logo
Barbara Lee wins Oakland mayor's race

Barbara Lee wins Oakland mayor's race

Yahoo19-04-2025

Former Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) was projected to win a special election to become the next mayor of Oakland, according to Decision Desk HQ, in what became a closer-than-expected race amid growing voter dissatisfaction over the direction of the city.
Lee won the nonpartisan ranked-choice election over a field of more than a half dozen candidates, with the most prominent being former City Council member Loren Taylor, who was the runner-up to now-former Mayor Sheng Thao (D) in the 2022 mayoral race and emerged as this election's dark-horse contender.
Taylor had the initial lead after the first batch of votes were tallied Tuesday night with 48.2 percent of the vote, about 1,200 votes ahead of Lee, who had 45.7 percent.
But after more than 40,000 additional mail-in ballots yet to be counted were tallied and announced Friday, Lee went ahead of Taylor by about 5 points, or nearly 5,000 votes. That was just enough to win a majority in the initial round of vote counting before any additional rounds of tallying in the ranked choice system need to be conducted.
Oakland has been without a permanent mayor since November, when Thao was recalled from office in a first for the city with more than 60 percent of voters in favor of her ouster. She was elected narrowly in 2022 to become the first Hmong American woman to serve as mayor of a major American city, but tensions rose under her mayoralty as she faced scrutiny over her handling of crime and law enforcement and her personal conduct.
The crime rate spiked particularly high in Oakland during the COVID-19 pandemic and remained higher than most other cities in the years in which many Americans began to resume normal activities. Homicides remained high while robberies and burglaries experienced a sharp rise in 2023, the first year of Thao's administration.
Crime appeared to be dropping in 2024 ahead of the election, but Thao also faced backlash over poor relations with the police union and missing a deadline to apply for a grant that would have given the city millions to address retail theft.
A personal controversy also surrounded Thao after the FBI conducted a raid on her home in June, not commenting at the time on its purpose. Months after leaving office, Thao was indicted in January on bribery, conspiracy and mail and wire fraud charges, accusing her of conspiring with others to give business from the city to two businessmen in exchange for financial benefits.
Thao has pleaded not guilty and denied any wrongdoing.
Lee's victory was initially expected to be virtually ensured for the long-time former House member, who chose not to run for reelection last year for an unsuccessful bid for Senate, which she lost in the primary. She also had the endorsements of several notable local and state political figures, including interim Mayor Kevin Jenkins, former California Gov. Jerry Brown and former Mayors Libby Schaaf, Jean Quan and Elihu Harris.
Brown also previously served as Oakland mayor.
But the race became increasingly competitive as the election approached, with two polls commissioned by Taylor's campaign and a group supporting his campaign showing a tight race last month. Taylor also touted endorsements from some less high-profile but still influential figures, including San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan and former City Council President Pat Kernighan.
The race became a bit of a proxy battle of sorts within the Democratic Party with Lee as the long-time progressive leader and the choice of many establishment leaders and Taylor running on a more moderate platform and positioning himself as an outsider who would bring change to the city.
Lee's website states that her priorities as mayor will be a public safety plan to ensure residents feel safe, providing unhoused people with housing and mental health and addiction services and improving the city's ethics regulations.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FBI Deputy Director confirms Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide based on agency's files
FBI Deputy Director confirms Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide based on agency's files

Fox News

time21 minutes ago

  • Fox News

FBI Deputy Director confirms Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide based on agency's files

FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino said Thursday that there is nothing in the Jeffrey Epstein file indicated that he died by any other way than by suicide. Bongino updated Fox News host Sean Hannity on the investigation into the Epstein file as conspiracies continue to float that he was murdered in prison. "The evidence we have in our files clearly indicates that it was, in fact, a suicide. We do have video. It's not the greatest video in the world. I don't want to set expectations on fire," Bongino said. "However, the video does show in that specific block, that he goes in, made a phone call; you'll see 12 hours of guards going in basically check on him, come back. You'll see nobody really comes out of that bay in that area than him. There's no one in there. "There's nothing there in the file at all that indicates anything other than in fact a suicide," Bongino added. The American financier died in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.

