Players suing ATP, WTA, others: ‘Tennis is broken'
Players filed multiple lawsuits Tuesday against the ATP, WTA and other professional bodies, alleging that "tennis is broken" due to unfair business practices.
The Professional Tennis Players Association and 22 players are accusing the ATP, WTA, the International Tennis Federation and the International Tennis Integrity Agency of anticompetitive business practices, monopolizing pro tennis and systemic abuse.
"Tennis is broken," PTPA executive director Ahmad Nassar said in a statement. "Behind the glamorous veneer that the defendants promote, players are trapped in an unfair system that exploits their talent, suppresses their earnings, and jeopardizes their health and safety."
Twelve players are named as plaintiffs in a 162-page complaint filed in U.S. District Court in the Southern District of New York. They include PTPA co-founder Vasek Pospisil of Canada, Australia's Nick Kyrgios, Romania's Sorana Cirstea and American Reilly Opelka.
According to a copy of the civil complaint obtained by ESPN, the plaintiffs accuse those organizations of working as a "cartel" and colluding to reduce competition and limit prize money.
"At some point we just felt as if we didn't have another option," Pospisil told ESPN. "We didn't set out to create a player association to not affect major change. That's always been the goal from the beginning, and we have to really consider all strategies and avenues to eventually accomplish that goal."
Ten other plaintiffs are involved in lawsuits filed in the United Kingdom and European Union, including Americans Ingrid Neel and Christian Harrison and France's Corentin Moutet.
The civil complaint in the U.S. demands a jury trial. Nassar said the goals of the legal actions include creating a more optimized schedule, increasing revenue sharing for the players and placing a greater emphasis on players' concerns.
The ATP and WTA both issued statements Tuesday.
"We strongly reject the premise of the PTPA's claims, believe the case to be entirely without merit and will vigorously defend our position," the ATP said.
"The PTPA's action is both regrettable and misguided, and we will defend our position vigorously in due course," the WTA said.
--Field Level Media
Field Level Media 2025 - All Rights Reserved
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
An Israeli soldier was taken hostage on October 7. In ceasefire plea, his mother releases video of his brutal capture
The family of an Israeli soldier held hostage by Hamas has released new footage of the moment he was pulled from his tank and captured by Palestinian militants during the October 7 attacks. The video shows the soldier, Matan Angrest, surrounded by a dozen men atop the turret of an Israeli tank. The men, whose faces are blurred in the video, then lower Angrest, head first, off the tank into the arms of Palestinian militants, who barely catch him. It is unclear whether Angrest is conscious in the video. His body is limp and tumbles forward as he is tossed off the side of the tank. One man can be seen kicking Angrest before he is thrown off the tank. Another man below appears to slap Angrest as he falls to the floor. In an interview, Angrest's mother said she decided to publish the video because she fears that her son has been 'left behind' and wants the public to know that he is in a critical situation. 'I don't feel the commitment of the government for Matan as an Israeli soldier like I felt the commitment of Trump to American citizens – a big gap,' Anat Angrest said. 'If the government wants soldiers to still serve her, she has to worry about the soldiers and to bring them home like the other citizens.' While her husband saw the video months ago, she only watched it for the first time on Sunday night. 'For me as a mother, it's the hardest thing to watch – to know about my son. Every mother knows that her kid from the first cry of a baby, we are worried about our children,' Anat Angrest said. 'It's the hardest situation for me as a mother.' This is the latest attempt by Angrest's family to sound the alarm about his deteriorating medical condition in captivity. They say he is suffering from chronic asthma, has untreated burns and has suffered infections during his captivity, according to the testimony of hostages who were held with Angrest. Keith Siegel, the American-Israeli hostage who was released in February, told CNN last month that he was extremely concerned for Angrest's physical and mental wellbeing. The two were held together for more than two months. The video released Monday appears to have been recovered by the Israeli military from the belongings of Palestinian militants, according to the watermark on the video. Angrest said her family did not release the video for months at the urging of the Israeli military, but said she now feels she has no choice as the Israeli government pushes for yet another partial deal that would see about half the remaining hostages released. 