logo
UK should 'actively prepare' for WAR on British soil amid Russia, Iran and North Korea threat, ministers are warned - as new national security strategy sets out China 'challenge'

UK should 'actively prepare' for WAR on British soil amid Russia, Iran and North Korea threat, ministers are warned - as new national security strategy sets out China 'challenge'

Daily Mail​2 days ago

The UK should 'actively prepare' for a direct attack on British soil in a potential 'wartime scenario' for the first time in many years, the Government has warned.
In a national security strategy published today, ministers said the UK now finds itself in 'an era in which we face confrontation with those who are threatening our security'.
It highlighted Russian cyber attacks and sabotage against the UK, Iranian hostile activity on British soil, and other adversaries 'laying the foundations for future conflict'.
This includes them 'positioning themselves to move quickly to cause major disruption to our energy and or supply chains,' the strategy said.
It added: 'For the first time in many years, we have to actively prepare for the possibility of the UK homeland coming under direct threat, potentially in a wartime scenario.'
The strategy aims to protect the UK at home and abroad, and also invest more in artificial intelligence (AI) and defence.
Sir Keir Starmer said the UK is 'facing daily challenges on the home front' with Britain targeted by 'very, very frequent and very, very serious' cyberattacks.
The Prime Minister, speaking to Sky News at a NATO summit in The Hague, added: 'We have to guard properly against those threats, and we will do so.'
While the national security strategy outlined the threat from Russia, Iran and North Korea, it also highlighted the 'challenge' of China as a global actor.
The PM met soldiers during a visit to a Dutch marine training centre, as part of the UK-Netherlands Joint Amphibious Force in Rotterdam, on the sidelines of the NATO summit
China is a 'sophisticated and persistent threat' but freezing the UK's relations with Beijing is 'not an option', Foreign Secretary David Lammy told MPs this afternoon.
In a statement to the House of Commons, Mr Lammy outlined the findings of the Government's examination of the UK-China relationship.
The 'China audit' recommended increasing Britain's 'resilience and readiness' towards the Asian superpower and the Government's ability to engage with Beijing.
As part of the national security strategy, a summary of the audit set out how 'China's espionage, interference in our democracy and the undermining of our economic security have increased in recent years'.
But it also noted how ministers are seeking a 'trade and investment relationship' with China to boost the UK economy.
Mr Lammy told MPs that in the past decade China has delivered a third of global economic growth, becoming the world's second largest economy.
Together with Hong Kong, it is the UK's third largest trading partner, the Foreign Secretary added.
'Not engaging with China is therefore no choice at all,' he said. 'China's power is an inescapable fact.'
Mr Lammy said the audit painted a 'complex picture' but 'the UK's approach to China will be founded on progressive realism, taking the world as it is, not as we wish it to be'.
The Foreign Secretary faced claims that the Government was going 'cap in hand' to China to bail out the British economy.
Tory shadow foreign secretary Priti Patel said: 'It has taken the Government a year to produce this audit, which seemingly fails to set out any kind of serious strategic framework.
'I think it's fair to say we know why: because the Government – and in fact the Foreign Secretary has touched on this – has gone cap in hand to China to bail out its terrible handling of the British economy.
'It is setting up its closer economic ties with China while knowing very well that British businesses here are struggling, not just when it comes to competing against China, but actually struggling to absorb the weight of Labour's own regulatory costs in this country.'
Mr Lammy was also forced to assure MPs that there are 'no grubby deals' with China on any issue, including the proposed 'super-embassy' in London.
Former Conservative leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith told the Foreign Secretary: 'I'll give him a quick audit now of exactly what should have been.
'China threatens Taiwan, has invaded the South China Sea, it's having massive disputes with the Philippines, genocide, slave labour, organ harvesting, transnational repression, taxes Hong Kong dissidents here, Hong Kong dissidents under threat constantly, cyber-attacks on the UK, supports Myanmar in their oppressive military regime, supports Russian's invasion of Ukraine, it also supports North Korea and Iran and has trashed the Sino-British treaty on Hong Kong, it has arrested Jimmy Lai, it has sanctions on UK MPs and it thieves all the IPs on private companies.
'What a record to balance, what? Against some potential trade?'
He added: 'In the course of this embassy decision, it was said quite clearly in the media that China would not apply again after the refusal of Tower Hamlets (Council), unless they received assurances from the UK Government.
'Can he now tell me that they have not received any assurances, or have they received private assurances that they will get what they want and get this embassy?'
Mr Lammy responded: 'Let me just express respect for (Sir Iain's) experience in relation to the China threat and also that he is subject to sanctions that I have consistently raised with China, noting that recently it lifted sanctions against members of the European Parliament and I pressed them recently to do the same.
'Let me assure him that there are no grubby deals on any issues and certainly not in relation to the embassy – and I reject any suggestion of anything other.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK and France discuss ‘one-in, one-out' migrant returns
UK and France discuss ‘one-in, one-out' migrant returns

