logo
Reinvent Leadership At Universities: Devoted Students Hold The Future

Reinvent Leadership At Universities: Devoted Students Hold The Future

Forbes20-05-2025

Graduation students who are committed to learning, leading, and building what comes next.
Here we are, another graduation season. Once again, the national spotlight focuses on disruption, protests, and political controversy, overshadowing what truly matters: the devoted students who are quietly advancing their futures and embodying the mission of the universities they attend.
Today's effective leader is being forced to reinvent on the move. That reality presents a defining moment. It's time for university leadership to step back, recalibrate, and return their attention to the very people they are meant to serve, the students who are committed to learning, leading, and building what comes next.
When I worked in the political space, distraction was a daily battle. We faced headlines and noise intended to pull our focus from the work and results we were generating. To win, we had to reclaim the narrative every day and keep it focused on serving the people who elected us.
The same principle applies to America's universities. Leadership must now show a commitment to their students by refusing to let protestors, fears of lost government funding, and pundits dominate the story.
There are three ways administrators can do this.
University leaders must ask themselves: Are we reacting to noise, or are we creating momentum for the future? The cost of remaining reactive is high, not just in terms of reputation, but in missed opportunities to lead with authority and purpose.
This is not about putting all their energy into responding to protestors. It's about amplifying the mission-aligned students whose presence proves that your institution works.
The unsung heroes of your university are disciplined, innovative, and driven. They are not a PR strategy. They are the product of your core values in motion.
Give them the mic.
Host the conversations you want to be hosting. Make room for optimism grounded in data, direction, and demonstrated outcomes.
If you are an administrator, align your energy with the future. Start by shifting your presence. Invite devoted students into your communication strategy. They are already telling a powerful story, one of persistence, progress, and purpose.
They are your most credible advocates.
Bring attention back to the fact that education changes people and uncovers the deep value of their character and purpose. Your students are proof of that.
They are the living, breathing evidence of your mission fulfilled. The well-being of your university depends on this focus. It is a defining moment for direction.
Model what it means to believe in the future and all that is possible. In doing so, you not only signal strength and vision, but you also invite meaningful engagement from alumni, future students, donors, and faculty.
Revenue streams that reflect investment in people, not just programs, are yet to be fully realized. But they start here.
Let's return to the days when people traveled for miles to hear someone speak in person, not because it was convenient, but because it mattered. Human-to-human experiences create energy, conviction, and clarity.
Students make up most of the audience at sporting events and concerts, not behind screens, but in the seats, showing up in person because shared experience matters. They go in person because the connection moves them.
That same energy can and should exist in your classrooms, auditoriums, and campus centers. Leadership must not forget this.
Host the conversations that matter.
They have ideas. They have values. And they want to help shape a world that works better than the one they've inherited. Give them the authority to do so.
Extend the invitation to speak, lead, and co-create.
This is not about what's going wrong. It never has been. It's about what is working, who is thriving, and what future those students are already starting to build.
The conversation at universities must change. It's time to stop reacting and start leading with intention. Administrators must seize this defining moment for direction—one that prioritizes optimism, elevates student voices, and leans into the reality that students are your most valuable data point.
They are lifelong learners. They are already future-proofing their own paths. They're ready to take meaningful action if you let them.
Model reinvention.
Be deliberate in your presence.
Lead with calm confidence.
Align your voice with the mission, not the noise.
Good news can and must make the front page. Let that news be about the students who reflect your university's best work and brightest future.
That's leadership. That's devotion. That's the opportunity in front of you.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Retired Justice Stephen Breyer's brother assigned to Newsom National Guard lawsuit
Retired Justice Stephen Breyer's brother assigned to Newsom National Guard lawsuit

Fox News

time5 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Retired Justice Stephen Breyer's brother assigned to Newsom National Guard lawsuit

The brother of retired liberal Justice Stephen Breyer was assigned Tuesday to preside over the lawsuit that Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom brought against the Trump administration in California this week. Judge Charles Breyer, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton, is set to oversee the case, which alleges President Donald Trump deprived California of its sovereignty by federalizing thousands of National Guard soldiers in response to anti-immigration enforcement protests and riots in Los Angeles County. Breyer is the younger brother of Stephen Breyer, who was appointed by Clinton to the high court and served on the bench for nearly three decades beginning in 1994. Stephen Breyer's retirement led to former President Joe Biden replacing him with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Charles Breyer, who serves on the federal bench in the Northern District of California, will oversee a lawsuit that pits Newsom, one of the country's most prominent Democrats and a possible 2028 presidential contender, against Trump. Newsom alleged in the lawsuit that Trump made an "unprecedented power grab" by mobilizing the National Guard in his state, a highly unusual move for a president to do without the consent of the governor. Trump has said the move was necessary to protect ICE personnel and federal buildings as some protesters engaged in unlawful assembly and pelted law enforcement with concrete bottles and other hard objects. After the National Guard proclamation, more unrest broke out in parts of the county involving rioters setting fire to several self-driving cars and looting some stores. Newsom alleged Trump's decision to send in the military spurred more chaos. Federal court cases in the Northern District of California are assigned by the Clerk of the Court "blindly and at random" through an automated system, according to the court's website. Fox News Digital reached out to Charles Breyer's chambers for comment on his assignment. The news of Charles Breyer presiding over the case comes as some Republicans have floated the theory that Judge James Boasberg in Washington, D.C., secretly took on Trump cases to sabotage them in favor of plaintiffs. Boasberg directly addressed the claims during a court hearing, saying his assignments, like most others in the court, were randomly assigned by a computer.

Overregulation Isn't What's Wrong With Pot
Overregulation Isn't What's Wrong With Pot

Wall Street Journal

time11 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Overregulation Isn't What's Wrong With Pot

Advocates of marijuana legalization have long played fast and loose with numbers. Jeffrey Singer's letter 'The Blunt Truth About States Subsidizing Pot' (June 7) is a case in point. Consider, first, that Mr. Singer dismisses the National Survey on Drug Use and Health—a long-form survey of nearly 70,000 subjects for which participants are compensated—because it relies on 'voluntary self-reporting.' He evidently prefers a much smaller cohort study from Canada that also relies on voluntary self-reporting. Why? Presumably because it found results he prefers.

Fortress Reacts to the Tillis-Hern Tort Reform
Fortress Reacts to the Tillis-Hern Tort Reform

Wall Street Journal

time13 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Fortress Reacts to the Tillis-Hern Tort Reform

We take issue with your editorial 'Ending a Tax Break for Lawsuits' (June 5). You assert that 'foreign investors in U.S. litigation don't have to pay tax on lawsuit proceeds because the tax code exempts foreigners from paying U.S. capital-gains tax, and their legal payouts are treated as capital gains.' But this isn't true for Fortress, an American company, whose investment decisions are made by our U.S. leadership. We have never allowed any non-U.S. investor to treat recoveries from legal assets as exempt from tax by characterizing income as capital gains. Investments in U.S. legal assets by our funds are subject to the usual corporate or ordinary income-tax rates and rules. American corporations use legal financing, like that offered by some Fortress-managed funds, because using the court system isn't free. This financing isn't about 'harming U.S. businesses' or targeting corporations. It helps American businesses spend less of their money on pursuing justified claims and more on job creation and economic growth.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store