logo
Taiwan on edge after Pope Francis's death, closely watching Vatican-China relations

Taiwan on edge after Pope Francis's death, closely watching Vatican-China relations

Yahoo27-04-2025

KAOHSIUNG, Taiwan - Some in Taiwan are watching with growing unease as the Catholic Church prepares to elect a new leader following the death of Pope Francis. The Holy See is the only European state that maintains diplomatic relations with Taipei, but some fear the growing ties between the Vatican and Beijing could change things.
Taiwan is home to fewer than 300,000 Catholics. By contrast, estimates put the number of Catholics in communist China at anywhere between eight and 12 million, with another 390,000 in Chinese-ruled Hong Kong. Despite these figures, the Holy See continues to recognize Taiwan as the sole "China."
After Pope Francis' death, Taiwan's President William Lai quickly said he planned to attend the funeral. A short time later, however, Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced that former Vice President and devout Catholic Chen Chien-jen will be Taiwan's envoy.
Pope Francis Emphasized Catholicism Globally, Reached Beyond Us, Europe Into Impoverished Nations
According to Taipei-based lawyer and political risk analyst Ross Feingold, Taiwan will be disappointed that President Lai will miss this gathering of world leaders. "The precedent exists for Taiwan's president to attend a pope's funeral. In 2005, then-President Chen Shui-bian attended John Paul II's funeral, so," he claimed, "it's safe to assume President Lai's team inquired whether Lai could attend Francis' funeral, and equally safe to assume the Holy See's response was a negative one."
After Pope Francis took office in 2013, the Vatican began to build ties with Beijing. In 2018, it signed a controversial agreement with China on the appointment of bishops. The deal—renewed and extended several times—gives both sides input on bishop selection, an attempt to bridge the divide between China's state-run Catholic Church and an underground church loyal to Rome. Vatican officials insist the agreement is pastoral, not political. Still, for Taiwan, it is seen as a warning sign.
Read On The Fox News App
China, which cut ties with the Holy See in 1951, demands that all countries end diplomatic relations with Taiwan before establishing relations with Beijing. Taiwan's official allies now number but 12, and the Holy See is its most symbolically significant diplomatic partner.
But Thomas Tu, a Vatican diplomacy expert at Taiwan's National Chengchi University, told Fox News Digital that fears of an imminent switch are overblown. "This isn't just about politics—it's about the global Catholic mission," Tu said. "The Vatican has survived empires. It's patient." Tu cited the Vatican's relationship with Vietnam as evidence of pragmatic patience. China and Vietnam do not have formal ties, but the Vatican maintains a high-level religious representative there.
First Photos Released Of Pope Francis In His Casket; Funeral Set For Saturday
Pope Francis believed that engagement with China, however imperfect, is preferable to nothing. Francis was the first pope to fly through Chinese airspace and famously sent greetings to President Xi Jinping in 2014. On his visit to Mongolia in 2023, the pontiff also sent a "warm greeting to the noble Chinese people."
Each overture to Beijing has drawn criticism from within the Church, particularly from outspoken China critics, such as 93-year-old retired Cardinal Joseph Zen of Hong Kong, who was arrested in 2022 after China imposed a National Security Law that criminalized almost every form of dissent in that supposedly autonomous special administrative region. Zen's passport was recently returned to him by authorities so he could attend the pope's funeral.
Zen and others view any warming of ties with Beijing as kowtowing to an officially atheist regime.
Since 1957, Beijing, via its Chinese Patriotic Catholic Association, has kept a tight leash on millions of Chinese Catholics. Pope Francis accepted some compromises with China, but the Vatican wants autonomy in spiritual matters, which may require a miracle to accomplish under China's one-party dictatorship.
Some observers suggest that Beijing may eventually allow more space for the Vatican, but any formal deal would require the Holy See to sever ties with Taiwan, a non-negotiable prerequisite for China.
Click Here To Get To The Fox News App
With a new pope being elected in the next month, some in Taiwan are worried about a shift, but few experts believe the next pontiff will make any hasty decisions. "There's no rush," said Dr. Chang Ching, a Senior Research Fellow of the ROC Society for Strategic Studies, "The Vatican knows how to wait, and China isn't willing yet to grant the Chinese Catholic community the same privileges Catholics enjoy in most other nations. This seventy-plus-year rift is just a tiny moment in the long history of the Church and the even longer history of Chinese civilization."Original article source: Taiwan on edge after Pope Francis's death, closely watching Vatican-China relations

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Want to help with Seattle's school superintendent search? Here's how.
Want to help with Seattle's school superintendent search? Here's how.

