Trump-appointed judge cleared of wrongdoing over Columbia law clerk boycott
April 9 (Reuters) - A federal judicial panel has dismissed a misconduct complaint against one of the 13 judges who last year signed a letter announcing they would boycott hiring law clerks from Columbia University in response to its handling of pro-Palestinian student demonstrations on its campus over Israel's war in Gaza.
The 7th Circuit Judicial Council ruled in Judge Stephen Vaden's favor on Tuesday, the same day the U.S. Court of International Trade judge went before a U.S. Senate panel for a hearing on his nomination by Republican President Donald Trump to serve as deputy secretary of agriculture.
The judicial council said that jurists like Vaden, who Trump appointed to the court in his first term, have "wide discretion" to establish their own screening and selection criteria for law clerks.
That latitude means a judge may refuse to hire law clerks from law schools or universities that in their judgment fail to foster "civility in discourse, respect for freedom of speech, and viewpoint nondiscrimination," the council said.
"Accordingly, the law-clerk hiring boycott is neither inconsistent with the integrity of the judicial office nor likely to diminish public confidence in the judiciary," the council held in a decision signed by Chief U.S. Circuit Judge Diane Sykes.
The ruling in favor of Vaden came after judicial misconduct complaints were dismissed against 11 of the other conservative judges who signed the May letter to Columbia.
Those misconduct complaints were all reviewed by chief judges within the same region or courts as the judges at issue. But Chief U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Roberts transferred the complaint against Vaden from the Court of International Trade to the 7th Circuit under a rule designed to avoid local conflicts.
Vaden was represented by the Christian conservative legal organization First Liberty Institute and Lisa Blatt, a prominent U.S. Supreme Court advocate at Williams & Connolly. Vaden and Blatt did not respond to requests for comment.
Vaden, along with 12 other judges who were all Trump appointees, in their letter, opens new tab called Columbia an "incubator of bigotry" and argued for "serious consequences" for anyone who participated in the campus demonstrations that roiled Columbia's campus in the spring.
They said Columbia had "become ground zero for the explosion of student disruptions, antisemitism, and hatred for diverse viewpoints on campuses across the nation" and had "disqualified itself from educating the future leaders of our country."
As a result, the judges said they would not hire anyone who attended Columbia as an undergraduate or law student, beginning with students who began their studies at the university in fall 2023.
The letter's other signatories included U.S. Circuit Judges James Ho of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and Elizabeth Branch of the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, who participated in similar boycotts of clerks from Yale and Stanford over disruptions of conservative speakers on their campuses.
The misconduct complaint against Vaden was filed in June by an unnamed person who, according to Tuesday's ruling, has been convicted of arson, terrorism and other crimes stemming from his role in firebombing and vandalizing Jewish houses of worship.
The complainant alleged that Vaden violated judicial ethics rules by engaging in partisan political activity and extrajudicial conduct that was likely to cause a lowering of public confidence in the courts.
He said Vaden had disqualified himself from any cases involving members of the Columbia community and should be removed from office.
US judge boycotting Columbia law clerks won't recuse from protest case
US judges cleared of misconduct over Columbia clerk hiring boycott
US judiciary to consider new ethical guidance for law clerk hiring
Group urges US judiciary to halt conservative judges' clerk boycotts
US law clerks in rare anonymous statement decry 'genocide' in Gaza
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
13 minutes ago
- Sky News
Israel-Iran live: Eight killed in Israel as Iron Dome breached; Iran threatens to leave key nuclear treaty
Iran and Israel have exchanged attacks for a fourth night, with Iranian rockets killing at least eight in central Israel and explosions reported in Tehran. Iran's intelligence chief has been reported dead. Follow the latest here and listen to Trump 100 as you scroll.
Spectator
20 minutes ago
- Spectator
Will Trump respond to Iran damaging the US embassy?
