logo
As Colorado River declines, states are failing to tap an alternate resource

As Colorado River declines, states are failing to tap an alternate resource

Yahoo02-04-2025

Five out of seven Colorado River basin states are failing to maximize a critical resource that could help alleviate the region's longstanding water crisis, a new report found.
Across all the states, just 26 percent of treated municipal wastewater is being reused, according to the research, released by the University of California Los Angeles, along with the Natural Resources Defense Council.
Arizona and Nevada, which both recycle more than half of their wastewater, stand out among the other five — California, Colorado, Utah, New Mexico and Wyoming — all of which reuse less than a quarter of their wastewater, the report determined.
'We're facing a hotter, drier future and we need to pursue water recycling aggressively if we're going to ensure a sustainable, resilient water supply for the Colorado Basin,' co-author Noah Garrison, a water researcher at UCLA's Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, said in a statement.
'Even recycling 40% of our wastewater could make a dramatic difference, and we have two states already above 50% showing this is an entirely feasible solution,' Garrison added.
The 1,450-mile Colorado River provides drinking water and agricultural irrigation to about 40 million people across seven U.S. states, 30 tribal nations and two states in Mexico.
As the West becomes increasingly dry and a growing population consumes more water, this key transboundary artery is dwindling.
On the domestic level, the seven U.S. basin states are currently negotiating an update to the Colorado River's operational guidelines, which are set to expire at the end of 2026.
The UCLA-led research team drew their conclusions by analyzing 2022 data from publicly owned treatment works, which process more than 1 million gallons of wastewater daily across the states.
They found that Nevada reused 85 percent of its treated wastewater, followed by Arizona at 52 percent.
California, which is the region's biggest wastewater producer, recycled only 22 percent, despite setting ambitious water recycling goals in 2009 and boasting stringent regulations on the subject.
Nonetheless, California fared much better than the remaining states, with New Mexico reusing just 18 percent, Colorado 3.6 percent, Wyoming 3.3 percent and Utah less than 1 percent, according to the study.
'This is a striking divide,' co-author author Mark Gold, director of water scarcity solutions at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said in a statement.
'The river is over-allocated by up to 4-million-acre feet a year, and state reductions can be less difficult,' Gold added.
For reference, the basin states have the collective right to 15 million acre-feet per year, while Mexico receives a 1.5-million-acre-foot allocation. The average U.S. household consumes about half an acre-foot of water annually.
In addition to identifying this dearth in water reuse, the researchers also flagged an apparent absence of basic monitoring as to how much recycling is actually occurring — creating a situation that they described as a 'data desert.'
To quantify the amount of reuse that was occurring, the scientists said they had to in some cases call specific treatment plants to get answers.
This absence of consistent reporting systems, they explained, speaks to other systemic issues: a situation in which prolonged drought, climate change, overuse and obsolete infrastructure have come together to create a regional crisis.
The authors also criticized the lack of federal standards for wastewater recycling, while noting that just a handful of states track where their treated water goes and how much of it is reused.
'There is tremendous opportunity to expand recycled water use, but the lack of adequate data is a significant barrier for increasing wastewater reuse,' Garrison said.
Going forward, the researchers suggested concrete policy recommendations for both state and federal governments.
They advised the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to develop model ordinances for states and work with them to create standardized reporting protocols and reuse targets. Also crucial, they added, would be the expansion of funding mechanisms, including grants from the Bureau of Reclamation.
At the state level, the authors recommended assessing the effectiveness of individual state programs while also conducting comparisons between neighbors.
Each state, they concluded, should establish its own numeric targets, timelines and interim goals, while working with local reclamation agencies.
If the Colorado River basin states raised their water recycling rates to just 40 percent, they could gain nearly 900,000 acre-feet of new water each year, or enough to quench the thirst of almost 2 million households, according to the report.
Although opportunities exist to ramp up the region's water recycling efforts substantially, the researchers stressed that doing so 'will require a strong commitment from all participants.'
'Water reuse won't solve the Colorado River crisis alone,' Garrison said.
'But it's one of the few solutions available today that can be rapidly scaled and sustained over the long term,' he added.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

