Minnesota small businesses struggling to "survive the tariff crisis"
Import taxes on Chinese goods are up to 145%. As trade talks are on the horizon. Minnesota-made companies are feeling the pressure.
Marissa Held-Nordling spends a lot of time in front of her sewing machine, creating children's clothing and bows for her small business, Little Roos children's boutique in Chaska, Minnesota.
"After my kids go to bed, I sometimes sew for another two to three hours," Held-Nordling said.
While each piece is designed and stitched in Chaska, most of her raw materials come from China.
"On top of the inflation, and then being hit with the tariffs, it's definitely been a big blow to small businesses like mine," she said.
Little Roos avoided the 145% tax increase until this month, falling under an umbrella of exemptions under $800.
"I ordered through our Fourth of July fabrics. After that, everything's kind of up in the air," she said.
Left to right: Little Roos' Marissa Held-Nordling, and Busy Baby's Beth Benike
WCCO
Held-Nordling says it's not just her business taking the blow. It's also impacting community partners, Minnesota makers and authors she supplies in her store front.
"There's going to be a big gap of empty shelves, for sure," she said. "I mean, vendors have already told me that that's going to happen."
Vendors like Busy Baby, a Zumbrota-based company that relies on manufacturing overseas. Beth Benike, Minnesota's 2025 Business Person of the Year, runs Busy Baby.
"I have maybe two months worth left in my warehouse in Minnesota, and when that's gone, I have no more revenue," Benike said.
She's turning to lawmakers in Washington D.C. and crowdfunding to help "survive the tariff crisis."
Both entrepreneurs are working through challenges they can't control.
"I'm just really hoping that this gets worked out to the point where in six weeks, I'm not going to have to deal with a decision of what we're gonna do," Held-Nordling said.
Trade talks between the U.S. and China will pick back up on Saturday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Travis Hunter gets his full $30.57 million signing bonus up front
When it comes to rookie contracts, there's not much to negotiate. On one of the few negotiable items, Jaguars receiver/defensive back Travis Hunter did very well. Adam Schefter of reports that Hunter will receive his full, slotted $30.57 million bonus up front. He's the first non-quarterback not taken first overall to get the full signing bonus up front. Advertisement Often, teams stagger the payments. Sometimes, a portion of the money isn't paid out for nearly a year. There's real value in getting the cash right away. It can be put to work, earning interest while Hunter does nothing. It's the least the Jaguars could do for a player who relishes the opportunity to work overtime. His contract won't pay him extra to play both ways; the total money is driven solely by the position in which he was drafted. When it's time for the Jaguars to pick up Hunter's fifth-year option, it will be driven by the position at which he takes the most snaps. Ditto for the franchise tag. Only in his second contract will Hunter have a chance to get paid for playing both positions. He won't be eligible for that until after his third regular season ends. Advertisement That's when it will get interesting. After the 2027 regular season. Hunter, if he's playing both ways on a full-time basis, will have every right to be paid for both of his jobs. The stakes will be high, for both sides. The Jaguars happily gave up their 2026 first-round pick and more to trade up three spots in the first round because they were getting two players in one — as their two-pronged social-media announcement of his signing confirms. At some point, they'll need to depart from a Collective Bargaining Agreement that doesn't contemplate paying extra money to a player who plays both ways.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Threatens More Action If Iran Doesn't Negotiate
The US is bracing for a response from Iran as President Donald Trump pushes for the country to come back to the negotiating table. US airstrikes hit Iran's nuclear facilities. Bloomberg's Tyler Kendall reports from the White House. (Source: Bloomberg)
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump's go-it-alone strategy on Iran risks dividing an already split Congress
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump's decision to launch a military strike on Iran's nuclear sites without fully consulting the U.S. Congress layered a partisan approach onto a risky action, particularly because the White House briefed top Republican leaders beforehand without doing the same for Democrats. While House Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Republican leader John Thune and the GOP chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee were all briefed before the action, their counterparts were not. