Jeremy Corbyn demands 'Chilcot' style inquiry into UK complicity in Israel's war on Gaza
Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has urged UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer to establish an independent "Chilcot-style" enquiry into the UK's involvement in Israel's war on Gaza.
In a letter to the prime minister, Corbyn - who sits in parliament as an independent MP - argued that Britain has "played a highly influential role in Israel's military operations".
"Many people believe that the government has taken decisions that have implicated officials in the gravest breaches of international law," he wrote, pointing to Britain's sale of weapons and supply of intelligence to Israel.
He recalled the Chilcot inquiry into the invasion of Iraq, which found Tony Blair government's decision was based on "flawed intelligence and assessments".
Corbyn urged a similar inquiry into Britain's complicity with Israel's assault on Gaza, which has killed at least 61,000 people.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
"We have repeatedly asked for the truth regarding the role of British military bases," Corbyn wrote. "And we have repeatedly requested the publication of legal advice behind the Government's (currently unknown) definition of genocide.
"Our requests have been met with evasion, obstruction and silence."
'Complicity'
A government spokesperson told Sky News: "Our priority since day one has been a sustainable ceasefire, and a lasting peace that will ensure the long-term peace and security of both Palestinians and Israelis.
"We must build confidence on all sides that helps sustain the ceasefire and move it from phase one through to phase three, and into a lasting peace and an end to the suffering on all sides."
New report lays out full extent of UK-Israel military partnership in Gaza Read More »
This comes after former Foreign Office official Mark Smith said last month that he witnessed "conduct that I believe crossed the threshold into complicity with war crimes" among officials.
"Officials are bullied into silence," he reported. "Processes are manipulated to produce politically convenient outcomes. Whistleblowers are stonewalled, isolated and ignored."
In his letter, Corbyn referred to a January report from the British Palestinian Committee which detailed the procurement of weapons from the Israeli military industry and the use of British military bases.
The Royal Air Force base Akrotiri on the island of Cyprus is used by the UK, US and Germany to supply Israel with 'weapons, personnel, and intelligence'.
The report argues that the UK "is not simply failing in its third-party responsibilities to uphold international law, but is actively complicit in genocidal acts perpetrated against the Palestinian people".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Iran missiles kill 10 in Israel in night of mutual attacks
Iranian strikes killed at least 10 people and wounded dozens in Israel overnight, as cross-border attacks continued into Sunday. One missile hit an apartment building in the city of Bat Yam, near Tel Aviv, killing six people, including two children. At least 35 people were still missing following the strike, according to Israeli media. Another four people were killed when a missile hit a building in Tamra, a Palestinian town in northern Israel. Israeli authorities said more than 140 were wounded by missiles that had hit homes in northern and central Israel, including the city Rehovot. At least 13 people have so far been killed in Israel and over 300 others wounded since Iran retaliated to Israel's offensive on Iran on Friday, according to Israel's rescue service. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters In Iran, authorities have said at least 78 people were killed there on the first day of Israel's campaign, and scores more on the second, including 60 when a missile brought down a 14-storey apartment block in Tehran, where 29 of the dead were children. Overnight Sunday, Israel struck the South Pars gas field, offshore in the southern Bushehr province, in the first apparent attack on Iran's energy infrastructure. Tasnim news agency said production was partially suspended at South Pars, the world's biggest gas field and the source of most of the gas produced in Iran, after the Israeli strike caused a fire there on Saturday. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Israel's attack on the gas facility on the shore of the Gulf sought "to expand the war beyond" Iran. Araghchi said Iran is acting in 'legitimate' self-defence and the attacks on Israel will end once Israel halts its military campaign against the Islamic republic. Israel and US modified F-35s to enable Iran attack without refuelling, sources say Read More » On Sunday, Israel issued evacuation warnings to Iranians living near weapons production facilities in Tehran to leave the area. US President Donal Trump meanwhile said the conflict could be easily ended, but warned Tehran not to strike any US targets. "If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the U.S. Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before," Trump said in a message on Truth Social. "However, we can easily get a deal done between Iran and Israel, and end this bloody conflict." Trump gave no details of any possible deal. Araqchi said Israel's attacks were aimed at sabotaging nuclear talks with the US, which were to resume in Oman on Sunday and have now been cancelled.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Iran says Israel crossed 'new red line' with attacks on nuclear sites as conflict escalates