Times

time20 minutes ago

  • Times

UK and France discuss ‘one-in, one-out' migrant returns

Britain and France are preparing to announce a one-in, one-out migrant returns deal in an attempt to break the model of the smuggling gangs. Sir Keir Starmer and President Macron are working on an arrangement that would allow Britain to send back illegal migrants who cross the Channel in small boats to France. In return Britain would accept migrants with a legitimate case for joining family already in the UK. The plans for the pilot could be announced as soon as next week to coincide with the first anniversary of Starmer's premiership, although other government sources suggested that later in the summer was more likely. A government source said: 'It'll start as a pilot but it's to prove the point that if you pay for your passage on a boat then you could quite quickly find yourself back in France.' Despite only being a pilot, it would mark a significant moment in relations with the French over the small boats crisis as it is the first time that France has shown its willingness to take back migrants from the UK. Talks over a returns deal have been led by Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, who has been credited with strengthening relations with France through her close partnership with Bruno Retailleau, the French interior minister. Under the deal, a joint UK-France processing system would be set up that would identify migrants who have a valid claim for family reunification in Britain. For each migrant relocated to Britain, an illegal migrant would be returned to locations across France, away from its northern coast. Any migrant who makes a return journey to the UK would be immediately identified through their biometric details and sent back once again. The deal will begin through a small pilot scheme designed to show 'proof of concept'. Government sources said that they were determined not to repeat the 'mistakes' of the previous government's Rwanda scheme, that they believe overpromised in terms of solving the small boats crisis. They pointed to other progress that they hope will combine to start reducing the numbers of migrants arriving on small boats amid a record high of 18,518 this year, which is 42 per cent higher than this time last year. French police are due to start implementing a law that will allow them to intercept migrant boats up to 300 metres into the sea within days in another move that UK ministers hope will reduce the numbers crossing. However, the Conservatives branded the limited plans for a one-in, one-out deal 'pathetic' and said that the French could not be trusted given the £480 million, three-year deal that Britain paid to France to bolster security, which has only led to increasing numbers making the crossing. Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said: 'We pay the French half a billion pounds to wave the boats off from Calais, and in return we get a migrant merry-go-round where the same number still come here. 'The French are failing to stop the boats at sea, failing to return them like the Belgians do, and now instead of demanding real enforcement, Labour are trying a one in, one out gimmick. 'If Labour were serious, they would not have scrapped the returns deterrent the National Crime Agency said we needed — instead, they've surrendered our immigration system.' Macron is making a state visit to the UK between July 8-10 along with his wife, Brigitte. The couple will be hosted by the King and Queen at Windsor Castle. The French president will also meet Starmer for talks about sealing the two country's security partnership and work on combating the people smuggling gangs that facilitate Channel crossings. Downing Street refused to comment on the specifics of the deal but said that 'our relationship with the French is stronger than it has been in a number of years'. The final details of a migrants return deal have yet to be agreed and government sources said they were wary of announcing a deal before it is ready to be implemented because of the risk it would lead to a rush in crossings. Smuggling gangs have in the past offered 'closing down sale' deals to migrants whereby they advertised discounted prices if they signed up before a particular new scheme is introduced. Retailleau first opened the door to a migrant exchange deal for the first time in April during a visit to the UK. He said: 'I do think that there must be an agreement that we can come to, a bilateral agreement between governments. 'Because we see many of those who land on British soil don't come back. Even when one has crossed the Channel, if one is sent back that will send a clear message.' The French interior ministry confirmed later in the month that it would work on the basis of a 'one-for-one principle'.

