As an American Parent, I'm Terrified to Send My Kids to Public School. Here's Why It's Justified
Part of the 'As Told to The Bolde' series. Have a story to share? Contact pitch@thebolde.com
Meet Sarah, 38. She shares her fears as a parent over the educational landscape in America.
"My husband and I grew up in the system, and despite its flaws— overcrowded classrooms, underfunded programs, overwhelmed teachers—I've never questioned sending my kids to public school. But in recent years, my confidence has been replaced by actual fear.
If our culture of school shootings isn't horrific enough, the threat of the DOE being dismantled dominating headlines, along with curriculum changes, book bans, safety concerns, and now ice raids, it's genuinely terrifying." — Sarah Hudson, 38, NYC.
Continue reading to explore why parents have become uncertain and fearful of public education in America > >
School should be a safe place for kids to learn, but for many parents, the fear of a shooting is a constant worry. Mass shootings have become disturbingly common in the U.S., and public schools have been the target of some of the worst tragedies. While politicians debate gun control, parents are left wondering if their child's school is the next to make national headlines. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, "38% of parents fear for their child's physical safety at school," highlighting the growing concern over school shootings.
The mental toll on students is undeniable. Many kids now accept active shooter drills as a normal part of their school experience, growing up in an environment where safety isn't guaranteed. Some parents have decided that no quality of education is worth the risk and are looking for schools with stricter security measures—or opting out of public education entirely.
Education has become another battleground for political disputes, with school board meetings becoming heated fights over curriculum, book bans, and lesson plans. Instead of focusing on improving education, many school districts have become consumed with culture wars, where policies are dictated by political agendas rather than what's best for students. According to Education Week, "school board meetings have become ground zero for political and cultural debates, with issues like masking policies and equity resolutions causing significant disruptions."
For parents, this constant tension is exhausting, especially with all the talk of dismantling the Department of Education and what that means. Many feel that their children's education is being hijacked by divisive debates that have little to do with learning. Rather than deal with the chaos, some parents are pulling their kids from public schools and seeking out environments where politics take a backseat to academics.
Despite anti-bullying campaigns, many parents feel that schools still fail to take bullying seriously. Reports of students being harassed—both in person and online—are often met with little action, leaving victims feeling unheard and unsafe. According to StopBullying.gov, "despite widespread anti-bullying initiatives, many schools still struggle to effectively address bullying, with only about 20-30% of students who are bullied notifying adults."
For parents, the breaking point often comes when they realize that their child is suffering, and school administrators either downplay the issue or blame the victim. When schools refuse to step in, parents are left with no choice but to find an alternative where their child won't feel like they have to fend for themselves every day.
The rise of artificial intelligence has made it easier than ever for students to cheat, but it's also raising concerns about how kids are learning. With AI-generated essays, automated tutoring, and even AI-assisted grading, the role of actual teachers is shifting—sometimes in ways that aren't beneficial to students. According to Inside Higher Ed, "47% of students believe it is easier to cheat than it was last year due to the increased use of generative AI, raising concerns about academic integrity."
Many parents worry that AI will reduce critical thinking skills, making education less about learning and more about finding shortcuts. While technology can be a powerful tool, the fear is that public schools are relying too much on AI without considering the long-term effects on students' ability to think, analyze, and create independently.
Public schools have become obsessed with standardized tests, using them as a measure of student success and school funding. But parents are increasingly frustrated by how these tests shape education, forcing teachers to 'teach to the test' instead of fostering real understanding.
Students are spending more time memorizing formulas and test strategies than actually learning critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Many parents feel that public schools are more focused on hitting testing benchmarks than on nurturing well-rounded, curious learners. As a result, they're seeking alternative education models that prioritize creativity and individual growth over multiple-choice exams.
Teaching has always been a demanding job, but in recent years, burnout has reached crisis levels. Low pay, increased workloads, and lack of support have driven thousands of teachers to leave the profession, leaving schools scrambling to fill positions.
