Utah's time change bill hits roadblock on Senate Committee
SALT LAKE CITY () — A Utah bill that would has come to a grinding halt on Wednesday.
H.B. 120 – otherwise known as '' – was brought before the Senate Business and Labor Committee, which voted 7-1 to table the bill indefinitely. This means, for the time being, Utahns can still expect to adjust their clocks forward and back an hour twice a year.
Dutch Bros has a new menu item that's only available in Utah (and one other state)
The bill was originally introduced by Rep. Joseph Elison (R-Hurricane) and co-sponsored by Sen. Dan McCay (R-Riverton). Under H.B. 120, Utah would permanently adopt Mountain Standard Time as its time of choice until the federal government allows for permanent daylight time – which Utah would then adopt.
Utah has already passed a bill that would see the state switch to permanent Daylight Saving Time should enough surrounding states agree to the change and the federal government allow it. The surrounding state threshold has been met, meaning Utah is only waiting for permission from the federal government.
Father-son duo survives night in Utah wilderness after finding 'miracle' backpack
H.B. 120 unanimously passed through the House Government Operations Committee before earning the House's approval behind a 52 to 23 vote. However, Senate lawmakers seemed to prefer letting the federal government make the final decision.
'I do think when we make this change, we should do it with some other states,' explained Sen. Todd Weiler (R-Woods Cross). 'We are a peculiar people, but I don't know that we want to be extra peculiar with our international airport and our surrounding states by standing out with a different timezone.'
Sen. Scott Sandall (R-Brigham City) said the time change would also put Utah on a different time than Idaho for eight months of the year, complicating interstate commerce for his constituents in Box Elder County.
Rep. Elison, however, argued that his bill is the only opportunity Utah has to stop changing the clocks now – something Hawaii and Arizona have already done.
'Bottom line is we can let this thing die, which it sounds like it will, or we can punt the ball to the federal government and hope that they take the lead,' said Rep. Elison. 'I'd rather take the lead in Utah personally, but I'm OK with the will of the body.'
The Senate Business and Labor Committee's decision to table the bill makes it unlikely lawmakers will take up the issue again this year. This means it is effectively back in the hands of the federal government to decide whether or not to end the clock change and what time we'd observe moving forward.
Yeonseung Kim contributed to this report.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Local officials warn of possible lawsuit in wake of Alaska governor's education funding veto
Then-Rep. Grier Hopkins, D-Fairbanks, speaks on the floor of the Alaska House, Wednesday, May 18, 2022. Hopkins is now the mayor of the Fairbanks North Star Borough. (Photo by James Brooks/Alaska Beacon) One day after Gov. Mike Dunleavy made a precedent-setting veto by cutting funding for the state's public school education formula, a group of city and borough leaders denounced the decision during a joint news conference, with some saying that they expect a lawsuit to challenge it. 'Everybody needs to start talking about what a lawsuit looks like,' said Rozlyn Grady-Wyche, a member of the Mountain View Community Council in Anchorage. Caroline Storm, of the Coalition for Education Equity, has been talking about a lawsuit for more than a year. On Friday, she said the coalition 'will file or be a partner in a lawsuit before next session, because it doesn't seem that between the Legislature and the governor, that they are capable of meeting their constitutional obligation to adequately fund public education.' State lawmakers this year voted for a bill that increases the base student allocation, core of the state's per-student funding formula, by $700 per student, overriding a Dunleavy veto in the process. But that formula is subject to the state's annual budget process, in separate legislation. If the formula is a bucket, the budget decides how full that bucket is. Until now, lawmakers and the governor have filled that bucket to capacity each year. This year, one of Dunleavy's vetoes took $200 per student from that bucket, cutting about $50.6 million statewide. For municipal officials, it's a significant problem because the ordinary local budget process is over, meaning that they will have to reopen their budgets and make additional cuts to public education. In some cases, those cuts will come atop school closures — including in Fairbanks, Anchorage, Kodiak and the Kenai Peninsula Borough — and other cuts that were already planned. 'It's a crisis for our state, and that's why we're all here today,' said Fairbanks North Star Borough Mayor Grier Hopkins during the joint news conference. On Thursday night, the Anchorage School Board voted to implement an immediate hiring freeze while it addresses the veto. The board had budgeted for a $560 BSA increase, thinking it was being cautious. Now that there's a $500 increase instead, ASD facing a $4.3 million budget gap. 