Germany's Greens call coalition talks result 'poison for our country'
Germany's Greens have harshly criticized the results of the exploratory talks between the conservative CDU/CSU bloc and the Social Democrats (SPD) on forming a government.
Instead of solving structural problems, the parties want to do as they did in previous centre-left governments and pour money into everything, Green party leader Franziska Brantner said in Berlin on Saturday. "That is poison for our country."
Co-party leader Felix Banaszak emphasized: "We are further from an agreement today than we have been in the last few days."
The Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and its Bavarian sister party the Christian Social Union (CSU) and the are likely to need the votes of the Greens to pass the security package they agreed on a few days ago.
They had agreed to relax the debt brake for higher defence spending and to create a debt-financed special fund of €500 billion ($528 billion) for infrastructure.
The changes, for which a two-thirds majority is needed, are to be decided by the existing Bundestag – in the next Bundestag it will be more difficult because of new majorities.
Specifically, the Greens are accusing the CDU and SPD of wanting to finance their election promises with these new funds instead of using the money for actual improvements.
"We see that the €500 billion are obviously not supposed to be used for additional infrastructure projects, but for election promises, pensions for mothers and commuter allowances," said Brantner.
It was "depressing" that climate protection does not play a role, Banaszak added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
21 minutes ago
- Axios
Democrats fume at "unserious" Trump impeachment vote
House Democrats privately vented their fury Tuesday about what they said is a "premature" and "unhelpful" vote on impeaching President Trump for his strikes on Iran. Why it matters: Impeachment has dogged Democrats since Trump came back into office, with Tuesday's vote finally forcing them to go on the record after half a year of internal turmoil. The outcome: 128 Democrats sided with House Republicans to block Rep. Al Green (D-Texas) from bringing a Trump impeachment vote, including most of Democratic leadership. Just 79 House Democrats — mostly progressives in safe districts — stood with Green on trying to force the vote. What we're hearing: "A completely unserious and selfish move," one House Democrat told Axios on the condition of anonymity to speak candidly about a colleague. Another House Democrat said there is "a lot" of anger about the vote — adding, "I think you heard it from leadership today, they're frustrated." "Most people think it's unhelpful," a third House Democrat told Axios. Several lawmakers noted that House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) voted against the resolution, as did House Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). State of play: Green forced a sudden vote on impeaching Trump for ordering strikes on nuclear facilities in Iran over the weekend without getting authorization from Congress. The unilateral strikes have been a major source of tension between congressional Democrats and the administration, though only a handful — including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) — have said they constitute grounds for impeachment. Green's five-page measure argued that Trump "disregarded the doctrine of separation of powers by usurping Congress's power to declare war." The other side: Green told Axios in an interview he doesn't have "one scintilla of regret" about forcing the vote, adding that it "does not in any way cause me any degree of consternation to be criticized." "I respect people have opinions that differ with my opinion," he added. Green said the vote was a matter of "conscience," adding, "Do we really want to give this president the power to take over 300 million people to war without consulting with Congress?" Between the lines: Many Democrats groaned that the vote forces them to choose between grassroots activists clamoring for impeachment and the broader, more moderate electorate. "It puts people in a difficult situation," a fourth House Democrat told Axios. A fifth fumed: "There are a lot of other things we should be focused on right now." Zoom in: Many lawmakers also argued that Green's measure was weak on its merits — even more so than the articles of impeachment Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) nearly forced to a vote in May, to the fury of his colleagues. "What a message to China and Russia — after we take military action, we try to impeach the president," said Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.). A sixth House Democrat said they were "not even clear the courts would uphold" the impeachment, noting that the debate over constitutional war powers is "fiercely contested." "This kind of motion is premature ... I just don't think it's ripe," said a seventh. Yes, but: Others said it was easy for them to vote with Green to force an impeachment vote.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
House torpedoes Rep. Al Green's effort to impeach Trump over Iran strikes
