Revoke F-1 visa, then terminate student record under US plan, claim experts
Amid a wider crackdown on immigration, the Trump administration in the United States is expanding how international students, including Indians, can be stripped of their legal status to stay and study in the country.
Lawyers representing affected students said the new policy allows for quicker deportations and seeks to justify earlier actions that cancelled thousands of foreign students' permission to remain in the US.
Students whose visas are revoked now lose their right to continue studies or employment. Previously, a student could remain in the country even if their visa was cancelled, as long as they did not leave and try to re-enter.
"Looks like US Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Department of State have devised a plan to deport any F-1 student with no process. DOS revokes the F-1 visa for any or no reason at all, and then ICE terminates SEVIS and/or puts the student in removal for the visa revocation," Brad Banias, an immigration lawyer representing students shared on social media.
Court filings shed light on new policies
The changes came to light during lawsuits filed by students who had their legal status suddenly cancelled in recent weeks, often without explanation. Judges in several cases made preliminary rulings that the government had acted without due process.
Following pressure in court, the government said it would issue new guidelines for cancelling student status. A court filing on Monday included a document from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) outlining that valid reasons now include the revocation of a student's visa.
'This just gave them carte blanche to have the State Department revoke a visa and then deport those students, even if they've done nothing wrong,' Banias.
Banias said the guidelines vastly expand ICE's authority beyond earlier policies, which did not list visa revocation as a reason to terminate a student's legal permission.
"The ICE's new 'policy' regarding SEVIS termination goes well outside of its regulatory and statutory authority and violates decades of policy by DOS", he shared on X.
Charles Kuck, an immigration lawyer based in Atlanta, added that the new guidance allows ICE to cancel a student's status if their name appears in a criminal or fingerprint database, regardless of conviction or charges.
Thousands of international students targeted
The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) said ICE had terminated SEVIS records for as many as 4,736 international students since January 20, 2025, with Indians making up the majority. Students from China, Nepal, South Korea and Bangladesh were also affected.
SEVIS (Student and Exchange Visitor Information System) is an online database schools use to update the government on the legal status of international students. Termination of a SEVIS record results in immediate loss of legal status to study or work under the Optional Practical Training (OPT) programme.
A common thread among many targeted students was some past contact with law enforcement. This included traffic tickets or university disciplinary violations. In several cases, charges had been dropped and no criminal record remained.
How students were labelled as criminals
Court filings and hearing discussions revealed that Homeland Security officials had cross-checked student visa holders against the National Crime Information Center (NCIC), a database managed by the FBI.
The NCIC contains information not only on those convicted but also on suspects, missing persons and individuals arrested but never charged.
Government officials admitted in court they had not applied the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty' and had launched the mass cancellations without individual case reviews.
About 6,400 students were flagged through this search, US District Judge Ana Reyes said during a hearing.
In the past month, foreign students across the US were alarmed to discover that their SEVIS records had been deleted, leading some to hide or leave the country.
Federal government reverses course under court pressure
Facing growing legal challenges, federal officials announced on Friday that international students' legal status would be restored while a new policy framework is developed.
In a court filing on Monday, the government shared a document outlining the new policy, including the revocation of entry visas as grounds for cancelling student status.
'This just gave them carte blanche to have the State Department revoke a visa and then deport those students even if they've done nothing wrong,' said Banias.
A lawyer for the government later told a federal court in Oakland, California, that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) would reinstate SEVIS records.
'ICE is developing a policy that will provide a framework for SEVIS record terminations. Until such a policy is issued, the SEVIS records for plaintiff(s) in this case (and other similarly situated plaintiffs) will remain Active or shall be re-activated if not currently active and ICE will not modify the record solely based on the NCIC finding that resulted in the recent SEVIS record termination,' the government's statement read.
Brian Green, a lawyer representing one of the students, said the government confirmed the temporary protections would apply to all students in similar circumstances, not only those involved in lawsuits.
Many students unaware they were being investigated
Students whose visas were revoked or legal status cancelled said they were often unaware of any wrongdoing. Many had only minor infractions, such as traffic violations, while others were completely unaware of why they were targeted.
In the case of Akshar Patel, an international student studying information systems in Texas, Homeland Security officials admitted in court filings that Patel had been pulled over and charged with reckless driving in 2018, but the charge was later dropped. Nevertheless, Patel's name was included among 734 students listed for SEVIS termination.
Within 24 hours of receiving a spreadsheet identifying these students, a Homeland Security official ordered their SEVIS records to be terminated.
Judge Reyes criticised the government's rapid action, saying, 'All of this could have been avoided if someone had taken a beat.' She described the process as demonstrating 'an utter lack of concern for individuals who have come into this country.'
Many colleges, unaware of the sudden terminations, told students to stop attending classes or employment, leaving them vulnerable to deportation.
Government lawyers insisted in court that database changes were merely an 'investigative red flag' and did not automatically strip students of legal status.
'Mr Patel is lawfully present in the US,' said Andre Watson of the Department of Homeland Security. 'He is not subject to immediate detention or removal.'
Reyes declined to issue a preliminary injunction but encouraged lawyers for both sides to settle the matter to allow Patel to continue studying.
Temporary reinstatements ordered in Georgia court
Last week, a federal judge in Georgia issued Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs) requiring the reinstatement of SEVIS records for 133 students, including many Indians. These students, holders of F-1 and M-1 visas, alleged their records had been closed despite no criminal convictions.
