logo
Starmer and European allies urge restraint from Israel and Iran after strikes

Starmer and European allies urge restraint from Israel and Iran after strikes

Glasgow Times15 hours ago

The Prime Minister, France's President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz called for a 'diplomatic resolution' to the stand-off between Israel and Tehran.
In a Friday phone call with the European leaders, Sir Keir and his counterparts 'discussed the long-held grave concerns about Iran's nuclear programme, and called on all sides to refrain from further escalation that could further destabilise the region', according to No 10.
A Downing Street spokesperson said they 'reaffirmed Israel's right to self-defence, and agreed that a diplomatic resolution, rather than military action, was the way forward'.
Elsewhere, Sir Keir told Bloomberg he was planning to speak to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Friday.
The Prime Minister convened a Cobra meeting on Friday afternoon to discuss the situation.
The Israeli strikes in the early hours of Friday targeted nuclear facilities, missiles factories, and killed Hossein Salami, the leader of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
The UK is prepared to take 'every diplomatic step' to prevent Iran developing nuclear weapons after Israeli strikes, Downing Street said.
This could include reinstating sanctions lifted under the 2015 nuclear deal with Tehran by triggering the 'snap back' mechanism.
The UK's priority is to prevent further escalation after the strikes and 'press for a diplomatic solution', and officials have urged Iran to keep nuclear talks going with US President Donald Trump, according to Downing Street.
The reports of these strikes are concerning and we urge all parties to step back and reduce tensions urgently. Escalation serves no one in the region.
Stability in the Middle East must be the priority and we are engaging partners to de-escalate. Now is the time for restraint,…
— Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) June 13, 2025
No 10 said the UK did not participate in Israeli strikes overnight and would not say whether Israel had requested help.
Iran's nuclear programme is 'more advanced than ever, and it is a clear threat to international peace and security', the spokesman said.
'We've urged Iran to continue engaging with President Trump's offer of a negotiated solution and we continue to liaise closely with our partners on this.'
The attack appeared to be the most significant Iran has faced since its war with Iraq in the 1980s.
Foreign Secretary David Lammy said stability in the Middle East is 'vital' for global security.
'Further escalation is a serious threat to peace & stability in the region and in no-one's interest,' he said in a post on X.
Stability in the Middle East is vital for global security.
I'm concerned to see reports of strikes overnight. Further escalation is a serious threat to peace & stability in the region and in no one's interest.
This is a dangerous moment & I urge all parties to show restraint.
— David Lammy (@DavidLammy) June 13, 2025
'This is a dangerous moment & I urge all parties to show restraint.'
It is understood that Mr Lammy had been due to travel to the US on Friday, but is now remaining in London.
Mr Netanyahu said on Friday that the 'operation will continue for as many days as it takes to remove this threat'.
In a clip posted on social media, he said Israel 'struck at the heart of Iran's nuclear enrichment programme' and 'the heart of Iran's nuclear weaponisation programme'.
Iranian state television reported that the leader of the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, Mr Salami, was killed, as well as chief of staff of the Iranian armed forces, General Mohammad Bagheri.
US secretary of state Marco Rubio said Israel acted unilaterally.
The aftermath of Israeli attacks on Tehran (Vahid Salemi/AP)
In a post on X, Mr Rubio said 'we are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region'.
Mr Trump said he 'gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal' and warned that Israel has 'a lot of' US military equipment, and they 'know how to use it'.
'Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left … JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE,' he posted on Truth Social.
Shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel, in a post on X, said: 'We must use our influence and diplomacy to work closely with all of our allies in the region and beyond to resolve conflicts, and deliver peace and stability in the Middle East.'
Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch said 'warm words' would not stop Iran, and that she did not see Israel's action as an escalation.
'If Israel sees Iran getting nuclear weapons, I don't think it should sit back and put its feet up and say 'Well, we're de-escalating'.
'Because the person, the country, that will escalate is Iran, and that would be absolutely disastrous for the entire world,' she told journalists in Scotland.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No more Edinburgh Book Festival for me – where did it all go wrong?
No more Edinburgh Book Festival for me – where did it all go wrong?

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

No more Edinburgh Book Festival for me – where did it all go wrong?