'We were quiet about it for a year and a half, but we understood that our quiet is very comfortable to leave Matan behind,' she said. Angrest is one of 55 hostages still held by Hamas and one of 20 still believed to be alive, according to the Israeli government. As a male Israeli soldier, Angrest is believed to be at the bottom of the list of hostages to be released – considered a high-value hostage by Hamas and one for whom the Israeli government will likely have to pay a steep price. Anat Angrest believes her son's concerning medical condition should be taken into account and, like many of the hostage families, called for the release of all the hostages and an end of the war. Ceasefire and hostage deal negotiations between Israel and Hamas have sputtered along in recent weeks, yielding no agreement. A framework proposed by the US would see about half the living and deceased hostages released in exchange for a 60-day temporary ceasefire. Hamas has insisted on stronger guarantees from the US that negotiations to end the war will continue – and the fighting will not resume – after that temporary ceasefire expires. This is a developing story and will be updated.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What the National Guard Crackdown in LA Made Us See
I was wondering at what point the nation that elected President Donald Trump twice would reach a collective breaking point. Could a country that overwhelmingly voted for mass deportations ever feel a moral calling to defend immigrants again? What would it take? It turns out that a growing number of Americans, exemplified by the mass protests in Los Angeles, are slowly starting to see everything the Trump administration doesn't want them to see, as federal agents conduct mass ICE raids across the country: humans, not criminals, being taken away. Faced with ICE raids over the June 7 weekend, hundreds of community members descended upon Los Angeles' downtown, building on a long legacy of civil unrest. This moment of empathy is not only the antidote to dehumanization, but also has the potential to upend the very story that got Trump elected to begin with. After his victory and endless fearmongering, Trump counted on America to welcome his anti-immigrant agenda, underestimating Americans' own capacity to feel compassion for immigrants. Perhaps, Americans also underestimated themselves. Until now. The Trump administration will continue to do everything in its power to feed voters images that are meant to sustain the fear and xenophobia that mobilized millions to support Trump at the ballot box. Over the weekend, the administration deployed the National Guard to respond to L.A. protestors, a show of force intended to reinforce a narrative that subtly casts Trump as the patriotic savior protecting Americans from the unruly masses defending immigrant criminals. It's the classic 'us vs. them' playbook manifested in yet another sinister way, leading Trump to say this Sunday, 'We are not going to let this country be torn apart.' The only problem is that voters are increasingly seeing Trump as the perpetrator of that division. And once you see it, it's hard to look away. Over the last couple of weeks, our social media has been flooded with images of masked ICE agents wearing bulletproof vests snatching undocumented immigrants by traffic stops, inside courthouses, in their workplace, or in parking lots. It's part of the White House's mission to ramp up ICE operations, detain 3,000 migrants a day, and follow through on their campaign promise to protect Americans from the so-called 'migrant invasion.' Yet, as federal immigration agents roam through communities, ordinary bystanders rely on their own eyes—not the administration's manufactured photo-ops portraying migrants as 'gang members'—to judge the scenes. From Nashville to New York City to Phoenix, rolling cameras are capturing fathers kissing their daughters goodbye as they are escorted by agents; 12-year-old boys being left alone on sidewalks after ICE raids; busboys being handcuffed outside local restaurants; neighbors being slammed to the ground, shoved into cars and vanishing. The breaking point happens when ordinary Americans can suddenly see themselves and their loved ones—their kids, parents, coworkers or neighbors—reflected in those images. Read More: Gavin Newsom Says Trump 'Manufactured' Crisis in California, Announces Legal Challenge Over National Guard Order It's happened before. In 2012, hundreds and thousands of Dreamers put a human face to the children of immigrants as they held mass rallies across the nation, pressuring President Barack Obama to offer many of them relief from deportation. In them, millions of voters started to simply see 'American Dreamers.' In 2018, during the Trump administration's Zero Tolerance policy, the sight and sound of mothers being separated from their children at the southern border haunted American families. In migrant children, even midwestern mothers recognized the sound of their own kids. Today, those viral videos circulating online seem to have hit a new nerve in an America that is