logo
Sunterra takes steps toward creditor protection while U.S. subsidiaries face legal scrutiny

Sunterra takes steps toward creditor protection while U.S. subsidiaries face legal scrutiny

CBC10-04-2025

Several businesses under the Sunterra banner, known in Alberta for its agriculture and high-end grocery operations, have taken steps toward creditor protection as three of its U.S. subsidiaries face legal and financial scrutiny.
Late last month, Sunterra Quality Food Markets, Sunterra Food Corporation, Sunterra Farms, Trochu Meat Processors and Sunwold Farms all filed notices under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, a process that gives financially strained companies 30 days of protection from creditors while they come up with a plan to restructure.
Trochu is where Sunterra processes its pork in Alberta. The facility was damaged in a fire last summer and has not yet reopened.
Sunwold Farms is a pig operation in South Dakota where Sunterra sends pigs to be finished.
"Please be advised that the company is not bankrupt and has availed itself to a procedure whereby an insolvent person, with creditor and Court approval, restructures its financial affairs," said the insolvency trustee, Harris and Partners Inc., in letters to creditors for each of the five entities.
Documents show each of the five entities owe millions of dollars to creditors, though some of that includes money owed to one another. For example, Sunterra Farms Ltd. owes just over $3 million to Sunterra Food Corp., and Sunterra Food Corp. owes $4.9 million to Sunterra Farms Ltd.
Meanwhile, a Midwestern farm credit cooperative has alleged breach of contract and fraud against three of Sunterra's U.S. subsidiaries. Since 2002, Sunterra has been shipping pigs to northwest Iowa and South Dakota to finish growing, according to the company's website.
The claims against Sunterra Farms Iowa, Sunwold Farms and Lariagara Farms South (another pig-finishing operation in South Dakota) are related to an alleged "cheque kiting" scheme in South Dakota, court documents show.
All three entities have the same parent company, Sunterra Enterprises Inc.
Cheque kiting refers to the process of depositing cheques from one account with insufficient funds into another, to temporarily make a bank balance seem inflated.
According to Compeer Financial, the companies were sending multiple cheques every day via next-day mail to be deposited with Canada Western Bank. At the same time, they were also sending Compeer multiple cheques, drawn against the Canada Western Bank account.
"In other words, Defendants were sending nearly identical amounts and numbers of checks back and forth between CWB and Compeer daily," said the court documents.
Compeer alleges the cheques purposely didn't exceed $1 million to avoid scrutiny.
It's alleged that the companies collectively owe $35,259,796 to Compeer and have $19,017,724 in collateral.
Given the apparent financial strain, Compeer has suggested that the companies can't afford to properly feed and care for 110,000 pigs that are being used as collateral on its loans.
"[An assessment officer for Compeer] testified that Defendants' pigs lack feed and veterinary care," the court documents say. "[He] added that propane was running low, which is used to heat the barns that house Defendants' pigs."
The companies, for their part, said Compeer was facing a self-inflicted problem because it controlled the "purse strings" and was trying to "turn off the taps" to cause an emergency, the court records show.
"Asking for Compeer to "keep the taps flowing" while Defendants' accounts are overdrawn tens of millions of dollars due to Defendants' alleged fraud is an untenable argument," a South Dakota judge wrote in his discussion of the case.
On March 28, the judge granted Compeer's motion to avoid mediation in the case and to appoint a receiver.
Sunterra has not responded to an interview request from CBC News.
A spokesperson for Compeer declined to comment.
The Sunterra company started with a small family pig farm operated by Stan and Flo Price in Acme, Alta. In 1970 the company began a pig-breeding business, Pig Improvement Canada (now known as Sunterra Farms). In 1990, it launched pork processing in Trochu and Sunterra Market retail locations in Calgary.
In 1990, the company told the Calgary Herald it had invested in a specialty slaughterhouse in Trochu and retail stores in Calgary to sell "superior, 'uniform-quality' meat" from "genetically improved herds" to the public.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iowa governor rejects GOP bill to increase regulations of Summit's carbon dioxide pipeline
Iowa governor rejects GOP bill to increase regulations of Summit's carbon dioxide pipeline

Toronto Star

timean hour ago

  • Toronto Star

Iowa governor rejects GOP bill to increase regulations of Summit's carbon dioxide pipeline

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds on Wednesday rejected a bill that could have introduced more complications for a massive carbon-capture pipeline project routed across several Midwestern states, issuing a rare veto in the Republican-controlled statehouse. The legislation was designed by Iowa House Republicans to increase regulations of Summit Carbon Solutions' estimated $8.9 billion, 2,500-mile (4,023-kilometer) project that cuts across Iowa and already has an approved permit in the state.

