Republican congressman Don Bacon of Nebraska will not seek re-election
Republican congressman and vocal Donald Trump critic Don Bacon is reportedly not going to seek re-election during the midterm races in 2026.
The conservative politician represents a swing district in Nebraska that includes Omaha, and word of his plans prompted Democratic figures to signal optimism that they could take the seat as the party tries to regain a House majority it has not had since 2023.
Bacon's decision was first reported on Friday by the outlets Punchbowl News and NOTUS before being confirmed on Saturday by the Washington Post. NOTUS and the Post cited anonymous sources familiar with the situation, with the former of those adding that Bacon would make a formal announcement in the coming days.
While Bacon had not immediately commented on the reports, his verified social media account did engage with multiple posts expressing 'good riddance' to him. He called the author of one such post 'an idiot' and told another who claimed he was a thinly veiled Democrat that he was 'the real Republican', having supported the party since he was 13 in 1976.
The second congressional district of Nebraska that Bacon represents voted for Kamala Harris when she lost to Trump during November's White House race. It also voted for Joe Biden when he took the Oval Office from Trump four years earlier. And in May, Omaha elected its first-ever Black mayor: John Ewing Jr, who defeated three-term Republican incumbent Jean Stothert.
Bacon's politics have come to reflect those realities in his district to some extent. The retired US air force brigadier general in May demanded the removal of Trump's defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, after he shared information about military strikes on Yemen in a Signal messaging app group chat that inadvertently included the editor of the Atlantic.
Though the president chose to keep Hegseth in place despite the so-called Signalgate scandal, Bacon told the Post in an interview that he 'would have been fired' at any point in his military career for doing what Hegseth did.
Separately, in a Post opinion column, Bacon criticized the brutal job and spending cuts that the Trump administration has inflicted within the federal government since the president retook office in January. He filed a bill aiming to hand Congress control over tariffs rather than continue leaving that power with the president as Trump upended financial markets by imposing substantial levies on some of the US's largest trading partners.
Furthermore, he stood as the lone House Republican to vote against a measure that would take Trump's executive order to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the 'Gulf of America' and make it law. 'I'm not into doing silly stuff,' Bacon, who joined Congress in January 2017, wrote on social media. 'It is sophomoric.'
And he has said he and his family endured threats after he opposed Ohio Republican congressman Jim Jordan's unsuccessful 2023 bid to become House speaker, which at the time had been endorsed by Trump in between his two presidencies.
'I'd rather be a defender of the traditional conservative values than just be a team player,' Bacon said to Omaha's KMTV news station in May. 'I think – a team going in the wrong direction, you need somebody to speak up and try to stand for what's right.'
A statement distributed by Democratic congressional campaign committee spokesperson Madison Andrus on Friday said that Bacon's foregoing re-election marked a 'vote of no-confidence for House Republicans and their electoral prospects'.
'The writing has been on the wall for months,' Andrus's statement also said.
In a separate statement, the Nebraska Democratic party's chair, Jane Kleeb, said her party's prospective candidates 'truly represent the values of the district' Bacon's seat is in.
'We are ready for change,' Kleeb said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US Senate votes down resolution to restrict Trump from escalating Iran war
Senate Democrats failed on Friday to get a war-powers resolution passed to limit Donald Trump's ability to single-handedly escalate the war with Iran. The resolution, 'to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran', was voted down 53-47. The vote on the resolution, introduced by the Democratic senator Tim Kaine of Virginia, split along mainly partisan lines. One Republican, Rand Paul of Kentucky, voted for it; one Democrat, John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, voted against it. 'Congress declares war,' Kaine said in a speech on the Senate floor. He stressed that the framers of the US constitution in 1787 were so wary of giving the power to start wars to one person that they did not even entrust it to George Washington, the first commander-in-chief. 'They decided that war was too big a decision for one person,' Kaine said. 'And so they wrote a constitution that said the United States should not be at war without a vote of Congress.' The measure would have compelled Trump to seek authorization from Congress before taking any further military action. Trump ordered airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities on 22 June. This directly followed Israel launching attacks on Iran, and Iran retaliating. Trump said that the US bombardment 'totally obliterated' key nuclear enrichment facilities and deemed the mission a success, although some initial reports said the damage was minimal. Iran condemned the attacks. Trump claimed on Friday that Iran had halted its nuclear ambitions after the bombings. But, he said, he would 'absolutely' continue to attack the country's nuclear sites if he believed it was once again enriching uranium. 'Time will tell,' Trump said at the White House. 'But I don't believe that they're going to go back into nuclear anytime soon.' Later on Friday, Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, rebuked Trump on social media. 'If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt followers', Araghchi wrote on X. 'The Great and Powerful Iranian People, who showed the world that the Israeli regime had NO CHOICE but to RUN to 'Daddy' to avoid being flattened by our Missiles, do not take kindly to Threats and Insults', Iran's top diplomat added, in something approximating Trump's own social media style. 'If Illusions lead to worse mistakes, Iran will not hesitate to unveil its Real Capabilities, which will certainly END any Delusion about the Power of Iran.'