Parents are noticing the impact, with teacher shortages leading to less experienced educators, overcrowded classrooms, and lower-quality instruction. When teachers are exhausted, underpaid, and constantly stretched too thin, students suffer. For parents who want their kids to be in an environment where teachers are supported and engaged, public schools are starting to look less appealing.
Many public schools simply don't have the funding to provide students with the resources they need. From outdated textbooks to overcrowded classrooms, the lack of investment in education is glaring.
Parents see this firsthand—teachers paying for supplies out of their own pockets, schools cutting extracurricular programs, and classrooms with 30+ students. Watching politicians talk about improving education while public schools remain severely underfunded is frustrating. Private and charter schools look like a better bet for families who want better opportunities for their children.
Kids today are facing more stress, anxiety, and mental health struggles than ever before, yet many public schools lack the resources to support them. With limited school counselors and mental health services, students often have nowhere to turn when they need help.
Parents are seeing the effects—rising rates of depression, self-harm, and anxiety among students, with little intervention from schools. Finding an alternative to public school is becoming a serious consideration for those who want their children in an environment where emotional well-being is a priority.
For today's students, lockdown drills are as normal as fire drills but carry a very different weight. The idea of an intruder coming into their school is terrifying, and regularly practicing what to do in case of an active shooter takes an emotional toll.
Many parents feel uneasy knowing their children are being trained to prepare for the worst. While safety measures are necessary, the constant reinforcement of danger is causing stress and anxiety among young students. Some parents are deciding that homeschooling or smaller private schools with stricter security feel like a safer option.
Many parents feel they have less say in their child's education than ever. Shifting policies, political interference, and controversial decisions by school boards can make parents feel powerless.
Some schools limit parental involvement, make major curriculum changes without consulting families, or dismiss concerns altogether. As a result, more parents seek educational environments where they feel they have more influence and direct communication with teachers.
Instead of focusing on improving education, many schools seem more concerned with policing what students wear. Strict and often outdated dress codes disproportionately target female students, reinforcing harmful stereotypes about what is considered 'appropriate' rather than fostering a respectful learning environment. Instead of addressing bullying, mental health, or academic struggles, schools spend valuable time disciplining students over ripped jeans, tank tops, or hair color.
Parents are frustrated watching their children be pulled from class or even sent home over minor dress code violations while academic performance and emotional well-being take a backseat. Many feel that enforcing these rules often serves as a distraction from bigger issues—like teacher shortages, school safety, and lack of resources. With outdated policies taking priority over meaningful education, some families are reconsidering whether public school is the right choice for their child.
For many immigrant families, the school drop-off is no longer a simple morning routine—it's a moment filled with fear and anxiety. With increased I.C.E. activity under shifting immigration policies, schools are no longer seen as safe havens. The thought of I.C.E. agents showing up unannounced, pulling students or parents into questioning, or detaining someone in front of their classmates is a terrifying reality for many. Children are arriving at school already on edge, fearful that a normal day could turn into a life-altering event. Teachers have reported students breaking down in tears during class, terrified they'll come home to an empty house because their parents have been taken.
