
Trump Puts Weight Behind Private High Speed Rail
While President Donald Trump has threatened to block federal funding from California's troubled high-speed rail project, his administration has singled out the privately led Brightline West project for praise. That differing approach has further bolstered the prospects for Brightline, which is expected to break ground soon on its line from Los Angeles to Las Vegas, while the proposed state-run train has faced mounting delays and cost overruns.
Brightline West, owned by billionaire Wes Edens' Fortress Investment Group, has also faced its own set of delays, and the company's Florida line has failed to turn a profit. Still, some critics of government spending see it as a model for constructing large-scale transportation infrastructure without excessive amounts of federal subsidies, Brian Kahn and Eliyahu Kamisher report. Today on CityLab:
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
7 minutes ago
- Forbes
Which Teams Could Trade For Darius Garland Or Jarrett Allen?
WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 07: Darius Garland #10 and Jarrett Allen #31 of the Cleveland Cavaliers ... More look on during the first half against the Cleveland Cavaliers at Capital One Arena on February 07, 2025 in Washington, DC. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by) The 2025 offseason is expected to be a busy one, and one of the teams that could be an active player in all the mayhem is the Cleveland Cavaliers. After their best season since LeBron James left town, the Cavaliers fizzled out in the second round of the playoffs for the second time in as many years, bringing back concerns about the overlapping skillsets of their four best players. Individually, Darius Garland, Donovan Mitchell, Evan Mobley, and Jarrett Allen are fantastic players. The four of them finished in the top 20 this season in Estimated Plus-Minus (per Dunks & Threes). Unfortunately, Garland's skillset clashes with Mitchell's, and ditto for Mobley/Allen. This leaves them vulnerable to more balanced teams like the Indiana Pacers. Plus, the Cavaliers are on track to be a second apron team in 2025-26. These conditions have reportedly made the team open to the prospect of trading Garland and Allen. But if they are actually available, which teams should pursue them? And what would those trades look like? Even if they break up their core four, a tandem of Mitchell/Mobley is still potent enough to compete for titles (particularly in an Eastern Conference that will be powered down with Jayson Tatum and Damian Lillard set to miss most/all of next year). So, in potential trades involving Garland/Allen, Cleveland should be requesting players who can amplify these two (along with some draft capital). In this case, the Cavaliers should be looking for two-way wings/forwards, a backup big to offer Mobley some relief, and a secondary creator to fill some of the void left by Garland. While we won't go into every single possible deal that could take place this summer, we will go into some examples of trades featuring Garland, Allen, and one including both the All-Star caliber performers. The most obvious destination for Allen would be the Los Angeles Lakers. After trading Anthony Davis for Luka Doncic, the Lakers are in desperate need of a pick-and-roll partner for Doncic, who can also be an enforcer in the paint. A potential trade could look something like this: Jarrett Allen Trade Idea. Rui Hachimura isn't an elite defender, but he has graded out as a positive in that area over the last three years. Meanwhile, on offense, he's a good shooter (41.3%) and finisher around the rim (66.5%). He's also still young (27) and pretty battle-tested (26 playoff games in the last three years). Overall, Hachimura is a clear starting-caliber forward in this league and a nice frontcourt fit next to Mobley. Dalton Knecht gives the Cavaliers a bigger and younger version of Sam Merrill (Knecht is an inch taller and five years younger), which will enable the team to let him walk in free agency this summer without a worry. They would also net some draft capital in this deal with the Lakers' 2026 first-round pick. As for Garland, the defensively brilliant (2nd in defensive rating) but offensively-challenged (third in offensive rating) Orlando Magic could be a prime candidate for his services. In a perfect world, the Cavaliers would get Jalen Suggs in return for Garland. But it is hard to imagine the Magic would be willing to part ways with someone so deeply embedded in their core. So, just in case they aren't willing to include him in this deal, here is an alternative idea: Darius Garland Trade Idea. Last year was a down one for Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, but he's still one of the best two-way role players of the last decade (he was also quietly much better after January 1). He'd be the perfect guy to share a backcourt with Mitchell. Anthony Black didn't have the sophomore surge that his advocates had hoped for, but he's still a great perimeter defender (80th percentile DEF EPM) with plenty of time to develop (21 years old) into the secondary ball handler Cleveland will need if Garland leaves. Although, if he is the only true facilitator the Cavaliers get back in these trades, they will really need to prioritize re-signing Ty Jerome in free agency. Goga Bitadze isn't a household name, but he is one of the best cost-controlled backup bigs in the NBA right now. His game is simple, yet effective. Bitadze sets hard screens, rolls to the rim, finishes layup passes, blocks shots, and is always in the right position on defense. The analytics love him, as he's placed in at least the 93rd percentile in DEF EPM and the 81st percentile in EPM in each of the last two years. The two first round picks from Orlando will give Cleveland three overall from the two trades. Jaylon Tyson and Jett Howard are included here to make the money work. The Dallas Mavericks would be another interesting trade partner for Garland. With Kyrie Irving set to miss most of next season with a torn ACL, the Mavericks will need someone to set the table for Davis, Dereck Lively II, and Cooper Flagg. And even when Irving comes back, lineups with him and Garland will still be tenable because of how much size they boast on the front line. Plus, they have Daniel Gafford and a cavalcade of wings/forwards to include in a trade. If one team were to acquire Garland and Allen in one fell swoop, the Magic would make the most sense. They are a playoff-caliber team that is in need of an upgrade at point guard and center, and a starting five of Garland/Caldwell-Pope/Franz Wagner/Paolo Banchero/Allen would be pretty formidable in the East (they would certainly need to part ways with Suggs in this case). Along with Suggs, the Magic would need to give 2 or 3 first round picks, Black, at least one of their three centers, and some combination of salary filler/young players Cleveland can try to take a flier on. Some other teams that could be interested in one of these two studs are the Houston Rockets (Garland), Phoenix Suns (Allen), Brooklyn Nets (Garland), Boston Celtics (Allen), Sacramento Kings (Garland), Milwaukee Bucks (Allen), Chicago Bulls (Allen), Miami Heat (Garland), and Toronto Raptors (Allen). Another alternative for the Cavaliers is to just trade one of those two players. If that's the route they choose to go, their best bet would be to trade Garland. He's the better player, which makes him the better trade asset, and Allen is on the much more team-friendly deal (Garland's average annual value is 39.4 million over the next four years, and Allen's is only 20 million next year before turning into 30.2 over the following three). In any event, the Cavaliers have some huge decisions to make this offseason – the kind that could completely alter the landscape of the league – making them one of the most interesting teams to monitor over the next few months.


