logo
FDA Approves Genentech's Susvimo for Diabetic Retinopathy

FDA Approves Genentech's Susvimo for Diabetic Retinopathy

Business Wire22-05-2025

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Genentech, a member of the Roche Group (SIX: RO, ROG; OTCQX: RHHBY) announced today that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved Susvimo ® (ranibizumab injection) 100 mg/mL for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy (DR), a potentially blinding condition that affects almost 10 million people in the U.S. and more than 100 million people globally. It is the first and only FDA-approved continuous delivery treatment shown to maintain vision in people with DR with just one refill every nine months. Susvimo is now available to U.S. retina specialists and their patients with DR who have previously responded to at least two anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections.
'The approval of Susvimo for diabetic retinopathy expands treatment options for patients, offering predictable and immediate durability after implantation with only one treatment every nine months,' said Levi Garraway, M.D., Ph.D., chief medical officer and head of Global Product Development. 'Many patients with common retinal conditions seek alternative treatment options like Susvimo that can help preserve vision with longer intervals between treatments than regular eye injections.'
'Susvimo is a compelling new treatment for patients at risk of vision loss from progression of diabetic retinopathy,' said vitreoretinal surgeon, Carl Awh, M.D., Tennessee Retina, Tennessee. 'I am delighted to have this far more durable treatment available for my patients.'
The FDA decision was based on positive one-year results from the Phase III Pavilion study. People with DR who received Susvimo refilled every nine months achieved superior improvements on the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS). This means there was a reduction in the severity of eye damage caused by diabetes, compared with those under monthly clinical observation who were treated with anti-VEGF injections as needed based on disease progression. Additionally, none of the participants receiving Susvimo required supplemental treatment at one year. Safety was consistent with the known safety profile for Susvimo.
Susvimo provides continuous delivery of a customized formulation of ranibizumab via the Port Delivery Platform, while other currently approved treatments may require eye injections as often as once per month. The Port Delivery Platform is a refillable eye implant surgically inserted into the eye during a one-time, outpatient procedure, which introduces medicine directly into the eye, addressing certain retinal conditions that can cause vision loss.
Genentech is committed to helping people access the medicines they are prescribed and will be offering comprehensive services for people prescribed Susvimo to help minimize barriers to access and reimbursement. Patients can call 833-EYE-GENE for more information. For people who qualify, Genentech offers patient assistance programs through Genentech Access Solutions. More information is also available at (866) 4ACCESS/(866) 422-2377 or https://www.Genentech-Access.com.
Visit https://www.Susvimo.com for additional information.
About Diabetic Retinopathy (DR)
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) affects almost 10 million people in the U.S. and more than 100 million people globally, accounting for almost 5% of all cases of blindness. DR can lead to the development of DME, which is a leading cause of vision loss, affecting around 29 million adults worldwide. The longer a person has diabetes, especially if it is poorly controlled, the higher the risk of developing diabetic retinopathy and vision loss. Diabetic retinopathy occurs when blood vessels in the retina become damaged. This can cause vision loss or distortion when the abnormal vessels leak blood or fluid into the eye.
About the Pavilion Study
Pavilion (NCT04503551) is a multicenter, randomized, U.S.-based Phase III study evaluating the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of Susvimo ® (ranibizumab injection) 100 mg/mL refilled every nine months compared with people under monthly clinical observation, in 174 people with diabetic retinopathy without center-involved diabetic macular edema. Participants were randomized 5:3 to receive either Susvimo with refills every nine months or monthly clinical observation, respectively. In the Susvimo arm, participants received two loading doses of intravitreal ranibizumab, before Susvimo implantation at week 4. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with at least a two-step improvement from baseline on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study-Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale at week 52. Following the primary analysis, participants initially in the clinical observation arm received two ranibizumab loading doses before Susvimo implantation at week 64.
About Susvimo ® (ranibizumab injection) 100 mg/mL for intravitreal use via ocular implant
Susvimo ® (ranibizumab injection) 100 mg/mL for intravitreal use via ocular implant is a refillable implant surgically inserted into the eye during a one-time, outpatient procedure. Susvimo continuously delivers a customized formulation of ranibizumab over time. Susvimo is indicated for intravitreal use via the Susvimo eye implant only. Ranibizumab is a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor designed to bind to and inhibit VEGF-A, a protein that has been shown to play a critical role in the formation of new blood vessels and the leakiness of the vessels. Susvimo was previously called the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab in the U.S.
The customized formulation of ranibizumab delivered by Susvimo is different from the ranibizumab intravitreal injection, a medicine marketed as Lucentis ® (ranibizumab injection), which is approved to treat wet, or neovascular, age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and other retinal diseases. Lucentis was first approved for wet AMD by the FDA in 2006. Genentech is also developing DutaFabs – the next generation of bispecific antibodies designed for increased efficacy and durability – tailored for continuous delivery via the Port Delivery implant.
Susvimo Indication
SUSVIMO (ranibizumab injection) 100 mg/mL for intravitreal use via ocular implant is indicated for the treatment of patients with Neovascular (wet) Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), and diabetic retinopathy (DR) who have previously responded to at least two intravitreal injections of a Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor inhibitor medication.
Susvimo Important Safety Information
WARNING: ENDOPHTHALMITIS
The SUSVIMO implant has been associated with an up to 3-fold higher rate of endophthalmitis than monthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab.
Warnings and Precautions:
The SUSVIMO implant and the procedures associated with inserting, filling, refilling, and (if medically necessary) removing the implant can cause other serious side effects, including:
