logo
Peter Bart: Having Survived Decades Of Enemy Attacks, ‘60 Minutes' Must Now Defy A New Phalanx Of Powerful Legal & Political Foes

Peter Bart: Having Survived Decades Of Enemy Attacks, ‘60 Minutes' Must Now Defy A New Phalanx Of Powerful Legal & Political Foes

Yahoo08-05-2025

Don Hewitt, the brilliantly contentious founder of 60 Minutes, saw to it that the most impactful characters in key segments turned out to be the 'heavies.' Hewitt wanted his audience to understand the threat posed by 'bad guys' — hence an ambush interview or some other dramatic confrontation.
During his 37-year reign, Hewitt never would have imagined the list of alleged 'bad guys' presently casting a shadow over his show. They include the principal stockholder of CBS, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission and a major sector of the legal establishment. Welcome to the Trump media universe, Don.
More from Deadline
Paramount Global In Discussions With Donald Trump To Settle Lawsuit Over Kamala Harris' '60 Minutes' Interview — Update
Trump 101: Why POTUS' Lawsuit Against CBS Over '60 Minutes' Is Seen As Dubious – Analysis
Paramount Ad Sales Chief Stands By Lower-Key Upfront Plan: "It's Not Bombastic, It Allows Us To Actually Listen To Our Customers"
Last weekend 60 Minutes sent a defiant signal to the prospective 'heavies,' who include Shari Redstone and FCC chairman Brendan Cox as well as The President. The nation's highest rated TV news show announced it would not back off its coverage nor support financial appeasement of its adversaries. The show's boss, Bill Owens, promptly resigned.
His predecessor, Hewitt, who died in 2009, relished combat and made headlines with his 1996 battle against the tobacco industry. At stake was suppression of news coverage about the damage caused by smoking, the intrigues forming the basis for The Insider, Michael Mann's 1999 whistle blower movie.
Hewitt had formidable ammunition in waging his wars. His ratings were strong, the network's leadership divided. Besides, Hewitt had previously produced the revered Walter Cronkite news show as well as the riveting Kennedy-Nixon debate. His lethal interview squad included Mike Wallace, Harry Reasoner and, later, the famously resilient Lesley Stahl, who is still on the show.
They would all have laughed at Trump's charge that the relatively mild-mannered Kamala Harris interview on 60 Minutes had been 'deceptively edited' to help her campaign. Demands in new legal filings have now reached $20 billion in reparations.
Complicating the dispute, of course, is that other elephant in the room — Shari Redstone's desire to facilitate the sale of Paramount to Skydance, David Ellison's company. That $8 billion deal has been moldering for ten months with a mediator now involved.
Meanwhile, CBS is trying to draw attention to its gains in the stolid network business, announcing eight new series including a new Taylor Sheridan western drama.
And further hovering over the battle is the Trump strategy of targeting those law firms that represent litigants opposing White House programs. Trump's actions are akin to 'a mob boss extracting protection money,' observed Mark Elias, a top attorney who appeared on last week's defiant 60 Minutes.
Long time viewers of 60 Minutes are understandably startled by these high level fireworks. During the show's earlier years, the 'bad guys' often consisted of neighborhood hustlers who overcharged for mythical auto parts, only to be shocked by a fast-moving TV crew. I remember one small time offender complaining on camera: 'Why do you guys always put the 'bad guys' in ominous dark lighting while your 'good guys' seem to shine brightly?'
Mindful of this, I once asked for improved lighting when I was an invited guest on an in-house segment. The 60 Minutes producer winced and replied, 'OK, we'll re-light you as a good guy.' Production note: I was invited to talk brightly about theater critics, not auto parts. I doubt if today's guests would fare as well.
Best of Deadline
Everything We Know About Celine Song's 'Materialists' So Far
2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery
2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Tonys, Emmys, Oscars & More

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Detained Columbia graduate claims ‘irreparable harm' to career and family as he pleads for release

time31 minutes ago

Detained Columbia graduate claims ‘irreparable harm' to career and family as he pleads for release