The sudden terminations had caused widespread confusion and fear among international students, many of whom did not realise they were under investigation.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
23 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Can Donald Trump call for Gov Newsom's arrest over LA riots? Here's what the law says
President Donald Trump on Monday suggested his border czar Tom Homan should arrest Gov Gavin Newsom amid riots in Los Angeles. 'I would do it … I think it would be a great thing,' Trump responded when asked if Homan should arrest the governor, who has challenged the administration's mobilization of National Guard in LA. Newsom, too, was quick to slam Trump. "The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America," he said on X, platform formerly known as Twitter. Read More: Los Angeles protests: 'Incendiary devices' hurled at police horses, says LAPD No, Trump cannot unilaterally arrest Gov Newsom over riots in Los Angeles. The US Constitution and legal system have clear checks and balances that prevent a former president—or even a sitting president—from directly arresting state officials without due process. Separation of Powers (Article II & III of the Constitution) The president does not have the judicial authority to issue warrants. Only law enforcement, backed by court orders, can detain someone. Any attempt to arrest Newsom without due process would violate the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, which guarantee fair legal procedures. State Sovereignty – Tenth Amendment Under the US system of federalism, states like California retain control over their own officials and law enforcement. The president cannot interfere in state governance unless federal law is violated and due process is followed. Read More: After tear gas and street fires, an Los Angeles community cleans up as National Guard troops arrive Military Limitations – The Posse Comitatus Act (18 US Code § 1385) This law forbids the use of the US military to carry out domestic law enforcement activities without explicit congressional authorization. Even in times of civil unrest, the president cannot use the military to detain or arrest state leaders like Newsom. No Legal Authority Post-Presidency As a former president, Trump has no legal powers—executive, military, or judicial. He cannot issue federal commands or make arrests.


Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- Indian Express
States sue US government over deal ending ban on triggers that make some rifles fire more rapidly
Sixteen states have sued the Trump administration over its plan to allow the sale of forced-reset triggers that make semiautomatic rifles fire more rapidly and return devices already seized to their owners. The suit announced Monday argues that returning the triggers would violate federal law, pose a threat to residents and law enforcement and worsen gun violence. It was filed in federal court in Maryland. There had been several legal battles over the devices, which replace the typical trigger on an AR-15-style rifle. The Biden administration had previously argued the triggers qualify as machine guns under federal law because constant finger pressure on the triggers will keep a rifle firing, essentially creating an illegal machine gun. Rare Breed Triggers, the maker of the devices, had argued that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives was wrong in its classification and ignored demands to stop selling the triggers before being sued by the Biden administration. The Justice Department reached a deal announced last month with Rare Breed Triggers to allow the sale of forced-reset triggers with. The company was previously represented by David Warrington, Trump's current White House counsel. Under the settlement, Rare Breed Triggers agreed not to develop such devices to be used on handguns, according to the Justice Department. The settlement requires the ATF to return triggers that it had seized or that owners had voluntarily surrendered to the government. The states' lawsuit is being led by the attorneys general of Delaware, Maryland and New Jersey. Other states involved are Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, along with the District of Columbia. The attorneys general in those states are all Democrats, though the office in Hawaii is technically nonpartisan.


Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Menswear Guy' admits amid LA riots he's in US illegally, JD Vance responds with a GIF
JD Vance responds to popular fashion blogger Derek Guy who admitted that he is not in the US legally. Derek Guy, also known as Menswear Guy, who is well-known on X for his men's fashion tips and analysis, claimed on the social media platform that he came to the US from Canada as a child and never had any documentation. The long post detailing his family's migration from Canada to the US came as ICE raided several locations in Los Angeles arresting illegal aliens -- leading to riots. Social media users tagged Vice President JD Vance and alerted him about the illegal status of Deek Guy, to which the vice president responded with a GIF, suggesting that he would be deported. Derek Guy said there is a perception that millions of violent criminals are pouring across the border carrying drugs but not everyone falls in the same category. "My family escaped Vietnam after the Tet Offensive and went through an arduous journey that eventually landed them in Canada. My father worked there for a time as a janitor; my mother, a secretary. When work fell through, my dad was offered to work with his sister in the United States, so he went, as our family needed money. He ended up staying in the US longer than he was supposed to — not knowing immigration laws — and asked my mom to come be with him. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Good News: You May Be Richer Than You Think Undo Of course, she went and carried me over the border while I was still a baby," Derek Guy wrote. "I'm still unsure whether we technically broke an immigration law. The border between Canada and the United States was pretty porous (as it is today, for the most part). But either way, since I came here without legal documentation, I eventually fell into the category of being an undocumented immigrant. Yet, I've been in the United States since I was a baby. My identity and roots are very much based in this country, no different from anyone else. " The fashion blogger said there are millions of people like him living in the US whose parents might have crossed the border, not knowing about the law. "I think the ICE sweeps are inhumane. I support and admire the protestors who are putting their bodies on the line for non-violent resistance. Ultimately, I think we need to solve this issue on a systemic level. It's unreasonable to me to expect that the government will deport some 10-20 million people. Even deporting 1 million will cause an insane amount of chaos, not to mention an incredible amount of wasteful government spending," he wrote.