An eye infection (endophthalmitis). Endophthalmitis is an infection of the eyeball that can cause permanent damage to your eye, including blindness. Endophthalmitis requires urgent (same-day) medical or surgical treatment.
A missing layer on top of the white part of the eye (conjunctival erosion). Conjunctival erosion is an area that becomes missing (defect) in the layer (conjunctiva) that covers the white part of the eye, which may result in exposure of the implant. Conjunctival erosion may require surgical treatment.
An opening of the layer that covers the white part of the eye (conjunctival retraction). Conjunctival retraction is an opening or gaping in the layer (conjunctiva) that covers the white part of the eye, which may cause the implant to be exposed. Conjunctival retraction may require surgical treatment.
Tear and separation of layers of the retina (rhegmatogenous retinal detachment). Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment is a tear and separation of one of the layers of the retina in the back of the eye that senses light. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment requires surgical treatment.
Implant movement (implant dislocation): This movement may require surgical treatment to correct.
Implant damage: Damage to the implant that prevents continued treatment (refills) with SUSVIMO. If the implant is not able to be properly refilled, a patient's wet AMD may be inadequately treated and a physician may remove the implant and/or change the treatment.
Bleeding (vitreous hemorrhage): Vitreous hemorrhage is bleeding within the gel-like substance (vitreous) inside of your eye. This may require an additional eye surgery.
Bump on top of the white layer of the eye (conjunctival bleb): conjunctival bleb is a small bulge in the layer (conjunctiva) that covers the white part of the eye where the implant is inserted. This may be due to leakage of fluid from the inside of the eye. This may require medical or surgical treatment.
Temporary decrease in vision after the SUSVIMO procedure.
Who should not receive SUSVIMO?
Patients who have an infection in or around their eye, have active inflammation in their eye, or have had an allergic reaction to ranibizumab or any of its ingredients in SUSVIMO in the past.
Information for patients who are of childbearing potential
If patients are pregnant, think that they might be pregnant, or plan to become pregnant. It is not known if SUSVIMO will harm an unborn baby. Patients should use birth control (contraception) during treatment with SUSVIMO and for 12 months after the last refill of SUSVIMO.
If patients are breastfeeding or plan to breastfeed. SUSVIMO is not recommended during breastfeeding. It is not known if SUSVIMO passes into breast milk.
Adverse Reactions
The most common adverse reactions were blood on the white of the eye, redness in the white of the eye, sensitivity to light), and eye pain. These are not all the possible side effects of SUSVIMO.
You may report side effects to the FDA at (800) FDA-1088 or www.fda.gov/medwatch. You may also report side effects to Genentech at (888) 835-2555.
Please see additional Important Safety Information in the full SUSVIMO Prescribing Information, including BOXED WARNING or visit https://www.Susvimo.com.
About Lucentis ® (ranibizumab injection)
Lucentis ® is a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor designed to bind to and inhibit VEGF-A, a protein that is believed to play a critical role in the formation of new blood vessels (angiogenesis) and the hyperpermeability (leakiness) of the vessels.
Lucentis is FDA-approved for the treatment of patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD), macular edema following retinal vein occlusion (RVO), diabetic macular edema (DME), diabetic retinopathy (DR) and myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV).
Lucentis was developed by Genentech, a member of the Roche Group. The company retains commercial rights in the United States and Novartis has exclusive commercial rights for the rest of the world.
Outside the United States, Lucentis is approved in more than 120 countries to treat adult patients with wet AMD, and for the treatment of visual impairment due to DME, due to macular edema secondary to both branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), and due to choroidal neovascularization (CNV).
Lucentis Important Safety Information
Lucentis is contraindicated in patients with ocular or periocular infections or known hypersensitivity to ranibizumab or any of the excipients in Lucentis. Hypersensitivity reactions may manifest as severe intraocular inflammation.
Intravitreal injections, including those with Lucentis, have been associated with endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, and iatrogenic traumatic cataract.
Increases in intraocular pressure have been noted both pre-injection and post-injection with Lucentis.
Although there was a low rate of arterial thromboembolic events (ATEs) observed in the Lucentis clinical trials, there is a potential risk of ATEs following intravitreal use of VEGF inhibitors. ATEs are defined as nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or vascular death (including deaths of unknown cause).
Fatal events occurred more frequently in patients with DME and DR at baseline treated monthly with Lucentis compared with control. Although the rate of fatal events was low and included causes of death typical of patients with advanced diabetic complications, a potential relationship between these events and intravitreal use of VEGF inhibitors cannot be excluded.
Retinal vasculitis and/or retinal vascular occlusion have been reported. Patients should be instructed to report any change in vision without delay.
In the Lucentis Phase III clinical trials, the most common ocular side effects included conjunctival hemorrhage, eye pain, vitreous floaters, and increased intraocular pressure. The most common non-ocular side effects included nasopharyngitis, anemia, nausea, and cough.
You may report side effects to the FDA at (800) FDA-1088 or http://www.fda.gov/medwatch. You may also report side effects to Genentech at (888) 835-2555.
For additional safety information, please see Lucentis full Prescribing Information, available here: http://www.gene.com/download/pdf/lucentis_prescribing.pdf.
About Genentech in Ophthalmology
Genentech is researching and developing new treatments for people living with a range of eye diseases that cause significant visual impairment and blindness, including wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), diabetic retinopathy (DR), geographic atrophy (GA) and other retinal diseases.
Founded more than 40 years ago, Genentech is a leading biotechnology company that discovers, develops, manufactures and commercializes medicines to treat patients with serious and life-threatening medical conditions. The company, a member of the Roche Group, has headquarters in South San Francisco, California. For additional information about the company, please visit https://www.gene.com.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Marjorie Taylor Greene Fumes Over Vaccine Approval: 'Not MAHA at All'
Marjorie Taylor Greene Fumes Over Vaccine Approval: 'Not MAHA at All'