'I cannot even imagine where $4.3 million is going to come from,' said Margo Bellamy, vice president of the ASD board. Kenai Peninsula Borough Mayor Peter Micciche, R-Soldotna, said the veto has a 'fairly significant impact' in his borough, where voters may be asked to pick up the slack. 'This is essentially a tax shift. It's the state not meeting a constitutional expectation requirement, if you will,' he said. Penny Vadla, treasurer of the Kenai Peninsula Borough school board, said the impacts in her area will be largest in sparsely populated places. 'We're closing theaters, we're losing library aides in some places where that means that library in a small school will close down,' she said. 'The impact on larger schools is that they might become larger without the capacity to put more students in that building.' State legislators could override Dunleavy's cuts, but Speaker of the House Bryce Edgmon, I-Dillingham, and Senate President Gary Stevens, R-Kodiak, said they don't expect that lawmakers will be available until the 2026 Alaska Legislature begins in January. 'I'll certainly be getting on my phone and hitting the streets to urge our legislators here, in the borough, the Interior delegation, to override the veto,' Hopkins said. Micciche was critical of legislators' slow pace. Before becoming mayor, Micciche served as Senate president. Lawmakers, and particularly the presiding officers of the House and Senate, should have already scheduled a special session to consider a veto override, he said. 'You knew that there was going to be a second swipe by the governor,' Micciche said. If the Legislature stays on the sidelines, that would leave legal action as the only recourse for Alaskans seeking a quick reversal of the governor's action. Any legal argument is expected to revolve around the question of whether or not the governor's veto violates the Alaska Constitution's education clause. 'The Alaska Constitution clearly states that the legislators shall, by general law, establish and maintain a system of public schools open to all children of the state, so that language creates a constitutional obligation to provide adequate and equitable public education,' said Grady-Wyche. 'If the state fails to meet this obligation by consistently underfunding schools, closing essential programs and/or making access inequitable across regions, it can be legally challenged in court,' she said. Storm, of the Coalition for Education Equity, has been watching the governor and Legislature closely for years and talking with other education groups in the meantime. The coalition is a nonprofit that has successfully sued to increase state school funding in the past. Storm said she sees a national pattern at work, with conservative and limited-government groups and officials attempting to favor charter schools over traditional public schools. 'This is a coordinated attack on public education as a whole, as part of a national trend, or as Project 2025 — one hundred percent — and parents need to really start thinking about what's going to happen when public education goes away, and what that means for their kid, because it's not going to be pretty,' she said. Storm wasn't in the news conference with municipal officials, who focused on the local consequences of funding — or not — public education. Micciche, who said he's 'not a courtroom guy,' cautioned that any lawsuit comes with risks: What happens if the plaintiffs lose? 'You can get a ruling; it doesn't necessarily mean that you're going to get an outcome,' he said. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tennessee Republican pushes roadway blockade protest bill ahead of ‘No King' demonstrations
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) — 'No King' protests are set to take place across the country, but in Tennessee, Republican lawmakers have tightened the reins, and they're asking demonstrators to obey the laws. The Republican supermajority has passed multiple measures related to protests, they say, to protect the public. 'I wouldn't classify it as trying to prevent protests and demonstrations,' Rep. Jody Barrett (R-Dickson) said. 'I would classify it as a public safety measure to try to prevent innocent bystanders from being caught up and put in danger as a result of these demonstrations.' 'This is not a monarchy': Nashville protest targets Trump, military parade For the last couple of years, Rep. Barrett has sponsored a bill to make intentionally blocking a roadway, bridge, highway, or other passageway a felony in Tennessee. However, his bill, which has a $241,000 fiscal impact according to the proposal's fiscal note, has yet to be included in the state's budget. 'What we're seeing and have seen over the last several years is this trend of intentionally blocking highways and roads and bridges and things and having sit ins on passages ways to put regular, ordinary citizens, who are just trying to get back and forth to work, or go to the airport, or deliver their load on time, or worse, get to the hospital, getting caught up in these demonstrations that are organized,' Rep. Barrett said. Intentionally blocking a passageway remains a misdemeanor in Tennessee, but people who are harmed, hurt, or otherwise negatively impacted as a result can sue the individuals responsible under a law, also sponsored by Barrett, that went into effect last year. 