Iowa governor rejects GOP bill to increase regulations of Summit's carbon dioxide pipeline
Iowa governor rejects GOP bill to increase regulations of Summit's carbon dioxide pipeline

Winnipeg Free Press

timean hour ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Iowa governor rejects GOP bill to increase regulations of Summit's carbon dioxide pipeline

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds on Wednesday rejected a bill that could have introduced more complications for a massive carbon-capture pipeline project routed across several Midwestern states, issuing a rare veto in the Republican-controlled statehouse. The legislation was designed by Iowa House Republicans to increase regulations of Summit Carbon Solutions' estimated $8.9 billion, 2,500-mile (4,023-kilometer) project that cuts across Iowa and already has an approved permit in the state. But in the Senate, it exposed a rift within the party over how to protect property rights. It also provoked loud opposition from members of Iowa's powerful ethanol industry, which argued the project is essential for Iowa's agricultural dominance, for farmers and for construction jobs. Even with the relief from Reynolds' veto, Summit will likely have to readjust plans after South Dakota's governor signed a ban on the use of eminent domain — the government seizure of private property with compensation — to acquire land for carbon dioxide pipelines. Summit's permit application was also rejected in South Dakota. The project has permit approvals in Iowa, Minnesota and North Dakota but faces various court challenges. The Iowa bill would have prohibited the renewal of permits for a carbon dioxide pipeline, limited the use of such a pipeline to 25 years and significantly increased the insurance coverage requirements for the pipeline company. Those provisions would likely have made it less financially feasible for a company to build a carbon dioxide pipeline. As the legislative session wound down, a dozen Republican senators insisted their leaders bring the House-approved bill to the floor for a vote after several years of inaction. The stalemate ended in a long and divisive debate among the Iowa Senate's Republican supermajority, with senators openly criticizing one another and exposing the closed-door discussions that got them there. The pipeline's many critics have for years begged lawmakers for action. They accuse Summit of stepping on their property rights and downplaying the safety risks of building the pipeline alongside family homes, near schools and across ranches. Lee Enterprises and The Associated Press reviewed hundreds of cases that reveal the great legal lengths the company went to to get the project built. In South Dakota, in particular, a slew of eminent domain legal actions to obtain land sparked a groundswell of opposition that was closely watched by lawmakers in Iowa as well. But as debate in the state Senate seemed inevitable, dozens of Summit employees and leaders and members of the Iowa Corn Growers Association, the Iowa Renewable Fuels Association and labor unions made a big showing as well. The pipeline was proposed to carry carbon emissions from ethanol plants in Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota to be stored underground permanently in North Dakota. By lowering carbon emissions from the plants, the pipeline would lower their carbon intensity scores and make them more competitive in the renewable fuels market. The project would also allow ethanol producers and Summit to tap into federal tax credits. Iowa Renewable Fuels Association Executive Director Monte Shaw said in a May 12 statement after the vote that a majority of the Iowa Senate 'turned their back on Iowa agriculture.'

