SpaceX launches 9th batch of 'proliferated architecture' spy satellites for US government (video)
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
SpaceX lofted another batch of next-gen reconnaissance satellites for the U.S. government this morning (April 12).
A Falcon 9 rocket lifted off from Vandenberg Space Force Base on California's central coast today at 8:25 a.m. EDT (1225 GMT; 5:25 a.m. local California time).
The launch kicked off the NROL-192 mission for the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), which builds and operates the United States' fleet of spy satellites.
NROL-192 continues a facelift of sorts for that fleet: It was the ninth launch in support of the NRO's "proliferated architecture," a new network comprised of large numbers of small, cost-efficient satellites (rather than a relative handful of highly capable but expensive craft, which has been the historical norm for the NRO).
"Having hundreds of small satellites on orbit is invaluable to the NRO's mission," NRO Director Chris Scolese said in the proliferated architecture press kit, which you can find here.
"They will provide greater revisit rates, increased coverage, more timely delivery of information — and ultimately help us deliver more of what our customers need even faster," he added.
Related: SpaceX launches next-gen US spy satellites on 100th Falcon 9 flight of the year (video, photos)
RELATED STORIES:
— SpaceX: Facts about Elon Musk's private spaceflight company
— SpaceX launches classified spy satellite for US military, lands rocket
— SpaceX launches US spy satellite, lands rocket in flawless Easter flight
We don't know much about the newly lofted satellites because the NRO doesn't disclose much about its orbiting assets. However, the proliferated architecture craft are thought to be modified versions of SpaceX's Starlink internet satellites that have been outfitted with high-tech spy gear.
All nine of the proliferated architecture missions have flown on Falcon 9 rockets out of Vandenberg. They have also come in rapid succession; the first one launched in May 2024.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
39 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Morgan Stanley Widens Net to Land $5 Billion Debt for Musk's xAI
Morgan Stanley is reaching out to a broader pool of investors to shore up demand for a $5 billion debt sale for Elon Musk's artificial intelligence startup xAI Corp., a deal that offers a window into the fallout from the billionaire's feud with US President Donald Trump. When Morgan Stanley launched the debt offering early last week, it already had more than $3.5 billion in orders. Some investors took that as a sign that the deal would soon be oversubscribed, a goal that has been easily exceeded for other Musk-related offerings. As of Monday, though, demand was only up to around $5 billion, and the bank began reaching out to smaller lenders who had not been given access last week, according to people familiar with the deal.
Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
DOGE Has Work Left to Do
Given Elon Musk's departure from the Department of Government Efficiency, where should DOGE go from here? The Trump administration created the department to reduce government fraud, waste, abuse and mismanagement. As a special government employee, Mr. Musk was prevented by law from working more than 130 days a year in that role—but that doesn't mean the effort should end with his exit. Since January, DOGE has conducted a review of a range of government information systems, and the team's work has significantly increased public concern over waste and abuse in the federal government. Building on the work done by the Government Accountability Office and the inspectors general of various agencies, DOGE's efforts have reinforced the need for updated information systems, stronger internal controls and modern management practices.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
The global impact of Trump vs. Musk
With help from Anthony Adragna and Aaron Mak Could Elon Musk's online slapfight with President Donald Trump put a dent in his global telecom ambitions? Musk's satellite broadband company Starlink has reaped massive gains since he became 'first buddy' to Trump. Numerous countries have cut red tape to approve Starlink this year, some reportedly under pressure from Trump's State Department. In some cases, countries appeared to be giving Starlink a green light in order to ingratiate themselves with the White House. Vietnam approved the service in February. In early May, the Democratic Republic of Congo granted Starlink a license. Later that month, South Africa eased laws that required telecom companies to provide 30 percent equity to groups that were historically marginalized — which could allow Starlink to start service without meeting the requirement. Now, Musk's feud with Trump raises the question of how Starlink will fare in future negotiations. Will countries feel the need to let it in? Will Trump go to bat for the company? 'When trade officials or when governments sit down for negotiations, you think about what horses you have to trade,' said a former Starlink executive, granted anonymity to speak freely. 'I don't even know if Starlink is a horse anymore.' Since Trump took office, a number of countries have granted licenses to Starlink, including India on Friday. The State Department reportedly pressed some of those countries, like Gambia and Cameroon, to approve the service. (As of late March, Starlink said it had coverage in 130 countries or territories.) Caleb Henry, director of research at the consulting firm Quilty Space, said U.S. diplomacy had helped Starlink get traction in hard-to-reach places. 'Starlink has already received market access in the easiest countries and the mid-tier countries,' he said. 'What's left is the hard countries. That's where the State Department gets involved.' Henry and other telecommunications veterans who spoke to DFD said this wasn't necessarily unusual: The State Department often lobbies for U.S. companies, and in that sense, Starlink was enjoying the same support that Boeing or the satellite companies Iridium and Globalstar have received in the past. Blair Levin, a telecoms expert who served in senior roles at the Federal Communications Commission under Democratic administrations, said he has seen an unconventional element in the State Department's discussions over Starlink: They're tying in the White House's tariff policy as well. Consider the case of Lesotho. According to The Washington Post, the landlocked African country was hunting for a way out of 50 percent tariffs announced by Trump. Then in April this year it granted Starlink a license. According to the Post, the State Department noted that development in an internal memo: 'As the government of Lesotho negotiates a trade deal with the United States, it hopes that licensing Starlink demonstrates goodwill and intent to welcome U.S. businesses.' The State Department did not confirm or deny the report, but said, 'Any patriotic American should want to see an American company's success on the global stage, especially over compromised Chinese competitors.' The embassy of Lesotho did not respond immediately to questions about the report. Said Levin: 'Embassies often represent the interests of U.S.