$7 Million Flowing to BC Communities for Watershed Security Projects
$7 Million Flowing to BC Communities for Watershed Security Projects

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

$7 Million Flowing to BC Communities for Watershed Security Projects

VANCOUVER, BC and Xʷməθkwəy̓əm (Musqueam), Skwxwú7mesh (Squamish), and Səlilwətaɬ (Tsleil-Waututh) Nations, June 11, 2025 /CNW/ - The Watershed Security Fund (WSF or 'the Fund'), a partnership between the First Nations Water Caucus (FNWC), the First Nations Fisheries Council (FNFC) and the Real Estate Foundation of BC (REFBC), is thrilled to announce the recipients of the second round of funding under the WSF Grants Program. Just under $7 million is being distributed to 28 recipients across British Columbia. At a time when communities are working hard to respond to climate, economic and cultural pressures, this critical resourcing is a positive step forward. A granting budget of $3-5 million is generated annually from interest earned on the initial $100 million endowment from the Province. In 2024/25, the WSF was able to hold a second grants intake, supplemented by a $7 million contribution from the Real Estate Foundation of BC. This second wave of funding builds on the success of the program's inaugural intake of 26 projects in 2024, continuing to support initiatives that prioritize the health of waterways, center First Nations rights and knowledge, and foster enduring relationships grounded in reciprocity and respect. Watershed security is a shared responsibility, requiring everyone within the watershed to actively contribute to its care and preservation. In its second application intake, the program received 161 applications, totalling over $41 million in funding requests—demonstrating both the immense need for funds and the deep commitment of communities to care for water and the natural world. "These projects demonstrate a strong commitment to watersheds and building lasting partnerships within community. The large number of First Nation-led and First Nation-partnered applications highlight the importance of First Nations' Rights and Title when doing work on watersheds. Protecting watersheds is no one person's responsibility, we all have a mutual reliance on water that will continue to drive this work forward." — Lydia Hwitsum, Co-Commissioner, First Nations Water Caucus The 28 recipients of the second intake include First Nation and non-First Nations organizations and partners working in territories and communities across BC. Project examples include: McLeod Lake Indian Band, in partnership with Saulteau First Nations and West Moberly First Nations, are receiving $400,000 to protect and restore the Kinosew Sîpîy/Whutone Gah Saghé, Murray River Watershed by implementing the actions in the 2024 Watershed Health Assessment and upcoming 2025 Water Quality Objectives established through government policy. We wanted to address an important question through this project: "Can we drink the water, can we eat the fish, would I be honoured to make tea for our Elders with these waters?' The WSF grant allows our Nations and local communities to advance critical collaborative work and studies to protect and recover this heavily impacted watershed. We look forward to continuing to work with all levels of government on this important project."—Nathan Prince, Traditional Land Use Coordinator, McLeod Lake Indian Band Raincoast Conservation Foundation, in partnership with Scw'exmx Tribal Council and Citxw Nlaka'pamux Assembly, are receiving $107,500 to continue mapping and assessing cold water shelter areas in the Coldwater River to support salmon recovery and climate adaptation. Lake Babine Nation is receiving $50,000 to enhance climate resiliency across the Lake Babine watershed through the development of a paired-watershed study that assesses feasible restoration sites for sockeye-bearing streams using beaver dam analogs (BDAs)."By using beaver dam analogs to build resilient salmon habitats in the face of industrial logging and a changing climate, we ensure that Lake Babine