Trump orders investigation of Joe Biden's alleged 'cognitive decline' and use of autopen
Trump orders investigation of Joe Biden's alleged 'cognitive decline' and use of autopen

USA Today

time26 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump orders investigation of Joe Biden's alleged 'cognitive decline' and use of autopen

Trump orders investigation of Joe Biden's alleged 'cognitive decline' and use of autopen The White House investigation comes on top of similar inquiries at the Justice Department and a House committee. Show Caption Hide Caption Biden speaks in public for first time since cancer diagnosis Former president Joe Biden delivered his first public speech at a Memorial Day event in Delaware since his cancer diagnosis was announced. WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump ordered an investigation of former President Joe Biden's alleged "cognitive decline" to determine who decided his signature should be applied to official documents by autopen. Trump's directive to the White House counsel, David Warrington, in consultation with Attorney General Pam Bondi, ratchets up the pressure behind Trump's longstanding criticism of Biden's mental ability. The probe comes amid similar inquiries at the Justice Department and in a House committee. "This conspiracy marks one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history," Trump wrote in his order. "The American public was purposefully shielded from discovering who wielded the executive power, all while Biden's signature was deployed across thousands of documents to effect radical policy shifts." But Biden has replied in a series of recent public appearances that he was in command of his faculties. He has also been critical of Trump, arguing that his successor was taking a hatchet to the Social Security Administration. "They are wrong,' Biden said of his alleged cognitive decline on ABC's "The View." Trump directed the investigation to cover whether Biden's aides coordinated to shield the public from information about Biden's mental and physical health. A new book, "Original Sin," describes aides shielding Biden from Cabinet secretaries and limiting his access. Biden recently revealed his diagnosis of prostate cancer. Trump also directed the investigation into how Biden took executive actions during his final years in office, to determine who ordered the autopen for granting clemencies or other presidential actions. Presidents have used autopens for decades under DOJ memo Presidents have used automated pens to mimic their signatures on documents for decades, often when away from the office, when Congress completed urgent legislation. Justice Department memos in 2002 and 2005 confirmed that a president could direct an aide to use an autopen to sign legislation that remains valid under the Constitution. "This memorandum confirms and elaborates upon our earlier advice that the President may sign a bill in this manner," the 2005 memo said. Biden pardoned his brother, James Biden, and other relatives for unspecified crimes during his final days in office. Biden had previously pardoned his son, Hunter Biden, after gun and tax convictions. At the Justice Department, pardon attorney Ed Martin said he would investigate Biden's pardons and use of the autopen. Congressional Republicans have long argued that the president profited from his son's and brother's overseas business deals, which the family denied. The chairman of the House Oversight and Accountability Committee, Rep. James Comer, R-Kentucky, asked former Biden aides to sit for transcribed interviews about his mental fitness for office. Trump notes special counsel's finding about Biden's condition Trump's order highlights a particular sore point involving the different treatment of him and Biden in retaining classified documents after leaving office. Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith charged Trump with unlawfully retaining more than 100 classified documents at his Florida estate, Mar-a-Lago, where they were retrieved 18 months after he left office during an FBI search. The charges were dropped when Trump was elected to a second term under a policy against prosecuting a sitting president. Special counsel Robert Hur decided against charging Biden for classified documents found at his Delaware home and a Washington, D.C., office during a search Biden invited. Hur concluded jurors would have found Biden "a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.' "For years, President Biden suffered from serious cognitive decline," Trump wrote. "The Department of Justice, for example, concluded that, despite clear evidence that Biden had broken the law, he should not stand trial owing to his incompetent mental state."

Shooting of Israeli embassy staffers underscores US ‘era of violent populism'
Shooting of Israeli embassy staffers underscores US ‘era of violent populism'

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Shooting of Israeli embassy staffers underscores US ‘era of violent populism'