The House on Tuesday overwhelmingly torpedoed an effort by Rep. Al Green (D-Texas) to impeach President Trump over the U.S. strikes on Iran, underscoring how little appetite Democrats have to try and oust the president despite their frustration with the weekend attack. The chamber voted 344-79 to table Green's resolution, which charges Trump with abuse of power. One hundred-twenty eight Democrats — including the caucus's top three leaders — voted with Republicans to table the measure, while 79 Democrats voted against the effort, pushing for the chamber to hold a vote on the resolution. Green for months has sought to trigger a vote on impeaching Trump, slamming his handling of both foreign and domestic policy issues. The congressman on Tuesday reupped that effort, filing and forcing a vote on a resolution accusing Trump of failing to seek authorization from Congress before striking three sites in Iran over the weekend, which Democrats have taken issue with. 'In his conduct of the office of President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, abused the powers of the presidency when he disregarded the doctrine of separation of powers by usurping Congress's power to declare war and ordered the United States military to bomb another country without the constitutionally mandated congressional authorization or notice to Congress — cognizant of the fact that should another country's military bomb a facility within the United States of America, it would be a de facto declaration of war against the United States of America,' the impeachment resolution reads. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and other top Republicans have backed up the president, arguing that he had the authority to execute the strike through his Article II powers as commander-in-chief. 'Let me be clear and be as clear as possible: The strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities were clearly within President Trump's Article II powers as Commander in Chief,' Johnson, who previously practiced Constitutional law, said on Tuesday. 'It shouldn't even be in dispute.' Despite that defense, however, Democrats — and some Republicans — have criticized Trump's strike, with some saying impeachment is warranted. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), who voted against tabling the resolution on Tuesday, said the strikes were grounds for impeachment over the weekend. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), one of the most vocal advocates against U.S. involvement in Iran, meanwhile, wrote in a statement that the strikes were 'not Constitutional.' He is teaming up with Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) on a war powers resolution to prevent more U.S. intervention in Iran. Top national security Democrats in the House have also introduced their own measure. Following Tuesday's vote, the White House touted Trump's efforts in the Middle East. 'President Trump was able to quickly accomplish what no other President has been able to achieve – thanks to his 'peace through strength' leadership, Iran's nuclear program has been obliterated and a ceasefire has been agreed to. Eliminating the prospect of nuclear war is a non-partisan and unifying accomplishment that everyone should celebrate as a historic moment for United States, the Middle East, and the entire world,' White House assistant press secretary Taylor Rogers said in a statement to The Hill. Updated at 3:48 p.m. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Los Angeles Times
4 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
House shelves effort to impeach Trump over Iran strikes
WASHINGTON — The U.S. House voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to set aside an effort to impeach President Trump on a sole charge of abuse of power after he launched military strikes on Iran without first seeking authorization from Congress. The sudden action forced by a lone Democrat, Rep. Al Green of Texas, brought little debate and split his party. Most Democrats joined the Republican majority to table the measure for now. But dozens of Democrats backed Green's effort. The tally was 344 to 79. 'I take no delight in what I'm doing,' Green said before the vote. 'I do this because no one person should have the power to take over 300 million people to war without consulting with the Congress of the United States of America,' he said. 'I do this because I understand that the Constitution is going to be meaningful or it's going to be meaningless.' The effort, while not the first rumblings of actions to impeach Trump since he started his second term in January, shows the unease many Democrats have with his administration, particularly after the sudden attack on Iran's nuclear sites, a risky incursion into Middle East affairs. Trump earlier Tuesday lashed out in vulgar terms against another Democrat, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, for having suggested his military action against Iran was an impeachable offense. House Democratic leadership was careful to not directly criticize Green, but also made clear that their focus was on other issues. Impeachment matters are typically considered a vote of conscience, without pressure from leadership to vote a certain way. Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-Redlands), chair of the House Democratic caucus, said lawmakers will 'represent their constituents and their communities.' 'At this time, at this moment, we are focusing on what this big, ugly bill is going to do,' he said about the big Trump tax breaks package making its way through Congress. 'I think anything outside of that is a distraction because this is the most important thing that we can focus on.' Trump was twice impeached by House Democrats during his first term, in 2019 over withholding funds to Ukraine as it faced military aggression from Russia, and in 2021 on the charge of inciting an insurrection after the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol by his supporters trying to stop Democrat Joe Biden's presidential election victory. In both of those impeachment cases, the Senate acquitted Trump of charges, allowing his return to the presidency this year. Green, who had filed earlier articles of impeachment against the president this year, has been a consistent voice speaking out against Trump's actions, which he warns is America's slide toward authoritarianism. The congressman told the AP earlier in the day that he wanted to force the vote to show that at least one member of Congress was watching the president's action and working to keep the White House in check. Mascaro and Freking write for the Associated Press. AP writer Joey Cappelletti contributed to this report.
