logo
DAVID MARCUS: Your social media feed is being hijacked to divide MAGA supporters

DAVID MARCUS: Your social media feed is being hijacked to divide MAGA supporters

Fox News3 hours ago

As our society buries itself deeper and deeper into the cave of social media, we are seeing a growing divide between what happens in our real world and what we see on platforms like X and TikTok.
A bombshell new report from the National Contagion Research Institute shows much of this is being directed by our foreign enemies. It also shows one of their top goals is to infiltrate and divide the MAGA movement.
According to NCRI, Russia and Iran have been employing tens of thousands of bots to inject extreme rhetoric into American social media discourse, and perhaps more importantly, to artificially inflate the influence of content creators who push radical and divisive agendas.
To quote one NCRI analyst, "If you talk to Republicans right now, more than 80% of them support the war against Iran. But if you go on Twitter [X] you get the sense that there is a civil war raging."
This manipulation of social media by our enemies is far more insidious than most Americans realize, so let's walk through how this kind of information operation, the technical name for propaganda, works.
Imagine, for example, that there was an obscure comedian, or Instagram model who began to "just ask questions," about why Jews run everything, or why black people commit crimes.
Even better, they might post about how they aren't allowed to ask these very questions and insinuate that neither are you.
At this point, according to the report, Russian and Iranian bot armies will begin to follow these radical accounts, massively pumping up their numbers. It will like and share the most divisive content, and work behind the scenes to make this person famous.
On platforms that monetize interaction, this can mean very large payouts for creators, as spy bots mindlessly watch their videos over and over, and the beauty of it is that the content creator never even has to know they are getting paid off.
When we talk about influencers being bought and paid for by foreign foes, it may not mean a duffle bag full of cash in a bus station locker, simply by using thousands of bots to juice the numbers, the social media companies themselves facilitate the payouts.
Perhaps the most obvious way we can see this malign foreign influence online is in the incredible amount of casual racism and antisemitism, supposedly being posted by Americans, that we see on X.
These hate posts range from straight-up Nazi apologism, to memes about fatherless black homes, or weird eugenics IQ graphs, and if their prevalence in the algorithm accurately reflects the level of racism in America, then this is a deeply racist country.
Only it isn't. Because X does not accurately reflect our society, instead countries that despise America are infusing hate into the platform and propping up the handful of real people willing to push racism and division.
What the Russian and Iranian bot farms hope we will believe is that America is full of secret racists who will only say their true beliefs through their anonymous personas, but this is absurd, America knows IRL, that that kind of racism is buried in our past.
The question becomes, what can we do to fight back against this massive information operation aimed at our minds?
Liberals have long taken the exact wrong approach, which is to try to protect the end user from malicious content. This always adds up to censorship, one way or the other.
The better approach, at least as far as the government is concerned, is to target the bot farms and countries that back them. This can be done through cyberattacks, sanctions, any number of measures.
There is also a role for the social media industry to play here. We are hearing growing calls for X to use a flag to identify the country of origin of its accounts. This would immediately help users see through the foreign operations.
The silver lining in all of this, as the report shows, is that making the leap from influence on a social media screen to influence in the real world is not as easy as we might have once imagined.
These foreign-backed influencers have few outlets they can go to off of social media. Sure, Piers Morgan may put on anyone with 250k followers no matter how awful they are, but Main Street America isn't seeing it.
As a free society, America is by definition vulnerable to informational attacks, and as citizens in that free society all of us bear a responsibility to process the unfettered flow of information we have access to in responsible ways.
Make no mistake, your social media feed is under direct foreign attack. So far, the attacks haven't done too much damage, but keeping it that way, first and foremost, starts with all of us.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Deep divisions in NYC over Israel and Gaza prove thorny political ground for Cuomo, Mamdani
Deep divisions in NYC over Israel and Gaza prove thorny political ground for Cuomo, Mamdani

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Deep divisions in NYC over Israel and Gaza prove thorny political ground for Cuomo, Mamdani