Nation members can rely on salmon into the future." — Lake Babine Nation Fisheries Team Amid tariffs and economic instability, many of these projects provide good jobs and nature-based solutions rooted in collaboration and focused on long-term resiliency goals. B.C.'s watersheds are the lifeblood of this province, and I thank every one of the 28 recipients for doing their part to help ensure safe, clean water is available to communities throughout B.C. for generations. Every watershed is unique in its characteristics, needs of the ecosystem, and the people it supports, so I'm thankful that we will see so much of First Nations' expertise and local knowledge go into these projects. This second grant intake creates another amazing path forward in taking action for watershed security, and we hope it will inspire others to contribute to the Fund's growth to support this important work."—Hon. Randene Neill, B.C. Minister of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship Our mutual reliance on water drives the need for collaboration to support enduring funding streams. Through shared leadership and strategic investments, the interim partners aspire to continue growing the Fund through crown governments, industry and philanthropic contributions to generate enduring and predictable funding. A third round of funding is anticipated for October 2025. For more information about the Watershed Security Fund and the list of Intake 2 Grant Recipients, please visit Media Contact: Alieska Robles, Communications Manager, Real Estate Foundation of BC alieska@ Madison Rattai, Habitat and Environmental Protections Manager, First Nations Fisheries Council of BC madison@ About the Watershed Security Fund On March 6, 2023, the Province of British Columbia and the B.C.-First Nations Water Table jointly announced an initial $100-million investment from the Province of BC to establish the creation of an independent Watershed Security Fund (WSF or 'the Fund'). Grants for watershed security projects are provided from the interest earned on the fund. The initial $100-million contribution will generate a $3-5 million annual baseline budget for grants and programs. Interim Governance and Working Towards a Permanent Entity Since the announcement of the initial $100-million endowment to the WSF, the First Nations Water Caucus (FNWC) – with the First Nations Fisheries Council (FNFC) acting as its secretariat – partnered with the Real Estate Foundation of British Columbia (REFBC) to provide interim Fund stewardship. Together, the interim partners are working to create a permanent entity to oversee, manage and grow the Fund over the long term. The Province of BC acts in an advisory role to the interim Fund. The First Nations Water Caucus (FNWC) is comprised of the First Nation delegates who participate in the joint B.C.-First Nations Water Table (Water Table). The Water Table addresses water and watershed security issues of concern between First Nations in B.C. and the Province through co-development and consensus. FNWC was first convened by FNFC in June 2022 and, since then, has worked with the Province at the Water Table to co-develop a draft Watershed Security Strategy for B.C. The First Nations Fisheries Council (FNFC) is a non-profit society that works to develop a cohesive and united voice among First Nations in B.C. FNFC, as the secretariat to FNWC, implements the goals and priorities of FNWC and carries out the substantive operational work. They are partnering with REFBC as interim stewards of the Fund and supporting the co-development process. The Real Estate Foundation of BC (REFBC) is a philanthropic organization working to advance sustainable, equitable, and socially-just land use across what is known as B.C. For many years, REFBC has been proud to work with First Nations, local governments, the Province and a broad network of partners to advance watershed security through its grants, research and convening, and as host of the Healthy Watersheds Initiative. SOURCE Watershed Security Fund View original content to download multimedia:

