Pakistan hides terror behind civilian shields: India at UNSC
India strongly rebutted Pakistan's claims on the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) and civilian protection during a United Nations Security Council meeting on water in armed conflict. In its first statement since the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor, India accused Pakistan of spreading disinformation and obstructing legitimate dam upgrades under the treaty.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
In a forceful intervention at the United Nations Security Council, India accused Pakistan of spreading disinformation over the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) and of shielding terrorists under the pretext of protecting civilians.Delivering India's statement at the UNSC's Arria Formula Meeting on "Protecting Water in Armed Conflict - Protecting Civilian Lives," India's Permanent Representative to the UN, Parvathaneni Harish, categorically refuted Pakistan's claims on IWT and condemned its obstructionist stance on treaty amendments.This marked India's first UNSC statement since the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor.Harish said Pakistan has consistently blocked permissible modifications to ageing water infrastructure, despite formal requests by India. "Some of the old dams are facing safety concerns. Pakistan has continued to block any changes to this infrastructure permissible under the Treaty," he noted.Citing decades of hostility, Harish underlined that Pakistan had violated the treaty's spirit by waging wars and sponsoring thousands of terror attacks on India, which have killed over 20,000 civilians in the last four decades.India accused Pakistan of deliberate attacks on Indian border villages, resulting in over 20 civilian deaths and more than 80 injuries, including shelling of places of worship and medical facilities."To preach at this body after such behaviour is grossly hypocritical," Harish said, asserting that Pakistan has "no credentials to speak on civilian protection" given its track record of targeting civilians and sheltering terrorists.He further added that Pakistan routinely uses civilian populations as shields for terror infrastructure and called on the global community to end tolerance for such tactics.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
38 minutes ago
- Hans India
Op Sindoor should not be used to derive political mileage
The political class will do better if it stops desisting from trying to derive electoral mileage from the highly successful Operation Sindoor that was executed recently. The military aspects of the operation have been largely praised (even by objective western experts), but the political aftermath has proven far more complex. The ruling party has come under scrutiny for allegedly using the operation's success to enhance its nationalistic image ostensibly for electoral gains. On its part, the Opposition has done little better. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge called for a special parliamentary session to discuss the operation in detail. He raised concerns about inconsistencies in official narratives, particularly surrounding reports regarding the number of Indian aircraft lost during the strikes. He also accused the government of 'misleading the nation.' His statement came after the Chief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan acknowledged the loss of some Indian aircraft but emphasised that the armed forces had adapted quickly to changing tactical scenarios, ultimately achieving the mission objectives. Chauhan categorically refuted Pakistan's assertions of shooting down multiple Indian jets, labelling them as propaganda meant to distort facts. His remarks highlighted the critical role of clear and truthful communication in sustaining public trust and countering misinformation. The political discourse triggered by Operation Sindoor reflects a broader tension between safeguarding national security and navigating partisan interests. While it is natural for political parties to discuss significant national developments, it is imperative that such dialogues remain constructive and rooted in the national interest. Exploiting military operations for electoral advantage not only undermines the integrity of the armed forces but also erodes public confidence in the nation's democratic institutions. As India continues to assess the long-term implications of Operation Sindoor, there is a pressing need for political maturity and a unified stance on issues of national security. Recognising and honouring the courage and competence of the armed forces should transcend political divides. National security must remain above the realm of party politics, treated with the seriousness and dignity it deserves. Also, our political leaders must come to terms with a sobering reality: Operation Sindoor, while tactically successful and symbolically significant, was not a war that we won—nor even a full-scale battle. At best, it was a well-executed skirmish, a calibrated military response to the horrifying Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 innocent lives. Its importance lies not in territorial gains or dramatic military victories, but in the message it has sent loud and clear-Pakistan will have to pay a heavy price for supporting and harbouring terrorist outfits. Precision strikes on terrorist camps disrupted their operations and showcased India's strategic capabilities. However, this operation must not be mistaken for closure. The war on terror is a long and evolving struggle, requiring constant vigilance, strategic foresight, and, above all, national unity. True victory will come not with a single strike, but through sustained efforts to dismantle the networks of extremism to be assured of lasting peace and security. Operation Sindoor stands as a testament to India's strategic capability and resolve in the face of terrorism. However, its legacy will be defined not just by military precision but by the manner the nation's political leadership chooses to engage with it. By fostering transparency, encouraging responsible dialogue, and prioritising unity, India can ensure that such operations serve their true purpose—protection and security of all its citizens.
Hindustan Times
39 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Boulder ‘terror attack': Why did Mohamed Soliman target protesters? Who are the victims?