Zohran Mamdani stepped into a simmering political quagmire earlier this week when he was asked on a podcast about a term seen as deeply offensive by many Jews — the word 'intifada.' Mamdani explained during the interview with The Bulwark Tuesday that pro-Palestine protest chants like 'globalize the intifada,' to him signify a call for Palestinian human rights. He noted the word has been used by the U.S. Holocaust Museum when translating into Arabic the history of a Jewish uprising against the Nazis. It might seem a perplexing position: For decades, anyone with hopes of leading New York City, which has the largest Jewish population outside of Israel, has seen strong support of Israel as a given. But the ground has shifted in the wake of the Oct. 7 terror attacks by Hamas and Israel's subsequent military campaign in Gaza, particularly among younger voters. New York is sharply divided on the issue. The Democratic primary comes as antisemitic hate crimes have surged in New York City, outrage runs high over the killings of Palestinians in Gaza and the Trump administration is pulling funding from universities, claiming antisemitism concerns. Cuomo struck back at Mamdani on Wednesday, slamming him for saying the word intifada was 'subject to interpretation,' and the former governor has continued to hammer the issue. 'At a time when we are seeing antisemitism on the rise and in fact witnessing once again violence against Jews resulting in their deaths in Washington D.C. or their burning in Denver – we know all too well that words matter. 'They fuel hate,' Cuomo said in a statement. 'They fuel murder.' Mamdani, who would be the city's first Muslim mayor and was born in Uganda, said Wednesday that he feels 'an obligation to speak out against violence and against bad faith or misinformed efforts to manipulate language in ways that only contribute to the division we're seeking to overcome.' He's also spoken out about death threats amid an NYPD hate crimes investigation into allegations that a man threatened to blow up his car. Amid the deep division and latest flare up, though, more classic local issues such as political experience and the affordability of living in the city have by and large received more air time from candidates than the conflict in the Middle East. Cuomo has generally focused more on Mamdani's age and relative lack of experience. Meanwhile Mamdani has aimed his attacks on Cuomo's donor base for overlap with Trump supporters and slammed the ex-governor as part of a broken political machine that care little about working New Yorkers. The divisions over Israel and Gaza are unquestionably intense. The conflict has emerged as a classic wedge issue with the potential to drive turnout among the candidates' respective bases. At the same time, New Yorkers largely have such deeply held and sharply divided opinions on the question that it is tough for candidates to change minds. 'You can't win on Israel anymore,' said Hank Sheinkopf, a longtime pro-Israel Democratic strategist, who firm has done consulting work for a PAC in opposition to Mamdani. 'But you can win on experience, and you can win on policies that don't stand.' Over the last 18 months, large demonstrations on both sides of the issue have gripped New York. Hate crimes have surged. Support for Palestine has been particularly strong among younger, more progressive voters. Many establishment Democrats continue to voice strong support for Israel, including Reps. Chuck Schumer and Ritchie Torres in Washington, D.C., as well as Cuomo and Mayor Adams locally. Mamdani has taken a different approach. He has voiced strong support for the Palestinians in Gaza and sharp criticism of Israel's military efforts. He has used the term 'genocide' to describe Israel's actions — a term many find offensive. That approach comes amid a changing political landscape. A national Quinnipiac poll released last week found that an all-time high percentage of voters expressed that their sympathies lay more with Palestinians than Israelis, with 37% saying they supported Israelis more and 32% saying Palestinians. Among Democrats, just 12% said their sympathies lay with Israelis, with 60% saying they sided with Palestinians. Locally, a recent Emerson poll found that 46% of poll takers did not think it was important that the next mayor have a pro-Israel stance, compared to 33% who believed it important they do. Polls show a tightening race between the frontrunner Cuomo and Mamdani with just days before voting closes. Other candidates, including Comptroller Brad Lander, who's consistently polling in third and is seeing a boost in momentum following his arrest, are looking to break in amid high voter turnout. Over 212,00 have already cast their ballots in early voting as of Friday morning. In the final days, a super PAC backing Cuomo is sending mailers, airing TV advertisements and expanding their ground game, criticizing Mamdani's proposal to raise taxes on the wealthiest city residents to fund free buses and childcare. Mamdani, for his part, is painting Cuomo as part of the same old political establishment that has ignored the concerns of working people for years. Israel and Gaza are unquestionably critical to many voters, but that doesn't mean that — at this point in the game — they provide the best opportunity for candidates to win over undecided voters or flip those who've already made a decision, experts say. Bread and butter issues like affordability, housing and public safety will likely take take center stage in this race as Election Day nears, Democratic strategist Trip Yang told the Daily News. 'Certain communities and certain constituencies and certain activists certainly care about this a lot,' he said, 'but it's not the main factor citywide.' With Chris Sommerfeldt