Fox News
7 minutes ago
- Fox News
Left's reaction to Elon Musk reveals its hypocrisy, Ted Cruz says
All times eastern Kelsey Grammer's Historic Battles for America Kelsey Grammer's Historic Battles for America Kelsey Grammer's Historic Battles for America FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: Former reality TV star Todd Chrisley leaves prison after Trump pardon


CBS News
10 minutes ago
- CBS News
CIF issues ruling as trans athlete set to participate in state championship
This weekend, a trans athlete will be competing for a title against female competitors at the state track and field championship meet. It has inflamed an issue central to President Trump's supporters, as the worlds of sport, law and politics collide. At issue is a California law that guarantees students the right to participate in sports based on their gender identity. That's now being challenged on the basis of the federal law that protects women athletes from discrimination. AB Hernandez is a transgender track and field athlete who just qualified to compete for a title in the long jump, high jump and triple jump events. When she placed first in qualifiers in the long jump competition, there were a number of angry adults in the crowd calling foul. "That's a boy! That is a biological boy," yelled one woman. Later, Hernandez was asked whether the criticism affected her during competition. "Um, honestly, no," she said. "Nothing I can do about people's actions. Just focus on my own." But President Trump focused on it, sending out messages threatening to cut federal funding and accusing California of illegally allowing "men to play in women's sports." "It's truly a blatant abuse of power," said Jorge Reyes Salinas with the transgender advocacy group, Equality California. "Targeting a transgender athlete, an underage student, a child, for political points is shameful and he should be ashamed for doing that." But shortly thereafter, the group that governs high school sports, the California Interscholastic Federation, or CIF, announced that whoever may have had the next closest score to Hernandez would be allowed to compete in the finals as well. It felt like an admission that something may not be fair about the situation, something Governor Gavin Newsom recently discussed with conservative influencer Charlie Kirk. "Well, I think it's an issue of fairness. I completely agree on that. It is an issue of fairness. It's deeply unfair," said Newsom. "Well, would you speak out against this young man, AB Hernandez, who right now is going to win the state championship in long jump," asked Kirk. Newsom replied, "In 2014, years before I was governor, there was a law established that established the legal principles that allow trans athletes in women's sports." That law was AB 1266 which says, "A pupil shall be permitted to participate in sex-segregated school programs and activities, including athletic teams and competitions, and use facilities consistent with his or her gender identity, irrespective of the gender listed on the pupil's records." CIF said it is required to allow Hernandez to compete for that reason. But a group called the California Families Council disagrees. "This is one of the only issues — the issues of boys' and girls' sports — that the majority of America agrees on. It's an 80/20 issue. We don't see that with many other social issues," said Communications Director Sophia Lorey. "So, no matter what people with CIF may be feeling or thinking, they keep saying their hands are tied by state law. But in reality, all they would have to do is come out and make a statement, and say, 'We will be following Title IX, which protects girls' sports, which allows equal opportunities for females.' Because at the end of the day, the federal ruling, Title IX, supersedes state law." The Department of Justice has joined the fight, announcing that it will be investigating whether AB 1266 is, in fact, a violation of Title IX. But Susan Cahn, history professor emeritus at the University of Buffalo, has studied women's sports and said the Title IX issue may not be as cut and dried as that. "Title IX has been interpreted the opposite way, too," said Cahn. "So, the gender discrimination could be understood as discriminating against that trans girl because she has a girl's identity. And that's how it was interpreted under Biden. And so, it really brings the fuzziness of Title IX out for us to look at. And that is a question that will probably be decided legally." In the meantime, the CIF is trying to walk a fine line. On Wednesday afternoon, they announced that, if Hernandez should make it to the finals, "a biological female student/athlete who would have earned the next qualifying mark will also be advanced to the finals." And, if Hernandez should win a medal, CIF said a duplicate medal would also be awarded to the next closest female athlete in the competition.