The US embassy in Tel Aviv has been damaged by an Iranian ballistic missile attack which landed close by, raising the prospect of President Trump retaliating against Tehran. The overnight incident, during a barrage of Iranian missiles fired at Tel Aviv and the port city of Haifa, came after Trump warned the US would attack Iran with its 'full force' if any American assets were targeted. The prospect of a military response to the overnight damage to the American embassy building is possible but unlikely It seemed the building was not directly targeted but the blast from the missiles caused minor damage at the branch office building. Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, confirmed the damage overnight but said no one had been hurt. 'Some minor damage from concussions of Iranian missile hits near the embassy branch in Tel Aviv but no injuries to US personnel,' he said in a post on X. He said the embassy in Jerusalem and the offices in Tel Aviv would remain closed. In his warning to Tehran, Trump had said: 'If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the US armed forces will come down on you at levels never seen before.' Since Israel's attacks on Iran's nuclear plants and air defence systems, codenamed Operation Rising Lion, began on 13 June, Trump has made it clear that the US is not involved, although a report by Reuters claimed that the American president had vetoed an Israeli plan to assassinate Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. 'Have the Iranians killed an American yet? No. Until they do we're not even talking about going after the political leadership,' a senior US official told Reuters. Washington's hesitation to participate in the latest round of Israeli raids on Iran suggests that minor, indirect damage to the embassy building in Tel Aviv will not provoke Trump into retaliating against Tehran. Yet it could persuade the US president to mount a full-scale defence of Israel, using warships in the Red Sea and Mediterranean and Patriot missile batteries located in the Middle East to help Israel shoot down the ballistic missiles and drones targeting Israeli cities. Israel's Iron Dome and Arrow 2 and 3 anti-missile systems have successfully shot down a large percentage of Iran's missiles and drones. However, dozens have breached the missile shield, leading to multiple casualties. When the tit-for-tat missile strikes erupted between Israel and Iran in April, the US, Britain, France and Jordan stepped in to support Israel with anti-missile defences. This time, it has not been made clear how much support has been provided. US European Command moved two destroyers with anti-missile systems to the Eastern Mediterranean last week which may already have played a role in intercepting Iranian missiles. The UK also sent additional fighter jets and air refuelling tankers to the Middle East. Trump's response to the damage caused to the US embassy building in Tel Aviv is likely to be measured by the desire not to escalate an already dangerous confrontation between Israel and Iran. During his first term in office in June 2019, he approved plans to strike Iran after the Iranians shot down a long-range US Air Force Global Hawk surveillance drone. Bombers were on their way to hit selected targets when the president changed his mind and the raid was called off. Later, Trump explained that no Americans had been hurt and retaliatory strikes which could have led to Iranian deaths, were, therefore, disproportionate. Now, in his second term, and following his warning to Iran, the prospect of a military response to the overnight damage to the American embassy is possible but unlikely. The calm statement from Ambassador Mike Huckabee suggests the response will be more cautious.
Times
23 minutes ago
- Times
The West should tighten the screws on Iran
Smoke billows from central Tehran on a third day of exchanging missile fire with Israel ATTA KENARE/AFP/GETTY IMAGES I ran's extremist, repressive and paranoid regime faces its greatest challenge since the overthrow of the Shah almost half a century ago. Israel has already inflicted devastating blows on Iran's desperate attempts to manufacture nuclear weapons. With precision targeting, comprehensive intelligence and a humiliating ability to use military facilities clandestinely set up inside the country, Israel has destroyed Iran's malign intention to string along international efforts to limit its nuclear research — to deceive not only President Trump and atomic weapons inspectors but all those urging a negotiated deal. Iran came within weeks of success: Israel will now continue its attacks until not only the underground bunkers are destroyed but so too are the morale and credibility of the Islamists holding Iran in thrall. It is the Iranian people who have suffered: not only from the inevitable casualties of war but from years of repression, mismanagement, penury and state-sponsored misogyny. But hopes of promoting regime change may be misplaced. Military attacks tend to rally people around the authorities, however despised. Nevertheless, Ayatollah Khamenei's defiance may be as hollow as it is blind. He has miscalculated badly. He had a last chance to save lives and face with Mr Trump's proposal for a new deal. But his sole aim is to preserve his power and the rule of Islamism. He knew any concession limiting his chance to make a bomb would wreck Iran's fast-fading power and influence and endanger the Islamists' domestic stranglehold. Already, the outposts are gone: Hezbollah and Hamas have been decapitated, the Assad regime has fled Syria and the Houthis are almost a spent force in distant Yemen. • Britons desperately try to leave Israel as Iran's missiles fall The danger of escalation remains, however. It will not come from Iran's Arab neighbours, which quietly share hopes for an end to the Islamic republic and have so far shown commendable pragmatism in their response. It will come from a desperate Iranian attempt at terrorist revenge. Islamists across the West and those suborned to sow death among civilians will be primed to attack towns, people and prestige targets. Leaders meeting today at the G7 summit should understand that 'de-escalation' does not mean futile calls for restraint and emollient words for Tehran. It means a readiness to confront the likely Russian support for Iran, the stepping up of security across the West and active protection for Jews worldwide. Israel has already paid a price for going to war. Civilians have been killed by Iranian missiles getting through the Iron Dome defences: more may die. Binyamin Netanyahu, with the firm backing of hardliners in his cabinet, believes this is a price worth paying to end years of calls by Iran for the destruction of the Zionist state. He has also calculated that Mr Trump will stand by Israel, America's ally, militarily and politically, and that the focus will shift from the growing rift with Washington and Europe over Gaza. This puts Sir Keir Starmer on the spot. He wants to play the even-handed statesman, as much to promote a ceasefire in Gaza as to appease angry Muslim voters. But Britain carries no weight at all in Israel. Its support for the International Criminal Court's arrest warrant for Mr Netanyahu, its embargo of some arms for Israel and the recent sanctioning of two Israeli cabinet ministers have provoked only a contemptuous response from the Netanyahu cabinet. That, in turn, does not help Sir Keir to influence the course taken by the only ally who matters to Israel: Mr Trump. • Israel knows what we won't accept: the mullahs want nuclear war Talk of moral equivalence between Iran and Israel is ill-judged. The intention to make and probably use a nuclear bomb is a threat not only to the region but to world peace. Israel knows it must avoid civilian casualties; Iran wants maximum destruction rained down. The G7 needs a robust response. Nothing should appease Tehran.