Carbon dioxide pipeline regulations pass in testy Iowa Senate but still need governor's signature
Carbon dioxide pipeline regulations pass in testy Iowa Senate but still need governor's signature

Winnipeg Free Press

time13-05-2025

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Carbon dioxide pipeline regulations pass in testy Iowa Senate but still need governor's signature

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — The Iowa Senate advanced a bill that could further complicate a massive carbon-capture pipeline project routed across several Midwestern states after a long-winded and testy debate that exposed a clear rift among Republicans over property rights and the future of the state's agricultural dominance. The legislation that narrowly passed late Monday would prohibit the renewal of permits for a carbon dioxide pipeline, limit the use of such a pipeline to 25 years and significantly increase the insurance coverage requirements for the pipeline company. Those provisions would likely make it less financially feasible for a company to build the pipeline. Already passed by the House, the measure now goes to Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds' desk. A spokesperson for the governor said Tuesday that the governor's office is reviewing the bill. The legislation could force adjustments to Summit Carbon Solutions' plans for the estimated $8.9 billion, 2,500-mile (4,023-kilometer) project, which are already strained after South Dakota's governor signed a ban on the use of eminent domain — the government seizure of private property with compensation — to acquire land for carbon dioxide pipelines. The project received permit approvals in Iowa, Minnesota and North Dakota, but it does face various court challenges, and its application was rejected in South Dakota. The Iowa Senate, already operating in overtime as legislative session drags on, came to a halt after a dozen Republican state senators insisted that their leaders bring a pipeline bill to the floor. In response, Summit spokesperson Sabrina Zenor this month outlined the company's investment to date, saying that the company remained committed to building the project and to Iowa. 'Summit Carbon Solutions has invested four years and nearly $175 million on voluntary agreements in Iowa, signing agreements with more than 1,300 landowners and securing 75% of the Phase One route,' Zenor said in a May 1 statement. Zenor declined to comment Tuesday. Dozens of Summit employees and leaders and members of the Iowa Corn Growers Association, the Iowa Renewable Fuels Association and labor unions made a big showing as debate in the state Senate seemed inevitable. They told lawmakers that the project is essential for the future of Iowa's ethanol industry, for farmers and for construction jobs. The pipeline would carry carbon emissions from ethanol plants in Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota to be stored underground permanently in North Dakota. By lowering carbon emissions from the plants, the pipeline would lower their carbon intensity scores and make them more competitive in the renewable fuels market. The project would also allow ethanol producers and Summit to tap into federal tax credits. A majority of the Iowa Senate 'turned their back on Iowa agriculture tonight,' Iowa Renewable Fuels Association Executive Director Monte Shaw said in a statement. 'For 25 years, Iowa has benefited greatly from being the most profitable place in the world to convert corn kernels into ethanol,' said Shaw, who predicts that there will be severe economic consequences if the legislation is signed into law. 'Iowa is poised to be left behind.' The pipeline's critics accuse Summit of stepping on their property rights and downplaying the safety risks of building the pipeline alongside family homes, near schools and across ranches. Lee Enterprises and The Associated Press reviewed hundreds of cases that reveal the great legal lengths the company went to to get the project built. In South Dakota, in particular, a slew of eminent domain legal actions to obtain land sparked a groundswell of opposition that was closely watched by lawmakers in Iowa as well. Tensions flared among the Iowa Senate's Republican supermajority, with senators openly criticizing one another and exposing the closed-door discussions that got them there. Thirteen Republican senators joined with 14 Democrats in voting in favor of the bill. Twenty-one Republicans and one Democrat voted against it. Winnipeg Jets Game Days On Winnipeg Jets game days, hockey writers Mike McIntyre and Ken Wiebe send news, notes and quotes from the morning skate, as well as injury updates and lineup decisions. Arrives a few hours prior to puck drop. The Republicans who opposed it stressed that they, too, respect private property rights. But they said the bill has holes that will threaten any infrastructure development in Iowa, not just carbon-capture pipelines. They criticized the bill for drawing out the permitting process by muddying up the standards of public use, allowing anyone, anywhere to intervene, and creating unnecessary insurance disputes between the company and landowners that may be miles away. The bill's backers said those criticisms are overblown interpretations of the legislation and distractions from the issue at hand. Republican state Sen. Jeff Taylor, who supports the bill, said it would fundamentally ensure that companies respect the constitutional requirement for eminent domain. 'Both the Iowa Constitution and the federal Constitution specify what the requirement is for eminent domain: It's public use,' Taylor said. 'It's not anything else. It's not a positive business climate, it's not helping the agribusiness in the state, it's not the price of corn or helping the ethanol plants. It's public use.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store