Newsweek

time16 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Marjorie Taylor Greene Fumes Over Vaccine Approval: 'Not MAHA at All'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Marjorie Taylor Greene has spoken out against a new COVID-19 vaccine being approved in the United States, saying the move is "not MAHA at all." Why It Matters Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is facing repeated backlash for some of his positions on health and medicine, including from people who would ordinarily support him. In May, prominent members of the Make America Great Again movement, including Nicole Shanahan, Kennedy's former presidential running mate, and media personality Laura Loomer, spoke out against Kennedy Jr.'s pick for U.S. Surgeon General Casey Means. In March, Kennedy Jr. sparked anger from anti-vax activists when he called on parents to "consult with their healthcare providers to understand their options to get the MMR vaccine," with one saying he is "no different than Fauci." Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., arrives for a meeting of House Republicans in the Capitol Visitor Center on May 15, 2025. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., arrives for a meeting of House Republicans in the Capitol Visitor Center on May 15, 2025. AP What To Know The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gave the green light for mNEXSPIKE (mRNA-1283), Moderna's new lower-dose COVID-19 vaccine, on May 31. Greene, the U.S. representative for Georgia's 14th congressional district, shared Moderna's post about the recent approval with the caption: "Not MAHA at all!!! Unreal." Not MAHA at all!!! Unreal. — Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 (@RepMTG) June 1, 2025 She was referring to Kennedy Jr.'s movement Make America Healthy Again, whose mission is to "aggressively combat the critical health challenges facing our citizens, including the rising rates of mental health disorders, obesity, diabetes, and other chronic diseases." Newsweek has contacted the United States Department of Health and Human Services outside of office hours, via email, for comment. The new vaccine is set to be used for adults 65 or older or people between the ages of 12 and 64 with at least one or more underlying risk factor as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Approval for the jab is "based on results from a randomized, observer-blind, active-controlled Phase 3 clinical trial which enrolled approximately 11,400 participants aged 12 years and older," Moderna says. It comes after Kennedy Jr. announced that the CDC is no longer encouraging COVID-19 vaccines for pregnant women and healthy children, marking a shift in federal public health guidance. What People Are Saying Chief Executive Officer of Moderna Stéphane Bancel said in a statement: "The FDA approval of our third product, mNEXSPIKE, adds an important new tool to help protect people at high risk of severe disease from COVID-19. "COVID-19 remains a serious public health threat, with more than 47,000 Americans dying from the virus last year alone. We appreciate the FDA's timely review and thank the entire Moderna team for their hard work and continued commitment to public health." Kennedy Jr. said about the new CDC guidance: "I couldn't be more pleased to announce that as of today the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from the CDC recommended immunization schedule." What Happens Next The new vaccine is expected to be ready for those eligible to take it in time for the 2025-2026 respiratory virus season. You should not get mNEXSPIKE if you had a severe allergic reaction after a previous dose of either mNEXSPIKE, SPIKEVAX (an mRNA vaccine for preventing COVID-19) or any Moderna COVID-19 vaccine or to any ingredient in these vaccines, the company warns.