One other event at the book festival I recall, for different reasons, was a session with the writer Yasmin Alibhai-Brown. I can't remember why I went to see her now because she's the sort of harrumphing lefty who sets off my allergies, but perhaps I figured it's good to listen to a range of views, which it is. I certainly remember being irritated when she laid into Ukip as an English not a Scottish problem even though the party had just done well in Scotland at the European elections. The same sort of flawed reasoning persists now with Reform. But the audience seemed to like it. They applauded at the end, and shuffled out for tea and biscuits. I mention the Alibhai-Brown event in particular because even then, ten years ago, the problems with the Edinburgh Book Festival were starting to become obvious. The lack of diversity on the stage and in the audience, by which I particularly mean diversity of class. The weak, and sometimes execrable, chairing of events that fails to challenge or properly explore the writer's opinions and assumptions. And most important of all, the tendency to platform writers like Alibhai-Brown and unplatform or ignore writers of a different or more conservative persuasion. In the end, it meant the festival became a place I enjoyed less and less, and eventually I just stopped going. But, you know, it really is good to listen to a range of views and I'm a hopeful sort of person on the whole, so this year, like every year, I looked at the line-up on the festival website to see if there was something good and if things had changed, and I scrolled and scrolled and saw that the answer was no. Things appear to be just as bad as ever, worse in fact, and the worry is that the problems at the book festival may have started to rot it from the inside. You start to wonder: how long will it last? The most obvious symptom of the problems is the lack of diversity on stage, which is worse than ever. One of the biggest stories of the last year – and the focus of one of the biggest-selling books of the year – was the trans debate and the Supreme Court ruling on the definition of 'woman', and yet you will not find a trace of it on the festival line-up. The book in question, The Women Who Wouldn't Wheest, was edited by Susan Dalgety and Lucy Hunter Blackburn, so why haven't they been invited? Is it because – unlike one of the big guests of the festival Nicola Sturgeon – they are seen to be on the wrong side of the debate? Yes, of course it is. Read more The chairman of the festival, Alan Little, rather gave the game away when he said the festival should be 'a place where progressive and nuanced discussion can happen in a safe and respectful space'. He's spot on with nuanced – we need it badly – but why only progressive? Why not traditionalist or conservative as well? And what's with 'safe'? It's become one of those words certain activists use to ratchet up the pressure, to hystericalise, but would the festival be unsafe because the line-up included Susan Dalgety or Lucy Hunter Blackburn? The only thing that would be unsafe would be the consensus that's dominated the festival and still does. The organisers would probably say in their defence that there would be a threat of disruption from activists – indeed, that was reason they gave for dropping Baillie Gifford as one of their sponsors. A number of activists, you will remember, a very small number, demanded the investment company be dropped on the grounds it invests in fossil fuels and sad to say, the organisers caved. They said they could not be expected to deliver a festival that was safe – there's that word again – because there was a threat of disruption from activists and so they ended their relationship with Baillie Gifford but more importantly they ended their relationship with Baillie Gifford's money. But it didn't have to be that way. First of all, if everyone buckled as quickly as the festival did over the threat of disruption to the free expression of views, we'd be in a very unpleasant place indeed; their weakness is pathetic. They could also have borrowed some of the stoicism of the Fringe which faced similar pressure over Baillie Gifford from the same sort of activists, but stood firm and it all came to nothing. To put it another way, everyone was perfectly safe. The Edinburgh Book Festival (Image: Newsquest) The organisers of the book festival also appear to be guilty of a kind of economic and practical idiocy that now threatens their future. There are some people who object to corporate sponsorship of arts events – so what: the only alternative is an increase in public money and that ain't happenin'. Baillie Gifford also invests in fossil fuels – so what: it invests far more in clean energy, and the objections of the activists led to the cancellation of a million pounds in money for the arts. The danger here is that the arts world ends up, in the words of the director of the Science Museum Ian Blatchford, eaten alive by its own piety. And the risks are particularly high for book festivals aren't they? We saw what happened to Aye Write in Glasgow when it failed to get funding from Creative Scotland; it only went ahead after a donation from the charity set up by the Lottery winner Colin Weir. The Edinburgh book festival is also going ahead this year thanks largely to a donation from Ian Rankin. But how long before the activists start digging into the personal views of the philanthropists writing cheques? And is this what they want: the arts funded by a few wealthy individuals? It doesn't sound all that progressive to me. Better, I think, to try to build more robust festivals that have a chance of lasting and that must mean some changes. First, encourage a broad diversity of views and opinions at the festival that will attract a broader and more diverse audience. Secondly, drop the piety and encourage corporate sponsorship because public money is not coming to save you. And thirdly, be robust when the activists rock up and shout 'unsafe!' They only have power because you give it to them. Reject them. Ignore them. And carry on. Mark Smith is a Herald features writer and opinion writer

Keir Starmer should lead diplomacy effort as tensions rise in Middle East
Keir Starmer should lead diplomacy effort as tensions rise in Middle East