The Independent
43 minutes ago
- The Independent
Photos of funeral for slain Minnesota lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband
Former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, who were killed in what authorities are calling an assassination, were honored with a private funeral at the Basilica of Saint Mary in Minneapolis. ___ This is a photo gallery curated by AP photo editors.
The Guardian
43 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Struggling in politics? Consider a war – the media will help
'You furnish the pictures. I'll furnish the war,' was the storied response of the newspaper magnate William Randolph Hearst to Frederic Remington after the illustrator was sent to Cuba to cover an insurrection and cabled back to the boss that there was little going on. Much has changed since that famous (if true) exchange of the late 19th century, in the heyday of sensationalism known as yellow journalism. But one thing that hasn't changed is that there's nothing like military conflict to capture the attention of the public, with plenty of help from the media. And the media – whether a tabloid newspaper or a cable news network – benefits, too. These days, Donald Trump's recent strike on Iran has proved the point once again, with the media's attention intensely focused on Operation Midnight Hammer, as it was dramatically dubbed. First the emphasis was on the threat of attacks to Iran's budding nuclear arsenal, then on the possibility of all-out global war, then on the strikes themselves and then the announcement of a supposed ceasefire. All to the greater glory of Trump, at least as he tells it. For those who are trying to bring public attention to other important matters – even matters of life and death – that's a frustrating reality. Jennifer Mascia knows this all too well. She is a founding reporter for the Trace, a non-profit news site dedicated to tracking the epidemic of gun violence in America and trying to do something about it, through exploring solutions. When elected officials in Minnesota were shot earlier this month – the former state House speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband were killed, and the state legislator John Hoffman and his wife were wounded – it was a huge story. Huge, but fleeting. 'Pitted against a global conflict, domestic news doesn't really stand a chance,' said Mascia, who previously contributed to the now-defunct Gun Report at the New York Times, begun by the then columnist Joe Nocera. That's true for domestic news that, in an earlier era, would have commanded the media's attention for many days, if not weeks. The Minnesota violence was even more newsworthy because of an early manhunt and disinformation swirling around the apparent assassin's political leanings. Still, coverage seemed to disappear in the blink of an eye. 'The Trump era has all but ensured that important news will get smacked out of the news cycle in favor of the latest development in Trumpworld,' Mascia wrote to me in an email, after we had talked by phone. Mascia is quick to clarify that she's not suggesting that the media ignore what the chaotic president is doing. 'It's important that we cover Trump's constitutional breaches. We shouldn't become numb or complacent in the face of eroding democracy,' she said. But it was remarkable to see how quickly the Minnesota shootings faded from media attention. A CNN contributor herself, Mascia is often called in to provide perspective for 'Day Two' of coverage after the initial reporting of gun-related news. But often these days, she notes, there is no Day Two. By then, the media has moved on. 'Maybe if the Israel-Iran war wasn't going on, we'd still be talking about it,' she said. 'Anderson Cooper would be broadcasting from Melissa Hortman's funeral. But instead, he's in Tel Aviv.' And, of course, this extends to all sorts of other subjects, not just gun violence. Those who try to focus attention on voting rights, the rule of law, crucial supreme court decisions, widespread citizen action such as the vast 'No Kings' protests – to mention just a few – may get a modicum of attention. But nothing compares to a show of military force. And Trump, always attuned to how he's being perceived, is well aware of that. 'A spectacular military success,' he crowed after the strikes. 'A historic success,' echoed his defense secretary. Pete Hegseth couldn't countenance being asked actual questions and claimed the press was trying to distort the story 'for their own political reasons to try to hurt President Trump or our country'. Was the administration's bragging accurate? Perhaps not, said intelligence reports that indicated the strikes may have only added months to the time Iran needs to produce the material for a nuclear weapon. But no matter. The strikes – from the lead-up to the aftermath – sucked up all the oxygen in the media universe for many days. Even by Thursday early afternoon, the top four news articles (plus one photo) on the Washington Post mobile app, for example, were Iran-related. And Fox News, of course, remained largely a cheering section. Whatever the effect on world peace, military conflict sure is good for ratings, as William Randolph Hearst knew in his bones. 'Historians point to the Spanish-American war as the first press-driven war,' noted a PBS article accompanying the film Crucible of Empire. It wouldn't be the last. Margaret Sullivan is a Guardian US columnist writing on media, politics and culture