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Want to help with Seattle's school superintendent search? Here's how.

Seattle Public Schools is searching for its next superintendent, and they're asking for the public's help. Families, community members, and even students have the chance to weigh in on what they want for the next leader of education. People can fill out an online survey, which closes June 30 or attend one of the following meetings: Family and Community Engagement Sessions Friday, June 20 (in person) 6:00 p.m. @ Franklin High School (3013 Mt Baker Blvd) Saturday, June 21 (in person) 3:00 p.m. @ Cleveland High School (5511 15th Ave S) Friday, June 27 (virtual) 6:00 p.m. (Join the Friday, June 27, 6:00 p.m. meeting) Saturday, June 28 (virtual) 10:00 a.m. (Join the Saturday, June 28, 10:00 a.m. meeting) Single-Language Engagement Sessions Monday, June 16 – Chinese 6:00 p.m. (Join the Monday, June 16, 6:00 p.m. – Chinese meeting) Tuesday, June 17 – Amharic 6:00 p.m. (Join the Tuesday, June 17, 6:00 p.m. – Amharic meeting) Thursday, June 26 – Spanish 6:00 p.m. (Join the Thursday, June 26, 6:00 p.m. – Spanish meeting) Thursday, June 26 – Somali 7:15 p.m. (Thursday, June 26, 7:15 p.m. – Somali meeting link) Friday, June 27 – Vietnamese 7:15 p.m. (Join the Friday, June 27, 7:15 p.m. – Vietnamese meeting link) Staff Engagement Sessions All staff engagement sessions are virtual, and links will be shared via email. Tuesday, June 3 Certificated staff, 4:00 p.m. Classified staff, 4:00 p.m. Thursday, June 5 Central Office staff, 3:00 p.m. Certificated and classified staff, 6:00 p.m. Friday, June 6 School leaders, 4:00 p.m. Student Engagement Sessions Thursday, May 29 4:00 p.m. (Thursday, May 29 4:00 p.m. meeting meeting link) 6:30 p.m. (Thursday, May 29, 6:30 p.m. meeting link) In March, Seattle Public Schools announced that the current superintendent, Dr. Brent Jones, would be stepping down in the fall. The district said he wants to spend more time with his family. Dr. Jones' last day with the school district will be Sept. 3. To apply for the job, click here. Hazard, Young, Attea & Associates (HYA), the search firm that's helping the school board, has listed the salary range as $330,000 to $385,000. The application deadline is July 31.