Daily Record

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Record

Keir Starmer should lead diplomacy effort as tensions rise in Middle East

Keir Starmer is right that we need cool heads following Israeli air strikes on Iran. Israel launched widescale attacks on the Iranian regime, saying it was targeting nuclear and military sites. The move has caused fears of a full-scale conflict after Iran's Supreme Leader said there would be 'severe punishment' for the attack. The Prime Minister has now called for both sides to step back and reduce tensions. He has realised the only way to get Iran to give up nuclear weapons is through talking. This is the correct thing to do. More violence would help no one. It would impact people in the region but also across the world. President Trump has unfortunately risked escalating things even further by threatening Iran over the potential nuclear deal. This is no surprise as his two stints as US president have been chaotic in terms of foreign policy. It was ultimately his decision to pull out of Afghanistan, which led to the Taliban taking over again. And he has repeatedly peddled the lie Ukraine started the war against Russia, despite it being clear it was Russia which invaded its neighbour. Hopefully Trump can change the habit of a lifetime and actually help bring some stability to the Middle East. This would mean he would have to think before he makes wild statements on social media. Maybe he should look across the Pond at what international leadership should look like. The world would be a better place if he took a leaf out of Starmer's book. Prioritise jobs The announcement by Alexander Dennis of 400 job losses was another hammer blow for Scottish manufacturing. Shutting two factories in Camelon and Larbert and centralising operations in Yorkshire is simply unacceptable. It comes on the back of hundreds of jobs being lost through the closure of the oil refinery at Grangemouth. Little wonder the trade unions are so incensed about another move that sees its members thrown on the scrap heap. In a letter to John Swinney and Scotland Secretary Ian Murray, the GMB's Louise Gilmour said it is 'absurd' Scotland can't sustain its only bus manufacturer. Her solution is for a review of procurement rules and priority given to domestic manufacturing. She says both governments have a role to play and she is correct. Politicians have for years spoken about the importance of having an industrial strategy but they have consistently failed to deliver. Both governments must ditch the rhetoric and protect jobs.

Israel bombarded by Iranian missiles after strikes on Tehran's nuclear bases
Israel bombarded by Iranian missiles after strikes on Tehran's nuclear bases

Powys County Times

time5 hours ago

  • Powys County Times

Israel bombarded by Iranian missiles after strikes on Tehran's nuclear bases

Iran bombarded Tel Aviv with hundreds of missiles overnight in retaliation for Israeli strikes on its nuclear bases. Calls from Sir Keir Starmer and other world leaders for calm amid the mounting conflict appeared to fall on deaf ears, as Tehran struck back against Israel's attacks. Air raid sirens sounded out across Israel and its citizens were ordered to move into bomb shelters, as the attack began. A plume of smoke could be seen rising from central Tel Aviv amid the barrage, after at least one Iranian missile appeared to bypass the iron dome missile defence system. The rocket attacks on the Tel Aviv area wounded 34 people, according to Israel's paramedic service, including one woman critically injured after being trapped under rubble. Operation Rising Lion – the offensive against Tehran – has mainly targeted nuclear sites, including destroying the above ground section of Iran's main Natanz nuclear base. Hossein Salami, the leader of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, was among the senior Iranian figures reportedly killed in Israel's initial overnight strikes. Some 78 people were killed and more than 320 wounded in Iran, according to its ambassador to the UN. The attack is believed to be the most significant Iran has faced since its war with Iraq in the 1980s. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said 'more is on the way' in a video message released on Friday night. امشب، می‌خواهم با شما، مردم محترم ایران، صحبت کنم. ما در میانه یکی از بزرگ‌ترین عملیات‌های نظامی در تاریخ، هستیم – عملیات طلوع شیران.رژیم اسلامی که تقریباً ۵۰ سال شما را سرکوب کرده، تهدید به نابودی کشور ما- اسرائیل می‌کند. هدف عملیات اسرائیل جلوگیری از تهدید هسته‌ای و موشکی… — Benjamin Netanyahu – בנימין נתניהו (@netanyahu) June 13, 2025 Danny Dannon, Israel's UN ambassador, claimed the operation was launched because Iran was 'within days' of having the capability of building nuclear weapons. Tensions between Israel, the US and Iran have escalated in recent weeks, amid negotiations over the Iran nuclear deal, which is aimed at preventing the country from developing nuclear weapons. On Friday, Israel's western allies attempted a diplomatic blitz aimed at cooling temperatures in the Middle East. After convening a Cobra meeting of senior ministers and officials, Sir Keir spoke to Mr Netanyahu, urging him to de-escalate and work towards a 'diplomatic resolution'. The Prime Minister and US President Donald Trump agreed the burgeoning conflict needed to be resolved by 'diplomacy and dialogue'. And Sir Keir joined with France's Emmanuel Macron and Germany's Friedrich Merz in calling for restraint. David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, spoke to Iran's foreign minister and urged calm, later warning the Middle East is facing a 'moment of grave peril'. Mr Trump has also suggested that Iran now had a chance to agree a nuclear deal to bring an end to the fighting. On his Truth Social platform, the President wrote: 'Two months ago I gave Iran a 60 day ultimatum to 'make a deal'. They should have done it! 'Today is day 61. I told them what to do, but they just couldn't get there. Now they have, perhaps, a second chance!' Both the UK and the US have insisted they were not involved in the Israeli strikes and that Israel acted unilaterally. The first time Israel discussed the strikes with the UK was at midday on Friday, according to Tzipi Hotovely, the country's ambassador to the UK.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store