Government expected to unveil welfare concessions after talks with Labour rebels
Government expected to unveil welfare concessions after talks with Labour rebels

South Wales Guardian

time25 minutes ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Government expected to unveil welfare concessions after talks with Labour rebels

Number 10 had been locked in crisis talks with backbenchers after some 126 MPs within the party signed an amendment that would halt the legislation in its tracks. On Thursday night, sources said a deal was being thrashed out between leading rebels and the Government as it seeks to head off the prospect of Sir Keir Starmer's first Commons defeat in a crunch vote next week. The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill has its second reading on Tuesday, the first opportunity for MPs to support or reject it. If the legislation clears its first hurdle, it will then face a few hours' examination by all MPs the following week – rather than days or weeks in front of a committee tasked with looking at the Bill. The Government's original package restricted eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limited the sickness-related element of universal credit. Existing claimants were to be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support in an earlier move that was seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. However, concessions offered by the Government to save the Bill from defeat are understood to include a commitment that those currently receiving Pip will continue to get the allowance. This would protect some 370,000 existing claimants who were expected to lose out following reassessment. Ministers had hoped the reforms would get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year, but fresh changes such as these would leave Chancellor Rachel Reeves needing to find more money elsewhere. Rebels had also been calling for the Government to row back on a freeze in the health element of universal credit, which was expected to lead to a £450 real decline in support for some 2.2 million existing claimants. The Government had earlier said it was listening to suggestions to improve the legislation amid concerns about the swift timetable of the Bill. The so-called 'reasoned amendment' led by Treasury select committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier had argued that disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. Speaking in the Commons earlier, Sir Keir told MPs he wanted the reforms to demonstrate 'Labour values of fairness' and that discussions about the changes would continue over the coming days. He said there was 'consensus across the House on the urgent need for reform' of the 'broken' welfare system. 'I know colleagues across the House are eager to start fixing that, and so am I, and that all colleagues want to get this right, and so do I,' he said. 'We want to see reform implemented with Labour values of fairness. 'That conversation will continue in the coming days, so we can begin making change together on Tuesday.' The Tories described the expected concessions as 'the latest in a growing list of screeching U-turns' from the Government. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'Under pressure from his own MPs Starmer has made another completely unfunded spending commitment. 'Labour's welfare chaos will cost hardworking taxpayers. 'We can't afford Labour.'

Government expected to unveil welfare concessions after talks with Labour rebels
Government expected to unveil welfare concessions after talks with Labour rebels

Leader Live

time26 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Government expected to unveil welfare concessions after talks with Labour rebels

Number 10 had been locked in crisis talks with backbenchers after some 126 MPs within the party signed an amendment that would halt the legislation in its tracks. On Thursday night, sources said a deal was being thrashed out between leading rebels and the Government as it seeks to head off the prospect of Sir Keir Starmer's first Commons defeat in a crunch vote next week. The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill has its second reading on Tuesday, the first opportunity for MPs to support or reject it. If the legislation clears its first hurdle, it will then face a few hours' examination by all MPs the following week – rather than days or weeks in front of a committee tasked with looking at the Bill. The Government's original package restricted eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limited the sickness-related element of universal credit. Existing claimants were to be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support in an earlier move that was seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. However, concessions offered by the Government to save the Bill from defeat are understood to include a commitment that those currently receiving Pip will continue to get the allowance. This would protect some 370,000 existing claimants who were expected to lose out following reassessment. Ministers had hoped the reforms would get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year, but fresh changes such as these would leave Chancellor Rachel Reeves needing to find more money elsewhere. Rebels had also been calling for the Government to row back on a freeze in the health element of universal credit, which was expected to lead to a £450 real decline in support for some 2.2 million existing claimants. The Government had earlier said it was listening to suggestions to improve the legislation amid concerns about the swift timetable of the Bill. The so-called 'reasoned amendment' led by Treasury select committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier had argued that disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. Speaking in the Commons earlier, Sir Keir told MPs he wanted the reforms to demonstrate 'Labour values of fairness' and that discussions about the changes would continue over the coming days. He said there was 'consensus across the House on the urgent need for reform' of the 'broken' welfare system. 'I know colleagues across the House are eager to start fixing that, and so am I, and that all colleagues want to get this right, and so do I,' he said. 'We want to see reform implemented with Labour values of fairness. 'That conversation will continue in the coming days, so we can begin making change together on Tuesday.' The Tories described the expected concessions as 'the latest in a growing list of screeching U-turns' from the Government. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'Under pressure from his own MPs Starmer has made another completely unfunded spending commitment. 'Labour's welfare chaos will cost hardworking taxpayers. 'We can't afford Labour.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store