Aravax Appoints Louise Peacock as Chief Regulatory and Quality Officer as it Prepares for Phase 3 Development
Aravax Appoints Louise Peacock as Chief Regulatory and Quality Officer as it Prepares for Phase 3 Development

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Aravax Appoints Louise Peacock as Chief Regulatory and Quality Officer as it Prepares for Phase 3 Development

MELBOURNE, Australia and OXFORD, United Kingdom, June 02, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Aravax, a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing next-generation, disease-modifying immunotherapies for food allergy, today announces the appointment of Louise Peacock as Chief Regulatory and Quality Officer, based at the Company's Oxford, UK site. With more than 35 years in the pharmaceutical industry, Louise brings extensive and highly relevant experience to Aravax having previously made key contributions to the approval of Palforzia® - the first and only FDA approved oral immunotherapy (OIT) to treat peanut allergy. Louise has held prior roles as Chief Regulatory Affairs and Quality Officer at Vaderis Therapeutics AG and Alladapt Immunotherapeutics and was Head of Pharma R&D at Nestle Health Science/Aimmune Therapeutics (acquired by Nestle Health Science in 2020) where she had broad responsibilities for global regulatory affairs across pharma products in food allergy, gastrointestinal and metabolic disorders. Whilst at Aimmune, Louise was responsible for activities supporting the development and marketing approvals for Palforzia® in the US, EU, UK and Switzerland. Louise's early career included senior positions at Abbott Laboratories, Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Intermune and Circassia. Louise received her BSc (Hons) Pharmacology from Kings College, London and her LLB (Hons) from the University of West London. Louise Peacock, Chief Regulatory and Quality Officer of Aravax, said, 'Despite recent advances, food allergy remains an ever-growing and life-threatening problem around the world and there is a critical need for better therapies. Having followed Aravax's developments, I am convinced that PVX108 has the potential to be a life-changing alternative for patients with peanut allergy. I look forward to joining what is a world-class team and to bringing my experience to bear on the rapid further development of PVX108 and other products.' Dr Pascal Hickey, CEO of Aravax, said, 'Louise's experience in regulatory affairs in the field of food allergy is unique. It spans all the major regulatory bodies and multiple programs including the successful approval of Palforzia®. We are enormously excited that she is joining the Aravax team.' About Aravax Aravax is a clinical stage biotechnology company focused on revolutionising the treatment of food allergies with next-generation, disease-modifying immunotherapies which are safer and more convenient than existing approaches. Aravax's proprietary platform generates engineered peptides that precisely retrain the immune system and restore the body's ability to safely tolerate food allergens, without putting patients at risk of treatment-induced acute allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis. The lead product, PVX108, is currently being studied in an international Phase 2 trial for the treatment of peanut allergy. Aravax is also developing a pipeline of products tackling additional significant food allergy indications. Aravax is an international company headquartered in Melbourne, Australia with a subsidiary in Oxford, UK and operations in USA and Europe. Aravax's investors include leading international and Australian investors including Novartis Venture Fund, Brandon Capital, Tenmile, Breakthrough Victoria, Uniseed and UniSuper. For more information visit: For further information please contact Media – AustraliaKirrily Davis, E: kdavis@ M: +61 (0)401 220228 Media - InternationalSue Charles, Charles Consultants E: M: +44 (0)7968 726585Chris Gardner, E: Chris@ M: +44 (0)7956 031077Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

