Ashburton Council Pushes For Four-Year Terms
One Ashburton councillor believes a shift to four-year terms would "work better for the ratepayer".
The Ashburton District Council supports a shift to four-year terms if it is for both local and central government.
The only issue is that draft legislation enabling a four-year term is for Parliament only - not councils.
If passed, it would extend the maximum term of Parliament from three to four years if certain conditions are met.
Ashburton Mayor Neil Brown said that if one changes, they both need to change.
That was the tone of the council's submission, emphasising the importance of the parliamentary term being a fixed four-year period that is matched by local government.
First-term councillor Richard Wilson said he learnt it takes 'six months to get council started' after an election and now supports a move to a four-year term.
'You actually lose a lot of time getting ready and slowing down [for elections].
'If we get another year in the middle, that would make council business a bit more streamlined and work better for the ratepayer.'
Council chief executive Hamish Riach said that if central government moved to four-year terms and local government remained at three, the elections would occur at the same time every 12 years.
He said the local election would be 'swamped by the coverage of the national elections'.
'We don't think that is good for local democracy'.
If both central and local government moved to four-year terms, there would be separate elections two years apart.
The councillors approved the submission on April 16, a day before submissions on the draft legislation closed.
Ashburton's stance is in line with what Local Government NZ (LGNZ) has been advocating for.
LGNZ president Sam Broughton believed there was a strong case for alignment of council and parliamentary terms.
'A four-year term will support the country to be more efficient with infrastructure planning and delivery, basically doubling the number of effective governance years between elections.'
There is also support outside of local governance with Infrastructure New Zealand chief executive Nick Leggett backing a four-year parliamentary term, 'but it must be accompanied by the same shift for local government'.
'This is critical if we want alignment between the two tiers of government, and for them to operate and collaborate effectively.'
Leggett said the draft four-year term bill overcomplicates the debate by introducing conditions that allow governments to choose between three- and four-year terms depending on how select committee membership is allocated.
'What's needed is clarity.
'We should ask New Zealanders one simple question at the referendum – do they support moving both central and local government to four-year terms?
'That approach gives each level of government the focus it needs, reduces administrative strain, and ensures important local issues are not drowned out by national campaigns.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Labour Keeps Door Open For Te Pāti Māori, But Urges Focus On 'Core Areas'
Tuesday, 10 June 2025, 7:13 pm Article: RNZ Morning Report Chris Hipkins says Te Pāti Māori needs to focus on important issues such as jobs, health and homes, like Labour is, keeping the door open to working with them despite three of their MPs being suspended from Parliament. Labour Māori development spokesperson Willie Jackson told Te Pāti Māori not every Māori supported them after three of its MPs disrupted a vote on the Treaty Principles Bill last year with a haka. The party could have responded differently after the three representatives - co-leaders Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi, and first-term MP Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke - were referred to the Privileges Committee, and suspended, Jackson said last week. "They love you, I love you, but some of the stuff is not going down well," Jackson said. Labour Party said last month while it agreed the actions met the criteria of contempt, it was concerned that the penalties were "unduly severe". Labour's own Peeni Henare took part in the haka, but was not suspended after apologising. Hipkins told Morning Report on Monday the feedback he was getting from around the country was that Māori wanted to see Labour focused on the issues that bring New Zealanders together and lead the country forward. "That includes focusing on things like jobs, health, homes, the sorts of things that New Zealanders all want to see their government focused on." He said while his party worked in co-operation with Te Pāti Māori, they were also in competition for votes. "We have previously held all the Māori electorates, we'd like to do so again. We're gonna, you know, we're gonna go out there and contest those vigorously at the next election, but we can also work together on areas where we have common ground." The most recent RNZ-Reid Research poll found Labour could lead the next government, but it would need both the Greens and Te Pāti Māori. Hipkins said Labour would look to have a similar relationship with Te Pāti Māori as it had with the Green Party and "set out clear parameters for a working relationship". "I think that's one of the things that