Accent Lighting: How to Use It to Elevate Your Home's Style
Accent Lighting: How to Use It to Elevate Your Home's Style

Time Business News

time6 days ago

  • Time Business News

Accent Lighting: How to Use It to Elevate Your Home's Style

Accent lighting is one of the most powerful tools in interior design, allowing homeowners to highlight architectural features, artwork, or specific areas of a room to create depth and visual interest. While it might seem subtle, the effect it creates can dramatically transform the mood and aesthetic of a space. In this article, we'll explore what accent lighting is, how to use it effectively, and where to find expert tips, including helpful resources like decoratoradvice .com to perfect your lighting design. Accent lighting is a type of lighting that draws attention to a particular object, area, or architectural element. Unlike ambient lighting, which provides general illumination, or task lighting, which helps with activities like reading or cooking, accent lighting is primarily decorative. Its purpose is to add dimension and enhance the visual appeal of your interior. Here are several ways to incorporate accent lighting in your home: Wall-mounted spotlights or track lighting can beautifully illuminate paintings, sculptures, or decorative shelving. By directing a focused beam of light, you can emphasize textures and colors that might go unnoticed under regular lighting. Accent lighting works well to underline architectural details like brick walls, arched doorways, built-in bookcases, or exposed beams. Recessed or uplighting can be installed to create dramatic shadows and highlights. Exterior accent lights can showcase landscaping, garden features, or the facade of your home. Path lights, uplights on trees, or spotlights on fountains can enhance curb appeal and safety. LED strip lights under cabinets, shelves, or behind mirrors can give your kitchen, bathroom, or living room a modern, sleek look. This kind of accent lighting is not only stylish but functional as well. The effectiveness of accent lighting largely depends on the type of fixture you choose. Here are some popular options: Track lights: Adjustable and perfect for art displays or gallery walls. Adjustable and perfect for art displays or gallery walls. Wall sconces: Great for framing a mirror or highlighting a hallway. Great for framing a mirror or highlighting a hallway. Recessed lighting: Subtle and space-saving, ideal for ceilings or niches. Subtle and space-saving, ideal for ceilings or niches. LED strips: Versatile and easy to install behind furniture or cabinetry. When selecting lighting, always consider the color temperature (warm vs. cool), beam angle, and the intensity of the light to ensure it complements your existing decor. Layer your lighting: Combine ambient, task, and accent lighting for a balanced look. Combine ambient, task, and accent lighting for a balanced look. Use dimmers: They allow you to control the intensity and mood of your space. They allow you to control the intensity and mood of your space. Avoid overuse: Too much accent lighting can become distracting. Focus on a few key features. Too much accent lighting can become distracting. Focus on a few key features. Test placement: Use temporary fixtures or flashlights to preview how the light will look. If you want to enhance your home's interior design, expert resources like decoratoradvice .com provide in-depth articles, ideas, an d product recommendations for accent lighting and other décor strategies. Whether you're redecorating a single room or undertaking a complete renovation, getting advice from professionals can save time and money and ensure a polished final result. Accent lighting is more than just a decorative flourish; it's a strategic design choice that adds personality and sophistication to your home. You can create a space that feels inviting, stylish, and uniquely yours by highlighting the right areas and using the proper fixtures. TIME BUSINESS NEWS

In a world without people, how fast would NYC fall apart? Here's the timeline.
In a world without people, how fast would NYC fall apart? Here's the timeline.

Yahoo

time07-06-2025

  • Yahoo

In a world without people, how fast would NYC fall apart? Here's the timeline.