ACURATE Heart Valves Halted After Consequential Study
ACURATE Heart Valves Halted After Consequential Study

Medscape

time2 hours ago

  • Medscape

ACURATE Heart Valves Halted After Consequential Study

Boston Scientific has discontinued production of its ACURATE neo2 heart valves following the release of data showing the devices were linked to higher rates of all-cause death, stroke, and rehospitalization than were other commercially available valves. The company reported the decision in a May 28 regulatory filing. 'While data continue to support the performance of the ACURATE valve system when the product's optimized instructions for use are followed, this decision was made based on recent discussions with regulators, which resulted in increased clinical and regulatory requirements to maintain approvals in global markets and to obtain approval in new markets,' Boston Scientific told Cardiovascular Business . 'Therefore, related commercial, clinical, research and development, and manufacturing activities will cease.' The company said it also would be halting production of its ACURATE PRIME valves, although the reason for that move was not clear. Disappointing Results The decision on the neo2 follows the publication May 21 of two articles from the study, one in the Lancet on the outcomes for patients and the other in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology on a relatively high rate of under-expansion of the valves. Despite its use in 50 other countries, ACURATE neo2 had not yet been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. The Lancet study, which the company funded, involved 1469 patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Its aim was to determine whether ACURATE neo2 was not inferior to its competitors. The randomized, controlled trial found ACURATE neo2 was associated with a 6.6% higher rate of a combined outcome of all-cause death, stroke, and rehospitalization after 1 year than was observed in a control group who received SAPIEN 3 or 3 Ultra or Evolut valves. The rates were also higher for each outcome (hazard ratio: 1.30 for all-cause death, 1.68 for stroke, and 1.57 for rehospitalization). Rates of cardiovascular mortality and myocardial infarction also were significantly higher at the same time point, according to the researchers. ACURATE neo2 was developed after its predecessor, ACURATE neo, a self-expanding valve for TAVR, did not achieve outcomes similar to those of SAPIEN and Evolut valves in randomized controlled trials. A problem with paravalvular leakage was found with ACURATE neo, prompting the development of neo2, which included a sealing skirt to prevent leakage, said Raj Makkar, MD, professor and associate director of the Smidt Heart Institute at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, and lead author of both papers. 'The sealing skirt worked, and the valvular regurgitation rates were lower than in ACURATE neo, but they were nonetheless still higher than in the control valves,' said, who receives research support from Boston Scientific as well as other manufacturers of heart valves. In addition to poor results on the longer-term outcomes, the ACURATE neo2 was associated with a lower rate of success, determined by whether the device was installed and operated successfully, did not require further interventions, and was not linked to complications within 30 days. One result was positive for ACURATE neo2. 'The hemodynamics were actually quite good,' Makkar said. 'This trial also highlights that, when it comes to clinical outcomes, it's not just the hemodynamics. A lot of other things come into play.' 'The ACURATE neo2 valve is an easy-to-use valve, and smaller, observational studies had suggested that outcomes were good,' Makkar added. 'But you need the rigor of a randomized controlled trial. In a randomized setting, the clinical outcomes were not as robust as they were with the other valve platforms.' Valve Expansion a Concern In a post-study analysis, the researchers went back to see if they could find any contributing factors to the ACURATE neo2's poorer outcomes. When they reviewed angiograms taken during TAVR procedures, they noticed many of the valves had not fully expanded. 'We found that under-expansion was associated with more frequent primary endpoints in contrast to valves that were properly expanded,' Makkar said. 'If you modified the device such that the radial strength were better, and we did more aggressive pre- and post-dilation, we could perhaps improve the expansion of the valve,' Makkar said. 'But whether that would lead to better clinical outcomes remains to be investigated and proven…. Dilation might increase the risk of some complications, such as stroke and aortic root injury. It is reasonable to try to safely expand the valve, but we should not expand the valve at any cost.' Makkar reported research support from Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Abbott, and JenaValve.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store