The killing of two staff of the Israeli embassy in Washington DC comes as the war in Gaza has splintered the American body politic alongside the ongoing rise in political violence. A shooter, identified as Elias Rodriguez, shot the two people, Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim, outside the Capital Jewish Museum on Wednesday after they left an event hosted by the American Jewish Committee. Rodriguez reportedly chanted 'free, free Palestine' while being detained by security. This is the latest act of violence in a string of incidents that have affected Jewish, Arab and Muslim communities in the US. A man in Illinois attacked a six-year-old and his mother, both Palestinian American, and killed the boy in 2023 soon after Hamas's 7 October attack on Israel, and three Palestinian students were shot in Vermont in November 2023. Reports of antisemitism, Islamophobia and anti-Palestinian racism have soared since the war began. But an uptick in violence is not uniquely associated with the war in Gaza. It's a feature of this 'era of violent populism', said Robert Pape, director of the University of Chicago Project on Security and Threats. Between assassination attempts on Donald Trump, ongoing threats of violence against a wide swath of government officials including judges, and an arson attack against the Pennsylvania governor, Wednesday's shooting was not one that happened in isolation. 'This is a chronic illness in our country,' Pape said. 'This is not a set of isolated events.' People who commit acts of political violence often believe they will be celebrated by some portion of the public that supports the same goals, he said. The alleged killer's supposed manifesto nods at this. 'They think about how they want to be perceived and what they want the news to be saying about them afterwards,' said Liliana Mason, a political science professor at Johns Hopkins University. 'And it's a very kind of self-oriented set of motivations.' 'We know that this guy screamed Free Palestine. He probably thought that he was doing something political. But also, there are plenty of people who think we should free Palestine, who are not going to go murder a couple people.' A small portion of the pro-Palestinian movement has formally embraced the language of armed resistance, but the vast majority of those protesting against the war have been non-violent. In the day since the shooting, condemnations have come from all sides of the political spectrum, including from politicians who have opposed US involvement in the war and joined pro-Palestinian protests. It also sparked a debate over the distinction between antisemitism and anti-Israel political violence, in part because it remains unclear what the perpetrator knew about his victims. 'My heart breaks for the loved ones of the victims of last night's attack in DC,' said Rashida Tlaib, a congresswoman who is Palestinian American. 'Nobody deserves such terrible violence. Everyone in our communities deserves to live in safety and in peace.' Trump offered condolences to the loved ones of the couple killed in the attack. 'These horrible DC killings, based obviously on antisemitism, must end, NOW!' he wrote on Truth Social. 'Hatred and Radicalism have no place in the USA.' Jews in the US have said it is another example of the menace they are facing as people protest against the war. Josh Shapiro, the Democratic governor of Pennsylvania whose residence was the target of an antisemitic arson earlier this year, said he was 'heartbroken and horrified' by the attack. 'May their memories be a blessing and a call to action for each of us,' he wrote on social media. A writer in the conservative Jewish publication Commentary wrote that Jewish institutions would quickly work to increase security and that 'Jews will be arming ourselves'. Pape's surveys have tracked a growing acceptance of using violence to achieve political goals across the political spectrum. A poll he conducted in partnership with the Anti-Defamation League in spring 2023, before the Gaza war began, found that Americans who are highly antisemitic were three times more likely to support violence to achieve political aims than the general population. (The Anti-Defamation League is known for tracking antisemitism, but its methods have come under scrutiny for conflating antisemitism and anti-Zionism.) But the killings also show that the US is a 'tinderbox' and that political violence is a slippery slope, said Pape. People tend to compartmentalize political violence – if there's an act of violence against Jews, it's only a Jewish issue, the thinking goes, he said. But violence tends to beget more violence, and more acceptance of violence. His surveys in 2024 found increasing support for violence against Trump alongside support for violence in favor of Trump, stemming in part from a belief that the electoral and political systems won't address their grievances. 'The more political violence there is against Trump, the more there will be political violence against Democratic leaders like Josh Shapiro,' Pape said. 'The more there's political violence against Josh Shapiro, the more there will be antisemitic political violence. These are not compartmentalized issues.' Meanwhile, it's not only those in the Jewish and Palestinian communities who are being affected, but also those who have taken part in demonstrations associated with the war in Gaza. Police have used force against protesters on campuses and off, seeking to quash the mass movements that have sprung up around the globe. Thousands of students have been arrested, suspended, kicked out of colleges, lost financial aid, had their degrees withheld. Others who were in the US on visas have seen their immigration threatened and face deportation. The killings in Washington will probably lead to further crackdowns by the Trump administration on the pro-Palestinian cause. Pape's most recent survey, earlier this month, showed 39% of Democrats agreed that using force was justified to remove Trump from office and that only 44% of Republicans opposed Trump using the US military to stop protests. 'We can sleepwalk into martial law pretty easily,' Pape warned.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store