Parents face the impossible choice of sending their children to school and risking exposure or keeping them home and sacrificing their education. Educators are frustrated and heartbroken, feeling powerless as they try to create a sense of normalcy in a climate of fear. While some schools have tried to implement 'safe zones' where I.C.E. agents are barred from entering, the threat remains palpable. Families who have spent years building a life in the U.S. now face the daily uncertainty of being separated—sometimes permanently—all while trying to give their children a shot at a better future through education. The fear isn't just psychological; it's systemic, and for many immigrant families, the schoolhouse is no longer a place of learning—it's a potential site of trauma.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
7 hours ago
- Business Insider
Trump voters with student loans are having 'buyer's remorse' over his latest debt collection moves
Tracy Davis, 42, still thinks that voting for President Donald Trump was a good choice. But she wishes the president would think more carefully about how his actions are affecting student-loan borrowers like herself. "I did vote for Trump," Davis told Business Insider. "This was a very big surprise for me. I mean, I was thinking he was going to fix some things, and it didn't go the way I was seeing it going with student loans." Davis is referring to the Trump administration's move to restart collections on defaulted student loans in early May after a five-year pause. Negative credit reporting for defaulted student loans resumed in October 2024, and Trump's Education Department announced that collections would resume in an effort to restore accountability to the student-loan system. "Borrowing money and failing to pay it back isn't a victimless offense," Linda McMahon, Trump's education secretary, wrote in an opinion piece. "Debt doesn't go away; it gets transferred to others. If borrowers don't pay their debts to the government, taxpayers do." Prior to the pandemic pause, Davis said she was able to make her $150 student-loan payments. However, once the pause lifted, she was billed nearly $400, which she said she could not afford. It caused her to fall behind on payments, and her credit score took a hit after negative credit reporting resumed. "I think they pulled the trigger a little too fast, especially with hitting the credit report, because we're not all in the same situation," Davis said. "I just wish there was more thought put into it." Business Insider has heard from dozens of student-loan borrowers who are delinquent or in default on their debt, including some who voted for Trump. Borrowers tend to go into default after 270 days of missed payments. While many borrowers expressed frustration with the abrupt collections restart and the consequences for defaulting, like negative credit reporting and wage garnishment, some said they recognize the importance of restarting the system and ensuring borrowers pay back their loans. Ellen Keast, a spokesperson for the Department of Education, previously confirmed to BI that Social Security garnishment for defaulted borrowers is paused: "The Trump Administration is committed to protecting social security recipients who oftentimes rely on a fixed income." However, the department still plans to garnish wages for defaulted borrowers later this summer. Davis is concerned that she might be on the receiving end of that policy. "If you were way behind and you had no intention of paying them back, yes, go after them, garnish wages," Davis said. "But when you're trying to make it and you're trying to honestly make an effort to pay them off, I don't think that's right that we're getting wages garnished or credit hits." 'Buyer's remorse' Miranda Metheny, 37, is in default on her student loans — and she's rethinking the vote she cast for Trump. "I'm having a bit of buyer's remorse," Metheny said. "Now, seeing what all is taking place, I'm like, maybe I just shouldn't have voted." Metheny is unable to work due to a disability, and she can't afford to dig into the $600 monthly disability insurance to pay off her student loans while also helping support her two children. "We already don't make enough to really even survive at this point," Metheny said. "We're all robbing Peter to pay Paul, and now you're going to cut into that? I worry about people that are already hurting." The Department of Education estimated that 5 million borrowers are currently in default. Recent data from the New York Federal Reserve showed that millions more could enter default this summer; since negative credit reporting resumed in the fall, 8.04% of balances moved into serious delinquency in the first quarter of 2025. While some higher education analysts previously told BI that the surge in delinquency was expected, many borrowers are at risk of defaulting because they might not be aware of their payment status and are unprepared to afford an extra monthly bill. Some student-loan borrowers at risk of default said they still support Trump's move to collect on defaulted student loans. Cheri, 67, said that she voted for Trump and supports his stance that loans should be paid back. She hasn't made any payments on her loans since the pandemic pause, though, and she said she's not financially prepared to shoulder another monthly bill. "I'm not going to bash the Trump administration. But that being said, I think that turning people over to collections is a very drastic move after what we just went through over the past four years," Cheri said. "I'm opposed to that." Aside from collections on defaulted student loans, the Trump administration is urging Congress to pass the president's big spending bill. The version of the bill that passed the House would condense existing income-driven