A group of Jewish protesters calling for the release of Israeli hostages were attacked with Molotov cocktails on Sunday in Boulder, Colorado, with eight victims injured and hospitalised. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has termed the incident as a "targeted terror attack" and arrested a suspect in the case. Also Read: 'Terrorism against Jews': Israel's UN ambassador slams Boulder attack The suspect, Mohamed Soliman, targeted protesters who belonged to the volunteer group 'Run for Their Lives', which organises run and walk events to call for the immediate release of the Israeli hostages who remain in Gaza. The group had gathered at the Pearl Street pedestrian mall, a four-block area in Boulder frequented by tourists and students. The eight people hospitalised for injuries ranged in age from 52 to 88, reported the Associated Press. Photos from the scene showed a woman lying on the ground, soaked in water, after several victims displayed burn injuries due to the attack. The injuries, consistent with burn wounds, ranged from minor to serious as per Boulder police chief Steve Redfearn. Also Read: 'They are jealous': Boulder attack suspect before throwing Molotov cocktails at pro-Israel group Lynn Segal, 72, one of 20 people gathered at the site of the protest, stated that they witnessed a 'rope of fire' and two big flares during the attack, after which the chaos erupted. Also Read: Boulder attack: Witness says Molotov cocktail thrown at pro-Israel protestors, raising terrorism concerns Segal, who is Jewish, has supported Palestine for more than 40 years, and was concerned that she might be accused of helping the suspect because she was wearing a pro-Palestine shirt. 'There were people who were burning, I wanted to help. But I didn't want to be associated with the perpetrator,' she told AP. Mark D. Michalek, the FBI special agent in charge, stated during a press conference, earlier today, that witnesses saw the suspect use a 'makeshift flamethrower' and yelled 'Free Palestine' during the attack. The people hospitalized for injuries in the Pearl Street attack range in age from 67 to 88. Photos from the scene showed a woman lying on the ground in the fetal position with her hair soaked, and a man helping her and getting water from someone with a water jug. The injuries authorities found were consistent with reports of people being set on fire, Boulder Police Chief Steve Redfearn said, adding that injuries ranged from serious to minor. Redfearn told reporters that it was too early to discuss a motive but that witnesses were being interviewed. Mohamed Sabry Soliman, 45, was arrested at the scene. No charges were immediately announced, but officials said they expect to hold him 'fully accountable.' Video from the scene showed him shirtless and wearing jeans and holding two clear bottles with a transparent liquid in them while shouting at onlookers. Another video shows a witness shouting, 'He's right there. He's throwing Molotov cocktails,' as a police officer with his gun drawn advanced on the suspect. FBI leaders in Washington said they were treating the Boulder attack as an act of terrorism, and the Justice Department — which leads investigations into acts of violence driven by religious, racial or ethnic motivations — decried the attack as a 'needless act of violence, which follows recent attacks against Jewish Americans.' 'This act of terror is being investigated as an act of ideologically motivated violence based on the early information, the evidence, and witness accounts. We will speak clearly on these incidents when the facts warrant it,' FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino said in a post on X.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Kept pleading for help': BJP's Nishikant Dubey cites declassified files to slam Nehru's foreign policy
BJP MP Nishikant Dubey NEW DELHI: BJP MP Nishikant Dubey on Monday launched a sharp attack on the Congress, targeting former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru over his handling of the 1962 Indo-China war. Referring to Nehru's appeals during the conflict, Dubey said, 'Nehru kept pleading for help.' The remark came in response to the Congress party 's criticism of external affairs minister S Jaishankar for 'informing' Pakistan about Operation Sindoor . In retaliation, Dubey took to X to highlight what he called the flawed foreign policy of previous Congress governments, especially under Nehru. Dubey posted a letter written by Nehru to then US President John F Kennedy, calling it 'the second letter written by Iron Lady's father Nehru ji to the American President during the China war. He kept pleading for help.' Sarcastically attacking Nehru's diplomatic approach, Dubey added, 'Pakistan is a brother, a friend, a good neighbour, we will reach an agreement with them, everything was written. But carefully read the excellent foreign policy of the great Nehru ji.' According to Dubey, the US passed Nehru's letter to then Pakistani military ruler Ayub Khan . 'America sent this letter to Pakistan's military ruler Ayub Khan. After seeing this letter, did we give Pakistan a chance to attack India in 1965 or not? What can be said about the person who tells the country's weaknesses to foreigners, especially Pakistan?' Earlier in the day, Dubey also responded to Congress leader Pawan Khera's post on X by digging further into history. He referenced another letter, Nehru's 1945 communication to British Prime Minister Clement Attlee regarding Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose.