'If you're unable to get to the hospital and you have damages as a result of that, or you have contractual damages because you can't get your load to the delivery point on time, that bill, this new law would give you the right to sue those people that caused that, who intentionally blocked your access and your use of the passageways in this state,' Barrett said. Democrats called the measure 'harmful' and 'anti-democratic,' but Barrett argues that intentionally blocking the public from getting to their destination has a much greater negative impact. 'When you get these mass protests going and things get out of hand, innocent people get put in danger and they get hurt,' Rep. Barrett said. 'Not only do we have property damage, but we have physical injuries as a result of it, and we need to stop that and make sure that's not the case in Tennessee.' Barrett told News 2 he hopes his bill to make intentionally blocking a roadway a felony is included in next year's budget. ⏩ This year, Gov. Bill Lee signed the 'Protecting Everyone Against Crime and Extremism,' or 'PEACE Act,' into law, which criminalizes giving a fake identity to police, intentionally coming within 25 feet of an officer after being asked to back up, and hanging a banner or flyer on a bridge or overpass, among other provisions. The measure will go into effect July 1. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lawsuits filed after drastic changes to initiative petition process
OKLAHOMA CITY (KFOR) – Two lawsuits were filed after drastic changes were made by lawmakers to the initiative petition process in Oklahoma. 'I think they took the idea of direct democracy away from everyday rural Oklahomans, and it offended me,' said Craig McVay, a rural Oklahoma voter. McVay is listed as a plaintiff in one of the lawsuits. He is one of many who joined in on the lawsuit. Senate Bill 1027 went into effect at the end of the legislative session. It was authored by State Sen. David Bullard (R-Durant) and prevents more than 10% of required signatures from coming from Oklahoma or Tulsa counties. Stitt signs bill limiting Oklahomans' access to support ballot initiative petitions Meanwhile, each of the state's 75 other counties, most of which are rural, are capped at 4% of total signatures. The lawsuit was filed as McVay et al. v. Cockroft and Drummond and challenges SB 1027's constitutionality. Supporters of SB 1027 have long argued that the reason it was needed was to give rural Oklahomans more of a voice when it came to signature gathering. 'I've checked a box in every rural part of the state and have been a part of the process the entire time. Now I feel like the legislature just took a swipe at me, and I don't like that,' said McVay. 'I can't imagine having to try to defend this law. It, quite frankly, is indefensible,' said Amber England of Strategy 77. England has led the way for many initiative petitions over the years and fought at the Capitol when SB 1027 was being discussed by lawmakers. 'We hope the court acts quickly to throw this out so that there's no longer uncertainty,' said England. According to Strategy 77, key constitutional arguments in the lawsuit include: County-Based Signature Caps: Senate Bill 1027 limits how many signatures can be collected in each county, violating Article V, Section 2 of the Oklahoma Constitution and the Equal Protection Clause by creating arbitrary distinctions among voters. Gist Language Approval: The law gives the Secretary of State, an unelected, politically appointed position, unchecked authority to approve or reject petition summaries, violating the separation of powers and placing unconstitutional restraints on free speech. Circulation and Funding Restrictions: Senate Bill 1027 mandates circulation and funding restrictions that courts have repeatedly struck down as violations of the First Amendment. Special Laws and Unequal Treatment: The law singles out initiative and referendum proponents for restrictions not imposed on candidates, opponents, or other political campaigns. 'It takes away power from Oklahoma voters. And I hope that the court will understand that and see that for what it is,' said England. On that lawsuit, Attorney General Gentner Drummond and Secretary of State Josh Cockroft are listed. The other lawsuit filed was brought on by supporters of State Question 836. They said that they are challenging the retroactive application of Senate Bill 1027. In their press release, they said that SQ 836 would establish an open primary system in Oklahoma, allowing all voters, regardless of party, to vote in primary elections. The measure was filed in January of 2025 and is currently pending before the Oklahoma Supreme Court. News 4 reached out to the AG's office and the Secretary of State's Office Friday and have not heard back yet. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