October 7 Changed Israel's Calculus
October 7 Changed Israel's Calculus

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

October 7 Changed Israel's Calculus

The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Last night, Israel struck at Iranian nuclear facilities, military installations, and high-ranking military leaders and nuclear scientists, dealing an audacious blow at what Israelis of all stripes have long viewed as an existential threat. The attack also took many analysts, including me, by surprise. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has threatened to take such action for decades, but was never ready to execute. He was always restrained by military, diplomatic, and political factors, leaving Israel perpetually teetering on the edge of attacking Iran's nuclear program. And then last night, it took a decisive jump forward. Since the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel, several events combined to remove the constraints that had operated on Netanyahu, enabling him to forge ahead at the same time that Iran was allegedly racing toward nuclear breakout. The first and most important was Israel's devastatingly successful campaign in August and September to take out Hezbollah's top leadership and destroy much of its advanced-rocket stores. That attack provided a proof of concept for the similar campaign unfolding now against Iran. The combination of Israeli air power and intelligence neutralized Hezbollah's offensive capabilities, preventing an immediate response that would have overwhelmed the Israeli home front. The universal assumption in Israeli security circles had been that a war with Hezbollah might be necessary but would be very costly. The unexpected degree of success, however, reduced Israeli wariness about launching a similar campaign against Iran, despite expectations that a severe Iranian response might still be forthcoming. [Graeme Wood: Why Israel struck now] Israeli fear of diplomatic blowback has also diminished—ironically, not because such blowback has lessened, but because it has increased. For years, Israel has been worried that a regional war would lead to isolation, crumbling relationships with its Arab neighbors, and European opprobrium. Israel's campaign against Hamas and the resulting destruction in Gaza have created diplomatic challenges that once seemed unthinkable: The International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for Israel's prime minister and former defense minister, multiple government ministers are under personal sanctions from Europe and Canada, accusations that Israel is committing genocide are routine, and the regional normalization process has ground to a complete halt. Many Israelis have treated much of this with a shrug and moved on, embracing the adage that the fear of death is often worse than death itself. Israeli leaders have found all of this less consequential than they anticipated, and that makes their concerns about diplomatic isolation from an extended conflict with Iran less acute. And then President Donald Trump's distinctive foreign-policy approach created an environment in which Israel had more leeway to strike Iran but was also more likely to have to do it alone. Trump has been clear about his reticence to have more American military involvement in the Middle East—and since Israeli strikes have begun, he has rushed to clarify that the U.S. did not participate—but was also not going to hold Israel back if it was willing to proceed and accept the risks involved. Past U.S. administrations had withheld a green light from Israel, but had also intimated that they would be willing to deal with the threat of Iranian nuclear breakout if it became advanced enough. Trump's preference for avoiding military conflicts and his pursuit of a deal with Iran counterintuitively created a greater incentive for Israel to take action, because the U.S. was neither going to stop Israel from attacking nor necessarily stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Finally, for much of his tenure, Netanyahu has been Israel's most cautious prime minister when it comes to employing military force. But the aftermath of October 7, his criminal indictments and ongoing trial, and the deep unpopularity of his coalition have together led Netanyahu to throw all caution to the wind. His poll numbers are deeply underwater and have been since he first pursued his proposed judicial overhaul more than two years ago. The unpopularity of the war in Gaza, the sense that he has abandoned the remaining hostages held by Hamas in order to placate his far-right partners, his refusal to take any responsibility for October 7, and his capitulation to the Haredi parties on dodging military service so he can keep his government afloat have left him in a deep political hole. In such an environment, rolling the dice on an Iran strike—the only move left to him that will be popular across the Israeli political spectrum—might salvage his poll numbers at a time when he has little left to lose, and give him the boost he needs to call a snap election and remain in office. All Israeli leaders have warned about Iran for years, and the consensus that Iran seeks Israel's destruction is the primary factor behind the strikes that Israel has embarked upon. But the timing is not a coincidence, and the chain of events kicked off by Hamas's Yahya Sinwar changed Israel's military, diplomatic, and political standing in ways that enabled Israel to finally do what it had long promised but never delivered. Article originally published at The Atlantic

Trump's DHS posts tip line propaganda amplified by white supremacists
Trump's DHS posts tip line propaganda amplified by white supremacists

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's DHS posts tip line propaganda amplified by white supremacists

In an effort to recruit Americans to use a tip line to aid its authoritarian crackdown on immigrants, the Department of Homeland Security this week promoted propaganda that white supremacist social media accounts claim to have generated. As Donald Trump and his administration pursue their anti-immigrant raids in California, DHS' X account shared an image Wednesday that featured an illustration of Uncle Sam alongside text encouraging Americans to 'report all foreign invaders to ICE.' DHS' post was also retweeted by White House deputy chief of staff Steven Miller, who has previously promoted white supremacist views, including circulating articles from white nationalist websites to a reporter at Breitbart prior to Miller's first role in the White House. Nashville-based investigative reporter Phil Williams, who's well-known for his reporting on extremism, identified a post on X from Christian nationalist influencer C. Jay Engel, who claimed the image originated from his account. Williams went on to link to his past reporting on Engel, whose white nationalist beliefs include a vision of America that, in Engel's words, 'affirms the domination and pre-eminence of European derived peoples, their institutions and their way of life.' In another post, flagged by journalist David Bernstein, Engel says he got the image from X account 'mrrobertwp,' which boasts a social media feed rife with racist propaganda, such as suggesting the Civil Rights Act is unconstitutional and reposting statements like 'racism is cool and normal.' Independent journalist Tim Burke also noted that the pair apparently sourced the image from a World War II–era war bonds poster. The Department of Homeland Security didn't immediately return MSNBC's request for comment on the image. In reality, there is no 'foreign invasion' underway in the United States, nor is there any evidence one is imminent, despite the Trump administration's best efforts to convince Americans otherwise. But the propaganda aligns with some of the bigoted imagery Trump and his administration have deployed to target immigrants — and with Trump's history of promoting racist propaganda that hearkens back to xenophobic imagery popularized by the Ku Klux Klan in the early 20th century. This incident is like a Russian nesting doll of racist propaganda that shows how social media can enlarge the audience for extremism. This situation also provides fresh evidence to support claims that white nationalist ideology is helping to fuel the Trump administration's anti-immigrant agenda. This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store