constantly searching for its moral compass. In rural Missouri, crowds gathered for Ming Li Hui, a beloved immigrant waitress from Hong Kong. In Worcester, a city in central Massachusetts, hundreds protested to demand 'ICE stop taking mothers.' In a small San Diego street corner, a group of neighbors clashed with ICE agents who had just raided a restaurant. From coast to coast, these small rallies culminated in the mass protests held in Los Angeles over this weekend, marking what feels like the beginning of a new national breaking point. Los Angeles, a majority-minority city with a significant undocumented population, has a unique history of protest. From the 1968 East Los Angeles student walkouts to the 1992 Rodney King Riots to the 2006 'Day Without Immigrants' protests, the city's streets have traditionally been used as a tool to push politicians, shape public discourse, and echo deep-seated anger towards social injustices. Several pundits believe the Trump administration is counting on the L.A. protests to escalate into the type of violence that lays the groundwork for further military force, once again propping Trump as the national strongman hero. At this point, it's unclear how the events will continue to unfold and whether or not Los Angeles will inspire other American cities to mass mobilize. But if history is any indication, then we should also wonder how long Americans will hold onto this moral outrage. Is the breaking point here to stay—or is it fleeting? My guess is that it may be here to stay. But for other reasons than we might think. ICE raids breaking apart immigrant families isn't just awakening a basic sense of humanity among ordinary citizens. It's also allowing many to see something even more profound within those images: the emergence of a militarized America that is starting to feel unrecognizable to the bystander. Because if you zoom into the deluge of rolling videos, it's not the immigrants who do not belong in the frame; it's those masked, armed agents glaring back at us. Maybe, all along, this was the real breaking point America needed. That subtle realization that American democracy is slipping away. It took immigrants to open our eyes. It's important that we not look away. Contact us at letters@
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former O.C. Supervisor Andrew Do headed to prison for COVID relief bribery scheme
Andrew Do, the former Orange County supervisor who took more than $550,000 in bribes over COVID-relief money meant to buy meals for needy, elderly constituents, was sentenced Monday to five years in federal prison. 'I just do not believe a sentence anything less than the maximum reflects the seriousness of the crime,' said U.S. District Judge James Selna. "Public corruption brings damage far beyond the monetary loss to the county." The judge expressed displeasure that the law allowed him to sentence Do to only five years. Do fled war-torn Vietnam with his family as a child to become an attorney and one of Southern California's most powerful Vietnamese American politicians. As part of a plea deal, Do admitted last year that he funneled more than $10 million in federal pandemic funds to a nonprofit that in turn steered money to his two daughters. The scandal was uncovered in 2023 by the news site LAist, which reported that Do approved contracts worth millions to the nonprofit, which promised to provide meals to the poor, elderly and disabled residents of Little Saigon but could show scant evidence of its effort. Do approved the contracts without disclosing that his 23-year-old daughter Rhiannon, a law student at UC Irvine, had signed documents identifying herself as the nonprofit's president or vice president. As accusations mounted, Do claimed he was the victim of slander, responding with defiant vitriol against the reporter who broke the story, Nick Gerda, and demanding his firing. When the Orange County Register called for Do's resignation, he accused the newspaper of spreading 'gross misinformation.' Late last year, however, Do agreed to resign from the Board of Supervisors and pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit bribery. Federal prosecutors said the Viet America Society gave Rhiannon a job, and paid her as an employee, after her father voted in favor of the lucrative contracts. Prosecutors also said the organization steered money to Do's other daughter through an air conditioning company. 'I'm very grateful that the judge saw the case for what it is,' said Janet Nguyen, the current First District Supervisor. 