Christopher Luxon hasn't done with ACT and with New Zealand First to say, 'Look, these are the areas where we think we can work together. These are the areas where we're not willing to compromise.' "And, you know, I think that includes setting clear standards of expectation around ministerial behaviour - so anyone who's going to be a minister in any government that I lead will be expected to behave like a minister, and that doesn't vary by party. "So unlike Christopher Luxon who seems to think that Winston Peters and David Seymour are subject to different rules to everybody else; I think all ministers should be subjected to the same rules." Hipkins rejected a suggestion that Jackson was appeasing pākeha with his comments. "Ultimately, if you want to be part of the government, then you need to follow the rules of the government." Asked how Labour could work with a party whose MPs broke those rules, Hipkins said it was "ultimately" down to voters. "We're going to be going out there competing vigorously for every vote we can get for Labour. If people believe in the sorts of things that the Labour Party believes in, they want to see a government that's focused on core areas like jobs, health, and homes, then they need to vote for Labour in order to achieve that." Hipkins said he would prefer to have an "environment where the government of the day, whomever that was, always had a majority". "That would be great, but that's not the reality. That's not what New Zealand voters have chosen for our electoral system. They've chosen a system in which we have to work with other political parties. "I think unlike the current government though, I'll be clear that, you know, there are some areas where, we, we will have standards and everybody will have to follow them." © Scoop Media
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
ACT MP Welcomes Changes To Anti-Stalking Bill, Calls For Urgent Action On Newer Forms Of Abuse
Press Release – ACT New Zealand Patterns of abusive behaviour deserve to be recognised by the law, and these changes will help victims seek justice, ACT MP Laura McClure. ACT MP Laura McClure is welcoming changes made at select committee to strengthen the proposed anti-stalking law, but says more must be done to protect New Zealanders from modern forms of digital abuse, particularly sexually explicit deepfakes. 'I'm pleased to see the Government respond to public concern about stalking with more robust and practical legislation,' says McClure. 'Patterns of abusive behaviour deserve to be recognised by the law, and these changes will help victims seek justice. 'But we can't stop here. As technology evolves, so do the tools of harassment and abuse. Sexually explicit AI-generated deepfakes made without consent are a fast-growing threat, especially to young people and women. 'I have a members' bill in the ballot that would create a specific offence for the creation and distribution of non-consensual sexually explicit deepfake content. This should be adopted as a Government Bill. 'Deepfakes are harming real people today, and the law is failing to keep up. 'The same commitment to protecting stalking victims should extend to those targeted by synthetic sexual abuse. We need clear, targeted laws so police can act, courts can prosecute, and victims can get justice.'
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
Government Rightfully Sued Over Illegal Climate ‘Plan'
Press Release – Green Party Christopher Luxon has spent the better part of two years telling the country everything is fine while he dismantles effective climate policy, gives handouts to the fossil fuel sector and platforms lobbyists pseudoscience on agricultural emissions. Last week, world-leading climate scientists called out the Government's approach to agricultural emissions. This week, climate lawyers have sued the Government because its Emissions Reductions Plans do not add up. 'Luxon's Government has chosen to pour oil, coal and gas on the climate crisis fire. Their climate 'plan' is not worth the paper it is written on. That's why they're being sued today,' says the Green Party's co-leader and spokesperson for climate change, Chlöe Swarbrick. 'I called it a demonstrable lie when the Prime Minister told Parliament in December 2023 that he wasn't weakening actions on climate – while he was actively weakening actions on climate. It was and remains a demonstrable lie. This is the first leg of the legal case. 'The Luxon Government's second Emissions Reduction Plan relies on unproven, economically unfeasible technologies and plastering our country in pine trees. This is the second leg of the legal case. 'Christopher Luxon has spent the better part of two years telling the country everything is fine while he dismantles effective climate policy, gives handouts to the fossil fuel sector and platforms lobbyist's pseudoscience on agricultural emissions. This would be a meme – a joke – if it wasn't so serious. 'The Greens have shown we can reduce climate-changing emissions five times faster than the Government's 'plan,' while reducing the cost of living and improving our quality of life. 'New Zealanders deserve so much better than this Government taking them for chumps,' says Chlöe Swarbrick.