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on Sunday that Israel had 'crossed a new red line' by attacking Iran's nuclear sites in strikes that began on Friday. 'The Zionist regime crossed a new red line in international law, and it was attacking nuclear facilities,' said Mr Araghchi during a meeting with foreign diplomats broadcast on state TV. Mr Araghchi also accused the US of supporting Israel's attacks, saying Tehran had 'solid evidence' of this. His meeting with ambassadors came after Iran and Israel exchanged attacks for a second day on Saturday. Israel killed top Iranian military commanders and scientists in its first wave of strikes early on Friday, which also damaged to its main nuclear site at Natanz. Iran has responded with salvos of ballistic missiles. Mr Araghchi said Iran's attacks on 'military and economic targets' in Israel 'have been solely in self-defence and to confront the aggression of the Zionist regime'. He said Iran would stop its attacks if Israel did, too, but it would not give up its nuclear programme that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said was the reason for attacking Iran. He called on the International Atomic Energy Agency to condemn Israel's attack on Iran's nuclear sites. The board of the UN's nuclear watchdog censured Iran earlier this week for not meeting its obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. 'Our legitimate defence will continue with strength, and our country's armed forces will carry out their duties with authority,' Mr Araghchi said, and added that bringing the scene of conflict to the Gulf region was a major strategic mistake. He said Iran considered the US a partner in the Israel's attacks and must accept its responsibility 'The Israeli regime's aggression against Iran could never have taken place without the agreement and support of the United States,' he said. 'We have solid evidence that shows the support of American forces and American bases.' He said that Iran does not want this war to spread to other countries or the region in any way, 'unless it is imposed on us'. 'In principle, we did not initiate this war and were pursuing diplomacy regarding our nuclear programme, but this aggression was imposed on us.' A sixth round of US-Iran talks on a nuclear deal were due to be held in Oman, which is acting as mediator, on Sunday, but Iranian officials said they would not be taking part after Israel launched its attack. US President Donald Trump on Sunday denied that the US was involved in Israel's attack and warned Iran against targeting the US in any way. 'The US had nothing to do with the attack on Iran, tonight. If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the US Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before,' Mr Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. 'However, we can easily get a deal done between Iran and Israel, and end this bloody conflict!' he added. Israel on Saturday hit fuel storage depots near Tehran, setting off fires. Iranian state media said production at Iran's South Pars gasfield, the world's largest, was suspended after an Israeli strike. In Israel, at least 10 people were killed overnight after Iran launched a second salvo of ballistic missiles. The Magen David Adom (MDA) ambulance service said at least four people were killed and about 100 others injured in the central region. Another 37 people were wounded in the Shfela region, a representative said. The Israel Police confirmed in a post on X that a strike along the central coast in Tel Aviv district killed several people and wounded dozens more. Three women were killed in an earlier strike that destroyed a three-storey building in the Western Galilee region, MDA said.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
What Iran's next potential move will mean for energy security
The Israel-Iran confrontation has entered a perilous new phase. Reported Israeli military attacks on Iran's gas sites put energy targets in the crosshairs. Global energy markets might escape crisis this time, but the margin of safety is getting ever narrower. An onshore site of Phase 14 of the South Pars gasfield, Iran's largest, in the Gulf industrial city of Assaluyeh, was struck, causing an explosion and fire. Iranian news agency Tasnim reported that 12 million cubic metres of gas production a day was halted. The Fajr Jam gas processing plant, near Bushehr, suffered from apparent drone attacks. Phase 14 processes 18.3 billion cubic metres of gas a year and Fajr Jam 20 bcm; the reported damage to the two amounts to about a tenth of Iran's gas output. Israeli military attacks have also destroyed petrol depots near Tehran. Iran denied reports that the Tabriz refinery was damaged but the Shahr Rey oil refinery south of Tehran was reported to be on fire. In response, an Iranian missile was reported to have hit Israel's Bazan oil refinery in the port of Haifa. As already seen in the Russia-Ukraine war, any taboo about attacking civil infrastructure is long gone. Oil prices climbed by more than $7 per barrel on the initial news of the air strikes. European natural gas prices are up less than 5 per cent. No doubt they will rise again when markets re-open on Monday. But so far, this remains a moderate response. Crude prices are not yet back to the level on April 2, just before the announcement of US President Donald Trump's massive tariffs and the increase in production by