-based companies. That's not unusual. But to tie tariff negotiations to certain companies, that's very unusual.' Satellite policy expert Ruth Pritchard-Kelly concurred. 'I can't say I've ever seen a country begging the U.S. not to do something catastrophic, saying 'look, we've even licensed your best friend's satellite service, please don't impose tariffs on us,'' she said. So what now? If Musk remains on the outs with Trump, he could become a global liability for the company, Pritchard-Kelly said: 'If Lesotho is actually worried about the U.S. imposing tariffs on them, then aligning themselves with this tech, which is currently run by someone who is persona non grata to Trump, could be a problem.' So far, the Musk-Trump feud has largely played out online, and Trump has not followed up on his threats to cancel the government's SpaceX contracts. But Trump has other buttons he could push to make Musk's life hard, said Pritchard-Kelly. One is withdrawing Starlink's license to operate in space. 'It's never happened, but I think if Trump really wanted to rattle Musk he would say, 'I'm going to pull your license,'' she said. The former Starlink executive said the State Department — and the government more broadly — could also pose subtle obstacles to the company, such as by slow-rolling approvals or giving less weight to Starlink's comments on federal policy. 'There are other disadvantages that could come to Starlink or other Musk companies just because they're no longer considered a favored son,' the person said. In the longer term, Musk's falling out with Trump is likely to spur other countries to keep investing in their own systems, according to satellite analyst Tim Farrar. On Friday, top lawmakers in the European Parliament wrote to Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, asking her to set aside €60B for space – including the EU's IRIS2 satellite communications network. 'You're going to have people who want to see IRIS2 going forward taking advantage of the risk of Musk threatening he could just decommission things at random,' Farrar said. But it will be 'years, if ever' before rival internet services have the muscle to match Starlink's 7,000-plus satellites, he said, even as Chinese companies and Amazon's Project Kuiper race to launch their own constellations. 'The State Department has to promote U.S. satellite interests over Chinese satellite interests,' Farrar added. 'For the time being, Starlink's the only game in town.' Vance Talks AI and Data In an hour-and-a-half-long appearance on comedian Theo Von's podcast over the weekend, Vice President JD Vance got into some heady tech topics. Von, whose 4 million YouTube subscribers have made him a fixture of online bro culture, tends to be skeptical of both Big Tech and Big Government. So it might be natural that Vance took an anti-establishment line on AI laws and data collection. On AI: Vance talked about the Republicans' proposal for a 10-year moratorium preventing states from regulating AI — an idea that, to many people's surprise, surfaced in the House reconciliation bill and made it to the Senate. He was skeptical of its chances on procedural grounds ('To be honest with you, I don't think that's going to make it in the final bill'), and then channeled his inner law student by laying out the populist case for both sides of the moratorium debate. Explaining why he might be in favor, Vance suggested the moratorium could stop liberal bias from infecting AI systems: 'You basically have a federal regulation that prevents, like, California from having a super progressive set of regulations on artificial intelligence.' On the other side, Vance cited the ELVIS Act, which Tennessee's Republican legislature passed in March prohibiting the unauthorized use of AI to replicate singers' voices. Vance said it was reasonable to want to protect the likes of Taylor Swift and Robert Plant from having AI coopt their voices to generate new songs — an explanation that both Swifties and Led Heads might find convincing. On data collection, Vance advocated for more regulations, calling out iPads for tracking users' reading behaviors. He also made an intriguing reference to a national security briefing he reviewed, after quickly checking with a staffer to ensure that the info wasn't classified. 'Let's say you're reading a story from some random newspaper and you hover on a particular paragraph, your iPad is collecting that information on you … that is the stuff that really freaks me out,' he said. The particular data collection technique that Vance was referencing is unclear — the Vice President's office did not respond to DFD's inquiry by deadline. Apple also did not respond to DFD's question about the brief and how iPads track user activity. Vance was responding to Von's question about the administration's contracts with Palantir to help implement a March executive order for more data sharing between agencies. Vance – whose mentors include Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel – described the order as connecting pre-existing databases, rather than enabling additional data collection. 'We've got to live in reality and the government's already got this information,' he said. 'We just need to make sure they don't misuse it.' UK'S BIG AI BET With much of the tech world descending on the U.K. for London Tech Week, Prime Minister Keir Starmer is doubling down on his plans to work 'in partnership' with businesses to harness the power of artificial intelligence for social good, POLITICO's Joseph Bambridge and Tom Bristow report. That commitment comes as the U.K. government prepares for a spending review this week that will set out its fiscal plans for the rest of this parliament. A government AI action plan released in January previously vowed to 'mainline' the technology throughout public services. Starmer said there is a responsibility to 'harness this unprecedented opportunity and to use it to improve the lives of working people.' 'Britain is once again, after years of chaos, a stable partner for investors that believes the future should be shaped by our democratic values, and that in this volatile world, is unequivocally, unashamedly, defiantly even, open for business,' the prime minister said Monday. Tech luminaries like Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, former Google CEO Eric Schmidt and DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis mingled with Starmer at his country residence over the weekend. post of the day THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS Stay in touch with the whole team: Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@ Steve Heuser (sheuser@ Nate Robson (nrobson@ and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@