repayment plans into two plans that have longer repayment periods. McMahon wrote in a June 11 post on X that the bill "will prevent future Democrat administrations from illegally transferring student loan debt to American taxpayers." Former President Joe Biden's SAVE plan — an income-driven repayment plan that would have allowed for cheaper monthly payments — is also blocked in court, leaving borrowers with fewer repayment options. As far as default consequences go, Sen. Elizabeth Warren said that McMahon confirmed in a private meeting on June 10 that Social Security garnishments will remain paused. "The Education Secretary has assured me that the pause that is currently in place will stay in place and if there is to be any change in that, she would get in touch with me directly before we go there," Warren said. Metheny said she hopes that the administration will consider more relief for borrowers. "We're not all billionaires," she said. "We can't just come up with that amount of money that quickly." Are you in default, or concerned about defaulting, on your student loans? Share your story with this reporter at asheffey@

Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
PA invests nearly $10M to ensure 35 farms in 18 counties stay farms forever
Jun. 13—Gov. Josh Shapiro's administration announced this week that Pennsylvania is investing nearly $10 million to purchase development rights for 2,672 acres on 35 farms in 18 counties — protecting them from future residential or commercial development. These joint investments by state and local government ensure that Pennsylvania farmers will have the prime-quality land they need to continue feeding families and supporting jobs and communities in the future, the governor's adminstration said. Since the Shapiro administration began, Pennsylvania has invested $125.2 million to preserve 415 new farms and 35,177 prime acres of farmland across the state. "Preserving Pennsylvania farmland is an investment in the future of our economy and farm families," said Agriculture Secretary Russell Redding. "When that land is lost to development, we lose one of our most valuable economic assets." More than 48,800 farms across Pennsylvania contribute $132.5 billion to our economy and support almost 600,000 jobs, making agriculture a key driver of Pennsylvania's economy. To continue Pennsylvania's national legacy as an agriculture leader, Shapiro's 2025-26 budget proposes: —An additional $13 million investment in the historic Ag Innovation Grant to help build the future of American agriculture right here in Pennsylvania. —Investing $2 million to keep Pennsylvania's new animal diagnostic laboratory in the western part of the state operational, providing critical testing services for farmers to ensure their livestock remain healthy and viable for continued farming operations. —A $4 million funding increase to connect Pennsylvanians at risk of hunger with healthy, local food through the Pennsylvania Agricultural Surplus System. —An additional $4 million funding increase to the State Food Purchase Program to provide emergency food assistance for low-income Pennsylvanians. Pennsylvania continues to lead the nation in preserved farmland. Since 1988, Pennsylvania has protected 6,564 farms and 654,551 acres in 58 counties from future development, investing nearly $1.76 billion in state, county, and local funds. Farms preserved at the State Agricultural Land Preservation Board meeting include: —Luzerne County — total investment, $555,160, state only. —Raymond H. and Corrine A. Barchik, 115-acre crop and livestock farm, Fairmount Township. —Joseph A. Disabella Sr. and Deborah A. Disabella, 54-acre crop farm, Sugarloaf Township. Bill to move DOE office to Pittsburgh introduced U.S. Sen. Dave McCormick, R-Pittsburgh, and U.S. Sen. John Fetterman, D-Braddock, this week introduced S. 2044 — which would move the Department of Energy's Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management to Pittsburgh. "For far too long, federal agencies in Washington have been physically removed from the workers and industries they regulate," McCormick said. "I'm proud to partner with Sen. Fetterman on this legislation to bring a critical Energy Department office to Pittsburgh near the heart of the Marcellus." "With its rich history of energy production, top-tier universities, and state-of-the-art manufacturing infrastructure, Pittsburgh is uniquely qualified to be the home of the Department of Energy's Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management," Fetterman said. "I'm proud to join Sen. McCormick to introduce legislation calling for this move while protecting the union way of life. FECM is an important agency that supports lower-carbon fuels like natural gas while addressing and lowering carbon emissions. Housing federal agencies in the communities they impact is a no brainer." Last year, McCormick proposed moving DOE operations to Pittsburgh to place agency officials closer to the industry they regulate and work with every day. Pennsylvania is the second largest producer of natural gas in America, with most of that production happening in western Pennsylvania. The Department of Energy's Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (OFECM) is made up of about 750 federal employees — scientists, engineers, technicians and administrative staff. The Office is responsible for research, development, and demonstration on advanced power generation; power plant efficiency; carbon capture, utilization, and storage technologies; emission control technologies; and so much more. It is responsible for the technological solutions for the development of our unconventional oil and gas domestic resources and also manages the Nation's Strategic Petroleum Reserve and Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve. The