Opec+. So far, Israel's energy targets appear to be those that serve the domestic market: gas, petrol terminals and oil refineries. It is early summer, and not the peak winter demand season. Still, Iran was already struggling with serious gas and electricity shortages. Exports to Turkey may be affected, but Ankara is already familiar with the unreliability of Iranian supplies, and can increase imports from Russia or buy more liquefied natural gas. Iraq relies on Iranian gas, but it was already facing a cut-off as the US tightened pressure on Baghdad. So far, Israel has stayed away from sites that directly serve the international market, notably the Kharg oil export terminal in the northern Gulf. This enables Israel to evade immediate responsibility for causing a worldwide energy crisis. Iran's oil exports, nearly all to China, are about 1.5 million barrels per day. If they were completely cut off, whether by a US blockade or direct Israeli strikes on Kharg and other oil sites, the volumes could quite easily be replaced by the spare capacity in Saudi Arabia, the UAE and elsewhere – assuming that Tehran does not retaliate, a risky assumption. The crucial question is where things go from here. The stated Israeli goal of eliminating Iran's nuclear programme appears unrealistic; it may be set back, but destruction is not feasible without American involvement. No doubt Israel hopes the US will be sucked in. Even then, the lesson of recent years – Ukraine and Libya contrasted to North Korea and Pakistan – is that those who give up their nuclear weapons are attacked with impunity by those who have them. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's other suggested goal, of toppling the Islamic Republic, is even less plausible. Yes, the regime of Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is repressive and unpopular. Its incompetence in one area where it should be capable has been unmasked by Israel's successes so far, first in severely mauling Hezbollah, then in striking the Iran homeland directly with impunity. But Iranians have deep memories, personal or learnt, of the resistance to Saddam Hussein's invasion, which also featured extensive bombing of urban areas. Neither democratic nor authoritarian regimes are overthrown by air campaigns alone. Even a new leadership, perhaps a secular nationalist one, would now seriously have to consider acquiring nuclear weapons. The former Shah, ousted in the 1979 Revolution, himself said, 'If small states began building them, Iran might have to reconsider its policy [of not acquiring nuclear weapons]'. American diplomacy has been exposed as duplicitous or ineffectual or both. With China wisely sitting out and Russia untrustworthy and stuck in its own war, there is no honest broker at hand. So, it is hard to imagine Iranian diplomats sitting down seriously again to negotiate a halt to their nuclear programme. That would look like a surrender under duress similar to the reviled treaties of Turkmenchay and Golestan that gave up much of Iran's territory to Russia in the early 19th century. It seems much less likely that Tehran can do as it did in April last year, launching a few face-saving retaliations against Israel and then reaching a ceasefire. Top regime individuals have been killed, military and nuclear sites have suffered damage. Israel will not want to give a respite to Iran to rebuild air defences and harden crucial sites. Iran does not seem to have the ability to launch a really devastating attack on Israel either, and if it did, it would be met with further reprisal and probably draw in the US. But Tehran also seems unwilling to sit idly by while it is pummelled. This draws attention to energy targets elsewhere. Mr Trump is acutely sensitive to higher oil prices and inflation. About 20 million barrels of oil and products per day goes through the famous Strait of Hormuz. This includes virtually all the spare production capacity in the Opec+ countries, other than Russia. Saudi Arabia can divert up to 5 million bpd to the Red Sea, though that brings its own problems. More than half of the UAE's exports, or about 1.8 million bpd, go through a pipeline to Fujairah, outside the strait but still potentially vulnerable. Iraq is mostly friendly to Iran, but its 3.3 million barrels of exports through the Gulf could easily be interrupted by 'accidents'. Europe, having lost most Russian gas supplies, would be acutely worried about another interruption. About 82 million tonnes of liquefied natural gas, a fifth of global supply, came from the Gulf last year, mostly from Qatar. For Russian President Vladimir Putin, this crisis could bail out his troubled war economy, and bring political gains. Simply-equipped Houthi troops have been able to shut down most shipping through the southern Red Sea, and have not been prevented by US naval escorts and missile strikes. Iran's planned responses have probably been severely disrupted by the killing of so many of the top brass, but as war so often demonstrates, it is an error to underestimate your enemy forever. Attacking energy sites or shipments could be one point of leverage for Tehran. It would be very risky. It would cut off its own oil exports, assuming they have not already been disrupted. It would anger China, which brokered the Iran-Saudi rapprochement in March 2023 with a major aim of safeguarding energy supplies. But the remaining Iranian regime may conclude that caution and restraint have not paid off for them so far, despite the calls for calm.
