sindoor, launched on May 7 in response to the April 22 terrorist attack in Pahalgam by Pakistan-sponsored militants that claimed 26 lives and injured several others. Subsequently, the Indian Armed Forces carried out targeted strikes against terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, resulting in the deaths of over 100 terrorists linked to groups such as Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Taiba, and Hizbul Mujahideen. (ANI)


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
In US, Shashi Tharoor explains why ‘mediation' with India won't work: ‘Pakistan is a revisionist power'
Congress MP Shashi Tharoor on Thursday dismissed the idea of mediation between India and Pakistan, arguing that it is not viable because the two countries are not equals. He said Pakistan is a 'revisionist power' that harbours terrorists and seeks to disrupt existing geopolitical arrangements. Speaking at the council on foreign relations in Washington, Tharoor said, 'Mediation is not a term that we are particularly willing to entertain. I'll tell you why not. The fact is that this implies, even when you say things like broker or whatever, you're implying an equivalence which simply doesn't exist,' news agency PTI reported. The Congress MP's comments come amid repeated claims by US President Donald Trump that he helped in 'mediating' tensions between India and Pakistan last month. Since May 10, Trump has said multiple times on separate occasions that he helped broker a ceasefire between the two countries after 'a long night' of talks. He has also claimed he offered both sides the prospect of increased trade with the US in exchange for peace. Meanwhile, Tharoor went on to say, "There is no equivalence between a state that is a status quo power that just wants to be left alone by its neighbours and a revisionist power that wants to upset the geopolitical arrangements that have existed for the last three-quarters of a century. There is no equivalence possible in these cases, and in these circumstances, to suggest that you can mediate between two unequals is not possible," he added. When asked how he would describe the American role in the situation, Tharoor said he was 'guessing to some degree' but believed Washington stayed engaged with both sides during the crisis. 'Certainly my government received a number of calls at high levels from the US government, and we appreciated their concern and their interest,' he said. 'Our assumption is that's where, because that's the side that needed persuading to stop this process, that may well have been where their messages really had the greatest effect. But that's guesswork on my part. I don't know what they said to the Pakistanis.' The Congress leader who is leading a multi-party delegation on Operation Sindoor, stressed that India sees no similarity between 'terrorists and their victims.' "There is no equivalence between a country that provides safe haven to terrorism, and a country that's a flourishing multi-party democracy that's trying to get on with its business," he said. Trump, during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Thursday, again said he was 'very proud' of helping to stop the India-Pakistan conflict. 'I spoke to some very talented people on both sides, very good people on both sides,' Trump said, adding that he warned them the US wouldn't make trade deals if the conflict continued. 'You know what, I got that war am I going to get credit? I'm not going to get credit for anything. They don't give me credit for anything. But nobody else could have done it. I stopped it. I was very proud of that.' India and Pakistan conflict that started on May 7 after India's military response to April 22 Pahalgam terror attack ended on May 10 after four days of cross-border drone and missile strikes. India has firmly maintained that the agreement to end hostilities was reached through direct military-to-military talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of both nations.