Imagine the ceaseless cacophony of New York City suddenly stopped. No sirens wailed. No cars zoomed. No subways rumbled beneath sidewalks. All eight million New Yorkers disappeared overnight. Now, imagine what would happen next. If no one's around to sweep the sidewalks, weed Central Park, or turn the power grid on, nature would move in—and quick. Dandelions would spring up in asphalt cracks. Raccoons would move into abandoned apartments. Sidewalk trees would outgrow their planters. But just how swiftly would the city disappear beneath a curtain of green? We talked to architects and urban ecologists to map out a potential timeline. With no one to maintain the power grid, the Big Apple would go dark within a few days. The Milky Way would illuminate Midtown as light pollution disappears overnight. Without air conditioning and heat, 'you start getting weird temperatures inside the building. Mold starts to form on the walls,' says architect Jana Horvat of the University of Zagreb, who studies building decay. Some green energy projects in the city might stay lit for longer, such as the solar and wind-powered Ricoh Americas billboard in Times Square. Eventually, though, even the Ricoh billboard would go dark; not because the billboard would lose power, but because there would be no one to replace its LED lightbulbs. Without power, the pump rooms that clear out 13 million gallons of water daily from the subway would be useless, and the train tunnels would begin to flood. 'Probably this water would result in [the subway] being, you know, occupied by new species,' says Horvat. 'Some plants would start growing, some animals' would move in. Likely, species that already thrive in the subway—rats, cockroaches, pigeons, opossums—would be the first ones to take advantage of the human-free passages. Within the first month, the manicured lawns of Central and Prospect Park would grow wild and unkept. 'When you stop mowing a lawn, you get a meadow,' says botanist Peter Del Tredici, a senior research scientist emeritus at the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, who wrote a book on urban plant life. Within a month, dandelions, ragweed, and yellow nutsedge would start popping up in the now knee-high grasses of New York's iconic parks. 'First, it's herbaceous plants, but then, you know, you get trees and shrubs and vines,' says Tredici. In a year without people, many of New York's buildings would start to deteriorate. 'The glass facades would be the first to go,' says Horvat. The single-pane glass on brownstones and family homes would be the most vulnerable, but in a decade, even the heat-strengthened glass on skyscrapers would start to wear down and crack. And once windows break, water gets in. 'Then you'll have plants start growing in there,' says Tredici. Apartments would transform into humid hothouses, the perfect habitat for mosquitoes, water snakes, fungus, and rushes. 'It's like a wetland on the second floor.' Without maintenance, the asphalt streets and parking lots in New York would quickly degrade. Freeze-thaw cycles would create cracks. 'Water settles in that crack, and then that's all the plants need,' says Tredici. First, mosses would grow. Within a decade, young trees may even sprout. The London planetree, the most common street tree in New York, is particularly known for its resilience and fast growth rate, and any of its offspring could quickly find a toehold in a deteriorating asphalt parking lot. Within a decade, the Statue of Liberty would also start to deteriorate. The statue's copper plating would start to split, allowing sea spray to break down its interior steel skeleton. Steel 'is a very durable material, but it is very prone to corroding if it comes in contact with damp conditions,' says Horvat: That's bad news for New York, a city made from steel. In the decades since humans abandoned New York, a 'novel ecosystem' would emerge, says Tredici. 'It's not going to look like anything that's ever existed anywhere in the world.' Tredici points to Detroit as a case study. Today, crabapple trees—tough ornamentals native to the Central Asian mountains—blanket Detroit. 'They actually will spread all over,' says Tredici, and after 50 years without humans, Central and Riverside Park's crabapple trees would grow among a young forest full of London planetrees, honeylocusts, pin oaks, and Norway maples (the last three being common New York street trees). Nightshade vines and poison ivy would creep up buildings, and mosses and resilient weeds would cover the higher reaches of exposed windy skyscrapers. Among the greenery, more and more animals would call Manhattan home. Deer, rabbits, groundhogs, and wild turkeys would move in. Larger predators—coyotes, bobcats, black bears, and copperhead snakes—would follow. Peregrine falcons, bald eagles, red-tailed hawks, and great horned owls would nest in hollowed-out buildings, while feral cats prowl the abandoned upper floors of apartment buildings, feasting on mice and birds. Despite their futuristic look, the city's newest spires, such as 10 Hudson Yards and 111 West 57th Street, would be the first to fall. These buildings rely on slender, reinforced steel skeletons encased in reinforced concrete. But when the power shuts off and water seeps in through these buildings' glass curtain walls, these high-rises would rot from the inside out. The Empire State Building and Chrysler Building would likely outlast their younger rivals. Built to support much more weight than necessary (a safety precaution in the early days of skyscrapers), these giants' steel frames are bolstered by thick masonry and interior walls. Ten Hudson Yards might last a century. The Empire State Building might last 50 years longer, but eventually even these historic titans would collapse. After a century, New York City would 'become a forest,' says Tredici. A canopy of mature trees over a 100-feet-tall would replace the city's skyscrapers. Soil would regenerate. Concrete, one of the world's 'strongest' construction materials, says Horvat, would dissolve. New York's carefully manicured river parks, such as the Hudson River and East River Park, would transform into wetlands teeming with eels, egrets, turtles, beavers, and muskrats. But even as skyscrapers fell and forests grew, parts of New York would 'survive for centuries in this ruinous state,' says Horvat. Cracked marble lions would stalk the forest floor. Soil and underbrush would obscure once-gleaming granite fountains. Rusted steel beams would jut out from dense root systems. Even without humans, pieces of New York would endure—a fragile legacy for the future to either uncover or forget. This story is part of Popular Science's Ask Us Anything series, where we answer your most outlandish, mind-burning questions, from the ordinary to the off-the-wall. Have something you've always wanted to know? Ask us.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store