Supreme Court Upholds Law Allowing Americans to Seek Damages From Palestinian Authorities
Supreme Court Upholds Law Allowing Americans to Seek Damages From Palestinian Authorities

Wall Street Journal

time35 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Supreme Court Upholds Law Allowing Americans to Seek Damages From Palestinian Authorities

The Supreme Court on Friday ruled that American citizens injured during terrorist attacks, and the survivors of those who were killed, could bring lawsuits seeking monetary damages from Palestinian authorities in U.S. courts. In a unanimous decision, the court said a 2019 law meant to facilitate lawsuits against the Palestinian Authority and Palestine Liberation Organization, two political entities representing the Palestinian people, didn't violate the Constitution.

Inside the Situation Room, where Trump and his national security team are weighing next steps on Iran
Inside the Situation Room, where Trump and his national security team are weighing next steps on Iran

Fox News

time38 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Inside the Situation Room, where Trump and his national security team are weighing next steps on Iran

President Donald Trump has reported to the West Wing's Situation Room multiple times in recent days as the conflict in Iran comes to a rolling boil and the U.S. considers launching its own attacks on the Islamic Republic over mounting concerns it could produce a nuclear weapon in a short span of time. "Yes, I may do it. I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do. I can tell you this that Iran's got a lot of trouble, and they want to negotiate," Trump told reporters Wednesday on the U.S. potentially striking Iran as it continues trading deadly strikes with Israel. "And I said, why didn't you negotiate with me before all this death and destruction? Why didn't you go? I said to people, why didn't you negotiate with me two weeks ago? You could have done fine. You would have had a country. It's very sad to watch this." Fox News Digital spoke to previous presidential administration officials — Fox News host and former Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany, who served under the first Trump administration, and former National Security Advisor under the first Trump administration John Bolton, who also served as ambassador to the U.N. under President George W. Bush's administration. They both conveyed the serious and historic tone the room and its meetings typically hold. The Situation Room is a high-tech 5,000-square-foot complex in the West Wing of the White House that includes multiple conference rooms. President John F. Kennedy commissioned the complex in 1961 following the failed Bay of Pigs invasion to overthrow the Castro regime in Cuba that same year, according to the National Archives. The complex was built in order to provide future presidents a dedicated area for crisis management, and was revamped in 2006 and renovated again in 2023. "I often would sit there and think about the Osama bin Laden raid," McEnany told Fox News Digital in a phone interview Thursday morning. "This is where we saw our heroic Special Forces take out Osama bin Laden during the Obama administration. And I think we're at another point where similar decisions are being made, and even bigger decisions that may change the course of history are happening right now in that room." Trump again held a meeting in the Situation Room Thursday morning, when he received an intelligence briefing with national security advisers, which followed a Situation Room meeting on Wednesday afternoon, another meeting on Tuesday afternoon with national security advisers and a Monday evening meeting upon his abrupt return from the G7 summit in Canada this week. Top national security officials, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff, are among officials who have joined Trump in the meetings as the administration weighs the spiraling conflict. Bolton explained to Fox Digital in a Thursday morning phone interview that two types of top-level meetings are held in the Situation Room. The first is known as a "principals meeting," he said, which includes Cabinet secretaries, such as the secretary of state and secretary of defense, and is chaired by the national security advisor — a role currently filled by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. "The principals committee usually meets to try and get everything sorted out so that they know what decisions the president is going to be confronted with," Bolton said. "They try and make sure all the information is pulled together so we can make an informed decision, set out the options they see, what the pros and cons are, and then have (the president) briefed." The second type of Situation Room meeting at the top level are official National Security Council meetings, which the president chairs. "He chairs a full NSC meeting, and people review the information, update the situation, and the president can go back and forth with the advisors about asking questions, probing about the analysis, asking for more detail on something, kind of picking and choosing among the options, or suggesting new options," said Bolton, who served as Trump's national security advisor between April 2018 and September 