OFECM also manages the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). This is the lead field center for research and program development. Through this laboratory there are nearly 700 federal sponsored projects that are conducted through private sector research partners. The bill would require the Department of Energy to move the Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (OFECM) within the DOE to Pittsburgh one year after passage. It would also require the Secretary of Energy to provide a report to Congress on employment changes and any impacts to collective bargaining rights. The OFECM houses the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), which is already based in Pittsburgh and does a significant amount of OFECM's functional work. The impact on staffing would be minimal and provide more jobs to Pennsylvania while having a federal office housed in the Commonwealth. Recommendations to help gun violence victims The importance of supporting the basic needs of gun violence victims — including housing, transportation, food — and providing tailored supports for youth were some of the key findings released this week by the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency (PCCD), following a statewide needs assessment conducted at the request of PCCD Chair Lt. Gov. Austin Davis. "The people closest to the pain should be closest to the power — and that's exactly what this initiative is all about," Davis said. "By gathering insights directly from survivors, families, and providers, these reports highlight critical gaps that too often stand in the way of individuals' healing process after experiencing gun violence. We're not just working to reduce gun violence; we're ensuring that victims and the professionals who serve them receive the support they need and deserve." From Fall 2024 to Spring 2025, PCCD contracted with ICF to conduct a needs assessment to better understand resources available to support individuals exposed to or who have experienced gun violence. Statewide needs assessment takeaways Key findings: —Meeting basic needs is critical: Housing, transportation, and food insecurity remain major barriers. Survivors often can't access support services when their basic survival is at stake. —Local trust matters: Individuals affected by gun violence prefer hyper-local, culturally relevant providers who understand their communities. Many learn about services through friends, family or trusted community leaders — not official channels. —Youth need tailored supports: Youth exposed to violence feel isolated and misunderstood. They emphasized the need for connection through food, creative outlets, and social media, as well as education on gun safety and conflict resolution. —Long-term care is lacking: Many survivors feel overwhelmed by offers of services immediately after a violent event but struggle to find help when they're ready. Services must be available beyond the crisis period. Recommendations: —Develop hyper-local communications to build awareness and trust in services. —Provide trauma-informed training to service providers and journalists. —Expand gun safety education and access to secure firearms storage devices. —Make services available long term, beyond the initial crisis period. Reach Bill O'Boyle at 570-991-6118 or on Twitter @TLBillOBoyle.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Alabama leaders react to proposed cuts at Dept. of Education
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (WIAT) — State Superintendent Dr. Eric Mackey said they are watching for any budget changes at the Department of Education. President Donald Trump's proposed education budget could result in cuts to some state programs. 'The changes are concerning on different levels,' said Dr. Corey Jones, Superintendent of Greene County Schools. Dr. Jones explained that those concerns have to do with federal education cuts. With less than 900 students in his school system, he said funding matters. 'You start looking at eliminating resources that will help any student assimilate and learn into our culture, you're not benefitting that student or their family,' said Dr. Jones. President Trump's proposal includes a $12 billion cut in education funding compared to last year's budget. Dr. Mackey said that would eliminate federal funding for English Language Learners (ELL). 'Again, if the federal funds were to go away. we would lose ground,' said Dr. Mackey. 'Because we would just be using state money to plug a federal hole. But, right now, it doesn't look like Congress is probably gonna do that.' Alabama Law Enforcement Agency announces changes for CDL holders State Education Budget Chairman, Sen. Arthur Orr (R-Decatur), said it's premature to be concerned. He said the state budget is in great shape. 'Our federal government has a $37 trillion operating deficit that is extensive,' said Sen. Orr. 'It's massive. And cuts are gonna have to happen somewhere.' But Rep. Phillip Ensler (D-Montgomery) said that funding is critical. 'Yes, the state should prepare for the worst-case situation. But members of Congress, especially those in the Alabama delegation, should do the right thing and support the U.S. Department of Education,' Rep. Ensler said. Dr. Mackey said they are watching the proposal closely. 'Congress is a kind of slow moving, large body,' he explained. 'And we think that when it's all said and done, we're probably gonna be looking at level funding. So, level funding in an age of inflation is not the best, but it's certainly better than cuts.' Dr. Mackey said the state is at record levels of support for English Language Learners when it comes to state funds. He said the state only relied on federal dollars for those programs five years ago. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.