'He benefitted while people suffered. He took advantage during the pandemic, when no one was watching.' She said the county is conducting an audit to better understand how Do's scheme was allowed to occur. Prosecutors accused Rhiannon Do of making a false statement on a loan application, but agreed to defer the charge, allowing her to enter a diversion agreement in exchange for her cooperation. The elder Do, a Republican, worked as a deputy public defender and a prosecutor before he won a special election in 2015 to represent Orange County's 1st Supervisorial District, which covers Cypress, Fountain Valley, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, La Palma, Los Alamitos, Westminster and Seal Beach. He became the second Vietnamese American ever to serve on the board, and was later elected to two four-year terms. He was known for his efforts to combat homelessness and for his sponsorship of a Tet Festival in Fountain Valley that drew thousands of people annually. At a time when Vietnamese immigrants face increased threats of eviction and deportation, the disgraced supervisor's behavior 'erodes the already precarious level of trust our community has in the government,' said Mai Nguyen Do, the research and policy manager for the Harbor Institute for Immigrant and Economic Justice, a community group. 'After he's released, it wouldn't surprise me if he goes about his life, and meanwhile so many working-class people in the community don't have the resources to pick themselves up again after they're incarcerated,' said Do, who has no relation to the former supervisor. Jodi Balma, a professor of political science at Fullerton College who has followed the Do scandal, wondered how the bribery scheme somehow passed through the checkpoints of the county bureaucracy. 'There are really good and smart though somewhat annoying procedures in place to verify all contracts with the county,' Balma said. 'Somebody had to say, 'Approve that payment' without any receipts or verification or services. And those people have not been held responsible.' Balma also wondered whether it was fair that Rhiannon Do was allowed to enter a diversion program. 'If there is no punishment for his daughter, that feels unfair to all the other law students who might not be accepted to the California Bar Association because of misconduct,' Balma said. 'This is huge misconduct for someone who wants to be a lawyer.' Andrew Do's defense attorneys asked that he be sentenced to 33 months in prison. In a court filing, they said he had been volunteering at a maritime institute that teaches sailing to underprivileged teens, adding that the head of the program had praised Do's 'unwavering ethical compass.' The defense attorneys said that Do had expressed 'shame' and 'deep sorrow' for his crimes, that his license to practice law had been suspended and that his life has been 'destroyed by his own acts.' Do had 'received no actual payment to himself—all significant funds were provided to his daughter Rhiannon Do,' the defense wrote in a court motion, claiming he had been 'willfully blinded to the violations by the desire to see benefit to his adult daughter.… He now recognizes how completely wrong he was in this catastrophic self-delusion.' The plea deal called for restitution between $550,000 and $730,500, with the sale of the family's forfeited house in Tustin credited against that figure. 'This episode of poor judgment stands out as unique in his otherwise commendable life,' the defense wrote. 'He had a catastrophic lapse of judgment when he failed to stop payments to his daughters, and because VAS was helping his family, he failed to see the red flags of these illegal acts.' Pleading for leniency, defense attorneys invoked Do's backstory as a man who rose to public service after a childhood in war-ravaged Vietnam. But prosecutors said his background only amplified his guilt, considering many of the constituents he victimized had similarly difficult pasts, and he was aware of their vulnerability. Do 'made the decision to abandon the elderly, sick, and impoverished during a national emergency so that he could personally benefit,' prosecutors wrote. 'When the County and nation were at their most vulnerable, defendant saw an opportunity to exploit the chaos for his own benefit and, in so doing, betrayed the trust of hundreds of thousands of his constituents,' prosecutors wrote. 'The scheme was far-reaching and premeditated, and defendant had no qualms about pulling others into his criminal enterprise, including his own children.' Do's crimes, the prosecutors wrote, were 'an assault on the very legitimacy of government.' Calling his conduct 'despicable' and his attempt to minimize his crimes 'absurd,' prosecutors said that of the more than $10 million he steered to the Viet America Society , much of it supposedly for meal programs for the elderly and disabled, only $1.4 million went to that purpose. Do's willingness to involve his family in his scheme pointed to his 'moral indifference,' prosecutors said, while his campaign of invective against the press aggravated his culpability. In connection with the Do case, the U.S. Attorneys office announced charges last week of bribery against the founder of the Viet America Society, and for wire fraud against a man affiliated with another Orange County relief group. The judge ordered that Do surrender himself to federal custody by Aug. 15 and recommended he be incarcerated in the federal prison in Lompoc. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