2019. "And out of that could well come decisions," he added. McEnany served as the first Trump administration's top spokeswoman at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, when the Coronavirus Task Force operated out of the Situation Room as COVID-19 swept across the nation. "A lot of critical decisions were made during the pandemic," she said. "It's a humbling encounter. Every time you go in, you leave your phone at the door. You go in, I think it's like 5,000 square feet, you're sitting there, there's clocks up from every country around the world, the different time zones. And you're just sitting there as critical decisions are made. And, in my case, it was regarding the pandemic, and there's back and forth, there's deliberation, and these decisions are made with the president there, obviously." She continued that during the pandemic, the task force would spend hours in the Situation Room on a daily basis as the team fielded an onslaught of updates from across the country. Trump frequently received the top lines from the meetings and joined the Situation Room during key decisions amid the spread of the virus. "When he was in there, absolutely, there's a deference," she said, referring to how the tone of the room would change upon Trump's arrival. "Yet, you had key officials who spoke up, who were not afraid to give their point of view to him. But I think there's a recognition he's the commander in chief." Press secretaries typically do not attend high-profile National Security Council meetings in the Situation Room, but have security clearances and can call into the room if needed, and are given updates from senior officials. McEnany added that press secretaries wouldn't typically want to be in the room for high-stakes talks because "you don't want your head filled with these sensitive deliberations of classified information" when speaking with the media. Bolton explained that for an issue such as Iran, the Situation Room meetings are likely restrictive and include top national security officials, such as the secretary of defense, director of national intelligence and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. "Sometimes it includes many more people, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Commerce Secretary, things like that," he said. "But in with this kind of decision, it could be very restrictive, so maybe just – well, there is no national security advisor – but, Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, Director of National Intelligence, CIA Director, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, maybe the attorney general." Trump's first national security advisor under the second administration, Mike Waltz, was removed from the role and nominated as the next U.S. ambassador to the UN in May, with Rubio taking on the additional role. The White House has also slashed NSC staffing since Trump took office, including after Rubio took the helm. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt held a press conference on Thursday — the first since Israel launched preemptive strikes on Iran June 12 — and said the next two weeks will be a critical time period as U.S. officials map out next steps. "I have a message directly from the president, and I quote: 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future. I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.' That's a quote directly from the president," she said Thursday. Israel launched pre-emptive strikes on Iran June 12 after months of attempted and stalled nuclear negotiations and subsequent heightened concern that Iran was advancing its nuclear program. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared soon afterward that the strikes were necessary to "roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival." He added that if Israel had not acted, "Iran could produce a nuclear weapon in a very short time." Dubbed "Operation Rising Lion," the strikes targeted Iran's nuclear and missile infrastructure and killed a handful of senior Iranian military leaders. Trump repeatedly has urged Iran to make a deal on its nuclear program, but the country pulled out of ongoing talks with the U.S. scheduled for Sunday in Oman. "Iran should have signed the 'deal' I told them to sign," Trump posted to Truth Social Monday evening, when he abruptly left an ongoing G7 summit in Canada to better focus on the Israel–Iran conflict. "What a shame, and waste of human life. Simply stated, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON. I said it over and over again! Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!" Leavitt added during Thursday's briefing that Trump is the "peacemaker-in-chief," while noting that he is also not one to shy from flexing America's strength. "The president is always interested in a diplomatic solution to the problems in the global conflicts in this world. Again, he is a peacemaker in chief. He is the peace-through-strength president. And so, if there's a chance for diplomacy, the president's always going to grab it. But he's not afraid to use strength as well," she said. Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for additional comment on the high-level talks but did not immediately receive a reply.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store