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer was given a perfunctory heads-up by the White House shortly before the strikes were made public. And House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries' office received a 'courtesy call' before Trump announced it. The so-called Gang of Eight congressional and intelligence leaders were not notified before the mission, according to two people familiar with the situation and granted anonymity to discuss it. One, Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said he learned of the strikes on social media, which he said 'is an uncomfortable thing for the ranking member of the Intelligence Committee.' 'Bad enough that we weren't informed,' Himes, of Connecticut, said Sunday on CNN, "but unconstitutional that we didn't have the opportunity to debate and speak, as the representatives of the people, on what is one of the more consequential foreign policy things that this country has done in a long time.' It's a highly unusual situation that is complicating the difficult politics ahead for the president and his party as the U.S. enters an uncertain national security era with the surprise military attack on the nuclear facilities, an unprecedented incursion in Iran. Trump faces a vote in Congress as soon as this week on a war powers resolution from Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., that would "direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress." Another resolution has been introduced by lawmakers from both parties in the U.S. House. And at least one Democrat, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, said Trump's actions are 'clearly grounds for impeachment.' At the same time, the Trump administration is expecting Congress to send an additional $350 billion in national security funds as part of the president's big tax breaks bill also heading soon for a vote. Senators are set to be briefed Tuesday behind closed doors on the situation in Iran. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Sunday that the White House made 'bipartisan courtesy calls' to congressional leadership. She said in a social media post that the White House spoke to Schumer 'before the strike' but that House leader Jeffries 'could not be reached until after, but he was briefed.' While the president has authority as the commander in chief of the U.S. armed forces to order specific military actions, any prolonged war-time footing would traditionally need authorization from Congress. The House and Senate authorized actions in Iraq, Afghanistan and beyond after the Sept. 11, 2001, attack. 'Congress should be consulted,' Kaine said on CBS' 'Face the Nation.' 'We were not.' As soon as Trump announced the actions late Saturday, he won swift support from the GOP leadership in Congress. Johnson, Thune and the Senate Intelligence Committee chairman, Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, were all briefed ahead of time and sent almost simultaneous statements backing the military campaign, as did the House Intelligence Committee chairman, Rep. Rick Crawford, also of Arkansas. But by apparently engaging with only one side of the political aisle, Trump risks saddling his Republican Party with political ownership of the military action against Iran, which may or may not prove popular with Americans. Rather than rally the country to his side, Trump risks cleaving its already deep divisions over his second term agenda. Johnson, who praised Trump's action against Iran as 'the right call,' said the president's targeted strike was within his authority and in line with past presidential actions. 'Leaders in Congress were aware of the urgency of this situation and the Commander-in-Chief evaluated that the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act,' Johnson, R-La., said on social media. Trump himself has shown little patience for political dissent from within his party, even as criticism rolls in from among his most trusted backers. The Iran military campaign threatens to splinter Trump's Make America Great Again movement, which powered his return to the White House. Many Trump supporters aligned with his campaign promises not to involve the United States in overseas actions and instead to be a peace-making president. 'I think I represent part of the coalition that elected Trump,' said Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., on CBS. 'We were tired of endless wars in the Middle East.' Massie and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California have introduced their own war powers resolution in the House, a sign of how close the far left and far right have bonded over their opposition to U.S. campaigns abroad, particularly in the Middle East. The Trump administration insisted Sunday the U.S. is not seeking a war with Iran. 'We're not at war with Iran. We're at war with Iran's nuclear program,' said Vice President JD Vance on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' And Trump swiftly attacked Massie, who is one of the most steadfast non-interventionist GOP lawmakers in Congress — along with Sen. Rand Paul, also of Kentucky — and the president suggested he would turn his Republican Party against the congressman. 'MAGA should drop this pathetic LOSER, Tom Massie, like the plague!" the president said on social media. "The good news is that we will have a wonderful American Patriot running against him in the Republican Primary, and I'll be out in Kentucky campaigning really hard.' __ Associated Press writer Mary Clare Jalonick contributed to this report.