NEW YORK -- A Columbia graduate facing deportation over his pro-Palestinian activism on campus has outlined the 'irreparable harm' caused by his continued detention as a federal judge weighs his release. Mahmoud Khalil said in court filings unsealed Thursday that the 'most immediate and visceral harms' he's faced in his months detained in Louisiana relate to missing out on the birth of his first child in April. 'Instead of holding my wife's hand in the delivery room, I was crouched on a detention center floor, whispering through a crackling phone line as she labored alone,' the 30-year-old legal U.S. resident wrote. 'When I heard my son's first cries, I buried my face in my arms so no one would see me weep.' He also cited potentially 'career-ending' harms from the ordeal, noting that Oxfam International has already rescinded a job offer to serve as a policy advisor. Even his mother's visa to come to the U.S. to help care for his infant son is also now under federal review, Khalil said. 'As someone who fled prosecution in Syria for my political beliefs, for who I am, I never imagined myself to be in immigration detention, here in the United States,' he wrote. 'Why should protesting this Israel government's indiscriminate killing of thousands of innocent Palestinians result in the erosion of my constitutional rights?' Spokespersons for the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement didn't immediately respond to an email seeking comment. Khalil's 13-page statement was among a number of legal declarations his lawyers filed highlighting the wide-ranging negative impacts of his arrest. Dr. Noor Abdalla, his U.S. citizen wife, described the challenges of not having her husband to help navigate their son's birth and the first weeks of his young life. Students and professors at Columbia wrote about the chilling effect Khalil's arrest has had on campus life, with people afraid to attend protests or participate in groups that can be viewed as critical of the Trump administration. Last week, a federal judge in New Jersey said the Trump administration's effort to deport Khalil likely violates the Constitution. Judge Michael Farbiarz wrote the government's primary justification for removing Khalil — that his beliefs may pose a threat to U.S. foreign policy — could open the door to vague and arbitrary enforcement. Khalil was detained by federal immigration agents on March 8 in the lobby of his university-owned apartment, the first arrest under Trump's widening crackdown on students who joined campus protests against .

Peruvian migrant acquitted in the first trial over the new militarized zone at US-Mexico border

time31 minutes ago

Peruvian migrant acquitted in the first trial over the new militarized zone at US-Mexico border

EL PASO, Texas -- A Peruvian woman who crossed the U.S. border illegally was acquitted Thursday of unauthorized access to a newly designated militarized zone in the first trial under the Trump administration's efforts to prosecute immigrants who cross in certain parts of New Mexico and western Texas. Adely Vanessa De La Cruz-Alvarez, 21, was arrested last month near the West Texas town of Tornillo after she entered the U.S. from Mexico by walking across the riverbed of the Rio Grande, court documents show. In addition to being charged with entering the country illegally, she was charged with accessing a military zone. She is among several other immigrants who have been charged under the law since President Donald Trump's administration transferred oversight of a strip of land along the border to the military. It is as part of a new approach the Department of Justice is taking to crack down on illegal immigration. The Associated Press left messages Thursday with De La Cruz-Alvarez's attorney, Veronica Teresa Lerma. The lawyer told The Texas Tribune the acquittal is significant. 'Hopefully, this sets the tone for the federal government,' Lerma said, 'so they know what the El Paso community will do with these charges.' Even before the woman's case went to trial, federal magistrate judges in neighboring New Mexico had dismissed similar cases, finding little evidence that immigrants knew about the zones. Lerma was convicted of entering the country illegally and was already facing deportation, but could have faced up to 18 months in prison for entering the militarized zone. Despite the verdict, U.S. Attorney Justin Simmons of the Western District of Texas said his office will continue to aggressively prosecute National Defense Area violations. 'At the end of the day, another illegal alien has been found guilty of illegally entering the country in violation of the improper entry statute and will be removed from the United States,' Simmons said in a statement. "That's a win for America." The administration wants to sharply increase the removal of immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally as Trump seeks to make good on his pledge of mass deportations. The administration has deployed thousands of troops to the border, while arrests have plunged to the lowest levels since the mid-1960s.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store